Officially, most sites require you to be 18 years of age or older to participate in gambling, but what if we see teenagers anonymously gambling with bitcoins? There are sites that work without kyc, but then you can never guarantee control? only in a physical casino you can easily check age. Someone who likes to gamble will always find opportunities to do so. And then it doesn't matter what the age is, they are resourceful enough.

It is already emphasized that there’s no way a website owner could determine an underage player on their system, no until KYC is done. And it is not surprised that many parents, who are supposed to be guardians responsible to direct children away from gambling, have failed to do so. I think that it cannot be pressed on which side is more liable for such, but collaborative ways to prevent and detect it must be focused more. Considering that the generation today is very adventurous, determined and revolves life on the internet, this can’t be stop just like that.

Such a great timing to get across this thread. I have jus started my way into OWLDAO, and I could say that I’ve never been more positive about anything more than this during the times. I hope that more can be shared about it here, so I and along with other interested users could materialize the information that will be posted here.

Alright, thank you for that! I am sure that many could learn a thing or two from this thread and from yours that will be soon posted. I’ll be checking this thread and your account as well from time to time. Hoping to hear from you real soon.

Welcome to the forum, Crashino! Your ANN thread really looks good, and much more your site. I am very excited to try your site and games right away, but I came across the concerns regarding KYC terms and such. I agree with the replies above that staying consistent and providing the right information with us here is very crucial to gain our trust and for us to have a good relationship with you. Nevertheless, I see and appreciate the you respond and comply with the concerns here. I think that making mistakes is normal, but your next action after receiving criticism is what will define you then.

Indeed. No one could ever tell when will this war would stop and if such would just last briefly, on a concentrated area or become worse. But on top of that, I don’t think that sports and competitions will be given attention during the times over the efforts in securing public safety and stopping this war. That being said, it would be the best to not risk to bet on events that could potentially be disrupted or whatnots.

This site has a solid reputation, with no problems. However, I doubt the story of the whales, would the info be real on the site you see? You see people's commitments. Is it actually allowed to show other people's bets? I can imagine that those users are not exactly waiting for that. The chat also always seems to be manned 24/7 on the site, separately.

It's good that you share your findings/experiences on the forum here. I don't know the amount of the payout, but my first impression is that it is not positive how the site handles this payout. 3 days is a long time these days, and the KYC isn't even completed yet. Unfortunately, I've heard several stories about this site from people who all have the same complaint: payouts are being held and not processed. Maybe the op can give us some info why it takes unnecessarily long for this user.

Apart from not following the rules, this also gives a strange impression by opening a new topic. Usually such things are only done if a bad reputation has been built up in the 1st existing topic. I'm not familiar with the site, but users who will see and notice that, won't do much for credibility by opening a new topic. Maybe there is an option to change that to make it more clear to users.

I really like this type of threads because it will make you think about the sites to choose to play and deal with. I am honestly not so educated about this topic, and through reading the replies here, made me realize of the misconceptions that I have been holding to for a long time now. I hope that you will update here about your separate thread @ultraBTC.

I haven’t really tried this one out. I saw in the OP that this is a fully working experimental site, but did it really pushed through and went well? And has anyone really shared their experience with the site here in the thread? I don’t know if I mislook the replies or something, but I don’t see much. It would be ideal if there are feedbacks about user experience here so newcomers will know what to expect.

1-1 seems like a great result fire United. Atletico will now be excited, perhaps United will look for the 1-2. Why not? They are definitely better as a team and Atletico will be very disappointed with the goal against. But these kinds of matches often end in 1-1 because both sides don't want to take any risks in the last 10 minutes of the match. That also applies to Benfica against Ajax where it is still 2-2.

Well, just like you, I haven’t seen the category Fan-Favorite Film in any sports book yet. It is reported to be included this year but I guess you are right that we’ll just have to see if this will really surfaced. Nonetheless, if they would really push this through, I hope that all goes well and they would prepare to counterattack any backlash and manipulation tactics.

Indeed, these options make it so challenging to choose a bet. Everyone wants to grow the money being put on, but in order to do so, you have to pick the movie that is most likely to be the winner. We cannot be all movie critic but we can do many efforts to acquire information to help coming up with a bet. I agree with @bittraffic, use the remaining time to join discussions, see the movies yourselves and even follow social polls to gather more info.

I have a question I have been meaning to ask regarding the BET free. You said that only users who deposited 0.001 BTC can withdraw the earning of free bet. I am just confused if only the users who have 0.001 BTC can participate to the free bet, or the users can only withdraw the profit from free bet if they have a minimum 0.001 BTC deposit?

Guys, this way of marketing really isn't going to work. It is very obscure that these accounts have been created by acedbets themselves for the purpose of advertising. It would be much better if the website itself would respond substantively and if necessary perhaps hand out some free too well, or process payouts faster without delay.

That's going to be a fun game. Juventus after less than a minute on a 0-1 lead. Many scenarios were possible and conceivable, but not this one. Can we now assume that this will be an open competition? Juventus smells blood but will also want to hold on to that 0-1 as long as possible, that would be an ideal scenario for the rematch in Turin.

I believe Twitter has made improvements compared to what they were few years back, so this may not be such a bad idea for Oscars. Twitter is now more keen to unusual and extensive activities detection made from the accounts, and is much thorough when it comes to verification and such. But as per the peace of mind and assurance for the bettors, I think it would be wiser to observe for a while and after some time they could place bets if and only if they are really decided.

Well said. As much as this thread has given us information about another bypass methods, it is not advisable to bluntly to do it. I think that everyone should be cautious of deciding whether bypassing is the best option they got. And further to that, the possible repercussions should also be assessed, and such are worth the risk of trying this or other methods out there. Again, there are many available information about bypassing, and it is your own decision to take them, so be wise enough.

That will depend on what kind of player you are. If they see that you are a professional gambler and are only placing arbitrage bets, then you can be less confident of getting a cap on your account soon. Doesn't seem normal to me either. People who really gamble won't get a cap anytime soon unless you really win a lot. I think it's good not to apply the limits too quickly, that costs a lot of customers. Good that the representative here has the power to regulate things.