Just ignore the last post. I'm new to computers. I still use Windows 7. But these are my clocks and settings and sustained rate. I can get these to over 3000. I'm freezing down here, but the GPUs can't seem to keep cool.    |
|
|
|
Those are not stock clocks for reference design super hot FE.
I can get 2900 easily with power limiting at - 13 and a bit of OC.
So what, its same 1080ti's on different miners... You stated that EWBF is faster, its not at least on my hardware. Because it is faster on any 1080ti. Not the same. Run that on asus FE with the fans on auto. There are several designs. Supercloked factory, different coolers. I have EVGAs sc2. Those can do 760 each with small tweaking. Check your average pool hashrate instead of what the miner shows. |
|
|
|
|
Those are not stock clocks for reference design super hot FE.
I can get 2900 easily with power limiting at - 13 and a bit of
OC.
I can't use that evga utility. I have mixed brands.
Afterburner is the same thing. Detects the cards default clocks no problem.
|
|
|
|
It's called solo before the diff is impossible with CPU.
I mined 1 million PASC with CPU only. (I'm messing with the troll. Normal people please ignore B-)
Your opinion has been noted 3 times.
Aren't you happily using nano when I mentioned you can happily using coinotron for ETH, PASC, ZEC...
@ZPDM. I will sell you PASC. If I had time, I would set up buy PASC service.
Dude. Like what drugs are you on? Seriously...... Your not my friend buddy and theres nothing in that post indicating to that I am on any substances. Please clarify where the indication of being on drugs is. I am on a whole lot of prescription medication. Would you like the list with dosages for the last 13 years? How many billions do you have? Legendary status. I got another letter from collection agency to pay 50 grand in lump sum. "employment verified". Maybe people owe me millions. I will call and ask where I work. I have 20 dollars in my bank. |
|
|
|
|
The fastest miner for 1080tis is still EWBF.
On stock FE, it gets < 700.
It depends on the cards.
superclocked card can do 720 stock and run at 60 degrees. FE runs at > 71 degrees no matter what.
I have 4 of them on a cold cement floor spaced out with long adapters.
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot get more than (in the past) 20 MH/s from my rx 480 and any miner I have tried.
I ended up with the slowest version ever released. 4GB, hynix RAM.
Flashing BIOS. Blockchain drivers are even worse and cannot use my computer.
Equiqhash it can do at 580 s/s 24/7 with 2 of them.
I know, it doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
|
We got the Reddit back  it will be very interesting hehe Mr. Merci. I hope interesting is good. I don't follow or check Reddit after few too many very inappropriate things I saw on there. Just not safe for 16 year olds.  |
|
|
|
|
This is not polo complaints/ support thread.
Please deal with them directly.
I am missing a fairly large withdrawal since Nov 7th.
Just have to wait. It usually is resolved but it can take 90 days.
|
|
|
|
If you check the Blockchain Explorer tab, there are 3 mining entities. Nanopool, cointron (also a pool you can mine on) and Zetapool (unknown).
Did not know about Coinotron will look to give them a try in next week or two. Zetapool has a website but seems to have zero active miners. Thx. Ahh the good 'ole days when GPu mining just became possible and a few of us mined almost all the coins.  No pools to screw with. 9/10 humblebrag there dreamer, but I am happy for you and your enormous stash of coins. Again I don't have a strong opinion about changing the algorithim I just don't know if it will solve centralization. Developers could also tweet out a PSA to try to avoid using nanopool as it has led to too much centralization, BTC and LTC did things like that in the past if I am not mistaken. I imagine if Pascal makes it back to $5 there may be more pools online and the problem could correct itself, but who knows maybe a CPU centric algo is the way to go. [/quote] It's called solo before the diff is impossible with CPU. I mined 1 million PASC with CPU only. (I'm messing with the troll. Normal people please ignore B-) Your opinion has been noted 3 times. Aren't you happily using nano when I mentioned you can happily using coinotron for ETH, PASC, ZEC... @ZPDM. I will sell you PASC. If I had time, I would set up buy PASC service. |
|
|
|
The big problem is that mining PASC is impossible due to super high diff.
I have 4 nvidias and two amds. Nvidias are pointed at nano, but not for ETH or PASC.
AMDs and my CPU are doing cryptonight. (Miners compiled from source - the fastest ones I found). CPU does higher H/s than one rx 480.
Any other configuration and it just doesn't make sense.
BTW: I set up solo cryptonote fork pool in the past. That was semi easy. There is no open source PASC pool that I could find.
PASC is profitable to dual mine. That sounds like a pretty incredible CPU hash rate unless you are using a $1,000 CPU or something. Good luck with getting your rig stable you reminded me I need to pick up a surge suppressor. Old 12 core Xeon ES from HK. 400$. I have surge protectors on every outlet. It's not rapid drawing 5kw from outlet protectors. It's not profitable to mine unless your name is GPU farm. I shutdown the AMDs. They crash without integrated graphics on every miner. Zec, xmr, pasc, eth Fixed. Takes 30 minutes and basic computer skills like @ZPDM knew I had.   It's a common issue with these. They leak out and the VRMs act up. Still slow on ETH (20 mh/s max)because this was the crappiest of them released. I flashed them to 580s, why not. Must be the exact same GPU but it's 2 years newer. AMD business model Works so so though for gaming though: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/24889677 |
|
|
|
|
There are several threads on this 'coin' and they are locked and reposted.
Is there a reason for that?
I have been mining it for a month at 5000 h/s and I only have 2000 coins.
The minimum payout on nano is 100. With CPU only at 600 h/s I would get 200 coins month.
Considering how many there are in circulation, it seems like something is not right.
This is probably auto moderating thread that doesn't allow these sorts of questions.
The number don't add up and it looks like a the biggest pnd in history.
The price is dropping like it's hot.
over 60 million USD volume around January 6th?
|
|
|
|
The way I see it one of the problems Pascal coin has right now is mining is centralized. With centralized mining some exchanges may be reluctant to list PASC over fear of a 51% attack. The developers, it is my understanding, are proposing a CPU algorithm to seek to address the problem. I'm not at all sure the current algorithm is the problem, that is to say with suprnova gone there is 1, ONE, pool to mine pascal, correct me if I am wrong. What if one goes through all the effort of putting a new algorithm in place at the end of which there is ONE mining pool, and possibly lots of botnets? So again it would seem the problem is there need to be more mining pools for Pascal, this doesn't seem like a terribly difficult problem to solve. The developers could 1) reach out to established pools and ask them to include Pascal, 2) talk to their programmer friends about creating mining pools 3) If they built the coin they sure could build a mining pool. So developers could build a Pascal mining pool take the 1% mining fee, 1% right and put the revenue towards coin development. Might not be much, but until or unless PIP11 passes it is something. For the past three weeks or so I have been happily dual mining ETH/PASC at nanopool. If I had someplace else to point my six GPUs for PASC I likely would and definitely would if I knew the mining fee was going towards coin development. There may be something I am missing in all this like a problem with ASICs or some such but I am not sure changing the algorithm solves the problem of too few mining pools. Even though I am not a programmer I am half tempted to try and set up a PASC pool myself, probably not a great idea unless I had a lot of expert help. Anyways, my two cents and something to think about. If you check the Blockchain Explorer tab, there are 3 mining entities. Nanopool, cointron (also a pool you can mine on) and Zetapool (unknown). Nanopool has been reliable and established for at least 2 years. The fees that are in the miners and pools are tiny compared to HR lost because of internet going down, computer crashes, and well the cost of a 6 GPU rig catching on fire - yes it can happen, electricity... @ZPDM: My 4 GPU 1080ti machine keeps crashing daily. I have spent months and it's still not stable. 12V rail got zapped on the PSU and melted few things, mobo is missing several parts. I fixed it, because it's cheaper than buying new stuff. I keep fixing it several time a day sometimes. And yes, coinotron worked/works, but it I had too many issues with it. You can happily mine ETH and PASC on coinotron and stop contradicting yourself. Sorry, I was commenting on that long post that doesn't make any sense. I honestly have no idea what it was about. |
|
|
|
Well, Pascal Coin is a very interesting project and I think it will quickly attract investors. Because as it is "easy to understand" and "easy to work with" Crypto, because it is very similar to the bank. Using a "easy to remember" account not a cryptographic address, and everyone needs to have a personal account to receive / send coins. Because, now everyone needs everything easy to understand and easy to run. I pray for this great project smoothly forever.
The what? At least one person posted this is not a make you rich overnight scheme. What are investors? How about the devs that support the project without being investors. It is an address. Just in different way. The whole project is different than the other ones... |
|
|
|
The way I see it one of the problems Pascal coin has right now is mining is centralized. With centralized mining some exchanges may be reluctant to list PASC over fear of a 51% attack. The developers, it is my understanding, are proposing a CPU algorithm to seek to address the problem. I'm not at all sure the current algorithm is the problem, that is to say with suprnova gone there is 1, ONE, pool to mine pascal, correct me if I am wrong. What if one goes through all the effort of putting a new algorithm in place at the end of which there is ONE mining pool, and possibly lots of botnets? So again it would seem the problem is there need to be more mining pools for Pascal, this doesn't seem like a terribly difficult problem to solve. The developers could 1) reach out to established pools and ask them to include Pascal, 2) talk to their programmer friends about creating mining pools 3) If they built the coin they sure could build a mining pool. So developers could build a Pascal mining pool take the 1% mining fee, 1% right and put the revenue towards coin development. Might not be much, but until or unless PIP11 passes it is something. For the past three weeks or so I have been happily dual mining ETH/PASC at nanopool. If I had someplace else to point my six GPUs for PASC I likely would and definitely would if I knew the mining fee was going towards coin development. There may be something I am missing in all this like a problem with ASICs or some such but I am not sure changing the algorithm solves the problem of too few mining pools. Even though I am not a programmer I am half tempted to try and set up a PASC pool myself, probably not a great idea unless I had a lot of expert help. Anyways, my two cents and something to think about. The big problem is that mining PASC is impossible due to super high diff. I have 4 nvidias and two amds. Nvidias are pointed at nano, but not for ETH or PASC. AMDs and my CPU are doing cryptonight. (Miners compiled from source - the fastest ones I found). CPU does higher H/s than one rx 480. Any other configuration and it just doesn't make sense. BTW: I set up solo cryptonote fork pool in the past. That was semi easy. There is no open source PASC pool that I could find. |
|
|
|
Are people going to wake up.
The source code is based on bytecoin core code.
Crytpnight algo, instamine with celeron CPU....
Connect the dots.
Connecting those dots, then what next? Personally, I dont think this one is a scam project. Do you have different idea about that one? There are exact clones of this project called cryptonote/cryptonight. few hundred. Do I need to list the 'coins', or can you research it? I think one of them was genuine because it did add many changes. XMR? Could mine it with CPU when 1 coin was 1$... uses the same daemon wallet, same UI. the websites look the same. The pool is open source, so is everything else. Just change the graphics and you have a 'how to make a coin'. Few really good coins were launched with CPU only miner that came with the wallet. If you got lucky or knew a friend, you could mine hundreds of coins in 24 hours with a fast CPU. 14 blocks = 1400 coins with CPU in 1-2 hours. Now you need 5000$ worth of GPUs to mine around 100 coins/month. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1583719.msg15913934#msg15913934 |
|
|
|
We could use a service where people can pay for PASC with fiat.
Not everyone has BTC or a way to obtain it. Not to mention avoiding the risky BTC state it has been for the last 3 months.
I did run such service for a few months, but had to give it up because only very few people wanted to sell PASC for FIAT I did notice that because I am human. Yes, I did click on your exchange couple days ago. BTW: The date on your site is wrong. 2017? There are no humans on Discord. They cannot answer simple questions. And they keep booting me after I confuse them. I don't need to paste my chat archives here. Crazy not stupid. Until there are humans that can answer basic questions about why is this and that... My brain gets so confused that I cannot think. I am pretty sure my main question was 'what happened to the difficulty?'. PASC is not minable at all. I don't see any new coins generated because it's impossible at least with 6 GPUs running at 100% load 24/7. They are here too. Keep posting the same crap over and over and keywords trigger even dumber posts. |
|
|
|
Yes, Mrboot, it is understood that PascalCoin needs a manager, not just 2 devs and 1 marketer. I spoke to Albert of this, and I believe soon things will fall into place as intended.
As Albert said, this is not a get-rich-quick-scheme coin. The tech is outstanding. I've read both V1/2 whitepapers many times.
If you expect to get-rich-quick, you might as well leave. I'm sticking around, because I believe the true potential.
It's funny that people always think when you give criticism its related to money, did you hear me say anything about money even once ? We will see if they change the structure and start marketing then my opinion might change so far still not impressed. Tech is not the only thing thats needed to become a great top coin. Just join us on Discord. I keep getting kicked off and blocked by angry bots in less than 5 minutes every time I try to ask something. Good luck discussing anything on there. I keep finding myself in a strange place where I don't have access to any text channels. This is getting old.    I was just joking about getting drunk for no reason. I didn't. |
|
|
|
Yes, Mrboot, it is understood that PascalCoin needs a manager, not just 2 devs and 1 marketer. I spoke to Albert of this, and I believe soon things will fall into place as intended.
As Albert said, this is not a get-rich-quick-scheme coin. The tech is outstanding. I've read both V1/2 whitepapers many times.
If you expect to get-rich-quick, you might as well leave. I'm sticking around, because I believe the true potential.
It's funny that people always think when you give criticism its related to money, did you hear me say anything about money even once ? We will see if they change the structure and start marketing then my opinion might change so far still not impressed. Tech is not the only thing thats needed to become a great top coin. Jmknapp80, dev. Your comment has been noted. You can argue on discord or stop posting pointless statements without backing it up. It's an experimental software. Free to use at your own risk and free to contribute in a constructive way. We could use a service where people can pay for PASC with fiat. Not everyone has BTC or a way to obtain it. Not to mention avoiding the risky BTC state it has been for the last 3 months. |
|
|
|
Why would someone delete their account? It doesn't make much sense. I tried reddit. Forgot my password. My comments kept being auto deleted everywhere. |
|
|
|
One of the worst team in the crypto-space for sure, good job Albert!
Your supossed to lead the team not be the team.
Albert did not reply to your previous comment about the worst marketing since 2013. There is no official team. Devs write code to help out. It says on here that people have contributed. http://www.pascalcoin.org/#faqThere are dev resources, links and other useful things on that site. Someone posted Pascal Chat code recently. That's a better way to keep the thread active. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
