Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 02:02:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »
81  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: October 20, 2013, 11:31:54 PM
Why is anyone against doing this? Don't you realize that this type of transaction is done all the time with mining pools, gambling sites, etc? It's not a script. It's a command built into the bitcoind protocol / API. Not only is it faster (eliminating doing each one individually), it also applies the mining fee to the one transaction (for everything) and not to each individual transaction. It's easier for John, cheaper for us, and faster for everyone.

There's no script. See here for sendmany: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Original_Bitcoin_client/API_calls_list
82  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: October 20, 2013, 10:32:09 PM
To aid you in the transaction, I have created the transaction that will take your data and require one small change to execute it. In column F, insert this formula and then drag it down to copy it to the rest of the rows that have addresses / amounts:
Code:
=concatenate("""",B2,"""",":",C2,", ")

Then somewhere else (doesn't really matter where - I put it in G2), put this:
Code:
=concatenate("sendmany ","""",""""," ","'","{",F2:F24,"}'"," 1 ","""","RaginAzn's Avalon Group buy 1 Refund","""")

Using those two in a copy of your spreadsheet, I generated this:
sendmany "" '{"1xbbjJcbeD4Qi88QmJmMgTFSdm7b5WCG4":5.013261,"1L5VE93qbbepo5CJtyeQaVF6sM8PnqrmPL":3.1284,"1QG2H6u9KvjyrgSpEB8sAQH2qzjUPDGmYp":5.013261,"19xZgcRduMiZENg8etHgW3R8KzakHGHvj":1.0026522,"1FKJzNP3bc81Ch2tchffKDs2J7Qj7cjmUN":5.013261,"17S1mgHyWHdpXSSDUtK9jY4Gpwi4sCeSAv":4.6926,"1NhSSrRW5Kqzki6TC2HVvHviEtQdxEBTeB":2.9008089,"17oDXLNifckeMjKk5CioRPHKu4txWAXPMG":1.0026522,"1Dq9q8MBbXFVSSHBtoysxnMwRzeG6rGtTo":6.64785,"1Ky1TKDV2cvHiNxE45sY4CfKyzkst8P4me":1.0026522,"174zoHrPuXNWVsRaNQYxYesihHYoKEKnsc":20.334600000000002,"1NpJWh55tae9Zd7VKRiWknVn8orDBDRi9V":50.1349563,"12hv7UcFgrBWLjWs5McPYP63Yza6ufT6Sw":23.463,"1GrEWEN9hMUAcKkCEtTKD6f2dQn68XKznt":2.0678724,"12KHW3i2Hamk1irY8b181N4vMXUnVYL1ah":4.0106088,"1HwrMG83oVJKABuLHouUvArCGsBuHqafTt":1.5305697,"1PVPGVQGfT8xiUYTNFkBxH7yRBQdUtNrvX":2.03346,"1Ki3sFg6bCasB6tkuMW41DCCpGFDgDHVgL":3.0079566,"17RXcRMUiXqsQkCqqYKXJkP1B4Lqm47hFB":1.0222047,"1CCa1scp5vLrbaha4MZ4sUFn3uboAjpRGX":20.053826100000002,"1F6WM3rjDzVDWRTMz5Q3pwU2T6dZ6Nrb9C":1.01673,"1Q1img1shsDS2sjy3781hpkSAW6eG1rUBm":39.105000000000004,"16SSPCBRxzaiXjA6XoCpq8tBvJdhoSSPmA":3.1635945,}' 1 "RaginAzn's Avalon Group buy 1 Refund"

The only thing to do to run it after that is to remove the comma before the closed curly bracket at the end (red, bold, and underlined). This is because it was a copied formula for the rest of the cells above it that contain the comma. Of course you can change the minconfirm (the 1 at the end) and the comment for the transaction.

Here's the code version with the unnecessary comma removed:
Code:
sendmany "" '{"1xbbjJcbeD4Qi88QmJmMgTFSdm7b5WCG4":5.013261,"1L5VE93qbbepo5CJtyeQaVF6sM8PnqrmPL":3.1284,"1QG2H6u9KvjyrgSpEB8sAQH2qzjUPDGmYp":5.013261,"19xZgcRduMiZENg8etHgW3R8KzakHGHvj":1.0026522,"1FKJzNP3bc81Ch2tchffKDs2J7Qj7cjmUN":5.013261,"17S1mgHyWHdpXSSDUtK9jY4Gpwi4sCeSAv":4.6926,"1NhSSrRW5Kqzki6TC2HVvHviEtQdxEBTeB":2.9008089,"17oDXLNifckeMjKk5CioRPHKu4txWAXPMG":1.0026522,"1Dq9q8MBbXFVSSHBtoysxnMwRzeG6rGtTo":6.64785,"1Ky1TKDV2cvHiNxE45sY4CfKyzkst8P4me":1.0026522,"174zoHrPuXNWVsRaNQYxYesihHYoKEKnsc":20.334600000000002,"1NpJWh55tae9Zd7VKRiWknVn8orDBDRi9V":50.1349563,"12hv7UcFgrBWLjWs5McPYP63Yza6ufT6Sw":23.463,"1GrEWEN9hMUAcKkCEtTKD6f2dQn68XKznt":2.0678724,"12KHW3i2Hamk1irY8b181N4vMXUnVYL1ah":4.0106088,"1HwrMG83oVJKABuLHouUvArCGsBuHqafTt":1.5305697,"1PVPGVQGfT8xiUYTNFkBxH7yRBQdUtNrvX":2.03346,"1Ki3sFg6bCasB6tkuMW41DCCpGFDgDHVgL":3.0079566,"17RXcRMUiXqsQkCqqYKXJkP1B4Lqm47hFB":1.0222047,"1CCa1scp5vLrbaha4MZ4sUFn3uboAjpRGX":20.053826100000002,"1F6WM3rjDzVDWRTMz5Q3pwU2T6dZ6Nrb9C":1.01673,"1Q1img1shsDS2sjy3781hpkSAW6eG1rUBm":39.105000000000004,"16SSPCBRxzaiXjA6XoCpq8tBvJdhoSSPmA":3.1635945}' 1 "RaginAzn's Avalon Group buy 1 Refund"
83  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: October 20, 2013, 10:10:59 PM
I assume you'll be doing a sendmany transaction, John?

And Ben, I realize that anyone could fill out my form. This is why I wanted John to double check it in the end but it, like your form, got things a bit more organized. It didn't quite make it to generating a sendmany transaction from the results (which is what I wanted to accomplish), but between the two of us I would like to think it made John's job just a little bit easier.

Anyway, let me know if I can do anything else to push this along. One good thing has come of this whole ordeal - we know who has their heads up their asses and have found some more people who weren't known before who can actually pull some things together and may be good people to transact / work with in the future.
84  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: MCXNow Can See your passwords! REALSolid has access to all your Passwords on: October 18, 2013, 12:21:08 AM
One should always assume the admin can see what you store. I'm surprised that people are worried about this aspect when in reality the fact that in a large majority of cases they store significant amounts of crypto on the site in a shared wallet. What do you care more about - that he can see your stupid "hunter2" password or that he could, at any time, jank your funds? There has to be a certain level of trust at some point. If you don't trust him or mcxnow, go elsewhere. I hear there are some Russians that are pretty trustworthy with these kinds of things. Wink
85  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [OPEN, 34/100 shares] R9: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury Chips!Below cost 40%+ on: October 17, 2013, 02:27:47 PM
Just paid for 5 shares. Order #257.

Since that is an automated order system, do you need any additional information from me in this thread?
86  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: October 16, 2013, 05:01:39 PM
Ultimately what I was hoping to achieve in my endeavors was to come out of this with a sendmany transaction that included the amounts and recipient addresses. This way John could simply look at the command, reconcile it with his info to ensure it is correct in amounts and recipients, and have it all done in one transaction rather than having to labor with sending them all to different people manually (and paying transaction fees for them all). I don't recall the sendmany syntax but I remember it being fairly straightforward.
87  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: October 14, 2013, 11:56:07 PM
Also, side note.  I take security very seriously and I've been thinking about the best way to assure everyone involved that I haven't modified anyone's 'verified' address, and I believe the best way to do that is to post the entire list here (once the list is finished) and have another trusted user quote it so that it can't be changed once it's posted.  I know that I'm trustworthy, but a dishonest person would say the same thing, so I want to make sure there are no questions about the validity of my list.  

If anyone has a better method, let me know.

A hybrid method might be to do that but to also sign it with John K's public key too found here
88  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: October 11, 2013, 04:33:50 AM
Thanks for keeping things moving, Ben. I've been traveling a LOT for work lately. This coupled with bitcointalk going offline resulted in my return just today. I appreciate you doing the reconciliation of addresses and I will be sending you a PM shortly with my address for you to verify and cross reference.
89  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [TENTATIVE] Avalon Gen. 2 Chips Group Buy on: October 01, 2013, 04:17:41 AM
Just saw this thread. I'm interested.
90  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: XPM PROOFS! The only physical representation of the first scientific crypto! on: September 28, 2013, 11:12:48 PM
I realize it took me a while but hopefully the wait was worth it. I'm not 100% happy with all of them but I think they're overall fairly decent. Here's the link to the album:

http://imgur.com/a/5zbP4





Here are the individual photos:





















91  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 28, 2013, 03:50:24 AM
Any word on what labcoin are doing in regard to the btct shutdown?

Swede said they're exploring bitfunder and that's what it looks like but we've heard nothing (that I know of anyway) from bitfunder on whether it's going to be allowed and what the method of transfer would be.

I can say this though: there's no way in hell I'm transferring my shares to any of the labcoin team at this point for transfer on btct. If a transfer happens, it needs to be through a trusted third party entity like Ukyo or burnside (or a collab between them) or perhaps as direct shares as an interim to bitfunder.
92  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Opinions about the Primecoin GPU Miner on: September 28, 2013, 03:00:56 AM
Hello,

As many of you know, A while ago, mtmlr started working on a Primecoin GPU Miner, and he received a lot of money in donations from people, where when they donate they receive early beta access to the miner.

The beta-access period is now over, and the miner source is released, but the miner doesn't seem to work quite yet.

Some people are very mad about this, Others are not. I don't have any feelings of my own on it, because I didn't donate anyways.

So I've been wondering. What is are your feelings on this situation? Take the poll so that we can see what are the collective feelings of this forum are. Smiley

Note: Please not hating on Mtmlr or anyone else here. Hate posts will be deleted. Create your own thread if you are mad.

It's not mtmlr it's mtrlt. Interesting post nonetheless.
93  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TIX] Lottery Tickets | Random Block Reward | Scrypt Jane | Now on 4 sites on: September 27, 2013, 05:06:48 AM
There's a couple guys working on a TIX poker room as we speak

Still entertaining bulk sales offers. Is that 1 LTC per 1m TIX offer still live?

I got some I would sell for that. Not sure if you're trying to buy or sell though

Selling. Yeah, I wasn't quite clear on that. Sorry.
94  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TIX] Lottery Tickets | Random Block Reward | Scrypt Jane | Now on 4 sites on: September 27, 2013, 04:46:31 AM
There's a couple guys working on a TIX poker room as we speak

Still entertaining bulk sales offers (I'm selling). Is that 1 LTC per 1m TIX offer still live? I'll match that - or make me an offer via PM. 1 million TIX minimum though.
95  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Klondike - 16 chip ASIC Open Source Board - Preliminary on: September 25, 2013, 10:37:55 PM
Move on people - this project is dead. I wish BKK closes the thread to end the drama. The designs are out there on github for you to fork & improve. Someone did it already - there's a working version doing ~ 7GH/s with 16 chips and low error rate (see marto74 's thread)

A link would be nice... Smiley
96  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 24, 2013, 10:34:39 PM
Back to the 'Which exchange should we move to?' discussion.  Just my 2BTC but I think Labcoin should place a high preference on moving to an exchange that is operating legally in the jurisdiction in which it exists.  For example, Havelock Investments is in Canada and Canada is very friendly to alt currency start ups, going so far as to say that they are unregulated.

Let's do what we can to avoid this same situation (or worse) in the future.

Are you suggesting that Bitfunder doesn't meet those standards? I'm not saying I prefer one over the other (I have holdings on both) but I'd just like to understand all the options and variables.
97  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: September 24, 2013, 10:26:40 PM
Please contact me via PM or email to get my refund address (or confirm ownership of my originating address) when the time comes to start sending us back our BTC. I think I might have sent my payment from an old wallet...

Did you fill out my form? I believe bigbeninlondon is using this to build his refund tracker spreadsheet. I have also PM'd John with the applicable spreadsheets and form results to help streamline this whole process.

Here is the form for refund / chip transfer tracking:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Db9Xx8NYvjnq-Pm7MmuVgWauTP1qSaFRyemI_sa5DkA/viewform
98  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] - Stumptown Miners - Avalon PCB Assembly - West Coast USA on: September 24, 2013, 09:12:30 PM
ryepdx,
You mentioned you were going to create a new thread for gauging interest in Gen 2 chips for the boards & components that have already been ordered and / or received. I didn't see any though. Any way to get on board with that? Without question I would back / trust you as a group buy organizer (of course would prefer on-hand stock rather than pre-order). Any info?
99  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TIX] Lottery Tickets | Random Block Reward | Scrypt Jane | Used to Gamble on: September 22, 2013, 02:33:38 AM
I'll keep the price I sold some for last night at 1 litecoin per million tix if anyone is interested

I will honor the same price.
100  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! FINISHED! on: September 21, 2013, 11:57:38 PM
Congrats everyone, it seems this mess is almost over.

I am so happy to see that I will get most of my BTC back from this group buy!

It is only a matter of time before JohnK gets everything sorted out.

Everyone please fill out the form to expedite the refund process:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Db9Xx8NYvjnq-Pm7MmuVgWauTP1qSaFRyemI_sa5DkA/viewform

So again, my name is not reflected in the original spreadsheet, i bought the chips from two people in that (dserrano5 and atsecure) - how should i go about this?

Should i fill this out twice and match it to both of them?  that's the only way i can see it making sense

You can fill out the form as yourself and have them fill it out. The form is for those who have sold as well as those who have bought.

ok i guess, I'll send them a PM to request they fill it out as well, that would be the smoothest way

I filled out a single one for me and provided all the links and proof on my end

btw not that it really matters, but i'm pretty sure BTC addresses are actually NOT the public key but a hash(hash(public key)) or something.

But yeah, i put 'ecliptic' in the field about "name in original spreadsheet" even though it's not there.  It should have been but the spreadsheet was never updated due to ragingazn's situation

I just want to make sure it's not a dumbfire automatica computer match between the original spreadsheet and this form, because if so it will falsely say i don't have any chips in this group buy.

No, I understand and have taken this into account when creating the backend spreadsheets (yes, there are multiple). What I can't promise, however, is that John will use it / them. Ultimately it will be he who resolves all of this in the way he deems proper / correct.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!