Bitcoin Forum
May 15, 2024, 01:37:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
1  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: April 08, 2014, 09:54:15 PM
I found this while reading a BFL thread and wanted to share some thoughts.

So do you actually need a motherboard or host computer for this thing to work?

If so, that seems retarded.

Yes. Well considering you could put 6 of these together (assuming spacing with risers and your mobo supports) that's pretty nice. It allows you to scale well as well. But since these are never shipping, it doesn't matter Tongue

VMC is doing something like that as well. but you have to buy the board to hold the cards from them i believe.

http://virtualminingcorp.com/shop1/index.php?id_product=26&controller=product


I feel like it may be a good idea to clean up the site so people don't get drawn away from the available product. I would think all attention should be funneled to a product that is in stock and will build a reputation for VMC. A shopper may find it cumbersome to sort through the pre-order products to find something tangible to hold and judge VMC with.

Maybe I've lagged behind in terms of understanding where the company stands but there are still mentions of work with eASIC on the front page as well as the silver, gold, and platinum editions. I believe if I were a new, prospective buyer I would have a better time navigating if the home page had the prospector plastered in the center, alone. Further navigating through drop down menus, a newcomer would then be able to see future products that will/may be released (I don't really know what on the site is going to materialize and what isn't).

Having said this I think this falls behind A/C, refunds, and shipping products in terms of priorities.

We are no longer involved with eASIC, those projects have been cancelled. There is a minimal amount of information about a custom 28nm chip currently being developed. I do agree that we should streamline the website to focus towards our current products, maybe have a link to the others showing 'future products'.
2  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: April 08, 2014, 09:28:37 PM
Ken,

I want to say thank you for what you have accomplished this past month. I can't imagine how difficult it has been competing in this space in the past year. I hope that as things continue to scale up, you will continue to modestly hire when help is needed. We've got mining, manufacturing, development, and sales/customer relations. That's a lot going on, employees should not be placed into the position where focusing on one aspect of the company causes another aspect to be neglected. I know you have hired new employees in the past few months, and it has helped tremendously. Hire knowledgeable people that have leadership traits and new skills that bring value to the team. Hire them on contract if you don't think you will need them long-term. As people get more experienced, hopefully they will be able to predict potential issues and plan around them, as time is very valuable in the bitcoin world. I know that it is a learning process and things will go more smoothly with more exposure. If ACTM is to be successful, it will need a small army behind it (besides all of us crazy shareholders).

I am also curious, as are the other shareholders, as to the status of the custom 28 nm chip. Looking solely at the history of the company, I would place a bet on this not precipitating to anything. However, I know that there are many challenges to the development of these chips, and a lot of these challenges cannot really be learned until you're ankle deep into the process. The bitcoin network and mining competition has increased incredibly, so I don't blame you for cancelling projects that wouldn't have been profitable. I hope that as a result of the previous failed/cancelled projects that you and others involved have gotten past the learning curve and are able to actually make a chip. I hope that there are employees working on this non-stop, as time is very valuable in this development. I hope that the employees involved have enough foresight to predict potential delays ahead of time, and plan around them. Is there any information that you can give us on the development of this chip, or are we supposed to just believe? How is our cash supply, do we have the funds to complete this development in an efficient manner?

Next up, Intellihash. Is there active development being done on intellihash? If there isn't active development, why not? Manage your human resources so that this can be developed, if it is something that you still believe can bring value to the company.

I hope that you have development focused in all aspects of the company congruently, and that human resources don't have to be shuffled around causing more delays and unsuccessful projects.

Thanks,
4ju5tice



3  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 28, 2014, 06:20:05 PM
i was actually considering purchasing one (for testing then resale) since they are "in-stock" so i went through the process, but the only form of payment available now is bank wire (no bitcoin?!?!).  and it said DHL shipping would take 4 days, which from Missouri to Louisiana would be 2 at the most.  so sadly to say i will not be ordering one of these.

Yes, we only have Wire Transfers on our site at the moment as our bitcoin processor before was MtGox.  We can still take bitcoins, but we will process them manual.  Send us a message if you want to order with bitcoins.



Ken, it doesn't matter who the bitcoin processor was before. It takes a few minutes to set up a Coinbase bitcoin payment method.

I second this.
4  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 28, 2014, 05:50:48 PM
Processor Highlights
·Fast-Hash One 28nm ASIC
·Underclocked for greater efficiency or overclocked for greater performance.
·Built in thermal controls that allow the chip optimization without damage to processor.
Warranty:  Quality Controlled Pre-shipping tested against DOA. Experimental No Warranty

Thanks for clearing that up, Ken.

This has to be my favourite post in the last 12 months!

If this truly is ActM's (or VMC or whatever) own chip then things have gotten much more exciting than I originally expected. I'd love to hear more of the details about the origins of the chip before I start singing from the rooftops however.


Quote
Chips
What is going on with the development of our own chips? Can you share details of what is going on with this? We need more information about what is the progress we have made so far and what we plan to accomplish the next few months. Please share as much information as you can.

We are still working on development of our own chip.



I'm not sure why this was deleted either. It's a legitimate point. If this isn't ActM's custom designed chip then that leaves either rebranded HashFast chips or bought exclusive rights to some other person's/company's chips.

I don't really care. Ken could have made a deal with another company, buying their design for part of ACTM company's shares. It is progress whatever happened. If ACTM is working on a better 28 nm in the background then that's even better.

It has been since about October that we've actually had any substantial good news with ACTM. And this thread has been terrible with all the manic-depressives out there. Things like this take time to build, but hopefully Ken has had time to develop his leadership skills and this is just the beginning for ACTM.
5  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 28, 2014, 06:16:36 AM

Nice work Ken. Now let's start seeing some profit come into the company.

I like the name and the picture of the gold prospector is nice.


Processor Highlights
·Proprietary 28nm ASIC

Ooohh.. I like that too.
6  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 07, 2014, 08:00:28 PM
Ken, we have been waiting on chips since the end of last year. You have kept us largely in the dark as our competition has been ramping up. Remember that you started ACTM so that you could provide a quicker solution to bitcoin mining? Is this going to happen? Or is all of the money going to drain out of this company before it does? Ken, get your act together. Get help where you need help to get this project completed promptly, or liquidate the public shares. Get people involved that have a passion for bitcoin mining and pay them with the company's half of the shares. I know that there have been a lot of mishaps and things out of your control. That's partly how the bitcoin world is right now, everything moves so fast. Either you can handle the task at hand in this environment and provide a return to the investors or you cannot. Do you have what it takes? If not, throw in the towel. If so, get us something to show for all this time and money.
7  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 06, 2014, 09:43:24 PM
What on earth does that even mean? While I agree it would be trivial to write such a program, can you explain how an SHA256 ASIC could ever be used to break the encryption scheme used by Armory?

He's talking about the ability of SHA-256 machines to break SHA-256 encryption and decipher the Private Key from the Public Key. This is impossible even if the hashing power of the entire network X 1,000,000 was pointed at an address.

Anything is possible if you just believe.
8  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Shareholder Discussion Thread {moderated TROLL FREE} on: February 14, 2014, 05:28:16 PM
You said we'd have 55nm in fall last year,

Are you sure about that? I think that might be wrong considering that he only announced the 55nm project on the 21st January 2014 (3weeks ago) and previous to that there had been no mention of 55nm.




https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297543.msg3220847#msg3220847

'PRESS RELEASE

Springfield, MO and Santa Jose, CA – January 21, 2014 – Active Mining Corporation (Belize) (AMC) a bitcoin Mining and Hardware Manufacture, and  People's ASIC a stealth Silicon Valley startup founded by two veteran engineers is proud to announce today the tape-out of their 55 nm UMC Bitcoin Mining ASIC.  The ASIC features SHA256 optimizations according to a scientific paper by Dadda et al.

Simultaneously, AMC has acquired the Intellectual Property (Verilog code, test bench, GDS-II data, etc. for the 55nm UMC Bitcoin Mining ASIC.  Delivery of chips is expected in Q2/2014.  Also, AMC will use the same design team and code which successfully taped out the 55 nm on AMC's eASIC's 28 nm.  EASIC's 28 nm development has been upgraded to a full custom 28 nm.'


Oh sorry, it was 45 nm not 55 nm.

kslaughter dated March 26, 2013:
"The team has been involved with Bitcoins since 2009. AMC has purchased and will operate Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) Bitcoin mining machines and is developing an ASIC chip and PCB that it will license to VMC for use in their Fast-Hash series of Bitcoin Mining Machines. AMC is developing ASIC chips on the 45nm and soon the 28nm process. AMC's ASIC 45nm chips will have fast speeds of 6 to 9 GH/s with low power usage. The 28nm chips are estimated to have speeds of 9 to 15 GH/s per chip which will be in VMC's Fast-Hash-XXT series of machines which will have even more speed and even lower power usage. VMC may purchase ASIC chips from different vendors if available."


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=158806.0
9  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Shareholder Discussion Thread {moderated TROLL FREE} on: February 14, 2014, 04:13:23 PM

Too bad I missed the pre-orders last summer for the 28nm miners. Sad

Now I can pre-order 55nm though! Smiley

I'm not trying to troll too bad, it's just super easy. The pre-order situation is ironic to me. I really hope that this company turns into something, because it is nothing now. I would have made a lot more investing in my own cex.io contract. And let's face it, while I don't believe Ken is a scam, he has definitely said some deceiving things. Ken, just get us some frickin chips! You said we'd have 55nm in fall last year, you led us to believe that we'd have 28nm by early this year by the latest, you talked of intellihash but it sounds like it is not at all complete, you said releasing shares are #1 priority. Damn, if they were your #1 priority then I'd hate to see how the chips and this 'game-changer' technology are coming along.

As unhelpful to our cause as getting the gov involved will be, I can understand why some scared little 'government-save-us' fellow may have done it.

Edit: As minerpart corrected me, 55nm chips were only announced three weeks ago. I was thinking of the 45nm chips that were announced March 26, 2013
10  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 06, 2014, 06:32:52 PM
At least Ken isn't being an immature troll. Hopefully he's using that time to actually work on ACTM. At least we have some desks!
11  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 02, 2014, 12:54:08 AM
Well Ken just logged back on about 3 minutes ago after being away for 5 days. Hopefully this means another update.

He's probably checking in to see the quality posts that he's missed. Lol
12  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 26, 2013, 04:33:06 AM
Weekly Update 12/25/13

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

Here is a picture of our manufacturing line for assembling miners.


Assembly Line


We are working on assembling everything, so when our boards and chips arrive, we can ship the miners fast.


Thanks for the update Ken. Great work, I know you've been doing a lot. Merry Christmas!
13  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 15, 2013, 03:42:03 PM
By the way I think actm share price will hit 0.01 within a week of us going live. And it will climb steadily until March where it will level off around 0.04
I think you are dreaming. The share price will likely stay below .0025 until we have some proof of miners shipping, or an announcement that we're adding 24.576TH/s of hash power with BTCGuild showing as much. Even then I think we will only get to about .005 and maybe .01 by March.

Catch me up, please.  How many millions of shares are the dividends divided over now?

How many satoshis a week would each share get with 24 Th/s of mining capacity?

This is all easily obtained publicly available information.

Since it's so easy, why don't you go ahead and answer the questions?

Since nobody bothered to answer I will.

If the network hash rate was at a constant 10 Ph/s and ActM had a constant 24 Th/s, it would have 0.24% of the network hash rate, mining 120.96 BTC per round. The round would last 14 days, since the hash rates were constant, giving 8.64 BTC per day. This would be distributed to 10 million shares until 0.0025 BTC per share had been paid, after which the number of shares would increase to 25 million.

According to the genesis block, the network hash rate is increasing by about 78% every 30 days, which is an increase of about 2.5% each day.

So, if the network hash rate was at 10 Ph/s and ActM brought 24 Th/s online, 8.64 BTC / 10 million shares gives 86 Satoshis per share per day, which would fall by 2.5% each day!  Cry

Thank you.

Math is a bitch sometimes.

ACTM will only have 24 Th/s? With atleast half of the manufacturing capability going towards the mining facility, that assumption means that the company will only produce 48Th/s or less. If you believe that, then you shouldn't have invested.

Yes, mining is an area with diminishing returns. Is that what you're trying to say? Or are you just trying to scare people with this obvious reality that hopefully investors are already aware of? Being a manufacturer of rigs, we have a HUGE advantage over non-manufacturing miners. Not only that though, even when mining becomes less profitable, we will receive income from software and hardware sales. Ken is smart and he is creating more consistent revenue streams in addition to the focus on mining. It's easy to forget when you're a part of the hype, but as they say, the people who sold shovels were the most profitable in the gold rush. We're a part of both sides of the gold rush. Ken has a lot to gain from this company being successful, and he has the most to lose from it not being successful. He's going to give everything to make this work. I believe he will.

That being said, if you want to get rid of your shares when we start trading, I'm sure you're not the only one. Bitcoin has gone up more than 1000% since a lot of us started investing in AMC. Investing is about making a profit, if you've made a profit in your eyes then by all means, do what you want. You can't lose money taking a profit.

Disclaimer: I don't really care where the share price ends up when trading starts. I think the dividends have the potential to be excellent.

I'm not sure what the deal is with the people in this thread. Psychologists could probably learn a lot from it. We've got a little bit of everything here. In the end, it doesn't really matter what any of the posters in this thread think. Things will happen how they happen. Fighting the stupid comments in this thread is impossible. Peace.
14  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 12, 2013, 01:47:00 PM
Weekly Update 12/11/13

VMC:

We are continuing to bring in all the parts for mass production of our miners.

AMC:

We will be using a minimum of 50% of our manufacturing capacity to build miners for AMC's mining farm.


This is awesome. Great work Ken.  Grin
15  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 02, 2013, 06:29:34 PM
They aren't bothering me. I'm ignoring them. People that trust what they say don't really know what their investment is worth anyways.
16  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 02, 2013, 06:23:36 PM
Are you not yourself 'responding to the trolls'?

There gets to be a point where the people that post tons and tons of posts right after each other that have no content become the trolls.
17  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: November 27, 2013, 09:05:31 PM

Does this take into account difficulty and the extra 15million shares dividends will be paid to after 0.00025 is received as dividends?

Seems very optimistic.


It accounts for 40% difficulty increases per month, which may be a little optimistic. It isn't accurate for the dividends after .0025, didn't throw that if statement in there.

I meant that I find it unlikely that we will get 10-12% of total hashing power.
I have no math to back it up, just that we have a lot of competition and 10-12% is a lot.

Understandable. It's just a model, nobody knows how things will turn out exactly. I'd assume that we can get rigs at a cheaper rate than what ACTM retail is, and I think we have more than 1M USD in reserves.
18  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: November 27, 2013, 08:21:44 PM
.0025/share payed out in 5.5 months. If that's the case, you can bet the share price will be at least .01.

I'd guess more like .02-.04 if we get that kind of network %.
Highly unlikely, although a nice wet dream ..

How is it highly unlikely? Which parameters do you not agree with?

Obviously, there is no calculation for power consumption, rent, general overhead. Manpower and electrical power will be limiting factors.
19  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: November 27, 2013, 07:36:39 PM
.0025/share payed out in 5.5 months. If that's the case, you can bet the share price will be at least .01.


20  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: November 27, 2013, 06:53:45 PM
Drawingthesun, you need to really chill out. From what I can remember you said you will earn 1000btc from selling at 0.007.

No that's some other guy who has 49% more shares than me.

OK 70,000 shares. Still, unless Ken fucks up on an epic proportion you should still be OK. Unless you bought in at a high price. Then thats just bad luck and judgement.

Yeah DTS, relax. It's not a scam. We're all impatient. Now that bitcoin is $1000 from $100, even if you bought at a price of .005, you'd still break even in fiat from selling at .0005. If you want to sell your shares for .0005, I'd buy a few. Wink ACTM will be about 10x more profitable than it was before this price rise. The price rise saved this company.  But seriously, I bet in two months we'll all be laughing about the days when the forums were filled with people freaking out.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!