Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2022, 10:10:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 [501] 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]  (Read 770784 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
sparky999
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:40:52 PM
 #10001


We are working with our vendors to use any of the funds we may have paid them on our new 28nm project, our vendors seem to want to work with us and meet our other vendors prices.  The project manager has been meeting with them last week and will be meeting with them again this week to get a quote.  We want to get started on the 28nm ASAP.

I don't have any documentation on the tapeout.  This was for the shuttle run and prototypes which we have canceled and have now changed to the production run.  See my weekly update for the wafer delivery dates.

How can you have no documentation of tapeout? What about proof of IP? Proof of order with UMC?
1664662241
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1664662241

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1664662241
Reply with quote  #2

1664662241
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1664662241
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1664662241

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1664662241
Reply with quote  #2

1664662241
Report to moderator
1664662241
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1664662241

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1664662241
Reply with quote  #2

1664662241
Report to moderator
sparky999
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:50:11 PM
 #10002

Ken, any updates on Intellihash? Will this be ready to go when we receive our chips in April?

I am hoping to work on it more between now and April.  I have been busy on the 55nm deal.

@Ken so what happens when the chips don't work with intelli-hash like supposedly happened with the eAsic chips last year? Will there be more delays whilst you get them re-done?

What happened to those eAsic chips that had to be have their software changed to work with intelli-hash by the way?
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:56:13 PM
 #10003

So VE by launching this complaint with the MO SEC may have set back trading for another month, or two. Doesn't bother me as I'm in this for the divs. If you wanted to trade Asap well don't forget to thank VE for his fine efforts. lol such a nice guy.
JoTheKhan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 10:07:04 PM
 #10004

So VE by launching this complaint with the MO SEC may have set back trading for another month, or two. Doesn't bother me as I'm in this for the divs. If you wanted to trade Asap well don't forget to thank VE for his fine efforts. lol such a nice guy.

He did the rational thing. Are you actually upset with him for this?
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 10:13:21 PM
 #10005

VE hasn't acted rationally on here as we have seen for months. He's always been off the  handle - a real Volcanic Eruptor. He began by threatening to shoot Ken, then he was selling 9mm ammo on this forum (an extention of the threat), and it's ended with this.

I'm not angry atall. The shareholders who wanted out should be. They should consider launching a legal suit against him for damaging the company out of malice. There is not a genuine bone in that mans body. He resents Ken somehow for the closure of BTC-TC where he lost money. Hardly Ken's fault. But VE is not a rational being.
Subcide
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 10:23:13 PM
 #10006

Ken, when are you meeting with the securities lawyer?
JoTheKhan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 10:32:23 PM
 #10007

VE hasn't acted rationally on here as we have seen for months. He's always been off the  handle - a real Volcanic Eruptor. He began by threatening to shoot Ken, then he was selling 9mm ammo on this forum (an extention of the threat), and it's ended with this.

I'm not angry atall. The shareholders who wanted out should be. They should consider launching a legal suit against him for damaging the company out of malice. There is not a genuine bone in that mans body. He resents Ken somehow for the closure of BTC-TC where he lost money. Hardly Ken's fault. But VE is not a rational being.

Then Ken threatened to "Lose" his shares and VE then decided to contact authorities instead of trying to take the law into his own hands. Like a rational human being.
shadallion
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 300
Merit: 102


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 10:33:12 PM
 #10008

I am not going to check this thread again for a month, as that is the absolutel earliest we could possibly be trading, now that Ken will have to wait to 1) meet with his lawyer 2) wait for them to talk to whoever called Ken 3) them to work things out

And that's assuming Ken doesn't just 4) get his ass shutdown and we are all wiped out as shareholders.

Awesome.
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 10:52:31 PM
 #10009

Then Ken threatened to "Lose" his shares and VE then decided to contact authorities instead of trying to take the law into his own hands. Like a rational human being.

lol. If someone had threatened to shoot you and then offered 9mm rounds for sale on this forum do you think you might get a bit upset about it? I don't know about this 'lose shares' business, sounds like a joke, if VE has his share-tender info from Bitfunder that is cast iron solid and can't be changed by anyone not even Ken. If the shares were denied him he would have a case based on his tender details and investigations could be made. But Ken couldn't do that anyway as the shares are sold anonymously. There is no way for Ken to know which shares belong to who.
You are defending a criminal who has made death threats. You should be careful what you say on here. We are being watched now.
kslaughter (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 10:57:15 PM
 #10010

Pre-Order 55nm Chips Shipping April 17,2014
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 10:58:14 PM
 #10011

Finally some solid news on the 55nm. Thanks dude.
DeadwoodDan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 11:02:28 PM
 #10012

If the shares were denied him he would have a case based on his tender details and investigations could be made. But Ken couldn't do that anyway as the shares are sold anonymously. There is no way for Ken to know which shares belong to who.

Oh crap. Whose shares do you suppose he just sold on CT?  I hope they weren't yours by accident...

                       ● pre-ICO ANYCOINS ●                   
A tool for raising the value of any crypto currency
● [WHITEPAPER] [FAQ] [BITCOINTALK] [BOUNTY] [GITHUB] [TELEGRAM] [TWITTER] [FACEBOOK] ●
kslaughter (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 11:03:51 PM
 #10013

I have been talking with gjpminingco about using his services for a couple of projects.
MrTeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 11:12:00 PM
 #10014

Pre-Order 55nm Chips Shipping April 17,2014
$3/GH/s just for chips, with delivery in two months? That's a little steep considering the chips are untested, and you can get chips that will give the same $/GH/s and J/GH numbers with immediate shipment and have a whole host of tested designs available.
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 11:15:57 PM
 #10015

Oh crap. Whose shares do you suppose he just sold on CT?  I hope they weren't yours by accident...

Good point but how did Ken know Ukyo held 232k shares? Either because he sold them to him personally at IPO price so he knew how many he sold to him or Ukyo told him how many he had bought. There is simply no way for Ken to know how many shares VE still held or how many ANY of us hold. Ken doesn't even have anyones email addresses from Bitfunder. That's why we needed to screen grab the time of tender.

VE gave several different versions of his holdings, from he sold them all to he sold most of them to he still held around 50k. I don't think he had any personally he just said that to have an excuse to keep posting. The real reason he posted was to get back at Ken. No way for Ken to withhold his shares unless he knows the exact amount and VE wouldn't tell him that.
equipoise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 794
Merit: 1000


Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 11:19:34 PM
 #10016

Oh crap. Whose shares do you suppose he just sold on CT?  I hope they weren't yours by accident...

Good point but how did Ken know Ukyo held 232k shares? Either because he sold them to him personally at IPO price so he knew how many he sold to him or Ukyo told him how many he had bought. There is simply no way for Ken to know how many shares VE still held or how many ANY of us hold. Ken doesn't even have anyones email addresses from Bitfunder. That's why we needed to screen grab the time of tender.

VE gave several different versions of his holdings, from he sold them all to he sold most of them to he still held around 50k. I don't think he had any personally he just said that to have an excuse to keep posting. The real reason he posted was to get back at Ken. No way for Ken to withhold his shares unless he knows the exact amount and VE wouldn't tell him that.
Ken knows the BF username he received the shares from.

About me | zRMicroArray - phase 2 - Gene Expression Analysis software | [Weed Like to Talk - Bulgaria] Start a wave of cannabis seminars in Europe | Monero weighted average price stats: moneroprice.i2p
BTC: 1KoCX7TWKVGwqmmFw3CKyUSrKRSStueZar | NMC: NKhYEYpe1Le9MwHrwKsdSm5617J4toVar9 | XMR (Tip me a beer OpenAlias Monero address): tip.changetheworldwork.com
[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency: 4AyRmUcxzefB5quumzK3HNE4zmCiGc8vhG6fE1oJpGVyVZF7fvDgSpt3MzgLfQ6Q1719xQhmfkM9Z2u NXgDMqYhjJVmc6KX
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 11:24:23 PM
 #10017


Ken knows the BF username he received the shares from.

And that user name will be 'VE'? I don't think so. VE could have tendered the shares to himself on BF under any nickname or multiple names before tendering to AMC. Anyway VE had no shares to tender. He said he sold them all then disappeared for a while then suddenly had 50k tendered even though he hated the company??? Not exactly believable.
equipoise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 794
Merit: 1000


Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 11:28:33 PM
 #10018

Sure, but at that point of time Ukyo had no reason to use different username for the shares. At some point of time maybe VE also used similar username.

About me | zRMicroArray - phase 2 - Gene Expression Analysis software | [Weed Like to Talk - Bulgaria] Start a wave of cannabis seminars in Europe | Monero weighted average price stats: moneroprice.i2p
BTC: 1KoCX7TWKVGwqmmFw3CKyUSrKRSStueZar | NMC: NKhYEYpe1Le9MwHrwKsdSm5617J4toVar9 | XMR (Tip me a beer OpenAlias Monero address): tip.changetheworldwork.com
[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency: 4AyRmUcxzefB5quumzK3HNE4zmCiGc8vhG6fE1oJpGVyVZF7fvDgSpt3MzgLfQ6Q1719xQhmfkM9Z2u NXgDMqYhjJVmc6KX
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 11:33:24 PM
 #10019

Well we are guessing. At the end of the day VE would have a good case for the SEC if Ken had 'lost' his shares so it would never have happened. There is a legal case for the Ukyo lien which is defensible. I refer you again to the point that this man was threatening Ken's life in a serious manner and was saying he was going to visit Ken and several times mentioned Ken's female relative who apparently works for the company. Wouldn't you react badly to that sort of threat level and say something you didn't really mean. We are all human.
mainline
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2014, 12:12:55 AM
Last edit: February 14, 2014, 05:08:25 AM by Maged
 #10020

I see Ken's trying to push more preorders here:

Pre-Order 55nm Chips Shipping April 17,2014

As expected, the news is met with much laughter and fingerpointing.
Pages: « 1 ... 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 [501] 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!