Lots of coins going into AMC today.

They are close to the NRE and when they get it, they will remove the buy wall at .0025.

Might be why BM has not realized much action.  Once the work is put out ona btct announcement we may see some additional action.

I just converted all my AM stock to ActM last night. I am going to spend the rest of the day today convincing family and friends to buy in ASAP, before that share wall gets blasted away.

Classic pump and dump.

Cross Posted from the ActiveMining Thread.

I will be getting all the transfers that are tendered before the cutoff time tomorrow done before dividends are paid tomorrow.

This has been a very busy day, getting everything ready for our engineers to build our prototypes, launching our Fast-Hash-One machines,
getting our Google ads running, etc.

Somebody get AM some better pipes!

Can we trust the 1300 "new" shares wont be dumped on the market immediately in order for the seller to recoup loses? If this is the case would it be better to use some treasury funds vs shares to pay for the mini-rig?

If you're having trouble with keeping the miners cool might I suggest posting a motion to use part of the 1000BTC towards another a/c (or whatever equipment you feel necessary) to bring the miners towards a higher efficiency?

just trying to bounce some ideas around and figure out why issuing shares are the way to go  I think its important to know what price point the shares will be issued at.

Hi creativex,

I don't know how much of a hurry you are in to have this motion passed, but I didn't receive an email notifying me of the motion, and only noticed it because I check btct.co and this thread reasonably frequently.  If you'd like to get the attention of some of the less active shareholders, I might consider putting a notification on btct.  (Hopefully, this is something burnside will make automatic in the near future.)

-gnomesick

His 20% stake in the company is to pay the costs of running the equipment, if he feels he can self host for less than a data center, I see nothing wrong.  I know I pay $1,000/mo per cabinet and 20A of juice in several data centers.

This thread is a great example.of some of the subtleties of Bitcoin.

Also to throw into the mix is that when the OP updated his software he no doubt started it up again. MultiBit automatically retransmits transactions that did not propagate out previously.  It connects to random bitcoind nodes when it starts up. This time it started the node it passed the transaction to may have decided to pass it on.

The transaction has been confirmed now. Thank Eclipse for ignoring the devs' new policy.

If you delete this TX from your wallet, you can re-spend the coins since the network didn't hear your TX either way.

It is most likely your change output is too small - transactions with outputs less than 5430 satoshi don't propagate across the network now.

I suggest you update to version 0.5.12 of MultiBit (the current one on the https://multibit.org site).
Then you will want to do a 'Tools | Reset blockchain and transactions' to sync back to the blockchain. The transaction you posted never made it successfully into the Bitcoin network so will disappear.

Then send the transaction again. The latest version does not generate 'tiny change' outputs - it gets bundled into the fee as a little bonus for the miner.