If Its PCB design issue, then labcoin was lying blatantly when he said they had begun hashing at 2TH and everything is fine. I don't think they will be so stupid that they risk their credibility  to cover a error can be easily fixed in 1 week

More likely it was a issue out of their expectation. For example, The board worked well for a while and then malfunctioned due to heat or the software does not scale to large number of chips.

Anyway, could we try to guess, if labcoin never lies, what's the possible situation now? They are indeed hashing, but is not stable. They can only provide a mining address couple of days later but not now. They cannot provide photos without further confusing investors.

For me, the only plausible explanation is they don't have full control of their assembly and mining partners. All they have in hand are some sample chips and boards. Their parter in China refuse giving any photos taken in their side, and their reason or excuse may be  they don't want disclose any evidence that they are involved in this project, since illegal IPO may lead to death penalty in China.

I really don't feel like recommending mining companies and will obviously be accused to "pump" them anyway. So far all new companies seem to want gullible investor "this is the next AsicMiner" money to have zero risk themselves; I think the new successful ones won't be publicly funded.

I am still invested in two but certainly do not plan to invest more.

you don't consider this a crash?

I figured that I would take a crack at this.

Advisory board, please try to nudge Ken towards getting a legitimate marketing director.  I just showed this image to my cubicle mate, and his response was, "What the fuck is that.  A cyber asshole?" Seriously, the current artwork looks like it was done by a 14 year old who just pirated is first copy of photoshop.  The logo also looks like ass compared to what hazryder was offering.

There are 25 million shares. 10 million shares receive the profits until each share has received 0.0025 BTC. After that, profits are split 25 million ways instead of 10 million ways.

So yes you'll get that back if you hold the shares for the time period required (and the profit allows of course).

I think basically 0.00249xxxxx!

The price will bounce around with news (PR would be helpful here for sure) but they are certainly inherently worth the original asking price given that the eASIC deal has been confirmed.

I still don't see why people are buying any form of PMB! or even when buying hosted hardware is cheaper.

做个基金，It's cool .赚钱又赚名声。我努力使自己有这个能力，但目前还不具备。
而且我不喜欢被束缚的感觉，管理别人的钱会受束缚，业绩的压力，资金安全，等等。每天早上起来好像都有一个声音告诉你有责任在身，多累！
我不为别人工作，只为自己而工作，随心所欲，自由自在的去实现我的梦想。
四百多个币的本金，足矣。

I will prob go as far as saying that the only reason that the shares are so far under 0.001 is the massive growth of profit and revenue has allowed a lot of very early investors to sell off at very nice profits. Once the early owners have taken home some profit, we should see a real valuation upgrade. If you look at he charts its fairly apparent that the valuation is moving in "steps" where old investors take home some profit, new owners buy and then it keeps moving up. Imho, a very good sign for continued value increase over time.

We proved Activemining is legit, buying at IPO price again is a sure profit in a couple of days.

InactiveMining noobvestors are getting desperate. Fun times ahead.

我不认为那时他会出掉。他强烈看好AM还会涨，却出掉了？我觉得他不是那种是口是心非的人。
5B到2BTC应该是一个不断加仓的过程，这才合乎逻辑。如果我看好一支股票一定会这么做。所以现在他应该是重仓AM

JimmyJazz, good ideas. +1


But if this really is a 1718% markup business ($1.50 per Gh), this party can not last for long.
How soon can we expect cheap chinese copies (stolen designs) to hit the market?
Next 6 month's are going to be interesting.

根據你在BTalk貼文量而定，不同收購者有不同價格
現在我知道有辦收購的有Bit777，TradeFortress，BTC.sx 有0.02到0.4不等，視乎帖量。我的帖量能收0.18每月


看到老五的更新，感覺他能找Bitfunder開一個基金上市了 (給錢你託管的朋友一定開心了)

一眨眼烤猫已经跌到2BTC了，不知道5B的价位接盘的人有啥感言，不知道当初的豪言壮志何时才能兑现了。


Quote from: lixiaolai on July 06, 2013, 01:04:36 AM
谢谢你的分析。

不过，这个分析，还是禁锢在传统金融知识里面了。

等它涨到20BTC的时候，我再说说我是怎么分析AM股票的吧。