Friends, does it make sense to take very cheap altcoins <$ 1? I think about buying, but I am interested in your opinion. Will they leave the market and exchanges, with such a strong fall?
If you don't have a lot of money, investing in coins of small value will be very beneficial. However, for big value coins, still doubling the value, it is still worth the investment. |
|
|
|
Hey guys.
I do currently ask myself if the ICO market will bounce back?. In how many ICOs do you typically invest and what is the average investement?.
Let me know.
I do currently work with a team on an ICO and i find it very important to understand the community and their investment habbits in 2019
Glad to hear the opinion of the bitcointalk community.
Although I lost faith in ICOs, I still invested in a few projects if I found it to be potential. For example, Bcnex. It's a potential project about exchange |
|
|
|
|
I know a bad news about EOS : Weiss Ratings downgraded EOS credit rating because of centralization concerns , so I will pick Cardano. It's still up to you, I can't decide your problem
|
|
|
|
|
Lina is good choice. I know Lina has insurance if prices fall. From the moment I hold until now, the price was nearly x2. It's just short term hold
|
|
|
|
|
Can you give detail? I am planning to invest in this project. You need to have personal evidence or judgment so people can consult.
|
|
|
|
For me, the best ones are the XRP TRON BNB. XRP - cooperation with Santander Bank. TRON - buying BitTorrent, BNB - a powerful cryptocurrency exchange.
Sometimes I feel that XRP is like stable coin lol. Although it has increased by more than 30% over the past few weeks. btw, it's really a good coin to invest  |
|
|
|
|
When it is applied to the education system, its effects seem to be easier to understand and closer to those who have little understanding of technology. That will be a big step
|
|
|
|
I'm here today to drop my own point about how KYC should be use
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying
In fact, big investors are always required to kyc, so this recommendation is not necessary. Besides, bounty hunters are required to verify their identity because the project wants to be fair to everyone. There are many people who create multiple accounts. |
|
|
|
I woke up this morning and just wondering how i can be of assistance in this race of making the ICO clean, because ICO is not what is bad, the scam being done is what is making ICO bad.
So let us pick it from this point, a scammer draft a whitepaper to get people's attention, innocent investors pays money to the scammers through Ethereum address, the scammer gets the transfer into his own wallet, he then transfers it to another wallet on a local exchange that will convert it to FIAT and transfer it to the scammer's traditional account.
What if we trace it from here, at least the account was transferred to a wallet, Local exchanges should be able to scan through their database to see the bank the scammer transferred the money to when he requested for withdrawal, at least investors knows the address they transferred the money to, which can be disclosed to exchanges to use for further research.
To make my point clearer, let me use an example, MR JOHH has ETH in is abc123 wallet, i asked MR JOHN to transfer money to my account from his address, the token from MR JOHN abc123 wallet landed in my wallet address abc700, and then i transferred it to the wallet address of my local exchange abc800 which is LUNO to chnage to FIAT and transfer to my account, LUNO should be able to trace my details to my bank since they have my KYC done already and since the receiving bank too has the details. i.e abc123 to abc700 to abc800 to scammer bank, bank to be contacted throug legal means to disclose the scammer information for authority to use.
I think there is no way to identify all projects. The phishing project is increasingly sophisticated. So we can only try our best to understand the project we want to invest |
|
|
|
I think the most important is for the coin or token to actually have a use case or product, otherwise, it's just another decentralized coin that you can trade and we already have them in the market. But, I think IEO is better than ICO, because to me with ICOs there are lots of scammers and from my experience, it is very hard to prove or be sure in the legitimacy of the project. But with IEO there are procedures a company has to go through before the launch and it kind of gives me the courage to trust these projects a bit more. For example, the https://yanu.ai/ IEO is trustworthy and they have a very nice Candybox campaign for token holders, a real product with a real-life use case  True true true. That's why I think IEO is better. Recent prices of ieo have proved that. I can't even buy IEO because it ran out so fast |
|
|
|
To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.
Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
I'm not sure about that. But I think IEO is a bit better than ICO. Just a little ! Because ICOs are not sure to be listed on exchange, the IEO is different. Besides, it also uses the stand-out trading platform to ensure more reliable. |
|
|
|
|
This is really a good idea. We can have a lot of experience while doing bounty and learning about the market. We can do them all at once!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank for your share ^^
I know bounty but I think you didn't research when you wrote this research. Bounty is one point, and ?
|
|
|
|
|
hey lets buy neo. Recently there is a lot of news about NEO. Besides, neo's upgraded to version 3.0. It will pumb soon
|
|
|
|
|
There are many projects that didn't pay to us. That's why I only choose reputable projects. I will only choose 1 -2 bounty to do. Lets choose carefully ^^ Don't waste your time
|
|
|
|
"Fiat-backed stablecoins are therefore rarely actual cryptocurrencies, which causes them to inherit their main characteristics and shortcomings from the centralised banking system. Ultimately, they function in the same manner as fiat, backed by what amounts to an IOU." Danial Daychopan wrote a short article linked below that has got me thinking. Are stablecoins bad for the cryptocurrency ecosystem because they are essentially fiat in digital form, or are they beneficial as they provide stability in an extremely volatile market? Curious to hear your thoughts, give it a read and let me know your angle on it. https://medium.com/@DDhopn/stablecoins-3b93b4f1ddc5Personally, I find this really a lack of stable coins. They need to be upgraded and overcome, I think. However, they help people feel easier when joining crypto world. That's why it is both necessary and dangerous. |
|
|
|
To be honest, I can't believe it at all. Because it is impossible and no one needs. This is specifically made such news. To all worried and more PR whether.
Of course, these are just rumors that are created to ordinary people, who understand little about how the market works, start to panic Typically newcomers are using the Binance trading platform. I don't think you should post this, it will have a negative effect on users |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
