Meh. As long as they keep buying and putting more more and reasonably meet hashrates..

Sorry if I sound like a douche. Its just burnside could have done this much better, and I am venting.

Everything you just wrote is null, because no issuer was told beforehand. Otherwise the issuers of all the stocks would be on this forum to explain their movement plans to stop panic.

The issuers were in the dark like we are.

Your personal. That's how they associate you with your portfolio.

I put my own personal address

TheSeven exists. He is just not doing anything important for labcoin. Im even willing to believe "howard wang" also exists (well, countless of them exist, its like the chinese John Doe), even though I cant find anyone on linkedin that would be a match. What is  clear the two arent even talking to each other, so how that constitutes a team is beyond me.

Here is my guess; the Howard Wang story may well be accurate. Its certainly feasible someone at a university would have access to the equipment and tools needed to make a rudimentary bitcoin asic on an old 130nm process and come up with a design in his free time. Upon learning about that,  theswede set out to capitalize on that and launched his IPO.  130nm asics arent very profitable, so he invented a "Rev2" to make his IPO look more lucrative. The 65nm chip cant possibly be made by Howard wang because his university doesnt have a 65nm fab.

Now the 130nm "hobby asic" isnt working, no one is pouring in the resources needed to make it work (assuming the problems are even fixable), still seems a one person venture. So theswede used his IPO money to buy some off the shelve hardware, be it avalon and/or bitfurry and is now claiming thats his 130nm chip. Actually, he isnt even claiming that, he is merely inferring it and lets others draw that conclusion.

To keep up the charade of a future rev2 65nm chip, he contracted 7 and asked him to do some work on it. 7 is apparently only working on the chip IO HDL, but doesnt know what process will be used, doesnt know who if anyone is actually designing the hashing engine, doesnt think he himself is up to the job,  didnt even know there was a dysfunctional rev1 and doesnt seem very convinced this 65nm chip will ever materialize.

But now that some avalons/BF's are hashing, somehow people believe that this is a goldmine.
Best of luck folks.

we are hashing on BTC guild.

http://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings&section=teams

watch that list over the next 2 weeks & profit.

Sorry if this has been asked & answered, just curious which is more likely to be true:

1.  Labcoin has no chips.
2.  The chips exist but are junk.
3.  The chips hash but don't clock up enough before thermal runaway / some other problem where they hash, but not well enough to be cost-effective.
4.  Soft/firmware tweakable problems -- will be hashing in no time.

Or

5.  Everything's working fine, the chips are hashing, Labcoin is already hashing & not releasing the news to cause panic & buy up their shares for nothing.