Thanks! Placed a vote for Qubit coin!  |
|
|
|
Qubit coin! |
|
|
|
Dev was last Active: February 27, 2014, 10:22:30 PM...also still no respond from krecu, coin is slowly dying. Even if we hit mintpal and we probably will...that doesn't mean anything without dev and someone who is willing to promote and work on coin. Sorry to say this,but that's current situation.
As I've heard, Krecu has some trouble in Ukraine and he'll back in the next few days. I also think that this project should be promoted better. Though the very low difficulty is good for me to solo mine, but unfortunately it also indicates low interest in the coin (at least for mining). I'm looking forward for Krecu to come back and to further develop this project. I'm also looking forward to when the people with no interest in this project but huge coin amount finish dumping, so the coins belong to people with real interest. |
|
|
|
Best wishes to krecu.
According to Krecus profile, he seems to live on Crimea - the island taken by russia. I'm pretty worried. Krecu, just tell us, if everything is alright with you and on Crimea. What's the situation there? |
|
|
|
I also think that the coin name doesn't attract new users. It should be more clear what the advantage of this coin is. I think, it should be named something with "multi" or "various" or "flexible" or "mixed". What about Varicoin , Varcoin, Flexicoin, Mixcoin or Mixedcoin? Multicoin is already used, but that project seems to be dead since 3 years. (=> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=24209.0 ) Maybe you could ask the developer to use that name? |
|
|
|
What's going on with the MTS price? It dropped down to 0.0001 and only a 0.5 BTC "wall" is preventing this coin from falling even more. Why are the people dumping this coin at that price?!  |
|
|
|
I also think that we need a more serious slogan. What does "Among the shadows you are not alone" even mean or how is it related to QubitCoin? I'm wondering, why the people are dumping Qubit right now just after the reward halving to 512 coins/block. Any ideas?! The price is ridiculous low right now (0.0000015 BTC / Q2C)... |
|
|
|
Are you interested in a improved CPU miner? I achieved a 30% more khs/sec with a Sandy Bridge i5-2400 from a friend. This version is based on SSE2 version by ig0tik3d and plus uses AES-NI instructions from an other library, so it's usable with this list of Intel Processors: http://ark.intel.com/search/advanced/?AESTech=trueand with these series by AMD: AMD Bulldozer-based processors AMD Piledriver-based processors. AMD Jaguar-based processors. AMD Kaveri-based processors. I have not cpus to mine, so I'd like a bounty for my time and moreover to package binaries, I hate compile things on windows with MinGW.... I'll release sources for sure, but I have to ask to original author of one library what is the license for the code he released. I can collaborate with ig0tik3d if he likes, I dont think that we need a fork for the miner... Q2C: GKSF2cqksVEAJEDhifPVrWkDtv9rvKrJZD Sounds very interesting  Will donate when will be released! |
|
|
|
any way, really fair launch！
Alright... And why do you think, that was a fair launch? Fair launch:
Since this is a new PoW, it is very hard to define a starting difficulty that avoids instamining. To overcome this and contribute to a fair launch, the first 576 blocks will have no reward and the next 576 will linearly increase and reach the full reward at block 1152, after 4 difficulty adjustments were performed. Besides avoiding instamining, this should allow time for those who want to compile their own clients.
Mining Okay, so you want to tell us something about a fair launch? Lets put the facts together:- The difficulty was insanely high from the start - There was no mining pool at the beginning => People have to solo mine this coin. But because of the extreme difficulty, you can't even solve a block with 50-100 CPUs in reasonable time (~48h). So, who is the winner of this coin? => Just a handful miner / botnet owner who have extreme capacity (> 500 CPUs) to solve the blocks. The do get the FULL reward, whereas miner with decent CPU capacity have nearly no chance to get somethink. This very unfair situation remains until there is a pool available. Until then, the few miner will squeeze everything out of that coin and this is called something like "INSTAMINING"! This launch was just like on most altcoins a huge fail. Either the difficulty had to be adjusted so that everyone has the chance to solve some blocks or you had to setup a pool for the launch. Let there be no misunderstanding: I am not asking that everyone should already mine >1k coins in the first few hours. But it's just not ok when a few people own almost all coins from the start because they are the only ones who have a decent chance to solve some blocks. I'm done with this. Pretty sad because I had some hope in this coin because of its innovative algo. But maybe it's interesting for the other people to know, what you mean with "fair launch". |
|
|
|
Fair launch:
Since this is a new PoW, it is very hard to define a starting difficulty that avoids instamining. To overcome this and contribute to a fair launch, the first 576 blocks will have no reward and the next 576 will linearly increase and reach the full reward at block 1152, after 4 difficulty adjustments were performed. Besides avoiding instamining, this should allow time for those who want to compile their own clients.
Mining Okay, so you want to tell us something about a fair launch? Lets put the facts together:- The difficulty was insanely high from the start - There was no mining pool at the beginning => People have to solo mine this coin. But because of the extreme difficulty, you can't even solve a block with 50-100 CPUs in reasonable time (~48h). So, who is the winner of this coin? => Just a handful miner / botnet owner who have extreme capacity (> 500 CPUs) to solve the blocks. The do get the FULL reward, whereas miner with decent CPU capacity have nearly no chance to get somethink. This very unfair situation remains until there is a pool available. Until then, the few miner will squeeze everything out of that coin and this is called something like "INSTAMINING"! This launch was just like on most altcoins a huge fail. Either the difficulty had to be adjusted so that everyone has the chance to solve some blocks or you had to setup a pool for the launch. Let there be no misunderstanding: I am not asking that everyone should already mine >1k coins in the first few hours. But it's just not ok when a few people own almost all coins from the start because they are the only ones who have a decent chance to solve some blocks. I'm done with this. Pretty sad because I had some hope in this coin because of its innovative algo. But maybe it's interesting for the other people to know, what you mean with "fair launch". |
|
|
|
Fair launch:
Since this is a new PoW, it is very hard to define a starting difficulty that avoids instamining. To overcome this and contribute to a fair launch, the first 576 blocks will have no reward and the next 576 will linearly increase and reach the full reward at block 1152, after 4 difficulty adjustments were performed. Besides avoiding instamining, this should allow time for those who want to compile their own clients.
Mining Okay, so you want to tell us something about a fair launch? Lets put the facts together:- The difficulty was insanely high from the start - There was no mining pool at the beginning => People have to solo mine this coin. But because of the extreme difficulty, you can't even solve a block with 50-100 CPUs in reasonable time (~48h). So, who is the winner of this coin? => Just a handful miner / botnet owner who have extreme capacity (> 500 CPUs) to solve the blocks. The do get the FULL reward, whereas miner with decent CPU capacity have nearly no chance to get somethink. This very unfair situation remains until there is a pool available. Until then, the few miner will squeeze everything out of that coin and this is called something like "INSTAMINING"! This launch was a pure fail. Either the difficulty had to be adjusted so that everyone has the chance to solve some blocks or you had to setup a pool for the launch. I'm done with this. Pretty sad because I had some hope in this coin because of its innovative algo. |
|
|
|
I'm also mining with about 50 cores from the beginning and got 0 blocks.  The difficulty is way too high and getting 0 reward with that computing power makes me think that this is nothing more than a huge waste of CPU time. I think, I'll quit this and switch back to a CPU coin with a steadier income and less price speculation. |
|
|
|
BTC out worked for me about an hour ago. Hope yours gets fixed soon...
Yes they are working right now, tried with 0.5 and it went straight through. The one from last night is still nowhere to be found though. Really wish I wouldn't depend on btc-e's worthless support at this point  I also wanted to withdraw 0.6 BTC about 10 hours ago. I got the mail, confirmed it and BTC-e said that everything is fine. But the amount was never committed to the blockchain. Waiting for several hours now and not knowing what's happening with my BTC. I hope, I didn't got scammed. |
|
|
|
are there any other pools? if ypool is the only one, someone's gonna try to fork the coin soon
There is another mining pool: |
|
|
|
You should add Metiscoin (MTC) with BTC as pair. Metiscoin ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=424517.0) is a pretty new cryptocoin that already has a huge community. MTC could be mined on the popular pool Ypool and reached there a hashrate of over 14 MH/s in just 4 days. The difficulty also jumped to 107774, but the people still believe in this coin and don't stop mining it. I think, there is something real big coming and whatever exchange platform will support it first, may make much money with it.  |
|
|
|
I am just curious as to the performance that people are getting when mining with ypool? I have been playing around with the source and compiler optimizations, but it would be nice to be able to compare my results with others. This particular screenshot is one running on a 3rd gen i7 with 7 threads and SSE2 optimizations turned on.  The performance seems to be legit. I also have a 3rd gen i7 and the hashrate with 7 threads and the hashrate is about 700 kH/s. |
|
|
|
"difficulty" : 107774.00215804  Yeah right, then you may also fuck all the other popular cryptcoins like BTC and LTC because of their high diff? The high difficulty is a sign that people like this coin and that they also believe in this coin. On Ypool, there is still a extremely high hashrate of 14 MH/s despite that difficulty. I mean, they just could say (like you) f*** this coin and instamine some copycat, but they are all still in. The value of a cryptocoin is based on exactly this trust in it. The train already left the station but it's not too late to get in. Exactly this trust is the secret on how a cryptocoin |
|
|
|
Hi, we are planning to realize a new cryptcoin trading platform with some very exciting new features for handling that large amount of new altcoins released every day. I can't go too much into detail, yet because we are still at the planning phase. Once we set up the alpha version, we'll feed you with more information about this exciting project! Though we have many skills in programming and administrating linux, we would want to know your opinions on some security relevant topics. Our main goal is to keep the whole exchange platform and especially the wallets safe. To realize our idea, it is very important to prevent any interference between the wallets on the server. We must make sure to run the wallets within a sandboxed or virtualized environment because there is the possibility that one wallet attacks the other ones or the server by executing custom code. Therefore, we thought about sandboxing or virtualizing mehtods that need to fulfill these requirements: - - Very high level of security
- - High performance and scalability
Our current ideas are the following: - 1 - Run the wallets in a virtualized environment. This well need a dedicated OpenVZ or KVM instance for each wallet running on the sever. Though this would probably allow the maximum level of security and a good scalability, we have concerns about performance issues. How much CPU and RAM resources does a wallet, that is used for a trading platform, need?
- 2 - Using sudo, chroot or systrace to sandbox the wallets. While this solution would be the most performant, I have some concerns about the level of security. Is it possible to escape from a sandbox when you have the possibility to execute custom code on the server?
I would be pleased to hear your opinions about our two ideas and of course I would also like to hear new ideas on how to solve this problem. Thank you in advance and regards! :-) |
|
|
|
The GigaWatt optimization is now for win64zip version - http://sdrv.ms/1fcpSAE7zip version - http://sdrv.ms/1fcpXEs20-25% improvement in hash speed compared to the original minerSoon the 32-bit version and the sorce code Thank you very much! This miner really speeds up mining MTC! :-) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
