Guys, have you heard about Vanig loyalty program for those who use their tokens? It is based on amount and frequency of token purchases and they talk there about some customer statuses (Silver, Gold, Platinum). I'd like to know more about this feature.
No, I have not heard of it yet. that sounds very interesting. I suppose the more you buy and pay with tokens, the higher you can go up in the ranking? is it like that? Then my wife is already after a month Platimum-Member :-) |
|
|
|
it's very important that unsold tokens are burned, not doing so just brings risks with it
Risk of which the investors share equal or even more of the ratio. However, I think this has been talked about before and burning was the conclusion of it. Yes, I also heard that they will burn unsold tokens. This is really needed if you want to growth of tokens. As far as i know they have also burned a lot of tokens right now and they have even raised the price per token from $2 to $4 for the 3 day sale. Where did you get this information from? There are still $ 2 / tokens left on the homepage, and I do not think they simply double the price for the 3-day sale. Maybe you are confusing something, because there are predictions that the token might be worth $ 4 after the tokenburn when it's listed on an exchange |
|
|
|
|
I'm still wondering if an RFID chip will be built into each package for tracking. How expensive is such a chip, is it really profitable? Or will we pay extra for it?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, the last 40h of the ICO have already begun. Somehow this ICO passed quickly. I am no longer used to an ICO ending on the scheduled date. Meanwhile, the dates are repeatedly postponed. But I am glad that Bittwatt does not join in, that the ICO ends on the weekend and is already listed on an Exchange on Monday
|
|
|
|
|
very interesting, Cryptocean has 3 cap levels: lightcap: 3mio, softcap: 5mio, hardcap: 10mio
and as I'm seeing, there's a long pause between public-pre-ico and main-ico (15.6. - 1.9.). do you think that in the summer fewer people would participate in an ICO? Fall is sure to be a good time for a public sale
|
|
|
|
have you already seen who is in the Superbloom team as an advisor? Guy & Galia Benartzi, co-founders of Bancor
So much better advisors you can not choose :-)
Wow, I am glad to hear that. I know that Bancor. It's very successful project. And now those people are working here as a adviser. Thats a good one. When did this get announced? Or is it old news? I remember it seeing this news already as well as new information. Nevertheless, Superbloom is definitely glowing a lot. I do not know if it's old or new news. I have browsed something on the homepage and found this PDF, then the two are listed as an advisor https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/3827911/TokenSaleDocuments2018/SuperbloomSummary_V1_09.pdf |
|
|
|
The goal for Stage 1 is 2000 Ethereum right ? What will happen if they don't reach that ? Will they just continue with Stage 2, because the hardcap is more than 2000 ETH.
I'm fairly certain that Bitfence will continue with Stage 2 of their token sale, they might even extend the token sale or reduce their hard cap total if they feel like they can set a more realistic target. I think problem is with the gap between softcap and hardcap. People might be thinking , Ifroject can start with small amount then why they need this big money. In my opinion, BitFence should change this hardcap. Well, I think it's a good thing - soft cap is nice and low so the project will go ahead no matter what; shows they have a good ambition. I'm not fussed about the big hard cap, the more money they have the easier it will be to deploy and get the project to the next stage Yeah Bitfence's hard cap in USD is $50,000,000 this is a very high figure and it is a lot higher than the soft cap of $3,000,000. It's nice to have big goals but I think the team needs to be realistic, I would revise the hard cap total and maybe lower it to a more achievable figure. If they said goal is 2000 ETH then how they will calculate this softcap amount. Because of ETH price is not a stable. Today it is hit low 575. Then how they will decide it their 3,000,000 amount USD? I agree with you, i think they should just stick to the hardcap based on ethet or rather use a fixed eth value to calculate the hardcap. I think they must have made their estimates based on a lower ETH price so that even the fluctuations in price will not affect them. Just my thought though. I Mean some other projects do similar statement of hardcap on ETH and they survive. So there must be a way round it. Agree. But how estimated price. I mean if $ 3,000,000 they need for soft cap as we know ETH continuously falling then how they will reach their target? I mean if ETH hit again 500$ then how they will calculate amount with 2000 ETH goals? I was already irritated from the beginning that they specify soft- and hardcap in Fiat, but everywhere else only ETH specify. We should really discuss this once in the telegram channel with the devs I believe they have the price of ETH pegged to 1 ETH = $600 USD hence why it is still 1 ETH = 6000 HNY tokens. True an admin talked about it in their telegram today when he said the price is pegged in dollar but 1eth = 6000 HNY in the website still despite the fluctuations of Ether, I didn't think I this direction, at least it's an advantage getting some token now So you get the 6000 HNY now a lot cheaper than a week ago. You just have to put fiat in ETH and buy HNY. Thus, the price loss of recent days has a positive side |
|
|
|
Yesterday the team member of Vanig Brett was in telegram channel for sometime and answering some of the questions from the telegram members. I think team should do this kind of interactions frequently to address lots of questions that are coming up about the project.
Heard about that but unfortunately, I wasn't online at that time. I hope they will repeat something like this in the future. The bigger the community grows, the more new questions could pop up. the good thing about the telegram channel is that you can read everything later. Just scroll up, everything is still there Just scrolling and see that there is a lot more going on lately, I like that |
|
|
|
|
what do you think, now that more and more power plants have been announced, is the Valuation Estimator still correct? Is not it rather the case that the annual income increases with each additional power plant? If so, then the team should quickly update the calculator before the 3-day-sale starts
|
|
|
|
Now I actually wished most project goes the way of BWT lol, raising a record $10.8 million in five days is simply huge and coming out with this promo will cause a rush in coss exchange, hope coss.io exchange can carry large amount of users, I think I would be buying some more BWT myself  I've just got some ETH in a wallet, and I'm definitely going to take part in the promo campaign. Think I have a good chance to get some free tokens and at coss I've been registered for a long time, so I can start right there |
|
|
|
vanig like most e-commerce that provides ease of shopping online,
but one thing that gives advantages, the use of blockchain technology that provides a direct path between sellers and buyers
and ease of payment transactions using cryptocurrency
Yeah they also use machine learning and IoT to provide interesting solutions to e-commerce platform, it gonna make shopping online very very fascinating and interesting. and probably then vanig knows us better then we do ourselves and offers us every day products that we did not know we wanted them :-) I have to hide my wife's credit card |
|
|
|
Wonach sortiert ihr die Bountys? Also aus welchem Grund entscheidet ihr euch für eine Bounty?
Usercase? Verteilung? Regeln? Zukunftsträchtiges ICO? Anzahl der Teilnehmer?
Wenn ich mir nämlich so einige Signaturen angucke, kann ich da teilweise keine Zukunft des ICO sehen.
Also bei mir ist zunächst wichtig, dass die Idee hinter dem ICO auch im Markt bestehen kann. Dann die Regeln. Teilnehmeranzahl und die Verteilung hält sich ziemlich die Waage.
Mittlerweile achte ich noch zusätzlich, wer der Bountymanager und das Feedback der Gemeinde ist. Das ist aber oft nicht so leicht herauszufinden.
Ach ja, und natürlich was die anderen für eine SIgnatur tragen und die Rückmeldungen hier im Thread
Ich achte schon sehr darauf, dass das Projekt auch eine Zukunft hat. Die Bountytokens lasse ich immer länger liegen und reifen:-) nur einmal habe ich ganz spontan entschieden ohne viel Recherche, aber da war die Belohnung einfach zu hoch und die Teilnehmerzahl limitiert (Taklimakan) Gestern hätte ich die Activity-Stufe zum Sr. Member überschritten, dank der Merits werde ich das wohl erst in 5 Jahren schaffen. Finde das System an und für sich ja nicht schlecht, aber die notwendige Anzahl ist einfach zu hoch |
|
|
|
The goal for Stage 1 is 2000 Ethereum right ? What will happen if they don't reach that ? Will they just continue with Stage 2, because the hardcap is more than 2000 ETH.
I'm fairly certain that Bitfence will continue with Stage 2 of their token sale, they might even extend the token sale or reduce their hard cap total if they feel like they can set a more realistic target. I think problem is with the gap between softcap and hardcap. People might be thinking , Ifroject can start with small amount then why they need this big money. In my opinion, BitFence should change this hardcap. Well, I think it's a good thing - soft cap is nice and low so the project will go ahead no matter what; shows they have a good ambition. I'm not fussed about the big hard cap, the more money they have the easier it will be to deploy and get the project to the next stage Yeah Bitfence's hard cap in USD is $50,000,000 this is a very high figure and it is a lot higher than the soft cap of $3,000,000. It's nice to have big goals but I think the team needs to be realistic, I would revise the hard cap total and maybe lower it to a more achievable figure. If they said goal is 2000 ETH then how they will calculate this softcap amount. Because of ETH price is not a stable. Today it is hit low 575. Then how they will decide it their 3,000,000 amount USD? I agree with you, i think they should just stick to the hardcap based on ethet or rather use a fixed eth value to calculate the hardcap. I think they must have made their estimates based on a lower ETH price so that even the fluctuations in price will not affect them. Just my thought though. I Mean some other projects do similar statement of hardcap on ETH and they survive. So there must be a way round it. Agree. But how estimated price. I mean if $ 3,000,000 they need for soft cap as we know ETH continuously falling then how they will reach their target? I mean if ETH hit again 500$ then how they will calculate amount with 2000 ETH goals? I was already irritated from the beginning that they specify soft- and hardcap in Fiat, but everywhere else only ETH specify. We should really discuss this once in the telegram channel with the devs |
|
|
|
Thanks for highlighting here. But just want to ask what is the plastic card? After that I like 1 benefits of Cryptocean "Payments and transfers via mobile, desk top and internet Apps". This is good thing in their project. I think it's like a credit card, except that you can choose to pay with cryptocurrencies or Fiat. An interesting concept, I definitely have to take a closer look |
|
|
|
|
have you already seen who is in the Superbloom team as an advisor? Guy & Galia Benartzi, co-founders of Bancor
So much better advisors you can not choose :-)
|
|
|
|
very interesting interview. I have not looked at everything yet, but I have noticed something important, if I understand him correctly, about 145mio tokens are to be burned, which is almost half of all tokens. and because of that they plan to increase the value of the tokens when listing $ 2 to approximately $ 4. That would be amazing! Can someone confirm that, did I understand that correctly? The token to be utilizing when burning takes place would be compliant with the energy produced. From what you are saying (I did not get to see the live steam yet tbh) burning is guaranteed to take place now right? I mean they raised 42 mil and the hard cap is at 72 mil. ICO hasn't come to an end yet, remember they are having a Pre-listing sales for three day starting on 1st of June to 3rd of June more tokens will be sold depending on how the sales go token burn will be the next step if tokens remaining after the sales. That would be great. By burning unsold tokens will increase value of tokens. This procedure really is profitable for tokens holders. A great incentive on investing in 4NEW is the point above. If all tokens sell - well that's really good news, and if they don't - investors will still be happy due to the coin burn resulting in a instant coin boost per token which is obviously good news for investors The project may actually not hit the hardcap to succeed, to me they've already started, i think they can work their way up from there, start small and grow big, the good thing is that, 4NEW produces something that the industry needs and something we all use everyday which is power, so the guarantee of them making sales is a sure thing It's very unlikely that they will reach the hardcap of 75m. But that's not an issue at all. They raised more than 40 million, already a lot more than their softcap was. So they have already a great amount of money to work with and there is still the 3-day-sale to come. yes, I also think that the hardcap is out of reach. But I can well imagine that they exceed the 50mio at 3-day-sale. Soon we will know more :-) |
|
|
|
|
this project is very reminiscent of Bitshares (another decentralized Exchange)
Are you building your Exchange on their platform? the similarities are very striking
|
|
|
|
We have just published a wrap-up post for the month of may do check it out to know everything that's being going down at vanig! The title should be "What a May We Had!" ... Slight grammatical error on the title but the rest of the article was a good read, I like how Vanig really take their communications seriously and they want to make sure their investors are kept updated on all developments. Can't wait for the MVP release!! It would interesting to get the feedback their partners gave on the current version of the system. I was informed that there are early members checking it out. Any feedback on that experience as of yet? I don't think there is of yet because am yet to see/come across any. I believe the team will make a post of the when they are ready for public release. For now, we wait. That's right, we will publish an update discussing the feedback and further developments for the MVP in near future. In the meantime, we have this video update from Brett Brodbeck our VP Investor Relations https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVbdrpt4WWYThanks for this video. I've seen a few more MVP screenshots. And what does he tell? there will be more videos about the progress of the platform in the future? With more detailed information about the MVP? Great! Great video and he is promising more video updates from now on and on a regular basis. This kind of vital communication with the community is essential. Other projects should take Vanig as an example when it comes to that. Do you know that the vice president of vanig was online live at the telegram group chat attending to users questions. I think that was super cool and a powerful step by vanig. Yes, I've heard of it. Also wanted to get into the channel, but yesterday was a stressful day. Will I watch the channel today, it was certainly many interesting things discussed |
|
|
|
Cool that the project is working towards more partnerships with energy companies. Hope for good news.
I love the fact that they are not trying to make their project an "island of one tree". They realize the need to assistance and decided to go for it. Very nice to see Bittwatt working towards getting more partnerships and I really do hope they can implement a successful project which will benefit the whole world in terms of energy consumption I am expecting one more huge partnership news to close the ICO with a bang. Listing would be a firework irrespective of market conditions. How much tokens are sold out till now? Anybody know about it? I've heard rumors about a big partnership some time ago. If they want to announce them during the ICO, then they should hurry, in 3 days the sale is over. And since the listing already planned for 28.5., they will probably not extend the ICO If they decide to release the information about this partnership only after the ICO is over, I am sure all the investors would be happy. Because that could cause a rush to the exchange where people who missed the ICO want to hop on the train. Of course that's right, I have not had that thought yet. So actually it would be better, they announce it only after the ICO. Then there are fewer tokens in circulation and the value at the exchanges will rise quickly :-) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
