Coinshift,
There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
Well I guess that Coinshift no longer supports his stuff since there is no real contact address for his site and no response here... time to switch pools then since he is not supporting his site. |
|
|
|
Coinshift,
There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
Well I guess that Coinshift no longer supports his stuff since there is no real contact address for his site and no response here... |
|
|
|
|
Coinshift,
There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
|
|
|
|
1: Clevermining.com "Pool 0 is issuing work for an old block: " When it does this, the miners sit idle can take up to 5 minutes each old block.
Could somebody put more details on this? We are not mining on any old blocks for sure. Maybe your miner considers a block as old if we switch back to a previously mined coin? Consider this: 1) We are mining block X of coin A. 2) Coin B just lowered difficulty and we switched to coin B as it became more profitable and we're mining block Y. 3) We mined block Y of coin B and its difficulty rose again so it stopped being profitable. 4) We switch again to coin A, but since it didn't have any blocks found in the meantime, we are mining on the same block again, so we try to hash again block X. Could some mining software thing that this is an old block just because it was working on it previously, then switched to another block and then switched to the same previous block again? In single-coin mining this scenario (getting again a previously mined block) means that the pool sends an old block. But in coin-switching this is perfectly valid and your miner should continue mining on the block X without issues. Is there a way to tell the mining software to ignore this error? |
|
|
|
I am using Minera with BFGMiner but I have noticed that BFGMiner is not letting me hash at full speed. I only can get 70% of the throughput before getting hardware errors.
Additionally, I have noticed that BFGMiner taking up CPU load up to 3.5 I think there may be a bottleneck somewhere within BFGMiner that is causing this excessive CPU usage.
My Miners are 2 x Zeus Lightning X6. I should be able to hit 84 MHs with both units... as per CGMiner.
Unfortunately we do not have access to this specific hardware to test. Can you test on a PC by chance? I am currently running the CGMiner 3.1.1 with Zeus support from Zeusminers on an EeePC running Windows XP and it is working fine... I will try with BFGMiner once I download it for Windows. |
|
|
|
hi,
only a short question.
I have multiple zeus miners (blizz/hurricane/thunder) on usb-hub connected @raspberry with minera. working all fine, no problems here.
Question: How can I set clockrate/chipcounts for each miner?
I can set it via --zeus-clock 328 but this will work then on all, not what I want so far. --zeus-chips etc.
I saw something like --set zus@/dev/ttyUSB0:clock but this is not working.
Here are the ones I figured out... CGMiner DMAXL --scrypt --zeus-options "A402XXXX,256,245;A402XXXY,256,200" --zeus-nocheck-golden Don't forget the Quotes or it will not work. BGMiner --scrypt -S zeusminer:all --set zeusminer@A402XXXX:clock=245 --set zeusminer@A402XXXY:clock=200 --set zeusminer:chips=256 If you want to get the serial number from the unit. start up in BFGMiner mode. via terminal login to console and type screen -r then hit M to manage devices the first device will be listed with the serial number on it. to switch processors, press / then type the next location (for Lightning X6. then next unit is at 2048.) for BFGMiner to target and set different chips and clocks, do as follows: --set devicename@serialnumber:setting=value
--set zeusminer@A402XXXX:clock=245
--set zeusminer@A402XXXX:chips=256
remember to add each set for each miner you have. Using the Serial Number is better since USBTTYs can change numbers and can toast your miners. |
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
I am using Minera with BFGMiner but I have noticed that BFGMiner is not letting me hash at full speed. I only can get 70% of the throughput before getting hardware errors.
Additionally, I have noticed that BFGMiner taking up CPU load up to 3.5 I think there may be a bottleneck somewhere within BFGMiner that is causing this excessive CPU usage.
My Miners are 2 x Zeus Lightning X6. I should be able to hit 84 MHs with both units... as per CGMiner.
Here are some stats
top - 17:40:15 up 24 min, 2 users, load average: 1.42, 1.91, 1.93
Tasks: 91 total, 2 running, 89 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 77.7 us, 5.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 0.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 16.6 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem: 447996 total, 224060 used, 223936 free, 21644 buffers
KiB Swap: 102396 total, 0 used, 102396 free, 126008 cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2999 minera 20 0 184m 10m 3316 R 91.5 2.5 15:13.96 bfgminer
3397 minera 20 0 4688 1448 1028 R 1.9 0.3 0:11.55 top
2502 root 20 0 24460 7444 2344 S 1.0 1.7 0:08.97 wicd
3506 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 1.0 0.0 0:01.60 kworker/u2:0
2833 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.6 0.0 0:09.48 kworker/u2:3
18 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:02.93 kworker/0:1
2132 messageb 20 0 3312 1248 880 S 0.3 0.3 0:04.05 dbus-daemon
2540 root 20 0 14992 8040 3984 S 0.3 1.8 0:06.25 wicd-monitor
3348 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:04.44 kworker/u2:2
3376 minera 20 0 9260 1460 872 S 0.3 0.3 0:01.90 sshd
1 root 20 0 2148 720 616 S 0.0 0.2 0:02.05 init
2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd
$ uname -a
Linux minera 3.12.22+ #691 PREEMPT Wed Jun 18 18:29:58 BST 2014 armv6l GNU/Linux
bfgminer version 4.6.0-6-g8f60a5f - Started: [2014-08-18 17:18:10] - [ 0 days 00:24:07]
[M]anage devices [P]ool management ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]uit
Pool 0: ...t.xxxxxxxxx.com Diff:139m +Strtm LU:[17:41:29] User:xxxxxx
Block: ...f9b7ad0d #342059 Diff:1.14k ( 8.19G) Started: [17:40:39]
ST:0 F:0 NB:72 AS:0 BW:[ 49/ 37 B/s] E:0.31 I: 2.06 BTC/hr BS:58
0 | 11.69/67.84/56.16Mh/s | A:342 R:13+0(6.5%) HW:17/3.4%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZUS 0: | 36.36/34.36/26.60Mh/s | A:168 R: 3+0(3.6%) HW: 8/3.5%
ZUS 1: | 36.63/33.36/29.46Mh/s | A:174 R:10+0(9.0%) HW: 9/3.3%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-08-18 17:38:54] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:39:04] Network difficulty changed to 75 (542.8M)
[2014-08-18 17:39:04] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:39:08] Accepted 0000c36d ZUS 1aah pool 0 Diff 1/139m
[2014-08-18 17:39:26] Accepted 00020517 ZUS 0bsa pool 0 Diff 495m/139m
[2014-08-18 17:39:29] Network difficulty changed to 71 (512.4M)
[2014-08-18 17:39:29] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:39:54] Accepted 0004bac5 ZUS 1crx pool 0 Diff 211m/139m
[2014-08-18 17:40:04] Network difficulty changed to 777 ( 5.57G)
[2014-08-18 17:40:04] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:40:18] Network difficulty changed to 864 ( 6.19G)
[2014-08-18 17:40:18] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:40:18] Rejected 00031339 ZUS 1bqj pool 0 Diff 325m/139m (Job 'd0d' not found)
[2014-08-18 17:40:21] Accepted 000019cc ZUS 1bms pool 0 Diff 9/139m
[2014-08-18 17:40:29] Network difficulty changed to 943 ( 6.75G)
[2014-08-18 17:40:29] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:40:32] Accepted 0000b5f3 ZUS 1atj pool 0 Diff 1/139m
[2014-08-18 17:40:39] Network difficulty changed to 1.05k ( 7.51G)
[2014-08-18 17:40:39] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:40:39] Network difficulty changed to 1.14k ( 8.19G)
[2014-08-18 17:40:39] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-08-18 17:40:40] Accepted 0002b5e3 ZUS 0bba pool 0 Diff 368m/139m
[2014-08-18 17:40:44] Accepted 00009c2b ZUS 0bln pool 0 Diff 1/139m
[2014-08-18 17:40:57] Accepted 00062f64 ZUS 0anj pool 0 Diff 161m/139m
[2014-08-18 17:40:57] Accepted 0004773b ZUS 0cuz pool 0 Diff 223m/139m
[2014-08-18 17:41:04] Pool 0 is issuing work for an old block: 14c35242631263d87ffc1fdcd26bd74046e5ddc2
f7f531d56aab5a4aeb9f3fab
|
|
|
|
Dont you reckon it's >suchmoon< ?
Huh? Why in the world would I own 90 GH/s of Scrypt hardware? My guess.... Hong Kong scrypt mining hardware firm with loads of excessive miners sitting idle in the shop and are mining until orders are coming in for them. Only they can have 200-300+ hardware on hand for testing each day and let it hash daily (confirming unit works) and collect "idle time" coins to help pay for the employees... $25k+ per day is a good income for the business. |
|
|
|
Anybody else showing lower hashrate on Clevermining than on their miners? My miners show an average hash rate of about 7.2 Mh/s with only about 1% rejected shares, but Clevermining is only showing an average hashrate of 4.2 Mh/s.
I'm running 20 Gridseed 300+ Kh/s miners at 850 Mhz off of an ASUS EeePC laptop (I couldn't get my Raspberry Pi to run stably).
To what my controller says (mining software) and Clever, I typically see about 20-15% variance. I typically focus on the 24 averages. This is the 24 hour average. I haven't had any problems with Clevermining previously. Yes I have seen lower mining due to the following issues: 1: Clevermining.com "Pool 0 is issuing work for an old block: " When it does this, the miners sit idle can take up to 5 minutes each old block. 2: Hiding block content from us as well. I was looking for a point of contact to report these problems but there is no address where we can inform them of this bad issue. Basically my miners are performing 20-30% lower than they should be. Clevermining.com can you please look into the problems above?Clevermining.com admins... can you respond on this issue? Anyone can help on this issue about getting old blocks on mining and making the miners go idle? |
|
|
|
Anybody else showing lower hashrate on Clevermining than on their miners? My miners show an average hash rate of about 7.2 Mh/s with only about 1% rejected shares, but Clevermining is only showing an average hashrate of 4.2 Mh/s.
I'm running 20 Gridseed 300+ Kh/s miners at 850 Mhz off of an ASUS EeePC laptop (I couldn't get my Raspberry Pi to run stably).
To what my controller says (mining software) and Clever, I typically see about 20-15% variance. I typically focus on the 24 averages. This is the 24 hour average. I haven't had any problems with Clevermining previously. Yes I have seen lower mining due to the following issues: 1: Clevermining.com "Pool 0 is issuing work for an old block: " When it does this, the miners sit idle can take up to 5 minutes each old block. 2: Hiding block content from us as well. I was looking for a point of contact to report these problems but there is no address where we can inform them of this bad issue. Basically my miners are performing 20-30% lower than they should be. Clevermining.com can you please look into the problems above?Clevermining.com admins... can you respond on this issue? |
|
|
|
How to lower reject in this pool.I got only 5-10% rejects on trademybit or ipominer  Ensure that you have QUEUE set to 0 in BFGMINER or CGMINER. |
|
|
|
Anybody else showing lower hashrate on Clevermining than on their miners? My miners show an average hash rate of about 7.2 Mh/s with only about 1% rejected shares, but Clevermining is only showing an average hashrate of 4.2 Mh/s.
I'm running 20 Gridseed 300+ Kh/s miners at 850 Mhz off of an ASUS EeePC laptop (I couldn't get my Raspberry Pi to run stably).
To what my controller says (mining software) and Clever, I typically see about 20-15% variance. I typically focus on the 24 averages. This is the 24 hour average. I haven't had any problems with Clevermining previously. Yes I have seen lower mining due to the following issues: 1: Clevermining.com "Pool 0 is issuing work for an old block: " When it does this, the miners sit idle can take up to 5 minutes each old block. 2: Hiding block content from us as well. I was looking for a point of contact to report these problems but there is no address where we can inform them of this bad issue. Basically my miners are performing 20-30% lower than they should be. Clevermining.com can you please look into the problems above? |
|
|
|
That's because there no Alyssa Trusten on the internet except for the one that works at AMT. There's definitely a connection between AMT and Long & Foster, with a Zipkin working there, and post of the AMT's offices being leased from them. There's an Alyssa at L&F, and an Cohen and a Brown. Alyssa just changed her last name.
More Cock and Bull from this guy... Dude... just stop. you are wasting HD space, people's time and are unproductive. AMT, Honestly, I would recommend abandoning this Thread and only continue posting on your forum only. On Page 1 here, edit the 1st message and add your Forum link there to ensure all customers can discuss on your forums there. Offer Weekly updates with your progress. |
|
|
|
Wow, this personal attack is now starting to get libelous. You are spreading rumors on something that is incorrect. You are stating that AMT is vacating the office on April 1st when the article states that 355D has a lease coming up on April 1st. AMT is in Building E1. It shows how this person only has time to attack others. What comes from this guy's mouth is losing value day by day... |
|
|
|
In AMT's defense, the 80GH miner is great. It uses 140W at the wall. I did remove it from the case, and unplugged the case fan, which i'm sure saves at least 10-20W.
So thats only about double what they promise on their website. Yeah. I did post that, it just wasn't in the video. It draws between 140 and 170, depending on how you tweak the settings. My 180 unit is pulling 175w at the wall. I had to change my PSU as the PSU that came with it died already. Had a spare Corsair AX860i around and set that puppy up. My next goal is to make a custom cage with a 3D printer. |
|
|
|
i genuine think AMT will deliver. I think they under estimated the whole thing and trying to dig out. Its not a good place to be in for them or us.
Its easy to be negative here but try being supportive i believe it can go alone way.
Good luck to anyone who files a suite. All they have to do is deliver and you have no case all that time wasted.
AMT did deliver to me... a little late (27 days) but they did deliver my units. Those who are considering filing a lawsuit, before even considering filing one, have you asked AMT to send your order unassembled? It may get your product faster. Reach out to AMT and see if they can send it out to you unassembled so you can assemble it. Otherwise, wait patiently and they will send your unit. AMT is WAY BETTER than BFL in delivering... Trust me, you can count on a great product from them. As for the Trolls, I tried to buy my first BFL Miner... Never will I deal with BFL again. AMT delivered within 2 months of my order (my order was in the 800s). Now that they have a huge influx of new orders, it will take longer but hang in there... it is way better with AMT to wait here than to get a BFL (Big Fucking Lie) promise to deliver in 3 months and took 1-1.5 years to deliver for most. Once I have enough BTC to get the 3.2Th/s miner, my order is going in. I will request them to ship it unassembled so I can set it up myself. One Suggestion for AMT, use CORSAIR AXi or AX series power supplies. You can run full tilt with these power supplies without it dying out on you. Just spoke with AMT and they are busy trying to get their orders out. It takes time to test each board and ensure it passes with flying colors. Testing time is what delays the orders and they need to confirm the equipment is shipped out functional.
For those who would like to build their own units, next time when you place an order, in the comments/shipping field, post a comment that you would like to have the unit come in pieces so that you can assemble it. It may be quicker to receive it that way.
Where you informed how many went out already?? It seems they have been doing same thing for a last month or so Seems another lie dude  either miner is not working or they are hashing with customer units Fell free to choose what suits you best dear amt customers  Guys, would you rather receiving a product that is 100% functional or a product that is only 80% functional? For those who wants to receive a product that is only 80% functional, call AMT ask them to ship your product as is and waive your right to a 100% functional product. Then you will need to deal with upgrading the unit to make it work 100%. In order to test the unit to make sure they are working, they need to HASH something. Look, they got a product last month with no programming for it prior to the final product. You expect that software programming can be resolved overnight? If you think so, dedicate some of your programming skill time and help them fix the bugs. Otherwise, be patient as they work out the bugs to get it working with their current product launch. Yelling and screaming about lies (when it is clearly not the case; just the answer you don't want to hear) that AMT is hashing over to make more money is inevitable. They need a real life test medium. Hashing with current hardware is a necessity. Also, in the type of office that AMT is at, they also have a limited power supply. either 100-200 AMPs. Therefore, they can not be hashing crazy or they will blow fuses. IDEA FOR THOSE TROLLS WHO CALLS AMT LIARSFor those who feel they are hashing for themselves, here is a thought. SETUP a User at CEX.IO or BTCGUILD.COM and POLITELY ASK AMT to use this user ID for your Unit to test with. I am quite sure they would be more than happy to program your unit with YOUR Mining information. All you need to do is request it. |
|
|
|
|
Did you smell something burning?
Did you buy a cheap motherboard?
Did you burn out your Motherboard?
Did you create a Powered Riser to bypass the motherboard power?
Did you check your Power connectors on the GPUs are properly pushed in?
THere are many factors that can cause this... you just need to find them.
|
|
|
|
Also, I was going to post in the AMT site forum, but can't seem to find it. I could have sworn there was supposed to be one today.
Damn, there's something new. AMT not updating their site/user portal/news... Just spoke with AMT and they are busy trying to get their orders out. It takes time to test each board and ensure it passes with flying colors. Testing time is what delays the orders and they need to confirm the equipment is shipped out functional. For those who would like to build their own units, next time when you place an order, in the comments/shipping field, post a comment that you would like to have the unit come in pieces so that you can assemble it. It may be quicker to receive it that way. |
|
|
|
|
I think that the POS Rounds may be too quick and are causing the out of sync issues. Is there any way to program the PoS to hit a minimum of 2 minute blocks? This will help stabilize the coin better and any PoS that hits under 120 seconds from the last block is immediately rejected to avoid desyncing issues.
I have seen POS hit 3-4 times in a minute so this may be our issues we are experiencing. The COL Wallet needs a hard fork, block all previous versions and program the POS to reject all POS hits under 120 seconds.
If the wallet hit a POS in under 120 seconds, it should then retry the POS block again in (120 - block time hit) while keeping the original Nonce hit time to gauge all other POS Hits and see who was first...
there would be lots of POS competition but at least it gives 1 minute for POS block to validate across the world.
Any new POS validation after the 1 minute mark will be auto rejected to give 1 minute buffer time to update the rest of the world as well.
Hope this idea helps.
|
|
|
|
MBlackout: Sorry bud but I'm not going to become an AMT Fanboy because you simply ask me to. I can assure you there are more people out there that would prefer clear concise updates from AMT along with pictures of what they will be getting and accurate timelines.
AMT_Miners: I am not going to waste your time on the phone so you can update me with details. Want I am after are FACTS from you posted HERE, so everyone that has pre-ordered and has their mortgage payments on the line, can read them as well.
Doesn't that make sense? Update the community here with timely DETAILED posts, so you don't have a few dozen people calling your team so you can answer the same questions over and over?
Not everyone has access to travel to Pennsylvania and visit your office. I'm sure you have money from people all over the country.
You would think that since you:
1. Sell the product via your Website ONLINE
2. Take money ONLINE (wire transfers & bitcoins BTC ONLY)
3. Give updates to the investing community ONLINE
4. Deal in BITCOIN MINING (which is based ONLINE)
You would be able to recognize that all of this information should be ONLINE and accessible by the user base.
It's 2014 and having to call in to talk to someone over the phone about hashing details and power consumption shouldn't be necessary.
All I am asking for is clear concise updates in a timely manner with SUBSTANCE. This means better photos and more details about what to expect in terms of parts/etc. The time spent to update the community will save your team loads of lost time explaining these details to customers over the phone.
I look forward to new detailed photos this week of the first few units assembled (this includes the internal and external parts along with mining screenshots).
Thanks for the response.
Mr. Piklo, Let me go ahead and answer your questions as best as possible. 1. Thanks for not calling and speaking to one of our representatives that can further assist you. I apologize but we dont give all of our specific information to random people off the street that we dont know on some forum. For all we know, you could be 12 years old. 2. I'm sorry that you cannot travel to Pennsylvania, we have the intention to expand our operation in the future but for now our humble office outside Philadelphia is the best we can do. 3. The reason there are no updates is because what we do is make a product as fast as possible, and the usual 1-2 year period to bring a product to market doesn't really apply in this situation. We know what works and what doesnt, plans are made in this industry and situations like heat control are no joke. Sometimes things need to be reworked before getting it right because no one has gotten it 100% right thus far and no one gets it right on the first/second or even third try. We also need to meet ISO and UL standards. If you'd like to chance your money with some of the other companies which claim to have a working Terrahash miner, or are based out of Pakistan or Russia, Ukraine or one of those countries please do. I'm sure they will give lots of technical information and specifications of machines that don't really exist and never will. I can vouch for AMT on this... They are trying to get their products out as fast as possible. They know they would like to ship their miners even if their proper boxes are still being built in China. So be patient and wait for your deadline... After the deadline, it will be shipped to them. Pre-Orders are no longer in the wait. Product is being shipped. It takes time to build your product when other orders are in front of yours. I had waited patiently and eventually they had shipped my product. They are no KnCMiner (yet!) with shipping on time but Most Definitely they are not BFL. BFL had me tagged for a long time until I waited over 110 days for my product... did not get anything from BFL and reversed my charges on my CC. I was NEVER, EVER able to get any answers from BFL. At least with AMT, they did respond eventually (if you were swarmed with 1000+ emails a day, could you read and respond to all of them in the same day?) Those who are thinking about refunds... my recommendation is wait patiently or call them weekly for an update... Give them some breathing room so they can build their products. For AMT: I would recommend adding 3 more people to your staff (Daily rotations of 2 handling phone calls and emails when not on phone and 3rd person strictly with email (no phone). This way, they can clean up the sales mailboxes and alleviate the A.D.D. for the countless emails available. Can be minimum wage people handling the emails but it will get cleaned up. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
