The transactions will never confirm.
Yes the payout transactions to people might never confirm. They depend on invalid transactions that you tricked blockexplorers to display.
Yes the payout transactions do depend on "non-ordinary" transactions, but those are no way near invalid.Non-standard? Yes to some miners and nodes. |
|
|
|
There is no specific amount of time that a node is required to remember your transaction. Some might drop it within a few hours, others might wait a day, some nodes might remember your transaction for a week.
Actually in Bitcoin core 0.12 the "-mempoolexpiry" parameter was introduced which is set to 72 hours by default. So majority of 0.12 users will drop the transaction after 72 hours. Though anyone can re-broadcast the transaction so I can't see the use of this parameter. |
|
|
|
And macbook-air didn't do shit, he just waited until someone else confirms the TX and then shot his message  What a turn off, I will not help here ever again. How could you have possibly helped?He was the only one who could (and other people who has access to his pool's pushing service). |
|
|
|
Am I ignored, blocked or banned? Do you guys see my posts, please confirm if so?
Even though you have a sig ad, you've always given good advice, so you are not on my ignore list. Perhaps you are on jackson99999's ignore list for some reason. I've quoted your post so that he hopefully will see it. I edited my post before I've seen these.I am not getting paid for my signature at least for way over a year now.I guess I make an impression of a paid advertiser at first sight.But I had not seen any person with the same signature as mine even in the gambling section. Also I should mention that it is not confirmed that Quckseller has access to f2pool's pushing service it's just my statement.And I also see that macbook-air is now online so jackson better hurry if he wants his transaction confirmed. |
|
|
|
yes everything is very messed up so i guess i need to pay a fee for this lesson i do not know any miners that can solve this problem. is ok transaction can be sent again but getting stuck in this position is way more worst.
Am I ignored, blocked or banned? Do you guys see my posts, please confirm if so?Is that because I have a signature?It's not paid if you are wondering I've been advertising BitDice for way over a year for nothing in return.I just said contact macbook-air he will help atleast he used to help in the past.Or contact quickseller he can also push your transaction to f2pool. |
|
|
|
this is so hard i been trying to use the boostfee but is not working at all do now know how to get my transaction sign with my blockchain wallet anyone here have any idea?
Just read the post above this and contact these people they will confirm your transaction. |
|
|
|
|
Private keys that start with 5 are uncompressed and private keys that start with K or L are compressed (as in newer Core releases or in your case Bitaddress). I recommend to use compressed ones as transactions with such private keys are smaller thus pays more fee/KB
|
|
|
|
The actual number is less than 2BTC check here https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin or other normal blockchain explorer.Someone's just playing with blockchain.info, and it's infamous for showing bogus stuff on it, like the guy who moved satoshi's coins. |
|
|
|
It's just a way to launder coins.
and just how do you know which miner is going to hit the block? Send directly to the miner and the others will see it only after the block is mined. And how will you do that?Even if you find pool's IP they are still broadcasting all transactions to the network(or are they not?).If you prove me wrong AND tell me how to broadcast transaction to only one pool whether it be Bitclub or other I will give you 0.02BTC. I'm not completely sure if i'm correct here, but i think the basic idear (one of the theories) was not that a thirth party was sending a transaction to the pool, but the pool owner creating a transaction and only keeping it in his own memory pool without broadcasting it to the network. This way, he would be the only one knowing about the transaction, so when his pool hit the next block, the "secret" transaction would be included, but no other pool/miner knew about the transaction, so they couldn't include it in a block. It was just a theory, most probably this is not what happened. I guess that would be possible, he (the pool owner) might have to hack into his nodes code, and recompile his binaries in order to be able to do this, but i don't think it would be impossible (but maybe a lot of work) And?That didn't answer my question nor it denied my statement.What you said is easy "push transaction to yourself(if you are pool owner) and don't relay it to anybody else", and I am almost sure that, that transaction was not the case because you can clearly see that the transaction was relayed 2 minutes before the block.If it was a "secret transaction"(how you describe it) then the relay time and block relay time would have been the same. |
|
|
|
It's just a way to launder coins.
and just how do you know which miner is going to hit the block? Send directly to the miner and the others will see it only after the block is mined. And how will you do that?Even if you find pool's IP they are still broadcasting all transactions to the network(or are they not?).If you prove me wrong AND tell me how to broadcast transaction to only one pool whether it be Bitclub or other I will give you 0.02BTC. |
|
|
|
I'm thinking specifically of the ~2000 nodes that were spun up quickly and support classic, and are split between the 3 datacenters.
So what?If nobody connects to these nodes they are useless, and either way normal users has no influence, only miners vote.Or am I mistaking something? |
|
|
|
I don't know what are you guys talking about.The fee is more than good but that's not the problem, the transaction has an output of 147 sat.No one will mine this transaction, the transaction is 100% sure not to confirm.
Ah, good catch, I missed that. The fee is a bit on the low side though. With the dust output, it will take longer to confirm, but I have seen several transactions with dust outputs that still confirmed. Depends on what you call a dust.To some nodes it's 2730 to some it's 560(?) if this transaction gets confirmed it will be new for me(but it won't) and the fee is 16sat per byte, it's good. |
|
|
|
|
I don't know what are you guys talking about.The fee is more than good but that's not the problem, the transaction has an output of 147 sat.No one will mine this transaction, the transaction is 100% sure not to confirm.
|
|
|
|
Block #403235 Size 999.987 KB  Hehe look at 403518 Size: 1000.0 KB.Is that the biggest one so far? |
|
|
|
you would need to fork the blockchain. i'm sure he cant do it. I can not do it today on mainnet. I haven't said that it is impossible always. All you need is just a simple orphan block. |
|
|
|
Can you make a test?
This is my address bitcoin 1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf send me a PM once you'll start. Not today, man. On mainnet. We can test this on testnet or on altcoin network. Do it on litecoin/dogecoin network.Are you going to orphan block that included your transaction? |
|
|
|
|
They are out of sync.They don't have last 3 blocks.When they get in sync your tx will appear.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
