I have been waiting for the thread 1 list to be updated for days, but since nothing happened, I'll post here. N° 1085 on stakeholder list : SlyWax Thread 1 post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.msg4787819#msg4787819transaction ID : b67870e1cc41db2b1539de9fdce6e89365534c4ac0bb5a6ceaac1fc399b2a42c Please put an Y on front of my name. Thanks. Any update on this one ? Solved. will need to check for duplicate hash though because your hash was edited in on a later date. Thanks, however it didn't make it to the Official list for public auditing. The status in the old list is "check later" but since it's surrounded by "duplicated hash" people it may have been skipped unintentionally. Can someone check it again and add it to the new list please. |
|
|
|
I have been waiting for the thread 1 list to be updated for days, but since nothing happened, I'll post here. N° 1085 on stakeholder list : SlyWax Thread 1 post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.msg4787819#msg4787819transaction ID : b67870e1cc41db2b1539de9fdce6e89365534c4ac0bb5a6ceaac1fc399b2a42c Please put an Y on front of my name. Thanks. Any update on this one ? |
|
|
|
I have been waiting for the thread 1 list to be updated for days, but since nothing happened, I'll post here. N° 1085 on stakeholder list : SlyWax Thread 1 post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.msg4787819#msg4787819transaction ID : b67870e1cc41db2b1539de9fdce6e89365534c4ac0bb5a6ceaac1fc399b2a42c Please put an Y on front of my name. Thanks. |
|
|
|
And what we can do with this Points?
- Keep them to get % of fee. I don't know if this is really working, I didn’t found a page to check that. - Sell them for CNY (but beware, I've read that you will lose 50% by doing that, and if you cancel your order you lose the 50% anyway, this is very strange, but I guess they don't want you to crash their own market). |
|
|
|
What charitable foundations would you like to see NEM donate to? I think it'll be fun to decide now. I personally am a fan of charities such as Water for Kids, Build Africa or any other charity which helps out vulnerable people in third world countries, especially ones involving building projects like schools, wells etc. How cool would that be for NEM to get involved with? I think it resonates well with NEM's egalitarian ethos. @The Development Team, what do you think about reserving a stake or 2 (maybe more?) for a charitable cause? I think that'd be really great. Edit: I posted this same question to the NEM subreddit. Head over there to talk if you feel like it!  While it is tempting to do so, I would prefer charity as a decentralized effort. We should be able to do it as a community. For charity donation, you should check how MemoryCoin is doing it in the blockchain : http://memorycoin.org/charity/The charities are voted for by all shareholder by sending some Satochi to a special address. |
|
|
|
So when you sell any altcoin you get BTER points, which have to be traded for CNY and then traded to BTC.
There's no reason not to allow direct Altcoin>BTC trading (since you can do BTC>Altcoin).
TL;DR: Never trading there again.
You didn't understand it well. Of course you can do Altcoin->BTC trading, it's just that they will give you free Bter point for each transaction you do. Consider it as some kind of fidelity point. |
|
|
|
|
it says :
"Bter Points (BTR) is obtained based on Bter user's trading volume. BTR holders share 25% CNY trading fee from Bter every month."
So it seems you will won CNY every mouth by keeping them.
What about the cancelling order issue ?
|
|
|
|
Voted 10 times  |
|
|
|
|
Nice table.
It miss one important data which is traded volume (and for that, you should take into account all currency pairing + BTC).
|
|
|
|
Democracy per head or democracy per coin?
Democracy per coin already has a (somewhat) proven real world method in voting shares for public corporations. You could use the voting system of MemoryCoin ( http://memorycoin.org) It is Democracy per coin. And it's used to elect officer of this DAC. |
|
|
|
|
Nice work.
But with a browser zoom level of 120% (my default in firefox) you can't see the top of the circle (we should be able to scroll up to see it) maybe some awkward svg positioning ?
You shouldn't use the "Halfing reward cycle, blocks:" for every coin, since this doesn’t apply to all.
For example MMC (MemoryCoin 2.0) have a 5% reduction in block reward every week.
|
|
|
|
Nice guide. |
|
|
|
Emergency announcement: From this point on all "reserved", "interested", "post transaction later" posts will be deleted. You should send the required fee to NEM addresses, obtain the transaction hash and make a post. The registration thread will strictly be maintained as a registration place only. All other comments should go to this thread.
This measure is introduced to combat the fraudster's practice of using other people's transaction hashes to reserve a stake. Since if two accounts have the same hash we only accept the first account who use that hash so it is critical that a fraudster account cannot use hash from legitimate transactions later.
Now for all accounts with duplicate hashes, the priority is given to an account whose post appears earlier. But for further appeal you would need to contact me via PM and show proof of ownership of that transaction. The appeal would work out easily by sending very small amount from your address to NEM again. Then the other account with duplicate hash would be label "fraudster".
I hope the community will also guard the registration thread to catch any attempt of fraudsters to cheat his way to the stakeholder list. Thanks.
UP
Why don't you ask people to sign their message with their BTC account, this is the way to go against fraudster. |
|
|
|
Buy the way, did you manage to remove the coin creation from the transaction chart, as we talked about before ?
Ok. I just did it and it was quite easy. The coinbase transactions are now excluded from the Transactions chart. I should have done it ages ago. It really didn't make sense to count the coinbase transactions because the first chart which counts blocks is the same thing as the number of coinbase transactions. It's much more interesting now. As I update the different currencies on the site, it will gradually take affect. Right now, I've only run it on Bitcoin. To make the transition clear, the old chart is called "Transactions" and the new chart is called "Transactions (non coinbase)". That way you know if it's applied to a particular currency yet. Are there any currencies you want me to update first? Great, thanks, this is funny to see 0 transaction a week at the very beginning of BTC. Well my next choice would be MMC and XPM. |
|
|
|
Could you add MemoryCoin (MMC).
They used a bad parameter at the beginning which resulted in quite a big funny fluctuation, they then changed the algorithm, it's smooth now. Could be interesting.
Added MemoryCoin charts to the site: http://cryptometer.org/memorycoin_96_hour_charts.htmlhttp://cryptometer.org/memorycoin_90_day_charts.htmlYes, that's interesting. You can see the fluctuation on the first chart. I guess they hard-forked at Hour 71? Sounds stressful! I'm going to read that giant thread and see what parameter they changed. Thanks, yes the fluctuation was stopping the mining due to high difficulty, FreeTrade applied this fix in just a few day, nice to him. Buy the way, did you manage to remove the coin creation from the transaction chart, as we talked about before ? |
|
|
|
|
Interested :p
0.016 BTC sent,
transaction ID : b67870e1cc41db2b1539de9fdce6e89365534c4ac0bb5a6ceaac1fc399b2a42c
|
|
|
|
Has anyone made an attempt to making a 'CPU mining profitability' calculator? There are a lot of good ones for SHA-256 and Scrypt mining, but there really isn't a way to tell which 'CPU Coin' is the most profitable. Any sites out there or anyone tinkering a a google spreadsheet?
There is one calculator for MemoryCoin : http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html |
|
|
|
|
Could you add MemoryCoin (MMC).
They used a bad parameter at the beginning which resulted in quite a big funny fluctuation, they then changed the algorithm, it's smooth now. Could be interesting.
|
|
|
|
MemoryCoin (MMC) solve this problem by paying the dev and other officer from the blockchain, based on election from the share holders (coin holders). This way the dev is paid only if he continue supporting the coin. And if not, another dev can take his place, and be hired from the blockchain. This work quite well and there is already a lot of tools and support in a record time. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=370806.0There is also 5 other paid position for marketing support network etc... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
