 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Is it possible now or in a future version to move dcri and dcoin settings to dpools.txt?
|
|
|
|
Hi all I need your help/advice  I have rig with mixed gtx1060,rx470,rx480,rx580, and problem with cvddc option. With 2 x rx470 i have no problem with setting correct voltage with cvddc option - they are working with 835 and 865mV. But on 480 and 580 i can't get lower then 950 mV. My rx480 works with 900mV, rx580 with 850mV and lower (values set in wattman or overdrivetool). Cvddc with this cards works only 950mV and higher. Lower values does not work. Anyone can help with this ? For some odd reason on many cards you need to lower mvdcc in order to get cvdcc that low. It's like they can't be too far apart. Try setting cvdcc and mvdcc to 850. That will prove the point, then you can work out if it's stable and go up from there. |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I understant you are mainly windows users of Claymore, but all my rigs are on LINUX (ubuntu 14 and 16), and for me the 11.6 update does not work at all. With everything else being the same, all I get is :
"
����������������������������������������������������������������ͻ
� Claymore's Dual GPU Miner - v11.6 �
� ETH + DCR/SIA/LBC/PASC/BLAKE2S/KECCAK �
����������������������������������������������������������������ͼ
ETH: 5 pools are specified
Main Ethereum pool is eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
Cannot load OpenCL library, AMD cards will be unavailable
No NVIDIA CUDA GPUs detected.
No AMD OPENCL or NVIDIA CUDA GPUs found, exit
"
Previously Claymore 11.5 was working perfectly fine, I never had to install OpenCL library... And I have the same error for my AMD and NVIDIA rigs... guesse I will stay with 11.5 for long now.
Run as root (sudo). |
|
|
|
|
Claymore, I'm not seeing any benefit from the new version. I have nvidia 1050s and 1060s in Linux and driver version 381. Which operating systems and driver are meant to benefit?
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys! One of the mail killer fee of this miner is obviously the dual mining.
My farm is based on 1070 and 1050ti. I am currently dual mining XVG (blake2s). What are you guys doing?
Also, I will not disclose the name of the pool because it would be advertising, but I am getting on average 50% of what calculators say I should get. Any similar experience or any pool that is acting in a more fair way?
You are using unimining or ant mine pool. Switch to nlpool |
|
|
|
|
Upgraded to 11.6 on my nvidia rig. But there is no difference in Linux. 6 x 1060 3gb and 2 x 1050 ti.
|
|
|
|
Dont divert the issue. Greatest example is XVG. Block reward is 1560, your pool then give 1544 to miners, you are stealing/getting around 1-2% on spot. And you were advertising it as 0 pool fee gimmick before? Hilarious. Now you are adding .9% on top of that.
Now you try your alibi here "due to network/miners fee, thats why 1544 bla bla bla". You're a big joke.
And yes, I already tried your shitpool. Setting c=XVG or whatever, it keeps mining other coin in the long run.
Yes, it took me seconds to create this account coz the username is really true.
http://1stminingrig.com/use-new-claymores-dual-ethereum-gpu-miner-v11-0-blake2s-keccak-algorithms/WHICH POOLS ARE THE BEST FOR DUAL MINING?
Before I get into the hashrates, here is some data I’ve gathered regarding pools:
nlpool – tested and reported by users as the best pool for blake2s If you would have something to say, just speak up ... don't need to use a troll account for that. While I agree this is a troll. As a user of your pool would request you change the reward per block to the correct 1560 and then if you so choose add the 1% fee to bring it to 1.9%. Even with 1.9% you're the best option as I see it, but transparency is something most crypto enthusiasts value highly. |
|
|
|
After new ETH DAG 1060 3gb say bye bye to ETH on W10, I try to mine now UBIQ on Ethermine but when they want to take devfee reestart becasuse they take ETH not UBIQ and DAG of ETH is not supported by 3gb GPU. Who has a good solution to all 3gb GPU ? Now after all cripto-coin go down is mandatory to have the mine in optimun condition to take same profit, another problem is that rare coin is not easy to convert in USD/EUR. I apreciate your comment.  I dont want to change to Linux for only same month more of life of ETH Linux isn't a one month solution its more like 14. Linux uses 6mb on all except the primary card and on that one it uses 43mb. If you make your first card something like a gtx 1050ti you should be able to keep going for at least the rest of the year. By my maths its actually May 2019. |
|
|
|
Hello,
for whose with 1060 3G that doesn't work, what drivers do you use? Are you dual mining?
most of my rigs are in 382.53 and one is on 388.00 I think, all on cuda 8.0, and I have no problem in ETH only.
If you use Linux you will be fine irrespective of divers |
|
|
|
Is anyone else getting the DAG error on 3gb nVidia 1060 cards (or any other 3072MB cards?)
Any fix for not enough vRAM for the DAG or am I better off switching to equihash coins now?
It was fine until I rebooted and I assume a new epoch was reached while I did that.
add the command line -eres 0 Awesome thanks! No hashrate reduction I wonder what it does. Edit: Neverming it doesnt reserve any future epoch amounts, so one more epoch (2 weeks?) and 3gb cards cant mine anymore? Switch to Linux and/or put a 4gb card in your primary pcie port. By my maths I'll still be mining on 3gb cards into 2019, at which point I can't help but think all mining is questionable. |
|
|
|
|
To everyone saying that there are hard and fast rules to using old kernel vs new, that is simply not true. Each of my GPUs is within 2mhz of giving incorrect shares on old kernels and doesn't give any on new kernels either. I think you just have to try for yourself and see what works best for you.
That said when the mining craze nears the end, old kernels are more power efficient!
|
|
|
|
I see some people have problems with latest versions because they use hard OC and/or custom bioses created for old versions. They work fine with old GPU kernels, but I modified kernels in v11.2 and you need to readjust your settings.
For those who cannot do it (or don't want to do it) I can revert some changes and release a version with "old-style" binaries. So I will release v11.5 within a few hours and it will be the only change in this version, so don't upgrade if v11.4 works fine for you.
@Claymore, can you please name the modified Version with old Kernel´s like 11.4(old) and not 11.5? I think this would be better than 11.5. Some Miners auto update to the newest Version and with the old Settings it might be a step back for miners with readjustet settings. Thank you for your good work! 11.4 works fine for me, <4% stale (with WIFI), no crashes, stable with adjusted settings Oliver Or one better. Release ver 11.5 where by default it runs the 11.4 kernel and with an option e.g. (-asm 2old) would run the older kernel. From what I can tell the -asm option already supports multiple kernels, its just another. |
|
|
|
@Claymore
Since upgrading from 10.6 to 11.3 (and now 11.4) my hawaii rigs are having hash rate drops every so often. About 5-7% drop lasting for around 2 minutes before going back to normal for about 10-15 minutes before it happens again. Any idea what might be going on?
Confirmed same issue with an rx390 (Hawaii) Maybe this: This sounds like a temperature issue. Your GPU reaches a certain temp. Miner reduces intensity so the temp can come down. Once temp lowers GPU intensity goes up again. Over and over. These are settings in the config file. Or. It's something else. It's definitely not a temperature issue on my rig. The card runs at a constant 71 degC |
|
|
|
@Claymore
Since upgrading from 10.6 to 11.3 (and now 11.4) my hawaii rigs are having hash rate drops every so often. About 5-7% drop lasting for around 2 minutes before going back to normal for about 10-15 minutes before it happens again. Any idea what might be going on?
Confirmed same issue with an rx390 (Hawaii) Edit, mine did it on 11.0 and 11.2 as well. But not on any 10 version or prior. It also seems to be a bit longer that 10-15 minutes between drops but they are sustained drops, not like a one off. |
|
|
|
So incorrect are just as bad as rejected? Wasted time and power.  (Edit: I did find where someone mentioned incorrect share is local, rejected share is pool and both are equally bad) I'm going to revert to 10.6. I could run the cards faster with almost no incorrect shares.  I'd try the slowdown too. You might find you have a better overall result. |
|
|
|
In 24 hours I'm getting 0 rejected eth shares and about 22 incorrect per card. 30 rejected decred per card. 0 memory errors. On 11.3. Is this acceptable?
yes It is acceptable but 22 incorrect is about 4%. You would have a higher profit slowing the cards down and eliminating those errors. A 29mhs card with 0% errors has higher profit than a 30mhs card with 4% errors. I'd start with lowering each mclock by just 20Mhz and see if that clears up the error rate. Of my 17 cards I tolerate an incorrect shares rate of 1% on one card that I can't shake no matter what timings I use and 0.5% on 2 others. The rest can all go weeks without an incorrect share. |
|
|
|
What GPU memory size should be to have same hashrate as with altcoins?
My nvidia 3gb cards mine ETH just fine and will continue to do so for about another 12 months (using them in secondary slots in Ubuntu which doesn't allocate ram to other purposes). For amd cards there was once an issue but driver updates fixed it. You need to install latest drivers and turn them too compute mode. If you do that the ETH rate is comparable to alt coins. But the driver is not available for really old cards or appears. I have an R9 390 that mines 29.3 in ETH and 29.5 in expanse, for RX series there is typically no noticeable difference. |
|
|
|
|
Hi claymore
Can I request a feature that detects a corrupt dag file (e.g. 3 incorrect shares in a row on a single GPU) and then purges and recreates the dag file from scratch? Ideally just on the GPU getting the incorrect shares if that's possible?
It's rare but every now and then one of my GPU starts getting 100% incorrect shares and needs a restart. The program doesn't detect this as an error so takes no action.
|
|
|
|
Having a bit of trouble here, trying to dual mine ETH/XVG with claymore 11.2(literally started mining yesterday, was doing ETH & Dcred, but dcred wasnt worth it for me, but I learned how to hook up to supernova)
Anyway. Im getting constant rejected shares on XVG with suprnova x17....Is there something im missing with my settings?
-epool us1.ethermine.org:14444
-ewal wallet address
-epsw x
-dpool stratum+tcp://xvg-x17.suprnova.cc:7477
-dwal username.workername (with supernova you dont put the address as with dcred?)
-dpsw workerpassword
-allpools 1
#-esm 1
#-mode 0
#-tt 70
#-asm 0
Please let me know
Thanks
Wrong algorithm. You need a Blake 2s algorithm pool. Mine.nlpool.nl or luckypool.xyz are the only 2 I've used that seemed honest (there may be others now). Are you mining on Nlpool? I saw my wallet getting some nevas and infocoins, so I asked the admin. He said he’d exchange them to verge for me. Do you think it fishy? I was iffy with that a first. But then I got a payout to my wallet leaving nothing but a tiny fraction of an xvg there. That fraction related to an info coin pending payout. These other coins are so much less valuable they only make a tiny percentage difference to your balance, but I do believe they get converted and credited after seeing that. Edit actually you can see it now. If you add my current balance since the last payout The 0.002431 nevacoin is contributing 0.00613511 xvg to my balance! Thanh you. I am mining xvg, not neva, nor info, nor taj. So I’m not happy with the pool deciding the coin to mine for me. Anyway, going to mine neva. It is double the price of xvg.  Btw, do you happen to be mining on nlpool? The first two days I was mining 35-40 xvgs/day. It seems to be going down, 27-29. D’y know why? It's a small pool so much more susceptible to variation based on luck. Also difficulty of verge has moved a bit of late. I had one day where I got 30% extra and a few where I got 10 to 20% less. On the whole I don't think anything dodgey is up with these pools but maybe I'm overly trusting. In any case, it's better than unimining or antminepool! |
|
|
|
Having a bit of trouble here, trying to dual mine ETH/XVG with claymore 11.2(literally started mining yesterday, was doing ETH & Dcred, but dcred wasnt worth it for me, but I learned how to hook up to supernova)
Anyway. Im getting constant rejected shares on XVG with suprnova x17....Is there something im missing with my settings?
-epool us1.ethermine.org:14444
-ewal wallet address
-epsw x
-dpool stratum+tcp://xvg-x17.suprnova.cc:7477
-dwal username.workername (with supernova you dont put the address as with dcred?)
-dpsw workerpassword
-allpools 1
#-esm 1
#-mode 0
#-tt 70
#-asm 0
Please let me know
Thanks
Wrong algorithm. You need a Blake 2s algorithm pool. Mine.nlpool.nl or luckypool.xyz are the only 2 I've used that seemed honest (there may be others now). Are you mining on Nlpool? I saw my wallet getting some nevas and infocoins, so I asked the admin. He said he’d exchange them to verge for me. Do you think it fishy? I was iffy with that a first. But then I got a payout to my wallet leaving nothing but a tiny fraction of an xvg there. That fraction related to an info coin pending payout. These other coins are so much less valuable they only make a tiny percentage difference to your balance, but I do believe they get converted and credited after seeing that. Edit actually you can see it now. If you add my current balance since the last payout The 0.002431 nevacoin is contributing 0.00613511 xvg to my balance! |
|
|
|
|
