Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[big al]

How do you guys figure? The stale shares are 2-6% more yet the devfee is only 0.35% higher.

184.5 x 97.02% = 179 claymore
184.2 x 95.376% =  175.7 Phoenix high
184.2 x 91.4% = 168.4 Phoenix low

[janding]

How do you guys figure? The stale shares are 2-6% more yet the devfee is only 0.35% higher.

If the pool you are mining at pays something for stale shares ( Ethermine pays .65% for a stale share ) then
you loose .35% for every stale share. But if the miner is only charging you .65% instead of 1% then it helps overcome the stale share loss.

However, if you mine where the pool does not pay anything for a stale share then it's really bad to have many stale shares.
Some pools pay something for stales, others do not. I don't know the list of which do or don't except for Ethermine.

[janding]

How do you guys figure? The stale shares are 2-6% more yet the devfee is only 0.35% higher.

184.5 x 97.02% = 179 claymore
184.2 x 95.376% =  175.7 Phoenix high
184.2 x 91.4% = 168.4 Phoenix low

Can't argue with that.
I was simply saying it about equals out becaue of the lower fee.
Phoenix would have to produce a higher hash rate on the same number of cards to over come the higher stale rate as you have shown.

That's one reason I'm staying with Claymore.

[xeridea]

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.

Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....

[groovytechno]

Thanks for the nice update to 11.6, Mr. Claymore!


On another note - Im sure most, if not all of you might find this info important.  

Please vote to help keep Ethereum and hopefully other Ethash coins ASIC resistant.   I'm sure Claymore wont mind that I bring this up in his thread.

Please log into github (make an account if you have to) and hit the thumbs up button.

https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/958

[Munka9]

Upgraded to 11.6 on my nvidia rig. But there is no difference in Linux. 6 x 1060 3gb and 2 x 1050 ti.

[leonix007]

Claymore's Dual Ethereum + Decred/Siacoin/Lbry/Pascal/Blake2s/Keccak AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner.
=========================

Latest version is v11.6:

- improved hashrate for weak Nvidia cards by about 1%.
- zero devfee for 3GB cards in Windows 10, same as for all 2GB cards.
- applied some tricks to increase available memory for 3GB cards in Windows 10 so you can mine ETH a bit longer.
- now you can press "y" key to turn on "Compute Mode" in AMD drivers for all cards (Windows only).
- Linux version: removed openssl library dependency.
- improved "-logfile" option, now you can use it to specify a folder for log files, use slash at the end to do it, for example, "-logfile logs\".
- added "-epoolsfile" and "-dpoolsfile" options.
- remote management: now "miner_getstat2" command also returns PCI bus index for every GPU.
- a few minor bug fixes and improvements.

But where is the Claymore's CryptoNight AMD GPU Miner update???

this is a piderast, while quote all post

and you do the same, you two deserve a kick in the @ss! 

Hey @Maxmidnite, there is a Search Box on the upper right side of the forum, its somewhat useful

Like this one

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search2

but if you are looking for an update, I guess its in Claymore's waiting list

[Marvell2]

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.

Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....

on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2

[janding]

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.

Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....

on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2

Is that number from the pool or the display in the miner window ?

[janding]

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.

Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....

on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2

Is that number from the pool or the display in the miner window ?

Edit:
Never mind I see you said it was reported by Phoenix.
Here is the truth about that number.
It is totally worthless. The miner has almost no idea if a share was stale at the pool.
Phoenix even states that if you read all the post's from them about that number.
Trouble is, few actually read more than one page back in a thread.

They rarely mention it because they don't want everyone to know or remember that little fact.
So, everyone sees that and accepts it is the actual stale share rate. I've brought that up to them on
multiple occasions.

In the miner window this is how that message should read:

The stale share number about to be displayed is fictional and is presented for entertainment purposes only.
Your actual stale share rate can only be know at the pool, not in the miner.
Please ignore the above message an tell everyone that this is my stale share rate.

[Marvell2]

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.

Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....

on my nvidia rig after 24 hours stales repoted by phoniex is 1.2

Is that number from the pool or the display in the miner window ?

Edit:
Never mind I see you said it was reported by Phoenix.
Here is the truth about that number.
It is totally worthless. The miner has almost no idea if a share was stale at the pool.
Phoenix even states that if you read all the post's from them about that number.
Trouble is, few actually read more than one page back in a thread.

They rarely mention it because they don't want everyone to know or remember that little fact.
So, everyone sees that and accepts it is the actual stale share rate. I've brought that up to them on
multiple occasions.

In the miner window this is how that message should read:

The stale share number about to be displayed is fictional and is presented for entertainment purposes only.
Your actual stale share rate can only be know at the pool, not in the miner.
Please ignore the above message an tell everyone that this is my stale share rate.

https://www.ethermine.org/miners/a57EeFabb76Bfd1E9E6ee606999b76BD123aFe32/worker/marvell9-117

it says 3% at the pool so yeah the miner lies, I just upgraded to the new phonenix , seema i was on 2.7c
ill check stales in 24 hrs

[nitrobg]

phoneix has lower fees so even with stales its a wash imo

Yes, you are correct.
I forgot to put in the fees with Claymore at 1% and Phoenix at .65%
Just about evens out on that front.

Ummm, 2% stale vs 4-8% stale? So 0.35% fee is worth losing 4% on stales? at that point just use ethminer....

Stales mostly depend on the pool's luck. Try running them side by side on similar machines for 24-48h, and then check the stales.

[YaStaer]

new versions crash at the stage of card definition NVIDIA in Windows 7, if there are more than 6 cards in the rig. The latest version that works with 6+ cards is 11.0.

Claymore log:

Code:

09:54:05:318	b94	
09:54:05:318	b94	ЙHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH»
09:54:05:319	b94	є                Claymore's Dual GPU Miner - v11.6               є
09:54:05:319	b94	є              ETH + DCR/SIA/LBC/PASC/BLAKE2S/KECCAK             є
09:54:05:320	b94	ИHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHj
09:54:05:320	b94	
09:54:05:320	b94	b571 
09:54:05:521	b94	You enabled full remote management, but did not specify -mpsw option to protect it by password, please do it, otherwise you can be attacked if you share remote management port to internet! Or use negative -mport value to enable read-only remote management mode, see Readme for details.
09:54:10:521	b94	ETH: 1 pool is specified
09:54:10:522	b94	Main Ethereum pool is eu1.ethermine.org:4444
09:54:10:522	b94	B2S: 1 pool is specified
09:54:10:523	b94	Main Blake2s pool is xvg.eu1.unimining.net:5770
09:54:10:685	b94	OpenCL platform: Intel(R) OpenCL
09:54:10:685	b94	OpenCL platform: NVIDIA CUDA
09:54:10:686	b94	AMD OpenCL platform not found 
09:54:10:888	b94	CUDA initializing...

09:54:10:889	b94	NVIDIA Cards available: 7 
09:54:10:889	b94	CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.1/9.1
09:54:10:930	b94	GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 1:0:0)

09:54:10:933	b94	GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 2:0:0)

09:54:10:938	b94	GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 3:0:0)

09:54:10:942	b94	GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 5:0:0)

09:54:10:946	b94	GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 6:0:0)

09:54:10:949	b94	GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 7:0:0)

Windows log:

Code:

- EventData 

   EthDcrMiner64.exe 
   0.0.0.0 
   5abe1013 
   ntdll.dll 
   6.1.7601.23915 
   59b94ee4 
   c0000005 
   000000000004b0a4 
   fb4 
   01d3c8bd0da3dc10 
   C:\Shara\Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred_Siacoin_Lbry_Pascal_Blake2s_Keccak AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.6\EthDcrMiner64.exe 
   C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll 
   50392d50-34b0-11e8-9250-38d547aacba9 

[wangusto]

hihi all

I have updates it to v11.6 but it says

eth stratum connected eth-eu nanopool.org:9999 (unsecure)

Whats with the unsecure part?

I have already read the readme file but i cant find the solution?

can you help me the noob guys

[gedeonodn]

Cпacибo зa тo, чтo пpиcлyшивaeтecь к пoльзoвaтeлям (tnx for your accept customer requests)!!!

[leonix007]

hihi all

I have updates it to v11.6 but it says

eth stratum connected eth-eu nanopool.org:9999 (unsecure)

Whats with the unsecure part?

I have already read the readme file but i cant find the solution?

can you help me the noob guys

its a connection between your miner and the pool, if you want it more secured then use the SSL port

otherwise its a default connection where I also use it

[wangusto]

hihi all

I have updates it to v11.6 but it says

eth stratum connected eth-eu nanopool.org:9999 (unsecure)

Whats with the unsecure part?

I have already read the readme file but i cant find the solution?

can you help me the noob guys

its a connection between your miner and the pool, if you want it more secured then use the SSL port

otherwise its a default connection where I also use it

Is it safe to use it "unsecure"?

[Ambros]

Hi Guys! One of the mail killer fee of this miner is obviously the dual mining.

My farm is based on 1070 and 1050ti. I am currently dual mining XVG (blake2s). What are you guys doing?

Also, I will not disclose the name of the pool because it would be advertising,  but I am getting on average 50% of what calculators say I should get. Any similar experience or any pool that is acting in a more fair way?

[leonix007]

hihi all

I have updates it to v11.6 but it says

eth stratum connected eth-eu nanopool.org:9999 (unsecure)

Whats with the unsecure part?

I have already read the readme file but i cant find the solution?

can you help me the noob guys

its a connection between your miner and the pool, if you want it more secured then use the SSL port

otherwise its a default connection where I also use it

Is it safe to use it "unsecure"?

yeah, what I could do is to set some security of my PC and close some ports one example is -mport options

So far. no attempts made idk if its just a waste of time penetrating my rigs though 

[Munka9]

Hi Guys! One of the mail killer fee of this miner is obviously the dual mining.

My farm is based on 1070 and 1050ti. I am currently dual mining XVG (blake2s). What are you guys doing?

Also, I will not disclose the name of the pool because it would be advertising,  but I am getting on average 50% of what calculators say I should get. Any similar experience or any pool that is acting in a more fair way?

You are using unimining or ant mine pool. Switch to nlpool