|
User: nachius
Hit: 10x on blast
Round ID: #2178162
|
|
|
|
 You guys requested a recap so here I am delivering one. A couple of things worth mentioning regarding above picture: * I made a cutoff at 6 correct picks. Lot of us has 5 correct picks so probably not so interesting to mention * Names to the left are your betnomi user names * buwaytress - sojouner with crazy come back after missing first 2 games * csmiami killing it with no draw tactics * Check your results if you are gunning for the prize, there could be some mistakes although I am quite sure everything is peachy  PS. Big thanks to tyKiwanuka for helping out with the table design and automation Thnx for putting together a nice Excel. Wow, I'd like to point out @sojourner Every match correct except for the first two. Why put Sheffield United beating Man City?   damn |
|
|
|
|
Thanks eaLiTy well done and congrats to TopTort777 as well. I think it's fair to split the 2nd and 3rd prizes, it was very close and well done to #1 who just edged both of us for the W.
My betnomi: nachius
Thank you very much
|
|
|
|
|
Uriah Hall, Decision
Bryce Mitchell, Decision
Kevin Holland, Decision
Greg Hardy, KO/TKO
Bobby Green, Decision
Alexander Hernandez, KO/TKO
Adrian Yanez, KO/TKO
Sean Strickland, KO/TKO
Jason Witt, Decision
Dustin Jacoby, KO/TKO
Cortney Casey, Decision
Miles Johns, Decision
user: nachius
|
|
|
|
|
Wolves v Crystal Palace - 1
Sheffield Utd v Man City - 2
Burnley v Chelsea - 2
Liverpool v West Ham - 1
Aston Villa v Southampton - x
Newcastle Utd v Everton - 2
Man Utd v Arsenal - 2
Spurs v Brighton - 1
Fulham v West Brom - x
Leeds Utd v Leicester City - 1
user: nachius
|
|
|
|
Did you (nachius) do the same thing to this poor guy? The fact that you intentionally lied to these people that'd you solo mine (and thus exaggerating the required price way above necessary), pulling $500+ for a much cheaper btc.com push and attempting to justify this makes me question why you're on DT2. IMO, the fair resolution would be for Zaizoun to pay nachius the amount required by btc.com to confirm the transaction. I already suggested to pay him what he paid to btc.com but he is still lying all the way. https://i.imgur.com/Y5vH12Q_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=high (he told me he paid 0.1 btc to btc.com) But : http://imgur.com/a/OAm1y ( the real price ) Edit : I deleted you and blocked you 20 minutes ago . Let the community decide No, you deleted and blocked me many times. I said it was 0.1 to try and get a part of the 0.292 you owe me. I did not try to scam you in any way. You wanted to pay 0.292 for the service, so I told you I could do it for 0.292. You owe 0.292, nothing less. I did tell you I'd accept what I paid to btc.com (which was not $5) but you are still refusing. Would you like to pay it? |
|
|
|
Half of this is a lie, half is the truth.
ViaBTC does work, what I was telling him is that the odds of getting the transaction confirmed soon was low. We made an exchange:
My job was to confirm his transaction within a short period of time. His job was to pay up the 0.292 BTC. The transaction was confirmed via pushtx.btc.com, and shortly thereafter, Zaizoun went offline. A few hours after that, still without a response, Zaizoun removed me and blocked me. This is without knowing anything about how it was confirmed. This is how I know Zaizoun had no intentions of paying.
After leaving a negative for me, Zaizoun began making excuses. He tried to make up some lies about how he should not pay, etc. To get to the point, I left a negative because Zaizoun is clearly not to be trusted.
As for my side, I did my part. I confirmed the transaction, whether it cost me $10,000 to do so, or $0.01, Zaizoun was to pay me 0.292 BTC to confirm it. I did in fact use pushtx.btc.com, however Zaizoun should have no issue with this if he stuck to his word.
Since then, Zaizoun has repeatedly blocked communications with me, made up lies, and is trying to make me look like the "scammer" to try and get his red trust removed. His actions are completely untrustworthy, and although from my side I have not dealt with him in the best way, this user has been so extremely hard to deal with that I have no other options but to act aggressively in return. Until the 0.292 is repaid, the trust sticks. Making up more lies will not help. Whether I played a trick on you or not, a deal is a deal.
I didn't block you nor delete you as I've screened the conversation and put it here . You Don't owe me anything because you told me no tool like viabtc or others work . But you used one of these tools to confirm this tx. This is called lying dude. Besides , this user puts a second neg rep to me Stating that I'm a blackmailer and shit? Can I know how can I be a blackmailer and a hacker as you say when you wants to take my private keys lol? Didn't delete me, right: https://gyazo.com/c9cd57b25ad244dbb04196614d50fb1fI was originally going to mine it myself. You were giving me a damn hard time so I decided to take the cheaper option. You are a blackmailer. You are refusing to even send what I paid to btc.com. You said if I remove the trust, you will remove all the lies and posts that you put here. That is blackmail. You deserve negative trust regardless, you had no intentions to pay 0.292 BTC in the first place. I legitimately wanted to help you until you started lying and bullshitting. If you want to fix things up, stop blaming me and pay-up. |
|
|
|
|
Half of this is a lie, half is the truth.
ViaBTC does work, what I was telling him is that the odds of getting the transaction confirmed soon was low. We made an exchange:
My job was to confirm his transaction within a short period of time. His job was to pay up the 0.292 BTC. The transaction was confirmed via pushtx.btc.com, and shortly thereafter, Zaizoun went offline. A few hours after that, still without a response, Zaizoun removed me and blocked me. This is without knowing anything about how it was confirmed. This is how I know Zaizoun had no intentions of paying.
After leaving a negative for me, Zaizoun began making excuses. He tried to make up some lies about how he should not pay, etc. To get to the point, I left a negative because Zaizoun is clearly not to be trusted.
As for my side, I did my part. I confirmed the transaction, whether it cost me $10,000 to do so, or $0.01, Zaizoun was to pay me 0.292 BTC to confirm it. I did in fact use pushtx.btc.com, however Zaizoun should have no issue with this if he stuck to his word.
Since then, Zaizoun has repeatedly blocked communications with me, made up lies, and is trying to make me look like the "scammer" to try and get his red trust removed. His actions are completely untrustworthy, and although from my side I have not dealt with him in the best way, this user has been so extremely hard to deal with that I have no other options but to act aggressively in return. Until the 0.292 is repaid, the trust sticks. Making up more lies will not help. Whether I played a trick on you or not, a deal is a deal.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the address where the money is located? The address you are trying to send from
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately with the current verisons of Electrum, you cannot import private keys into Electrum, only sweep. This is fair enough, because the addresses would not have their private keys saved along with your backup seed anyways.
The best option is to create a brand new Electrum wallet using your 18 words. I've PM'd you if you need help doing this. The easy way out is to simply send your Bitcoins over, rather than migrating. This works if you don't care about the addresses you previously used.
|
|
|
|
It's probably the worst time in the history of Bitcoin to make a move right now  |
|
|
|
Hmm, seems like the transaction confirmed  Offered me a bounty as stated, didn't pay. Deleted me and blocked me. I've left a negative rating, it's staying until you pay up. |
|
|
|
Yup! A child transaction cannot be confirmed without having its parents confirmed. Your transaction had a 90.96 sat/B ratio for its fee. This is a big no-no to get transactions confirmed these days. It's not too late to fix things though, there are steps you can take! Your first step before re-broadcasting your 0.5 transactions is to get this one fixed up. You can try out: https://www.viabtc.com/Or look for help from more veteran users here on the forum. I assume a more sophisticated reply will follow mine Thank you for the info. That's what I get for being a cheapskate....  I now realize after I did my first zapwallet it cleared that transaction! So it is no longer broadcasting on my end. Is my thinking correct on this? Yeah, try and maintain at least 300 sat/b ratio on all your transactions. Seems like both of your transactions got dropped. It is useless trying to re-broadcast anything until the 1 BTC is confirmed. The 1 BTC can't be used until then. Don't be a cheapskate with BTC  |
|
|
|
Yup! A child transaction cannot be confirmed without having its parents confirmed. Your transaction had a 90.96 sat/B ratio for its fee. This is a big no-no to get transactions confirmed these days. It's not too late to fix things though, there are steps you can take! Your first step before re-broadcasting your 0.5 transactions is to get this one fixed up. You can try out: https://www.viabtc.com/Or look for help from more veteran users here on the forum. I assume a more sophisticated reply will follow mine |
|
|
|
Hmm, seems like the transaction confirmed |
|
|
|
|
You'd get more customers (in my opinion) or at least replies if you took out "Trusted Exchange" from the title, and offered to use escrow.
Just my 2 cents
|
|
|
|
This is most definitely a scam. Why would you sell far below market rate?
We offer the fastest and safest way to trade in many cities over the world, yet with the best fee.
What do you mean! They offer not only the fastest, but the safest way to trade! Apparently it's extremely safe to trade with them, your money for sure will not be stolen. For larger amount and regular customers, we could offer even better rate, please feel free to contact us for more detail.
Far below market rate? That's no big deal, we run this business to bring in a large loss. That's why we would sell our Bitcoins even further below an already ridiculous loss. But don't fret, our service is not only fast, but very very safe too. *wink* *wink* its safe. Safe? Safe. Really dude @OP? If you're going to try to scam.... actually no. My advice won't help, you are the biggest imbecile I've ever seen, you could not even scam if you tried. |
|
|
|
Your transaction had a size of 486 bytes. You put a 0.001008 BTC fee. That equates to a fee per byte rate of 207.407 sat/B. To get the transaction confirmed, you should have put a fee of around ~300 sat/B. A fee of around ~250 sat/B would have confirmed within about 10 blocks too. 207 is far too low. Grasp a better idea by heading to: https://estimatefee.com/Your transaction had 3 inputs, which made the tx size a little higher than your wallet probably expected. A result of using change addresses. You can take action if you'd like, however your coins will be returned to your wallet soon enough. Afaik you cannot make a CPFP transaction, but other options are most probably available |
|
|
|
|
Do not bother trying to deal with this user, he is unwilling to use escrow and is only interested in stealing your money. His word is nothing, he lies and finds excuses for you to send first.
|
|
|
|
Correct. I thought it may have been possible to somehow track them down. oh well :-(
Do you remember who you sold the computer to? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
