|
Game 1: 12' 2-1 Arsenal
Game 2: 25' 3-3 Draw
Game 3: 23' 0-2 Norwich City
|
|
|
|
Les allemand vont encore nous pollué avec leur charbon. Et le gaz de schiste est une saloperie même pour la consommation . Ils beaucoup plus riche en polluant et produit cancérigène . Alors les allemands interdisent le gasoil et vont brûler du charbon ? |
|
|
|
|
1. draw - 1:1
2. Barnsley - 2:3
3. Middlesbrough - 2:0
4. Preston - 1:0
5. Swansea - 2:1
6. Reading - 2:0
7. draw - 0:0
8. Fulham - 2:1
9. Huddersfield - 4:2
10. QPR - 3:1
11. Blackburn - 0:2
12. Luton - 0:1
Sportsbet username: 00016
|
|
|
|
|
Avec tout ce qui déboule je me questionne: Trudeau ! Complètement taré ! ??
Mais j'y repense et je me dis pourquoi ça serait pas vraiment un truc dans le vaccin ("du genre celui qui affecte tout le monde!"), un ou quelques brins ARN qui seulement une fois dans le corps s'installent pour se développer et former un genre de petite machinerie organique/biologique qui se branche sur le système nerveux !
Les connaisseurs du sujet vous dirons que oui effectivement il y'a déjà belle lurette qu'on peut carrément se passer de dispositifs implantés, mais ce dernier confère un avantage majeur, celui d'avoir prise directe sur le fin fond du "système"!
|
|
|
|
Got mine Thank you   |
|
|
|
I'm not sure but I remember reading a similar discussion back then as the player tried to point out there was one casino that had a slightly higher payout compared to another casino even though the game is the same.
I think one of the slot providers that lets you do this is Booming or Betsoft, not sure if it's both of them but i'm sure that the name of the provider is starting with the letter "B" since these are the providers that most casinos have back then.
I think Betsoft do, drastical difference frome one casino to another ! |
|
|
|
|
Tu pourrais aussi transférer sur échanges P2P tel localcryptos, localbitcoins .. Créer tes annonces de vente occasionnellement (qd ça t'arrange), tu reçois le cash de la manière que tu choisis !
|
|
|
|
Different casinos also can adjust slot RTP since it depends on backend team. Odds of winning obviously can be modified with live RTP, so we have to decide which casino is "fair" for each gambler.
Actually, online casinos can not adjust slot RTP with the backend team. (Except unlicensed casinos running fake slot games on their own servers). They can request different RTP settings from the software provider (if that particular software provider has different RTP options). The same stands with live RTP. Games are "running" at provider's servers, thus casino itself can not influence RTP or outcome of the game. You can check RTP of PnG slots with simple trick, just press F12 on slot page and search RTP keyword on console tab. For Pragmatic slot provider you can check RTP on info page of each slot. For example, Roobet and Stake offers two different RTP for Dog House Megaways, slightly difference between both casinos on same slots. So it depends on casino, they can increase or decrease whenever they want depending on few secret variables, IMHO. Yeah, with PnG slots it can be seen in the code, while Pragmatic, NLC and others on info page. Play 'n GO can be brutal at some sites, as they have 5 different RTP models (96%, 94%, 91%, 87% and 84%). Not arguing that online casinos can't increase/decrease RTPs, it's just that it's not an easy click of a button from their side. They need to contact game provider and request change from provider's side. I have created a discution on the subject here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5386501 |
|
|
|
Hello Danydee
I don't think the casinos can make public this information because a variable RTP would mean they are rigged because if you increase the RTP the user will lose more times. You surely mean decrease! To be honest, I'm not sure if the RTP is variable, but what I know is that we can search slots by RTP and this way play with better odds. just google rtp-slots and you will find a huge list.
Not all casinos do this, and on top some do not even provide the RTP info ! Most of the slots are provided by gambling agencies that develop these games, and they rent them as a service. They don't have to prove the fairness of each roll because they have a verified license. And this means we shouldn't care about what happens in the backend and we should trust them because if they do something nasty then they will lose their license. Here's the point, I've read somewhere here ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5383777 ) that RTP may vary from casino to another and can be adapted to the casinos wants ! In addition in some casinos software is executed under (the website/casino URL), normally it should redirects to the game provider servers, so you know you are running the game from the original makers, but running the game under another (Interface if we could say) there's no more, or any insurance there, and everything can happen.
Edit ...
Yeah, with PnG slots it can be seen in the code, while Pragmatic, NLC and others on info page. Play 'n GO can be brutal at some sites, as they have 5 different RTP models (96%, 94%, 91%, 87% and 84%). Not arguing that online casinos can't increase/decrease RTPs, it's just that it's not an easy click of a button from their side. They need to contact game provider and request change from provider's side. |
|
|
|
|
Hi
Si it is true that RTP of slot games can be adapted to the casinos preferences ??
do all providers do this ?
And what about when slots are accessed directly on the casino website, here anything can happen, things like avoiding use of RNG too.
Thanks to everybody
|
|
|
|
Lorsqu'un gouvernement abusent potentiellement son pouvoir, je vais pas me prononcer sur ce que fait le gouvernement canadien. Voilà, mais en tout cas, la liberté financière, c'est quand même une liberté fondamentale parce que sans liberté financière, il y a pas de liberté d'expression sans liberté financière. Y a pas de liberté de déplacement puisque pour faire. Pour utiliser toutes ces libertés là, vous avez besoin d'argent et donc si vous ne pouvez pas utiliser votre argent, comment vous pouvez avoir ces autres libertés ? Sans liberté financière, il n'y à pas de liberté de décision, de liberté d'agir.. sans liberté financière, tu n'es qu'un esclave ! Facile à dire mais au lieu de se laver les mains en disant si vous ne voulez pas prendre ce risque débrouillez-vous entre vous, il pourrait bosser pour réduire les fees et intégrer le LN afin que les gens n'aient plus à laisser leurs fonds sur son exchange. Le p2p c'est l'arme absolue contre ça mais malheureusement l'adoption chez les commerçants et les particuliers progresse à pas de fourmi quand elle ne régresse pas carrément, et les exchanges p2p je n'ai pas l'impression que ça soit la panacée sinon il n'y aurait pas autant de monde qui utiliserait les exchanges centralisés. Sur sujet, la responsabilité incombe plutôt aux devs et à la comm (communauté).. tiens, si les frais de txs n'étaient pas reversés aux mineurs.. plutôt peut-être dans une caisse contrôlée par la comm qui les redistribue (nods ... projets, tudes, ...) les mineurs n'auraient pas (et eu à) refusuer la proposition d'augmentation de la taille des blocs (dont est issu BCH) ! Et pourquoi il ferait, il touche une commission si les fonds viennent à êtres gelés sur sa platforme je crois, non?  |
|
|
|
Sent to PM, but I don't received a bonus yet
Rules- Closing period for BitcoinTalk users to submit their Livecasino.io username is on Monday 21st February, 09:00 GMT
- The offer will be credited to the livecasino.io account on Monday 21st of February by 17:00 GMT
.. [/list] |
|
|
|
Lorsqu'un gouvernement abusent potentiellement son pouvoir, je vais pas me prononcer sur ce que fait le gouvernement canadien. Voilà, mais en tout cas, la liberté financière, c'est quand même une liberté fondamentale parce que sans liberté financière, il y a pas de liberté d'expression sans liberté financière. Y a pas de liberté de déplacement puisque pour faire. Pour utiliser toutes ces libertés là, vous avez besoin d'argent et donc si vous ne pouvez pas utiliser votre argent, comment vous pouvez avoir ces autres libertés ? Sans liberté financière, il n'y à pas de liberté de décision, de liberté d'agir.. sans liberté financière, tu n'es qu'un esclave ! |
|
|
|
|
1. Bournemouth - 19:15
2. draw - 2:2
3. Millwall - 0:2
4. Cardif - 1:0
5. Blackpool - 1:3
6. Coventry - 2:1
7. Derby - 1:0
8. West Brom - 0:3
9. draw - 1:1
10. QPR - 2:1
11. Sheffield Utd - 2:1
12. draw - 2:2
Sportsbet username: 00016
|
|
|
|
Hey, you have a very good memory! Was the Fortunejack Banning on Bitcointalk once or more times?
I don't think so, it was just one time I think. |
|
|
|
FJ username: 00016 Me, In !  Thank you |
|
|
|
Seems FortuneJack has been banned (most likely temporarily for sending PMs to many users)
Seven years later they are doing the same SPAMMING here, but in another form with several accounts. I remembered this, they was just created, So they PMed all active users of Gambling section for rewarding them with 10mBTC if when they register they create account with same username as the username forum  In other side, maybe should them consider reducing the for-deposit wagering requirement to 1x, it is pretty sufficient to brake money washing tentatives ! I think that wagering two times is also pretty much, so imagine someone who wants placing just one(1) single bet on sports, If he deposit and win, this is just like obliging him to put his money on risk another time ! |
|
|
|
...
Well hopefully there will be changes in the future
Yes, they still have a relatively high withdrawal limit, so yes they surely can reduce the wagering requirement to 1x like what do some other casinos. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
