While I like this kind of technical comparisons, most of the higher figures are not realistic.

OP, if you want this to become a serious thread, please compare apples to apples. Divide the table into two sections:

- real public blockchain tps
- potential/controlled environment tps

BitShares' or NEM's high throughputs were tests in a controlled environment with private blockchains. That's easy Hashgraph isn't even targeting the public blockchain sector - it's a technology for private and consortium blockchains.

Public blockchains have much higher challenges. The network must be able to react to attacks, and be prepared for multiple reorgs that consume LOTs of computational resources, even with blockchain-less DAGs. That is the hard problem. So for the first section ("real public blockchain tps"), you should take only provable stats measured in the mainnet.

It would also be cool to include a link to the stats taken as a source.

Cool. Every coin can achieve that.

Still no winner for the puzzle!
Tweet us your answers!
https://twitter.com/Loki_Project/status/971743903488663553

I’m sorry I own coins on the crypto I’ve made. How dare the developers collectively own 5% of the maximum supply. Also, why turn your argument in a different direction now that it failed on one side?

Thanks, adding to the OP and sending your bounty!  

This coin is a copypaste from ALQO: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2343884

ZEITCOIN is 140 TPS ONCHAIN.  

* Plus it would take very little to Double the 140 to 280 TPS.*
* Either moving to a 2mb block size or changing the block speed to 15 seconds.*

Using Multiple Exchanges Offchain Processing ,
ZEITCOIN's Offchain TPS is Unlimited.