While I like this kind of technical comparisons, most of the higher figures are not realistic.
OP, if you want this to become a serious thread, please compare apples to apples. Divide the table into two sections:
- real public blockchain tps
- potential/controlled environment tps
BitShares' or NEM's high throughputs were tests in a controlled environment with private blockchains. That's easy
![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
Hashgraph isn't even targeting the public blockchain sector - it's a technology for private and consortium blockchains.
Public blockchains have much higher challenges. The network must be able to react to attacks, and be prepared for multiple reorgs that consume LOTs of computational resources, even with blockchain-less DAGs.
That is the hard problem. So for the first section ("real public blockchain tps"), you should take only provable stats measured in the
mainnet.
It would also be cool to include a link to the stats taken as a source.
Using Multiple Exchanges Offchain Processing ,
ZEITCOIN's Offchain TPS is Unlimited.
Cool. Every coin can achieve that.
![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)