no, not until i am confident in the ways to cash out behind the gov eye

limited supply is not a flaw, and that does not limit growth in value. the good thing it does is inflation control, manipulations with printing money, corruption

the context of TS implies investment security, not blockchain security probably. looking at full span price of btc it may look very secure - exponential growth. the rule of thumb in finance is that past performance does not guarantee future. and the back side of any investment is risk. so of course it is not.

if you live in such country thats should not be a big secret how to turn it around. those involved in corruption in your country have the same issues and manfge to live by smooth. read the newspaper after all ))

have hard wallet
dont store at the exchages
have separate pc for crypto on linux
pretty much that

like now is ggod time, catch the bottom and buy. dont do this "too expensive already" mistake

for the past ten years i see Russia is back. Heros like navalniy will put it 10 year back. not voting for him.

some say ...once upon a time they privatize money printing machine and played it smart )

i wouldnot call anyone stupid publically. thats rude and not intilligent. how abount they are just spamming )

dont remember who said that, just liked it and absorbed  - expansion. that in human language shall probably mean development

a common cause for any inequality is defined in economisc 101 - resources are scarce and spread out unequally. i would count human qualities such as intilligence as a resouces too.

i wouldnt be surprised if bankers soon lead the market. there is time for everything

why do we have to choose and separate those traits? isnt it great to be both smart and strategic? those who smart or strategic... well who is perfect? we are all striving our best with what has been given. i think

норм написано без воды, спасибо

в кеш руб или usd

когда же он закончится ?

hard to imagine how the gov will manage supply with two currencies on hand and.. probably many other private coins in circulation. something shall dominate and the other be restricted somehow. crypto shall finally pick up the lead. within 5-10 years i think ))   

bitcoin has cons adn pros like stocks or other assets, it does have greater return over real estate, but we take much greater risk investing in crypto. i would say it is highly subjective to claim that btc is better.

bitcoin itself can not lead to a corruption i think. some may use btc in the corruption schemes as any other fiat money or assets, but at least one thing is out from corruption world - you can not print btc on your wish

the gov may ban crypto ( some have already done so), but that will not stop its development and sooner or later they will have to admint it. those banning may find themseves far behind the world