Maybe that is not the block 18851 you are being sent?
Is there a block explorer for devcoin?
|
|
|
BTW, I believe Doublec is actively working on Ixcoin, with the timetravel fix at block 140K and merged-mining implemented 5K blocks later.
I0coin is what I'm actively working on. Ixcoin I provided patches for the timetravel fix and the merged-mining implementation for the coin maintainer (switching on at 40,000 and 45,000 respectively). So far he's done nothing with them so I guess those won't be the actual switchover block times.
|
|
|
Is there a git repository, based on the original bitcoin repository it was forked from? If not, do you know the commit id where it was forked? If not git do you have any version control repository?
|
|
|
someone needs to patch the daemon in order to make it accept the merged mining, follow what ArtForz did for his namecoind fork that will give you a good idea
ArtForZ didn't do Namecoin. 'vinced' did. I ported namecoin's merged mining support to i0coin and ixcoin recently. I could do the same for devcoin assuming it's similar. Is devcoin based on the standard bitcoin git repository? You need to be aware that it's a blockchain forking change though. It'd have to have a block number that it turns on and all clients would need to update. Those that don't will be on an incompatible fork of the chain.
|
|
|
G0n+/4N/SwNJfsjVNrVvkVuGbwiR+X/Wwzm8IZk9WBuoZfriG7iWqnMdOALUDx4NEXfiTkeDsy5dk/OI3JUBQ9s=
Confirmed, nice: $ litecoind verifymessage LSQAz3zmxfKAEPZJd9693Udrg19gEidHs8 "G0n+/4N/SwNJfsjVNrVvkVuGbwiR+X/Wwzm8IZk9WBuoZfriG7iWqnMdOALUDx4NEXfiTkeDsy5dk/OI3JUBQ9s=" "Yes, it's really me" true
|
|
|
If you use the command line client you can prove it by signing a message using that address: $ litecoind signmessage LSQAz3zmxfKAEPZJd9693Udrg19gEidHs8 "Yes, it's really me" Show the result of that here. People can verify with: $ litecoind verifymessage LSQAz3zmxfKAEPZJd9693Udrg19gEidHs8 [result from above] "Yes, it's really me"
|
|
|
Thanks all for the donations, much appreciated!
|
|
|
Doublec, I would like to send you donation for fixing i0c client. Is this address still valid ? i0coin: jWqLauZXfF3PVVZDhjNqZLZk7voG2CAofi
Yep,thanks!
|
|
|
We need a Dalvik miner. Seriously.
Or a native C miner and call it using the Android NDK.
|
|
|
Version v32507 of i0coin is available. Source and windows binaries are included. Only minor changes but I wanted to get a recent checkpoint out: - Added new hardcoded seed node
- Add a checkpoint at block 142,900
|
|
|
For the not so experienced miners, how do you do merged mining when solo mining?
Assuming you want to mine namecoins as well as i0coins. Get and run the latest namecoin daemon, 0.3.24.64. Get and run the latest i0coin daemon. Get the i0coin source. Inside the 'contrib' directory of the source there is a 'merged-mining 'merged-mining-proxy' python script. Run this with command line arguments like: merged-mining-proxy -w 10332 -p http://user:password@127.0.0.1:7332 -x http://user:password@127.0.0.1:8332 Replace 7332 and 8332 with the ports you are running the i0coin and namecoin JSON-RPC server on respectively (the above are the defaults). Replace 'user' and 'password' with the rpcuser and rpcpassword's used for the respective programs. Point your miner to http://127.0.0.1:10332 as the address to mine and use any username and password, they are ignored. Mining should then start.
|
|
|
Block 45,000 or block 40,000?
Block 40,000 is when the timetravel fix activates, 45,000 is when merged mining activates. Assuming the ixcoin developer keeps the same block numbers as I used in the patches. Probably best to make them larger now since there won't be time for people to get new clients.
|
|
|
Hopefully doublec and nasakioto come to their senses and implement a 5% sales tax on transactions to be deleted before block 45,000.
It's nothing to do with me - I just provided fixes for issues raised by the ixcoin developer to claim a bounty. Block 40,000 is getting close - if you're not going to release a client with the timetravel exploit fixed soon you'll need to change the block switch on time. Any timeline?
|
|
|
Is there a i0coin, namecoin and bitcoin mining support? All 3 at same time?
Not yet, you have to wait for block 160,000 before that becomes possible. Currently only i0coin+namecoin (or other chain that has support as a auxiliary merged mining chain).
|
|
|
Unexpectedly, at the moment, i0coin is almost 4x the hash rate of GG (difficulty almost 200) so by the time it gets to 160,000 (or 150,000) it should be way safer than GG I would suggest a checkpoint update soon after that too I hope those of you mining i0coin at the moment are merge mining namecoin at the same time and making extra out of it. Namecoin difficulty is fairly high though so it's probably not a big deal.
|
|
|
Merge mining pull request enabling support as an auxiliary chain at block 45,000: https://github.com/ixcoin/ixcoin/pull/5I tested mining bitcoin, namecoin, ixcoin and i0coin all at once, successfully getting blocks. This was on my own internal forks of the block chains so I could mine at low difficulty. I'd suggest doing your own tests too to be comfortable. If this is enough to claim the bounty my address is xo8Jj5XcebH6qZE8ndhvrJjferxjL885L6 While testing I noticed the genesis block for the ixcoin testnet is invalid. it'd be great if you could generate a valid testnet genesis since it makes testing a bit easier.
|
|
|
Merged mining: https://github.com/doublec/ixcoin/tree/mergedminingThis enables ixcoin as a primary chain on the main network. It is supported as an auxiliary chain on the testnet only. I'll do some testing then push another commit to enable it as an auxiliary on the main net at a certain block number. Then I'll do a pull request. Primary chain support is still useful though. It means you can mine ixcoin and namecoins together right now by building this branch as it's a non-forking change.
|
|
|
|