Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 02:28:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 »
1121  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin on: November 24, 2011, 01:41:50 PM
Well post your address and take your price, I need Bitcoin, solidcoin and i0coin.

Thanks!

Bitcoin: 1NpNGkLxyWRHNeb9wvq2AATKWcEtsTRZsL
i0coin: jWqLauZXfF3PVVZDhjNqZLZk7voG2CAofi
Solidcoin: I don't run the solidcoin client so don't need this, thanks though

And will all my 300K i0coins be worth anything? Or be on a separate block chain
And have only zero? It be good if you did the same thing as solidcoin 2.0;
and Pre-mined and give me what i had.

As I mined over 300K hoping it would one day be worth something
When merged mining is activated it'll be on a fork of the main blockchain. This means your existing i0coins will be valid and will work. I'll do some more testing then look at having merge mining switch on at a set block number, similar to the way I've set the timetravel exploit fix to activate.
1122  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: i0coin hits block 100000 on: November 24, 2011, 01:34:41 PM
Success! Block 130176 on the main i0coin chain is a block mined using merge mining. It mined a testnet block and a mainnet block. You can see the coinbase containing the extra data:

Code:
"coinbase" : "0445fe021c0131522cfabe6d6d02309d7a5cdf4eddf7773d0c40d7771f052bb0821b95885e229a226f5ed291060100000000000000"

1123  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin on: November 24, 2011, 09:37:47 AM
Anyone want to test merged mining with i0coin? I have a first cut at code, taken from the namecoin implementation, and a post explaining how to test it.
1124  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: i0coin hits block 100000 on: November 24, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
This looks great.  Have you tried to do merged mining?  There is a large bounty if you can get that working and there is source code at dot-bit to do it.
I have the first attempt at merge mining support in the 'mergedmining' branch of the git repository. If anyone wants to test it I'd appreciate the feedback. On linux you can clone the repository and build with:

Code:
$ git clone git://github.com/doublec/i0coin.git
$ cd i0coin
$ git checkout -b mergemining origin/mergemining
$ cd src
$ make -f makefile.unix i0coind

Merged mining is disabled on the production network but enabled on the test network. What I do is set up a 'test network in the box' approach. This allows running test nodes without connecting to the wider network. I run two nodes on i0coind testnet - these will be the 'secondary chain':

First create directories to hold the chains. Node 1:

Code:
$ mkdir -p node1/testnet
$ cat >node1/testnet/i0coin.conf
rpcpassword=node1
rpcuser=node1
daemon=1
upnp=0
rpcport=17001
noirc=1
port=18001

Node 2:

Code:
$ mkdir -p node2/testnet
$ cat >node2/testnet/i0coin.conf
rpcpassword=node2
rpcuser=node2
daemon=1
upnp=0
rpcport=17002
noirc=1
port=18002

Now we need a primary chain node. You can use namecoin for this since it's merge mine enabled. You can also use production i0coind with the binary built above since it has the code to be a primary node enabled:

Code:
$ mkdir -p node3/testnet
$ cat >node3/testnet/i0coin.conf
rpcpassword=node3
rpcuser=node3
daemon=1
upnp=0
rpcport=17003
noirc=1
port=18003

Start the nodes:

Code:
$ i0coind -conf=/full/path/to/node1/testnet/i0coin.conf -datadir=/full/path/to/node1 -port=18001 -testnet 
$ i0coind -conf=/full/path/to/node2/testnet/i0coin.conf -datadir=/full/path/to/node2 -port=18002 -testnet -addnode=127.0.0.1:18001
$ i0coind -conf=/full/path/to/node3/testnet/i0coin.conf -datadir=/full/path/to/node3 -port=18003

You need the 'addnode' in the second node start so it connects to node1 to form a network. Also note that 'node3' is not a testnet node. And make sure 'i0coind' is the one built from the 'mergedmining' branch. You can check the status of the nodes with commands like:

Code:
$ i0coind -conf=/full/path/to/node1/testnet/i0coin.conf -datadir=/full/path/to/node1 -port=18001 -testnet getinfo
$ i0coind -conf=/full/path/to/node2/testnet/i0coin.conf -datadir=/full/path/to/node2 -port=18002 -testnet listtransactions

Now run the merged mining proxy:

Code:
$ contrib/merged-mine-proxy -w 17004 -p http://node3:node3@127.0.0.1:17003/ -x http://node2:node2@127.0.0.1:17002/

The merged-mine-proxy code is from namecoin and is in the 'contrib' subdirectory of the i0coind 'mergedmining' source. This proxy will listen on port 17004 which is where you should point your miners. For example, poclbm:

Code:
python poclbm.py -d 0 --user mm --pass mm --host localhost --port 17004 

You can use any username/password. You should see output from the proxy when the miner finds a block like:

Code:
2011-11-24T09:13:04.598774,solve,0,1,00000000a94a6f99a4ff77dc5ec8cdda3567ac3674bbc1e7ceec8339083d0e86

The "solve,0,1" means it solved the secondary chain (the i0coind testnet). It'd be "solve,1,1" if it solved the primary and secondary chain. Hopefully the above gives a start for people to test the code. When it's confident that it's stable we can set a block to enable it live.
1125  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin on: November 23, 2011, 09:18:15 AM
Anyone having the new windows binaries?
I built the following: http://i0coin.bitparking.com/i0coin-win32-bin-v32502.zip

That includes the 'i0coin.exe' for the GUI and 'i0coind.exe' for the command line tool. I've only lightly tested it, downloading the blockchain successfully. Backup your wallet before running!
1126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin on: November 23, 2011, 04:40:08 AM
Really cool of you. Just curious as to what brought on the desire to re-work I0C?
I was bored and got tired of reading "Please somebody fix i0coin" posts/emails.
1127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin on: November 23, 2011, 03:40:07 AM
I made an attempt at fixing the following i0coin bugs:

* Fix for the timetravel/zeitgeist exploit. This is a block-forking change meaning that all clients must upgrade to this version. To enable time to update it turns on at block 150,000.
* Add a checkpoint at bock 127,360
* Remove the list of bitcoin DNS seed nodes
* Change the hardcoded i0coin seed nodes to the only active node I know of accepting connections
* Remove the outdated windows binaries included in the archive
* Changed the IRC code to use the lfnet server instead of freenode

Source (tarball and git repository) and details at http://i0coin.bitparking.com.
1128  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: i0coin hits block 100000 on: November 23, 2011, 03:39:45 AM
I made an attempt at fixing the following i0coin bugs:

* Fix for the timetravel/zeitgeist exploit. This is a block-forking change meaning that all clients must upgrade to this version. To enable time to update it turns on at block 150,000.
* Add a checkpoint at bock 127,360
* Remove the list of bitcoin DNS seed nodes
* Change the hardcoded i0coin seed nodes to the only active node I know of accepting connections
* Remove the outdated windows binaries included in the archive
* Changed the IRC code to use the lfnet server instead of freenode

Source (tarball and git repository) and details at http://i0coin.bitparking.com.

1129  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin on: October 23, 2011, 06:12:27 AM
What block explorer are you using?
http://blockexplorer.sytes.net
1130  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Merged mining for Ixcoin on: October 22, 2011, 04:02:57 AM
I would also suggest that you contact BitcoinEXpress and figure out why he DS attacked Ixcoin
ixcoin on the bitparking exchange was never double-spent. i0coin was. I saw BitcoinExpress had in his signature for a while that he purchased an ipad 2 with money obtained from an ixcoin double spend - I don't know what that was in regard to.

I wouldn't open another ixcoin exchange (or any other low hash rate exchange) in their existing forms , unless I found some way of dealing with double-spends or improving the way existing exchanges work to reduce the risk.
1131  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Weird Namecoin Transactions on: October 22, 2011, 03:52:37 AM
I finally run my namecoind again after a long time and found more than 21 namecoins with me.  This is weird, I never recall having any namecoins in the first place.  How do I check where did they come from?
Have you ever mined in the bitparking pool? When I closed I automatically sent out remaining balances.
1132  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin on: October 17, 2011, 02:10:40 AM
jLSn51oKE27uc9JJ74ccscyRdj3mnMTVAY appears to contain the coins that were used for double spending on the bitparking i0coin exchange. If you run an exchange and see a deposit coming from this address you know you're at risk from the double spender.
55,000 i0coins seem to have been moved from this address to jXHTbPFRrMua2RAMUkPNniThu1qAmP3eGt. Anyone transacted that many i0coins recently?
1133  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] on: October 13, 2011, 01:13:59 AM
I fail to see how it was a shot at me, you said he was full of shit and I simply pointed out the fact, his "Shit" scared the hell out of you.
Please quote the part where I said he was full of shit, thanks.
1134  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alleged BCX update [Sorta Confirmed] on: October 13, 2011, 12:50:38 AM
DoubleC just took a cheap shot at BCX in another thread. But he forgets that just the threat of BCX hitting Namecoin sent him scurrying like a rabbit along with Ruxum. There was statement in big red letters for almost two weeks that BCX was the reason he closed his NMC exchange.
It was a shot at you, not at BCX. You're the one that listed those claims, not BCX. Unless you're BCX of course.
1135  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 13, 2011, 12:43:37 AM
Have you forgot the red colored bold message displayed on your Namecoin exchange for about 10 days. You stated BCX was the reason and only after the NMC was cancelled did you reopen.
Indeed, I closed deposits/withdrawals due to the threat. I take threats seriously. No attack occurred though. I closed the other exchanges due to the double spend that happened. I'm not saying BCX didn't do the attack. I'm saying there's no evidence of him doing the attack. He's more than welcome to prove it if he wants by moving the double spend coins.  Please point out which of my statements you feel are untrue.
1136  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 13, 2011, 12:29:29 AM
Quote
Geist Geld - Two successful attacks
BitcoinExpress claims one attack. The first was ArtForZ's. ArtForZ has claimed in public IRC channels that there is no evidence that BitcoinExpress did what he claims on the GG chain so the claim of even one sucessful attack here is dubious.

Quote
Fairbrix -Reorged the chain and stole over 1700 blocks.
There is no proof this was BitcoinExpress. He should move coins around if he wants to prove it was him.
Quote
Namecoin - Rumored to have paid off by NMC Dev not to attack
Rumours don't mean anything. I know of no one paying him off for the attack.

Quote
Solidcoin 1 - Scared CH so bad he killed the chain as a precaution after seeing GG hit.
This one I don't know about.
Quote
I0C and IXC - Numerous test for 51%, basically killed them
Where is there evidence of tests for 51% attacks on these coins by BitcoinExpress?
Quote
Bitparking - Number 1 suspect in DS attack has every trait of BCX
Again, no evidence it was BitcoinExpress. He can prove it by moving the coins out of the I0Coin address holding the double spent coins - by posting in advance the amount he plans to move.

Basically he may or may not have done any of the above. There's no proof either way.
1137  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 13, 2011, 12:21:39 AM
DoubleC has confirmed BitcoinExpress post in newbies is LEGIT
I didn't confirm the post was legit. I confirmed the poster was correct that bitcoinexpress corresponded with me under that name. I have no idea if the contents if the post are legit. Please change the title. I don't think this needs another thread....
1138  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alleged BCX update on: October 12, 2011, 11:27:25 PM
DoubleC can you verify?
Yes, I received emails from BitcoinExpress from a gmail address with the name "Justin Guss" in the past.
1139  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 12, 2011, 02:05:05 AM
Wait, so the premine was actually 12m?
The coins are apparently unspendable - the client is hardcoded not to allow spending from the premined supernode addresses.
1140  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 11, 2011, 11:34:31 PM
So from this non programmers point of view I have learned several things that could easily hurt Solicoin 2.0.
3) Client must communicate with Super node
Where are you getting information about supernodes? Has source or a paper been released?
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!