 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Hi,
I’ll be straight to the point, only dealing with serious people, i have a PHD in Data Science and AI, i challenged myself to replicate Pluribus, the AI develloped by Facebook with Carnegie Mellon to play poker.
It’s not at all open source, so it’s a real challenge to replicate their work.
Disclaimer:
It’s not a copy of Pluribus, i develloped my own AI, it’s clearly not as efficient as Pluribus which make 1000$/hour in average, all day long and won 10,000 hands against professional player.
Mine make ~300$ per hour, but it’s manual so can’t work 24h unless you don’t sleep.
I sell it only for research purprose, i don’t know if it’s legal to use, so i tested it for research purpose but i don’t use it, you use it at your own risk.
The current version has no GUI, i’ll dev a very poor quality GUI, meaning atm
it won’t be automated, you’ll have to enter the cards you see on your screen and it will tell you what to play.
I will only sale very few, probably less than 5 or 10. AI poker wouldn’t work if everyone use it.
Price 1BTC delivery within 1 month to finish the GUI, i sell it only for research purpose, first come first served basis.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a very impressive work you have done.
Great idea, great project and the team deliver as promised.
|
|
|
|
This one asking for donations as well?! LOL. Thats like the 4th copycat "project" claiming to add privacy to XRB with no code shown ever, moderated thread, deleting comments when challenged as a scam, locking the thread, a lot of noob accounts singing praises to the dev and claiming that they have donated money. Overall red flags and warning signs. So we have STONE, Paper, Manta and now this one. Could be the same guy behind all of them. A scam alert thread has been opened here for STONE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2677524.40So buyer beware, you have been warned. Look at all my messages in the Stone scam accusation topic. I have been the first one to show that Stone is scam with obvious copy paste from wikipedia ans silly conclusion that make no sense. i can't say if Azulik is legit but check page 2 there is a big scam accusation from a fake profile of the Stone creator. Not removed by azulik. They have a draft of whitepaper (which seems to be original as discussed page 3 in the discord screenshot) and most of all they say: "yes adding ZK-Snarks to XRB insn't feasible and we are working on 3 other approches, we will do simulation to check which one is the best among WPI and Recursive-ZK-snarks. " On top of that they garanty they will not cash out the DEV wallet and justify everytime they need it. I sent them a PM as i did with the guy of Stone, asking technical questions and their reply was really acceptable. I ask them why they did a pre-ann and they replied they are sure stone is a scam whereas they have been working hard in bad condition this guy stole people's money and this money could really help them. Apparently testing recursive-ZK-Snakrs is something really consuming in term of hardware. In 2 days what they speak about is much more interresting that these other project: "We will add Zk-Snarks to XRB" BS it's not possible. IMO does worth to follow. |
|
|
|
Tested the payment.
Its damn fast as stated... Almost received in 4 seconds...
Hope the Dev team will soon solve the Node problem..
Just a question.. Why not reward the people for staking? That way more people will help out...
Or since circulation is over that cannot be done?
how do you reward in a network without fees ? |
|
|
|
|
I sent a PM for donation.
I did my homework and what i have seen so far is flawless.
Is it true you will stop donation ? I have seen that on the discord screenshot.
|
|
|
|
He has been working for the last month and so what ? No whitepaper ? No code ? Only copy and paste from wikipedia. It's more than that, he copy-paste random things from wikipedia and make completly silly conclusion, but absolutely wrong conclusion. And you still think it's legit.  Azulik is legit, Stone isn't. |
|
|
|
|
I'll dig the WP and donate accordingly.
Keep us updated frequently.
|
|
|
|
wow, Stone, Manta, Azulik.... all the same ANN, is there any demo ?
I'm well invested in XRB and in love with the technology. I think i have been the first one to raise the accusation that Stone was only a copy and paste from Wikipedia. Post #31Since, someone uploaded this video We must be carefull with Azulik project, but at least here they quote Wikipedia and don't try to hide it like Stone, they don't say we will take XRB protocol and add zkSNARKS whithout any other explanation like Manta. Here at least, they offer a new approach with WIP, they want to discuss, they started a whitepaper. I'll go in details, i haven't check the WP but it looks better to me. I have been so disapointed by Stone and Manta but i want to believe it's possible to add privacy to Raiblocks. |
|
|
|
|
A Raiblocks with privacy is the holy grail, your project looks much more legit than the others on this niche.
Not sure about the name Azulik but i like your first picture, i'll take time to have a look at your project in details and give some coins to encourage you.
|
|
|
|
@KryptoQuant
That is useful information for me.Thank you for sharing.
You are welcome, Thanks to bitpotus for starting this thread. I'm currently working on adding this privacy feature, to be honest as a hobby in the evening as i still have my daily job. I have found a very interesting approach which would misrepresent the current XRB approach. I have to work harder to keep the philosophy of the XRB, having free and instant anonymous transaction would be amazing. |
|
|
|
We are making many progress our first backtesting results are very good as we beat the equally weighted benchmark of 3 biggest crypto (BTC,XRP,ETH). Taking into account the fees we get a better results than a held position. It's very encouraging for having a very powerful tool for automated trading using AI. The downside ? If our strategies are really that good we may keep them for us  |
|
|
|
|
A topic like the Stone project which is definitively a scam and for which a scam
accusation topic already exist. This accusation topic should be linked to the official topic.
It's ok to say you may have a doubt and hence don't close the topic.
But at least be fair and make people aware there is scam accusation by adding a red banner on top of the thread !
|
|
|
|
It is hard to understand what is really scam and what is just FUD. I remember it was scam alrerts on DeepOnion or Worldcore and I see how much profit have gain the people who invest money and time to this "scam projects"
Here is the proof: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Hi Stone supporters, apologies for the variance in communication over the last two days, a little technical insight into what stage right now, and what is currently filling my time.  A DAG G Transitive reduction of G
If G is a DAG, its transitive closure is the graph with the most edges that represents the same reachability relation. It has an edge u → v whenever u can reach v. That is, it has an edge for every related pair u ≤ v of distinct elements in the reachability relation of G, and may therefore be thought of as a direct translation of the reachability relation ≤ into graph-theoretic terms. The same method of translating partial orders into DAGs works more generally: for every finite partially ordered set (S, ≤), the graph that has a vertex for each member of S and an edge for each pair of elements related by u ≤ v is automatically a transitively closed DAG, and has (S, ≤) as its reachability relation. In this way, every finite partially ordered set can be represented as the reachability relation of a DAG.
The transitive reduction of a DAG G is the graph with the fewest edges that represents the same reachability relation as G. It is a subgraph of G, formed by discarding the edges u → v for which G also contains a longer path connecting the same two vertices. Like the transitive closure, the transitive reduction is uniquely defined for DAGs. In contrast, for a directed graph that is not acyclic, there can be more than one minimal subgraph with the same reachability relation.
With the 'Transitive reduction of G' it will bring some sense of privacy ontop of zk-SNARK's, which effectively will make it more secure than ZCash 
Whilst i don't want to make any promises right now, i'm looking at getting another developer onboard, with the development funds provided, to get the project completed quicker, as its proving to be quite the task and larger than originally expected, are we all happy for this to go ahead? I'm also looking to get a roadmap out the door at some stage!, possibly within the next two weeks, i have quite the treat prepared in terms of a roadmap, just need to get it projected onto a graphic.
I appreciate all the donators so far, and i will be responding to PM's when i can, i will just need a little longer than usual, thank you.
felixando I'm "specialized" in DAG and here is just a copy and paste from wikipedia. . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_reductionI participated in writing this Wikipedia page and transitive reduction has nothing to do with privacy. I don't know whether the project is a scam or not but it's clearly very poorly documented and i'm not even sure you understand what DAG and the math behind are. If you are legit, and just need help to understand stuff, then you can contact me. So you copy-paste random things from Wikipedia, you make conclusion which are no sense, you get challenged, and you just delete the post instead of explaning how it will work. That's a SCAM 100% sure !!!! |
|
|
|
|
I confirm this is scam, i tried to challenge his skills in DAG and he deleted my post.
I'll try to find my deleted post to add it there.
|
|
|
|
Every XRB holder should read this and give: https://www.reddit.com/r/RaiBlocks/comments/7otjgy/how_ill_try_to_make_raiblocks_known_by_chineses/I created a facebook ads targetting China and HKD. https://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/452521RedditFBAdd.pngI'll invest some of my XRB and if you whish to do the same: xrb_3z6s5acfi19kyo4s1r38kzfh9nzm777o4ac64nm3j3hdid5e5izxt8gkgxtp For more info: https://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/204973RedditFirst.pngIf i get enough traction here are the following steps: Professional video explaning Raiblocks with chinese speaker Advertising on Renren a popular social network in china Facebook ads in South Korea and Japan UPDATE: Here is the text from the professional translator are our chinese reader member happy with this translation ? Raiblocks(XRB)是为真实世界而呈现的加密货币——是人们在生活中对一切进行支付的快捷免费方式。 投资于新型比特币，投资于一种快速、安全且无需任何费用的加密货币，投资于未来。 目前适用于Bit-z、Kucoin 、Bitgrail，且很快将适用于Binance。 详情请查阅白皮书。 UPADATE 2: I received no XRB at all, so i'll start with 2 XRB of mine, which is around 1% of my XRB to start. I think 2 XRB allow to target 10k People among the 1.2 million targeted audience. All of your XRB will be used for advertising purpose. It's a very good start to make XRB popular in Asia I can see so many people giving there XRB to the potentially scam coin Stone, whereas using some of them for advertising in Asia would make it super popular and x10 !
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I would like to get more information about how an ERC-20 token and an ICO works.
There is the token itself and a crowd sale contract associated, so I have the following question, sorry if it sound very basic or completely wrong.
o If I’m interested in an ICO, I register on the ICO website, once in the user dashboard I will see an ETH address and I will send my ETH to this adress right ?
o From which ETH wallet should I send it ? Do you know one for mac which handle ETH and ERC-20 ?
o Will I immediately get my new token on my ETH wallet ? Or will I get it in the end of the ICO ? Do I have to do something to receive or it’s automatic ?
o How can I monitor the ICO, I mean is it possible to check the wallet where I send my ETH on etherscan.io, just to see first how much they raised ?
o Is it also possible to see the detail on etherscan for the ERC-20 token I received or will receive?
o What details the user dashboard usually show ? Will I see how I much ETH I send and how much ERC-20 I got back ?
o If the ICO has a crowd sale contract which state the hard cap is 3 million, does it mean that if the cap isn’t reach I’ll get back my ETH and send back the ETH I received ? Is it done automatically ?
Thank you for your help
|
|
|
|
I really like the idea behind this project. It is practically impossible for an average person to experience and take advantage of a trading bot.
I can only speak for myself but I am very curious about how it works and how would it be to use one. Let me know if there's any "non-technical" help you might need with the project.
Thank you for you enthusiasm which is highly appreciated. If you have any question about the project, the strategies we would be happy to provide further details. |
|
|
|
the idea of your project looks very interesting and promising, but you have provided very little information about yourself.
no website, no information about the team.
how do you want to be supported and advertised by you, if there is no information
Completely understand your point however we want to make the project hype not ourself, we have described some strategies that will be available as well as the current state of the project. We will work very soon on a website, but as mentioned in the first post, we have first prioritised the two main steps of the project: a strong trading framework and solid strategies. |
|
|
|
|
