I agree. I think current logo is a bit too old school for my liking.
I want a clean cut modern commercial style like DRK, VRC, CLOAK etc. Simple is best IMO.
I like the original logo style but that without the superman trademark diamond would be good.
 Just me thinking out loud  Looks good but I would like the "S" to be a bit more prominent. (Nearly filling the entire coin circle) I wish I was good at thinking out loud for designs but I'm no designer and have zero paint skills.  I agree. I was thinking the 'S bolt' should be thicker, taking up most of the space in the circle (coin)... I threw that graphic together just as a rough example... Logo design isn't really my thing, and my photoshop skills are limited (obviously, lol)... If we have a designer on board maybe he can work with the 'S bolt' idea? Anyone else have any suggestions? We should get this new logo happening asap, before we gain more marketing steam... JP's article was great; too bad we didn't have a finalized logo to brand that page with... No worries, though; all good things in all good time  Supercoin to the moon! interesting logo |
|
|
|
Some news for the promotional video or the project stalled?
It was a very good idea to show SUPERCOIN's features and talk about Phase II.
I see 16,911.42993697 SUPER have been donated, dev use these coins to do demo. This coin has A+ tech, and D- promotion, dev team can't you do something?? |
|
|
|
Who wants to see super over 50.000 Satoshi??? after or before phase 2?
need to get more people involved, need more people like cryptobull. The key is how to motivate people. This is a great coin, technically more advanced than other coins. Just need a better promo and awareness campaign. |
|
|
|
Sorry for my previous last post i am writing on the iphone while ridding in rhe subway  and i am not writing proper.I believe that you get my point Soon we are all going to speak words like sorry team/dev, thank you dev and etc. believe me there is a bright future for our coin with the Super abilities it has we are going Super trend in weeks SUPER is everywhere! Yes SUPER is everywhere! |
|
|
|
I vote for Poloniex truce If everything is clear with us and the big exchanges we can approach Bter and all others exchanges in Canada and China  Forget about poloniex, it is an inferior exchange, and with low quality people who don't understand coin code. I am perfectly happy to trade at mintpal, cryptsy and bittrex (and severalother exchanges), we don't need poloniex at all. Hello, i am not talking on getting listed on Ploniex again,u misunderstood. I am talking for truce between the Dev and Poloniex and to post official truce and to clear things out, because now when google it the result are scandal no official excuse or what so ever. Believe me i prefer Bittrex mintpal and Cryptsy too.But i believe that clearing things out is better than this fake accusations. Approaching other exchanges is better than sit and do nothing,but this is my point of view. SuperCoin will stand tall and will not bow down to any exchange or group but we must clear things out and think positive if we believe that PR and marketing is good for the coin. If the the community doesn't think that we need Poloniex then we shouldn't approach them in any way We are like republic so any opinion is respected and reviewed by all of us There's nothing to talk about with poloniex. Despite the facts that they made stupid mistakes and they have zero ideas on the altcoin code, they tried their best to deny their mistakes. They tried to find other issues in SUPER code in an intention to cover their stupid mistakes, yet they showed to people more that they know nothing about the code (like later they tried to find a computation mistake in the total coin count, but they themselves made another mistake), you can see all the history in this thread and the one they made. Despite the overwhelming facts that they are idiots, they all the time refused to change the title of their post (why poloniex rejected Supercoin) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0they refused to make public apologies to supercoin community, although there are many requests in both threads. They had no reasons, no facts against supercoin technically, but they all the time remain hostile to supercoin, despite the friend proposal by supercoin team. They are downright stupid. Just ignore them, that's all. All the facts tell you why Supercoin has rejected poloniex! |
|
|
|
I vote for Poloniex truce If everything is clear with us and the big exchanges we can approach Bter and all others exchanges in Canada and China Forget about poloniex, it is an inferior exchange, and with low quality people who don't understand coin code. I am perfectly happy to trade at mintpal, cryptsy and bittrex (and severalother exchanges), we don't need poloniex at all. +1. A great coin like SUPER does not need a bad exchange such as poloniex. Poloniex made a nice circus for us, they can continue their circus role in the alt coin community.  That circus does not prevent us to have the top tier exchanges for trading SUPER. |
|
|
|
The dev knows nothing about the multisig and what it means to the coin. How the multisig addresses and tx should be used. He just broadly said that it will make the coin more secure. This is complete garbage and he has no idea how the multisig works.
Too many shitcoins like this, some devs just use a hot name to promote his coins, without knowing the details.
Multisig coin is a scam, be careful!
Yes agree, there are too many shitcoins like this, just use some buzz words and nothing else. |
|
|
|
I think the 100% POS interest accounts for compound interest because I am not receiving the 0.27% per day that 100%/365 days in a year would bring. This means that for the interest it will be harder to accumulate in the first few months with most coming in the later months.
Like the other guy said he is earning stake every 48 hours, I think this could be the reason. But we could get a comment from the dev.
POS is working fine here... I have had no problems staking with any version of the supercoin wallet... Have you tried consolidating your coins? Coin consolidation in wallet 1. Enable Coin Control Go to Settings\Options\Display and check the Display Coin Control Features checkbox. 2. Create a new address to receive coins. Select Receive Coins, and click New Address. Copy the new receive address. 3. Send Coins Click Send. Click Select Inputs. Select all the inputs you want to consolidate into one transaction. Send coins to new Receive Address you created in step 2. This consolidated batch of coins will now stake in larger amounts, instead of giving you a lot of tiny dust payments. Since the POS interest payments also stake after 1 day, and begin paying POS on previous POS deposits, (go compound interest!) the deposit consolidation may need to be done monthly. Since Supercoin only needs 24 hours to stake, the consolidation only cost 1 day of POS payments. Good strategy. Small pos amounts are sometimes annoying. This way we get consolidate the pos generation, so one day 1-2 times a lot easy, and you don';t need to keep the wallet open all the time, just once per day or 2 is enough. |
|
|
|
Sold all my coins between 8-10k. I definitely missed the top on this pump but at the same time it would be foolish to think it can stay above 10k and never come back down so I dont regret my decision. To all you lucky bagholders, would be foolish to not sell at these prices. But a lot of the bagholders claiming they now `have` profit at this price, its not profit until you sell. I made that mistake with XC, price went to 400k+ and I didnt sell then it dropped. I thought I had made $50k profit but it was just on paper Edit: Guys remember this pump was pushed up by P&D groups, it will come down as hard as it went up. another "trader", lol. I will take my profit too, but at much higher price Just look at its market cap, and compare to others you know what I mean. |
|
|
|
Great! I am out of the game. Certainly the coin might go up, but you have to remember not to be greedy or you might lose it all!
Are we even at 1 million yet? Nope. SUPER at #39 now http://coinmarketcap.com/ |
|
|
|
10K MINTPAL interesting, why bittrex traded lower than mintpal? |
|
|
|
with 14.3million current supply im thinking of holding out much longer than 50k sats
Just like CLOAK went to 0.01 sats? You're delusional, you know that right? dude your just pissed because your sold. cloak was coin which was taken over because previous dev was a scam, don't compare cloak to us, Still waiting on your proof.. Old Cloak thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=634046.0New Cloak thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637704.0Same Dev. Don't spread bullshit in other threads without citing proof. Cloak? don't tell me that, please read SuperSend's white paper, then read Cloakcoin's thread. They have no idea what is a trustless system, yet they claimed they will have it, what a FUD. Only a fool will believe it. Agree. Supersend white paper clearly explained what is a trustless system. So Supercoin's dev team understands the context very well. They said they are working on it. Go to Cloakcoin's thread, reading their posts they indeed have no idea of what is a trustless system. They thought as long as they can find a mixer to pair and that's it. It is far from that. A simple pairing system can easily be cheated and it is not a trustless system at all. I think they need to learn the concept first, before they can claim they want to build a trustless system. |
|
|
|
|
Good to see beta anon released. I tested it, and it works fine. Great job! I like the new indicators, looks really good to me. When it will be in main network? From what i tested, there is no problem. All work fine.
|
|
|
|
cloned from Honorcoin and you guys buy into it ? seriously ? do your selves a favor and go read up on Honor coin before screaming take my money but but but it has Anonymous something or another blah blah gimmick. sad + pathetic ponzi cheerleaders Cloned of what?? Does honor coin have super-pos blocks? Supercoin is the first coin to have it. Moreover, honor coin? what the heck is that coin? I guess you know JPC well, and you know where the PoW/PoS separation technique is coming from right? Does that stupid honorcoin have it? lmao |
|
|
|
Well, to me, it's not an apology unless he updates the OP saying what he wrote about MAX_MONEY etc was WRONG. (which it is) By him leaving that on the OP still unchanged, busoni is still spreading fud. I don't understand why he is leaving it as is. Also, as I said before, Anon transfer is only released via testnet and isn't even enabled by default. So it's only for those who wants to "test". It has been confirmed by many that it works perfectly BTW. Dev team is also working on a decentralized method as we speak. So I have no idea what the issue is. Anyways, this has really negatively impacted supercoin. Most people will only read the OP and dump. +1 Busoni behaved very unprofessional, he made a mistake, it's as simple as that, but he tried to find 1000s reasons to deny his mistake, this makes him more stupid, and incompetent. |
|
|
|
I don't see why we shouldn't trust busoni's claim when it's true, explain why was it higher value than the other one then?
Because it has jack shit to do with the max coin supply, it is so irrelevant they didnt bother changing it. hey smart guy.. what if i made OTHER changes to the code on the next update increasing the money supply ? the function that is called that contain that max money static variable is used in a lots of places and what would happen first is if someone tried to send money that is greater than that setting the transaction would fail to go through. so it would be a NECESSITY to setup a scam ! most of you here prob have no experience coding in 'c' or even looked at the code but are spouting off. the fact is this could have been a multi-part scam.. as in parts of malicious code are added in phases so not to set off an alarm. this Altcoin scene is swiss cheese with scammers running wild 24/7.. hell look what god damn coin it was based on Honor coin of all coins LOLOLOL I have witnessed coin cloners here update the wallets with scammer code.. i don't want to get into who and what coin etc but trust me i know for a FACT it happens. You guys need to cut the crap.. most of you know nothing but are repeating 'crap' you *heard. And the bottom line is do we have proof 100% that something malicious was going on ? Maybe ? Maybe not. But it does LOOK fishy. And if something looks fishy in crypto.. it usually is. Most of you are gullible and eat up what ever is fed to you and this is just shell account games for control of the lemmings.. the usual Bitcointalk routine. got a brain ? use it.. or don't not my problem. Spoetnik, I saw you posted often in JPC thread, that is a coin I like too, and I like some of your good posts there. But why fud here? Why not you just look at the facts? I showed how the MAX_MONEY is used in the code: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7315515#msg7315515and how total coin is calculated: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7315840#msg7315840From these facts, the MAX_MONEY etc are irrelevant to the coins the system will generate. What are your concerns? that the dev will sneak in later and increase the coin system generates? You know this will be a hardfork and requires at least 51% network to agree, right? Also if dev can sneak in some new things into the code, isn't it extremely easy for him to change whatever numbers he wants to change? From what I see, the guy from Poloniex simply made a mistake, as he or someone he asked to review the code have no idea at all what the code means. That who reviewed the code is either never worked on coin code, or a copy-paster who created some scam coins (only simple copied from other coins) before. This is the fact, no deny of it. Very simple. |
|
|
|
This is called SLOPPY CODING you noobs. if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; This is how to do it, without hardcoding values if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY) But then, too much greed to see the truth That value (150 million) is left over from SUPER's initial specs, prior to the recent fork. That line of code is innocuous. Read the thread, Polo-shill. +1 MAX_MONEY is non issue, this has been repeated multiple times in the thread. At this point Busoni stuck his neck out and made a post on code he himself did not fully understand at all. Unfortunately for him his comments were incorrect and the code is clean, looks like he already knows this, based on his backpedaling posts once it was verified by other parties that it was incorrect. Its just Amateur moves, all new entrepreneurs make stupid mistakes like this early in their career, it either makes them or breaks them. The take away here is, if you discover a "securtiy hole' prior to disclosing it publicly, one may review all the code that is affected in their software ecosystem. The entire process of disclosing security holes must be take serious[1], especially when you are dealing with high volume of BTC. He could of just said, "we found out super coin has funky code, and upon further research we found out that 70% of the other coins listed on our exchange suffer from the same venerability, we will look into the matter". Off course if he the above statement massive panic would ensue, and it would be difficult for poloneix recover, but not impossible. Tough decisions. If busoni was acting in good faith of the community as he has repeated many times in this thread, then he would just clean up his OP, apologize and say that his initial comments were way off with his findings, it was dumb to post with out it being verified by multiple sources, and that he did not hire an expert in to conduct the coder review. Or he can just ignore it, and pray that we all forget in a few days how unprofessional their exchange currently looks to the community.
[1] https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2007/01/schneier_full_disclo.htmlAgain, the facts are listed here: I showed how the MAX_MONEY is used in the code: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7315515#msg7315515and how total coin is calculated: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7315840#msg7315840Busoni made irresponsible claims on SUPER, he should apologize to the community. This was an event that degraded a lot Poloniex. Correct it now, otherwise it will just give people impression that Poloniex is very incompetent. |
|
|
|
I would like to point out that I did not personally review the code, as many people seem to think. The person who did has very high standards and was not thrilled with what he saw, and he was overzealous in his criticisms. When I made this post, I firmly believed that the maximum supply was inflated. My intention with going public before contacting the devs was to make sure they did not have a chance to cover up the mistake or take advantage of the issue.
It is my responsibility to ensure that these issues are addressed correctly, so no fingers should be pointed anywhere but at me. I see now that I should have had another reviewer confirm the findings, and investigated sufficiently to make sure I understood all of the code myself before proceeding. I apologize for this misstep. There are still some parts of the code we're concerned about, so our investigations will continue, and I will talk to the devs privately about the anon feature.
This whole raising the standards for coins thing is in an early stage, and we are constantly improving our process. We believe strongly in integrity and transparency, and it has always been my intention to use Poloniex's position to improve the quality of crypto.
lmao, it is not the problem of standard, it is also not the problem to ensure good quality of coin code, it is the problem whoever reviewed the code, have no basic idea how the coin code works - this is a serious problem. Please, I used Poloniex a lot and I liked it (I traded a lot there), but I am surprised at what has happened. It certainly degraded Poloniex. Next time please use a qualified person to do review, not a high school kid who have no idea what he's talking about. In my previous posts, I showed how the MAX_MONEY is used in the code: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7315515#msg7315515and how total coin is calculated: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7315840#msg7315840and as a staff of Poloniex, please make responsible claims. Whoever made that claim, apparently have no idea of the coin code. |
|
|
|
|
This event and the release of anon features on the other hand showed that we have very qualified dev team for SUPER. I am very confident on this coin. Remember that they also have plan for phase-2, for a completely peer-2-peer anon system, no one did it yet. With their qualification, I suspect SUPER will be the first coin to achieve this...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
