Perhaps someone can find a good therapist who accepts SBC for those that don't make it through the other side     Word association test SBC --> Hold

Short term fluctuations and low volumes, unless that 2.5k represents your life savings don't worry be back up again soon You'll go nuts if you watch prices minute to minute.

Someone didn't take your advice, they just dumped 18k on Cryptsy

Sure, spelling the domain name incorrectly won't help any

At risk of going slight off topic another observation for you, if you take the words you used above^^ to describe the your vision & intent, then a higher value domain for that target would have some of those words in it. Examples might be cryptoswitcher.com , cryptoswitching.com, switcherpool.com

All three of those are still unregistered BTW, so if I were a buyer looking for something to fit the intent you describe for my business or project then I would rather spend US$10 * 3 = US$30 on registering those three domains than paying 2-3 BTC for the one you have listed. Unless of course I absolutely had to have the 'flip' concept in my branding in which case I'd probably find similar unregistered domains. You could of course register those other three yourself right now 

Not trying to be clever, just providing feedback as you requested. Domains scoring valuations in multiple BTC range are more likely to be single keywords or phrases that someone just has to have as nothing else will work for them.

Now that's going to need escrow!

I will try and give you some constructive feedback. I'll leave others to take a view on value of this specific domain/s but needless to say 2-3 BTC is a lot of money. Yes domains sell for that level but anything at that level needs to have strong branding potential or relate to high value concepts, topics & keywords already in use for its target audience.

As feedback, issue will be cry and flip as words don't match well with the target audience and searches if this is aimed at a bitcoin related product, service or business. cry is a very short truncation of crypto or cryptographic, possibly too short for most search assumptions and the fact it is a word in its own right with a very different meaning won't help either. flip doesn't have a strong word association, I know you can 'flip' something by quick buy-sell trading but that might be too weak an association.  Short domain name (7 characters) is better than many you see on here and .com never hurts.

What is you vision for the usage of this name?  It normally helps to given an indication of potential uses unless it is very obvious to all.

Hope that is viewed as useful and helpful feedback to your request. Disclaimer: only my view and I may have read it all wrong and assumed a specific target audience just because its posted on here.

Great link, thanks for sharing that. Will watch with interest to see how quickly it starts to fill up!

It sorts itself out after a while, very laggy at the moment but catches up.

FWIW this is where I am as well.

@scooby903 - for some reason that avatar of yours still makes me smile even after all this time 

SBC <-> BTC in preparation for its upcoming new feature

^^^Better summary than I typed 

Don't think so, just what Scooby and Ximp were saying. More people getting to the point where they are unsure if they want to hold given price trend of last week or two. Graphic I saw might also have been exaggerated on screen by way Cryptsy scales graphs sometimes, it seems to look much more reasonable on screen now. Wish I'd taken a screenshot.

In general, without any extensive analysis, it looks like there a few bigger trades happening. Not massive in overall scale of things but more than the dribble of 1-10 SBC type transactions that have been the norm. Those smaller ones are probably miners doing auto-sell or similar.

That said, pretty low volumes overall, so I'd assume most people are still in a hold position and may be doing slow accumulates if they still feel comfortable.

^^^^^which is totally reflected in the current SBC Depth graph on Cryptsy! Small group of green buys way over on left, big sea of red sells over the rest of the graph area. Not seen it that polarized before.

Looking good, very pleased with the update 

Are you taking coin requests for the next update? Dropped you a suggestion before but guess it's not made it to the top of the list yet. 

---->>>>>SBC would be great please

@gginer - any updates on the potential project for local stablecoins site/service?

Haha, beat me by seconds to the same quote! 

Please also pass across the domain I donated to the Frozen community to those still active on it before going. I've not any issue on the SHS thread as wasn't involved in any way but seeing as you are doing the right thing please help the Frozen guys out as well in the spirit of the donation I made to you. Thanks.

No, this one using different hashing algorithms

I don't think he did! The announcement just asked for testers, it didn't say it was launching instantly. In fact the wording in the sign-up thread is

"This thread will be used to collect a list of individuals who are interested in beta testing the mixing feature of StableCoin when it is ready"

Nothing more, nothing less.  I bet there are some who jumped on this announcement for mining and want to jump out just as quick when launched.

I think you've misread what I've actually written and taken offence when it wasn't intended. I wasn't saying you'd done anything wrong or comparing to other coins.

I was simply stating that the QBT ticker code, as you've shown yourself in your own thread title, and coin name had already been used elsewhere in the past. Therefore, if you wanted to get the best result for your coin launch you may want to consider that in case it causes confusion further down the line. That's all I was saying.