 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
As mentioned in the main ITNS ANN thread (looks like SlowGrowth forgot to cross-post here), those that were missed for the fact that Slack display names were not properly read have been re-evaluated. According to our re-evaluation of the 446 people that were excluded from the original airdrop for the reason of not finding their Slack/Discord membership information, 95 of these users were actually qualified to receive payment. Please see the new tab in the airdrop sheet here, labeled Airdrop RECHECK. We are giving the community 48 hours to double-check this to verify that the entries are correct as re-checked. If there is an issue, please DM @SlowGrowth#2620 on Discord. After that process is complete, we will issue the promised 1k ITNS reconciliation payments to those missed originally and qualifying according to this form (see column should_be_paid). Looks okay this time. thanks. |
|
|
|
Good morning everyone,
I would like to say that after some thought our team decided to giveaway a consolation reward of 1k Intense to all those that missed the airdrop due to slack username issue.
I hope that everyone can accept this as a gesture of goodwill, and also accept my apologies for the issues experienced.
Have a great weekend,
Francisco
Francisco, thanks for information, nice and correct move. It is good to see that there is common respect and understanding between the team and its community. Let us know when payments go out and in the meantime hope to hear soon more news in regards with the re-branding and new exchanges. The idea behind the coin looks so good however it still needs hard work and a big boost. What we nrrd to do now? Dnt want to miss it again)) You dont need to do anything, we will process payments to the existing list. Hi Fransisco, hope all is well. Please let us know if you have any news with it as well and if any payments have been processed. thanks. |
|
|
|
there is another coin ann (NXB) on btk, and they promote own exchange (ex.nxboost.com) with a very few coins, but ITNS has listed there. I just would like to check if ITNS dev team is aware about it.
There was a talk about it on the discord channel and the team is aware about it. Though the team has asked everyone to stay away from that exchange and trade at their own risk. In fact, the question begs. What is the risk then? From the outside everything looks quite dignified. Share information. The risks are quite moderate, but there are no guarantees. You must understand this for yourself, newcomers do not belong here. I believe the team will not share the same opinion. Everyone should be useful to belong in this community (even those with negative and constructive opinions are more useful than those who believe that everything is perfect!) if we want the venture to succeed. |
|
|
|
Good morning everyone,
I would like to say that after some thought our team decided to giveaway a consolation reward of 1k Intense to all those that missed the airdrop due to slack username issue.
I hope that everyone can accept this as a gesture of goodwill, and also accept my apologies for the issues experienced.
Have a great weekend,
Francisco
Francisco, thanks for information, nice and correct move. It is good to see that there is common respect and understanding between the team and its community. Let us know when payments go out and in the meantime hope to hear soon more news in regards with the re-branding and new exchanges. The idea behind the coin looks so good however it still needs hard work and a big boost. |
|
|
|
Holy hell, how are you people still bitching about the airdrop? Who gives a flying funk. Get a job, you'd have more in your pocket than the hours spent wasting your time bitching here. My shit didn't go through as valid somehow, but I'm not raising pitchforks. Go dig in your couch cushions for coins and you'll find your airdrop.
Move on with your life.
I agree totaly with you ... I have been in both campains and my xmas didn.t go thru ... but no bitching there .... Also still mining intense  First of all, allow me to say that we are not using the airdrop to full our pockets (at least speaking for myself). We are doing it just as a hobby and would not use the airdrop for such purpose. Airdrop was a way to get some coins that we mine easier and when you get disqualified without any reason from your part is rather disappointing. It becomes even more disappointing when they throw the blame to you by saying that you did not fill the form correctly while you did. Also if we had at least participated successfully in one of the two campaigns might be better instead of getting zero. Anyway, after all, each guy reacts differently, Some people get the dick and they are happy, others are neutral while others do not like it. Thanks God I am in the last category. |
|
|
|
Good evening everyone, I would like to address the latest issues regarding airdrop. First of all, I would like to apologize in the name of the team, to all users that for one reason or another, did not receive any coins from the airdrop. Although it does not change what happened, I would like to provide you all with the following reasons why I believe this occurred: 1) I would like you all to remind everyone that when this airdrop started we had a team of 3 people. We have grown a lot internally in the last months, including changing our Marketing Manager. 2) Internal organization takes time to achieve, specially when so many people join in a short time. In the beginning we may have missed a few things due to natural internal organization. 3) Regarding invalid entries, the team made the decision to use a script to validate entries rather than check each entry manually, this validation included Slack and Discord. We then had multiple team members go through a portion of the members that had invalid submissions. Due to the amount of time that it would have taken for our team to work through each submission manually, we believed that this would be the best option. 4) We have been very busy with the following: 4.1) Our development plan is very detailed, we have been working very hard to achieve a structured plan before starting development. ( which we already did ) 4.2) Our Blockchain dev team has been very busy with the rebase to Monero in order to improve our product. 4.3) We have been diligently working to achieve results with new exchanges but, we have been hitting a few walls, our blockchain transaction volume is still very small, our current markets have a very low volume and our community is also still very small. 4.4) Our rebranding is coming along, and we have been putting a lot of hours into this because we believe that a great project needs a name to match 4.5) We are in the process of finalizing our Non Profit Foundation, a legal entity we can work under is something that we have been focused in achieving in order to guarantee our long term product implementations. 4.6) We have been meeting VC's to negotiate partnerships with the intention to create liquidity for our markets and further support to our legal entity once its created. 4.7) We have been working with several legal offices in order to make sure we comply with all existing regulations. As well as any future regulations that may be on the horizon. Our project is not a nearsighted one, and we are taking every precaution to ensure that we are ready for anything that comes our way in the future. 4.  We have been working with key individuals in order to increase our awareness with communities like cyber security, journalism, health sector, vpn providers, etc. These are not excuses at all, and again, I apologize. I take full responsibility for the mistake. I want people to have a better understanding that honest mistakes sometimes happen, and that we keep working hard to achieve and implement what brought us all here together... Decentralized P2P open source VPN network! I'm willing to listen to the community in order to make it right with all those that missed the airdrop. Have a great evening, Francisco After all, a serious response came explaining the situation as it is and without blaming the 53% of participants who did not receive their share. Thanks Francisco. |
|
|
|
If you paid only 47% (!!) of the people who participated in the Xmas airdrop which was not a "competition", let us guess how many people you will pay in these competitions!  |
|
|
|
I wanted to provide you all with an update on the exchange voting that started almost a week ago. We currently have a contest running on our Discord where the prize is currently 13,500 ITNS. To enter in this contest, all you have to do is go vote for us on the exchange and react on Discord. It's that simple. We have risen from 52 votes on Coinpulse on 03/01/18 to 295 Votes as of now. We are currently the 3rd most voted for project. Link to vote ---> https://request.coinpulse.io/on VIC Exchange, we were recently added to the voting list on 03/01/18. We already have 207 votes! (You must be registered on VIC Exchange to vote. However, you have the ability to vote once per day!) Overall, I know that we have a strong community and I am very thankful to all those that have voted. Keep up the great work. If we have everyone vote on coinpulse, we can take the first place slot. I know it! Not even possible to register: This User Interface is being made available for you to become familiar with the many features that will be available once the trading platform is launched in June 2018.
You will not be able to register account at this time. They are not even open yet. I voted up, but I cannot register to vote up. Therefore I think no one else can, therefore no one gets "entry" into the contest... I am not surprised |
|
|
|
|
Are you going to pay more than 50% of the participants in this airdrop?
|
|
|
|
Problems must not be ignored, problems must be solved. But I see trying to ignoring users, lying and bending rules.
I'll not sell all coins because one screwed airdrop, but I'll definitely not invest more in this project.
Maybe it was mistake of 1 person who didnt know how correctly check users but from my point of view ITNS team failed as whole team in this BTT topic.
Right. Their very bad and userious attitude was the worst of all things. A serious team would apologise for the mistake, outline the reasons that they can not solve at the moment and tell to their audience that they will revert with a better airdrop in the future. Instead of doing this, they are trying to convince everyone that we are crazy and that we sent a form which was not correct !! |
|
|
|
It goes without saying that we mean VALID Participants. A participation which does not follow the requirements/rules is not a participation anyway.... So with what they did they accepted that they had more than 1000 participants but they paid only 565 of them. No sense at all.......
I agree with you. They should use common sense but they did not specify it in the airdrop rules if I am not wrong so you can not say that he is lying. It is just playing with words as you said before. It seems there is no chance to admit that ITNS did something wrong. Yes and for this reason we note all the facts as they are in order for all the community to get informed and do not waste their time in a future airdrop. |
|
|
|
I barely met the minimum requirements and I got 4400 ITNS on the airdrop.
Sometimes people screw up and they simply can't admit it and go rage the internetz...
Well, indeed I agree with you. The IntenseCoin team screwed up and they can not admit this. According to Slack support team, the usernames have been replaced by the display names. This has happened since September 2017 and those who have signed up in Slack after that date do not have any Slack username but they have a Slack display name (which is what was formerly known as username). I can provide evidence about it. Officially coming from Slack. The IntenseCoin team have disqualified a lot of people since they do not accept this official principal!! They believe that the username in Slack is something different. According to the IntenseCoin team, my Slack username was my email ID (the email that Iused to sign up in Slack). This is totally incorrect. Therefore, I inserted the correct information in the form but the team disqualified me (and many others) since they believe that the username is something different (which is not!). I don't know if they took this action by scope or not however the way they have handled all this and the ignorance they have shown is very bad and shows much of unseriousness. If you still do not understand what I am saying, I am sorry. I have also contacted the Slack support team and I know very well the story inside-out and I do not care about the coins. But my IQ has falled down to zero with the excuses I hear from these people. And thatīs the answer I wanted to hear from devs! Thanks a lot for your effort and explanation. This search should for sure ITNS team did and not you. I gave up my fight because I donīt like to repeat same things again and again if there is zero chance to get real answer. Shame on me that I gave up I think they didnīt want to tell the truth because they screwed up it with SLACK and a they also screwed up rewards. Correct me if I am wrong please, because I really donīt remember it precisely but didnīt they say 1000 for everyone who will meet the conditions in airdrop? So why they sent higher amounts to people who met the conditions? Yes, It is nice from them and they have 2/3 of happy airdropers but it was not necessary and they would have now coins for people with SLACK problem. Problem would be solved as fast as arised and everybody would be happy. People would get their coins, bitcointalk would be full of positive messages how great devs are because they solved it and devs would save some coins for future. So devs are in trouble now I guess. They donīt have coins which were intended for airdrop and they donīt want to send their own coins. But after all my messages I would say they will just ignore it or ThePigwee will say something what will look like the answer. It will be not real answer but someone will say to you just shut up we do not want to listen it anymore . Case is closed The payment amount was the second mistake that they did. They said they will distribute 1 million up to 1,000 participants and 2.50 million coins if participants were higher than 1,000 and up to 2,500. So what they did? Total participants were 1227, from them the team says that the 53% were invalid participants and the valid were 565. However, they pay the amount basis 1227 participants. They brought a total mess in a simple airdrop and can not see what was the scope out of it. Just so you have a better understanding, up to 1000 participants means the number of people that entered is less than or equal to 1000. Greater than 1000 participants bumps the payout amount. Participants =/= valid submissions. If you continue like this i will believe it is just a matter of IQ all this. So you paid 565 people with the amount which you should have paid if participants were higher than 1000. This way I could send 2000 fake forms and those few people who are valid to earn even higher amount if this is based on all participants even valid or invalid. Are you playing with the words or is there anything else behind this BS? Thumbs up again because ThePigwee is good with playing with words. I guess thatīs why he was chosen as community manager But it really was in the conditions of airdrop. Another thing is that common sense should say to them something else. It goes without saying that we mean VALID Participants. A participation which does not follow the requirements/rules is not a participation anyway.... So with what they did they accepted that they had more than 1000 participants but they paid only 565 of them. No sense at all....... You can complain all you want but in the end you got to suck their dick. Thanks that you allow us to complain all we want. |
|
|
|
I barely met the minimum requirements and I got 4400 ITNS on the airdrop.
Sometimes people screw up and they simply can't admit it and go rage the internetz...
Well, indeed I agree with you. The IntenseCoin team screwed up and they can not admit this. According to Slack support team, the usernames have been replaced by the display names. This has happened since September 2017 and those who have signed up in Slack after that date do not have any Slack username but they have a Slack display name (which is what was formerly known as username). I can provide evidence about it. Officially coming from Slack. The IntenseCoin team have disqualified a lot of people since they do not accept this official principal!! They believe that the username in Slack is something different. According to the IntenseCoin team, my Slack username was my email ID (the email that Iused to sign up in Slack). This is totally incorrect. Therefore, I inserted the correct information in the form but the team disqualified me (and many others) since they believe that the username is something different (which is not!). I don't know if they took this action by scope or not however the way they have handled all this and the ignorance they have shown is very bad and shows much of unseriousness. If you still do not understand what I am saying, I am sorry. I have also contacted the Slack support team and I know very well the story inside-out and I do not care about the coins. But my IQ has falled down to zero with the excuses I hear from these people. And thatīs the answer I wanted to hear from devs! Thanks a lot for your effort and explanation. This search should for sure ITNS team did and not you. I gave up my fight because I donīt like to repeat same things again and again if there is zero chance to get real answer. Shame on me that I gave up I think they didnīt want to tell the truth because they screwed up it with SLACK and a they also screwed up rewards. Correct me if I am wrong please, because I really donīt remember it precisely but didnīt they say 1000 for everyone who will meet the conditions in airdrop? So why they sent higher amounts to people who met the conditions? Yes, It is nice from them and they have 2/3 of happy airdropers but it was not necessary and they would have now coins for people with SLACK problem. Problem would be solved as fast as arised and everybody would be happy. People would get their coins, bitcointalk would be full of positive messages how great devs are because they solved it and devs would save some coins for future. So devs are in trouble now I guess. They donīt have coins which were intended for airdrop and they donīt want to send their own coins. But after all my messages I would say they will just ignore it or ThePigwee will say something what will look like the answer. It will be not real answer but someone will say to you just shut up we do not want to listen it anymore . Case is closed The payment amount was the second mistake that they did. They said they will distribute 1 million up to 1,000 participants and 2.50 million coins if participants were higher than 1,000 and up to 2,500. So what they did? Total participants were 1227, from them the team says that the 53% were invalid participants and the valid were 565. However, they pay the amount basis 1227 participants. They brought a total mess in a simple airdrop and can not see what was the scope out of it. Just so you have a better understanding, up to 1000 participants means the number of people that entered is less than or equal to 1000. Greater than 1000 participants bumps the payout amount. Participants =/= valid submissions. If you continue like this i will believe it is just a matter of IQ all this. So you paid 565 people with the amount which you should have paid if participants were higher than 1000. This way I could send 2000 fake forms and those few people who are valid to earn even higher amount if this is based on all participants even valid or invalid. Are you playing with the words or is there anything else behind this BS? Thumbs up again because ThePigwee is good with playing with words. I guess thatīs why he was chosen as community manager But it really was in the conditions of airdrop. Another thing is that common sense should say to them something else. It goes without saying that we mean VALID Participants. A participation which does not follow the requirements/rules is not a participation anyway.... So with what they did they accepted that they had more than 1000 participants but they paid only 565 of them. No sense at all....... |
|
|
|
I barely met the minimum requirements and I got 4400 ITNS on the airdrop.
Sometimes people screw up and they simply can't admit it and go rage the internetz...
Well, indeed I agree with you. The IntenseCoin team screwed up and they can not admit this. According to Slack support team, the usernames have been replaced by the display names. This has happened since September 2017 and those who have signed up in Slack after that date do not have any Slack username but they have a Slack display name (which is what was formerly known as username). I can provide evidence about it. Officially coming from Slack. The IntenseCoin team have disqualified a lot of people since they do not accept this official principal!! They believe that the username in Slack is something different. According to the IntenseCoin team, my Slack username was my email ID (the email that Iused to sign up in Slack). This is totally incorrect. Therefore, I inserted the correct information in the form but the team disqualified me (and many others) since they believe that the username is something different (which is not!). I don't know if they took this action by scope or not however the way they have handled all this and the ignorance they have shown is very bad and shows much of unseriousness. If you still do not understand what I am saying, I am sorry. I have also contacted the Slack support team and I know very well the story inside-out and I do not care about the coins. But my IQ has falled down to zero with the excuses I hear from these people. And thatīs the answer I wanted to hear from devs! Thanks a lot for your effort and explanation. This search should for sure ITNS team did and not you. I gave up my fight because I donīt like to repeat same things again and again if there is zero chance to get real answer. Shame on me that I gave up I think they didnīt want to tell the truth because they screwed up it with SLACK and a they also screwed up rewards. Correct me if I am wrong please, because I really donīt remember it precisely but didnīt they say 1000 for everyone who will meet the conditions in airdrop? So why they sent higher amounts to people who met the conditions? Yes, It is nice from them and they have 2/3 of happy airdropers but it was not necessary and they would have now coins for people with SLACK problem. Problem would be solved as fast as arised and everybody would be happy. People would get their coins, bitcointalk would be full of positive messages how great devs are because they solved it and devs would save some coins for future. So devs are in trouble now I guess. They donīt have coins which were intended for airdrop and they donīt want to send their own coins. But after all my messages I would say they will just ignore it or ThePigwee will say something what will look like the answer. It will be not real answer but someone will say to you just shut up we do not want to listen it anymore . Case is closed The payment amount was the second mistake that they did. They said they will distribute 1 million up to 1,000 participants and 2.50 million coins if participants were higher than 1,000 and up to 2,500. So what they did? Total participants were 1227, from them the team says that the 53% were invalid participants and the valid were 565. However, they pay the amount basis 1227 participants. They brought a total mess in a simple airdrop and can not see what was the scope out of it. Just so you have a better understanding, up to 1000 participants means the number of people that entered is less than or equal to 1000. Greater than 1000 participants bumps the payout amount. Participants =/= valid submissions. If you continue like this i will believe it is just a matter of IQ all this. So you paid 565 people with the amount which you should have paid if participants were higher than 1000. This way I could send 2000 fake forms and those few people who are valid to earn even higher amount if this is based on all participants even valid or invalid. Are you playing with the words or is there anything else behind this BS? |
|
|
|
@nikolasgr
Thanks - despite you did not provide direct answer, I get it like you are going to hold all your coins and support the project further.
And I think al the others' answers will be the same.
No I will not keep my coins. I lost any confidence to this project. OK nikolasgr - you are a proud man - if you keep your word and sell your coins within next few days (not trying to sell them a couple of weeks or months later). Thanks God, I do not have a high exposure here therefore I will not take any proud decision. |
|
|
|
@Fjody
My goal is not to sink ITNS or do something bad to them. They did mistake from my point of view and they should admit it. If they will and they will apologize for it I will accept it. Everybody makes mistakes and if someone screw up silly airdrop for example then you should not rejecet his work. But it is only my opinion.
3-4 days have passed and the team still believes they are talking to stupid audience. They say "we feel sorry that you did a mistake, did not fill the form correctly and lost the airdrop" LOL ! |
|
|
|
I barely met the minimum requirements and I got 4400 ITNS on the airdrop.
Sometimes people screw up and they simply can't admit it and go rage the internetz...
Well, indeed I agree with you. The IntenseCoin team screwed up and they can not admit this. According to Slack support team, the usernames have been replaced by the display names. This has happened since September 2017 and those who have signed up in Slack after that date do not have any Slack username but they have a Slack display name (which is what was formerly known as username). I can provide evidence about it. Officially coming from Slack. The IntenseCoin team have disqualified a lot of people since they do not accept this official principal!! They believe that the username in Slack is something different. According to the IntenseCoin team, my Slack username was my email ID (the email that Iused to sign up in Slack). This is totally incorrect. Therefore, I inserted the correct information in the form but the team disqualified me (and many others) since they believe that the username is something different (which is not!). I don't know if they took this action by scope or not however the way they have handled all this and the ignorance they have shown is very bad and shows much of unseriousness. If you still do not understand what I am saying, I am sorry. I have also contacted the Slack support team and I know very well the story inside-out and I do not care about the coins. But my IQ has falled down to zero with the excuses I hear from these people. And thatīs the answer I wanted to hear from devs! Thanks a lot for your effort and explanation. This search should for sure ITNS team did and not you. I gave up my fight because I donīt like to repeat same things again and again if there is zero chance to get real answer. Shame on me that I gave up I think they didnīt want to tell the truth because they screwed up it with SLACK and a they also screwed up rewards. Correct me if I am wrong please, because I really donīt remember it precisely but didnīt they say 1000 for everyone who will meet the conditions in airdrop? So why they sent higher amounts to people who met the conditions? Yes, It is nice from them and they have 2/3 of happy airdropers but it was not necessary and they would have now coins for people with SLACK problem. Problem would be solved as fast as arised and everybody would be happy. People would get their coins, bitcointalk would be full of positive messages how great devs are because they solved it and devs would save some coins for future. So devs are in trouble now I guess. They donīt have coins which were intended for airdrop and they donīt want to send their own coins. But after all my messages I would say they will just ignore it or ThePigwee will say something what will look like the answer. It will be not real answer but someone will say to you just shut up we do not want to listen it anymore . Case is closed The payment amount was the second mistake that they did. They said they will distribute 1 million up to 1,000 participants and 2.50 million coins if participants were higher than 1,000 and up to 2,500. So what they did? Total participants were 1227, from them the team says that the 53% were invalid participants and the valid were 565. However, they pay the amount basis 1227 participants. They brought a total mess in a simple airdrop and can not see what was the scope out of it. |
|
|
|
@nikolasgr
Thanks - despite you did not provide direct answer, I get it like you are going to hold all your coins and support the project further.
And I think al the others' answers will be the same.
No I will not keep my coins. I lost any confidence to this project. |
|
|
|
I barely met the minimum requirements and I got 4400 ITNS on the airdrop.
Sometimes people screw up and they simply can't admit it and go rage the internetz...
Well, indeed I agree with you. The IntenseCoin team screwed up and they can not admit this. According to Slack support team, the usernames have been replaced by the display names. This has happened since September 2017 and those who have signed up in Slack after that date do not have any Slack username but they have a Slack display name (which is what was formerly known as username). I can provide evidence about it. Officially coming from Slack. The IntenseCoin team have disqualified a lot of people since they do not accept this official principal!! They believe that the username in Slack is something different. According to the IntenseCoin team, my Slack username was my email ID (the email that Iused to sign up in Slack). This is totally incorrect. Therefore, I inserted the correct information in the form but the team disqualified me (and many others) since they believe that the username is something different (which is not!). I don't know if they took this action by scope or not however the way they have handled all this and the ignorance they have shown is very bad and shows much of unseriousness. If you still do not understand what I am saying, I am sorry. I have also contacted the Slack support team and I know very well the story inside-out and I do not care about the coins. But my IQ has falled down to zero with the excuses I hear from these people. @nikolasgr and other people that were searching for the truth: I am questioning myself since the beginning of this flame (or discussion, as you wish). What you guys are going to do once you find the truth? Because you just did it, you have found your answer. Are you going to seel all your ITNS coins because you do not want to have anything in common with the team any more? Or are you going to keep them and support the "scammers" and "unserious ignorants" further? Yes, I know it was about the explanation, truth etc. but are you going to support the coin or leave it? How relevant you believe is your question with what has happened and what I describe? And we are not searching for the truth. We were expecting a serious reply from the management team of a "so called" serious project. And if the airdrop was not important, why did they do this? They could just distribute the coins to the people they wanted. |
|
|
|
|
