You have no idea about the issues that are present in PoS coins. There is a reason why almost all the top cryptocurrencies use the PoW algorithm. PoS is vulnerable to manipulation and those who enjoy the majority stake can gang up and do whatever they want, ignoring the requests from the community. With PoW, doing so is near impossible. And also, try to find why Ethereum delayed the shift from PoW to PoS repeatedly. They had to postpone it indefinitely, because the best developers still don't have the confidence to make the PoS algorithm risk-free, despite working on it for many years.

POS does ZERO to stop greed
you just have people trying to gain control another way
once you buy enough staking power, you have it , it is done
pow attack must be maintained

Yeah this is temporarily because of overall market down. Well EOS is the only one which proves itself when crypto market was free falling since start of this year.

And if you compare the graph of EOS with other coins then you will get the clear picture. Highly profitable coin in TOP 10.

I have a hard time believing this. Why would Satoshi, who seems to have good intentions, create Bitcoin and immediately start a drug/illegal operation with it? I think some criminals just took advantage of its security, that is all.

Did you not even think about how this would work before you wrote that? a year?? haha. why would they keep it open for a year??

I don't know what payment options Steam has. So i'll just quickly explain in general. Any serious merchant probably has lots and lots of people buying stuff every day. If they use credit cards the merchant loses 3%+ on every transaction. LN sure they do two on chain transactions to open and close a payment channel, those fees would be nothing compared to however much business they are doing. They could open and close their payment channel every 24 hours if they wanted, or however often they wanted, two onchain fees are nothing on a daily basis for a business. So if they keep the payment channel open for even just 24 hours, they might do hundreds of transactions that day and we don't know exactly what LN fees will be but the Poon guy who came up with LN said they should be in the 0.1% to 1% range. So even if it's 1%, that means on every single one of hundreds of transactions a day they are saving 2%+. For a business that would end up being a lot of money!!

So why exactly do you think saving money is of no interest to businesses?? I didn't realize saving money was an "extremely limited use case" haha

hahaha What you're saying in #1 shows you clearly don't have any idea what the LN is. So why are you trying to make claims about it??
#2...well thats just hilarious. You said that in your last post, why are you trying to peddle that lie. Bitcoin has far more merchant adoption then any other crypto obviously. And merchant adoption, also obviously, has barely even begun, to say its too late when we're still at the starting gate is just silly. I'm guessing you are perhaps a BCH shill who is desperately hoping merchants adopt it instead of Bitcoin before LN comes and utterly crushes it. Am I getting warm??

LN v1.0 was just tested on the bitcoin mainnet for the first time today. Once LN gets implemented high fees will be a thing of the past. Bitcoin's utility is not being destroyed, blockchains just need to upgrade to reach mass adoption, and Bitcoin is on its way!

I call bullshit. Banks do it only between accounts within the same bank. You can't have an instant transaction between different banks and you can't have money sent during weekends and at nights. I have been doing it for many years and my last transaction sent on Monday needed over 24h to appear on the account of my friend in a different bank within the same country. My another transaction that was sent on Saturday arrived on Tuesday (!) because they don't work in the evenings, nights, on Sundays, and it takes up to 48 hours anyway.

From the blog post:


Bitcoin had a plenty of 20-30% drops and spikes this year and the year before, it's simply not true that volaility has increased, unless they measure volatility in flat amounts, which is dumb.

I've personally used Bitcoin 2 times with Steam, and to those who don't know how it works, they actually have Bitpay as intermediary, and Bitpay requires transactions to be sent and confirmed within 15 minutes - so the chances of BTC dropping 20% in 15 minutes are actually extremely small, and all the volatility is handled by Bitpay. The real problem here is that customers have to use high fees to get their tx included in the next block, otherwise Bitpay will have to send their transaction back.

庄是自己在玩吧，我都还没准备好么

一个被矿工操纵的妖股，更加的中心化！