Totally random.... but John Kerry has the face of a horse.  Is that bullish or bearish?  |
|
|
|
What's going on? I'm afraid what'll happen the coming week. It's Sunday, so do you think we might see another Sunday night rise/pump or are we in for a Monday-Monday-Manic-Crash? Where are our long-term support lines we're supposed to bounce of now?
Personally I think we are in for an interesting week - mid term decision time is nearly upon us... Yeah, I don't know if I should be excited or frightened. But when things got tough in this recovery phase, everything actually went pretty well! But I can't say I'm not afraid... It's nerve-wrecking!  If we get to 750 and there is some serious volume then I will be all eyes and ears If we go to 435 I will also be all eyes and ears. At this stage I am hiding behind the sofa- I almost cannot watch... or I am asleep- not sure which. Edit - Eitherway I am all eyes this week, and if we still get nothing but sideways this week (god help me) then I am still going to be behind the sofa for the few weeks after that too... if we have not done anything between now and say Aug 8th- then I really will be really quite shocked |
|
|
|
What's going on? I'm afraid what'll happen the coming week. It's Sunday, so do you think we might see another Sunday night rise/pump or are we in for a Monday-Monday-Manic-Crash? Where are our long-term support lines we're supposed to bounce of now?
765 750 735 710 676 666 654 636 629 =623 618-614 609601 586 ish 565 530/5 500 476 435/430 Personally I think we are in for an interesting week - mid term decision time is nearly upon us... I will be looking thursday/friday, although who knows what will happen Monday... This sideways has got to be up sooooooooon |
|
|
|
Maybe it's because the day isn't over  thanks ha ha oh yeah sorry having a senior moment... in my ind that was not a day chart.. ha ha opps, time for bed. |
|
|
|
Just hold your paper wallet in a clenched fist while you're talking to him or you might find out when you get home that it's gone.  lol Nahhh... I keep that paper wallet in my next door neighbours horse, sorry I mean my magical unicorn. |
|
|
|
And the winklevosses adore them. Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin. Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged. Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star. Suckups. at this stage in the game... I think the regs are a good thing for the next stage of the BTC life cycle...... later down the line.... things will change I am sure as BTC becomes ubiquitous. I think there is a middle ground point of view on the regs themselves... between the views of the winklevosses and Erik.... my feelings towards the future of cryptos is more aligned with Erik as far as I know , however I differ on how negative I think these regs are at the moment I think they are good becuse they bring clarity and a framework- a foothold if you like for BTC to continue its path- not that it needs it... but fact is... they are coming, they are going to be put into place, and as such- they are not "bad" or should I say "not too bad" It is a far cry from "BTC is bannned" or regulated out of use (good luck with that one) One way or another I do not see these regs being the end of "Cryptos for humanity" either. There are too many people around the world fed up of the boot on their face. Voorhees is just a slick well educated criminal. His only concern is his free ability to sucker people into incredible wealth for himself. Let's face it, his past business ventures haven't been humanitarian concerns. He created a gambling site that bombed the blockchain at a time when it wasn't prepared for it. He sold illegal securities and only paid anyone back after his legal counsel told him he could go to jail. He stole 2600 Bitcoins from people with FeedZBirds and never returned any of it. He couldn't care less about any freedom other than the freedom to steal. The Winklevoss at least want Bitcoin to "fit into society" for now. That leads to wide spread adoption and more profit for all of us. Next time I talk to Erik I will pass that on I am not sure he would agree with you. Lemme see...  he said...  |
|
|
|
And the winklevosses adore them. Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin. Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged. Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star. Suckups. at this stage in the game... I think the regs are a good thing for the next stage of the BTC life cycle...... later down the line.... things will change I am sure as BTC becomes ubiquitous. I think there is a middle ground point of view on the regs themselves... between the views of the winklevosses and Erik.... my feelings towards the future of cryptos is more aligned with Erik as far as I know , however I differ on how negative I think these regs are at the moment I think they are good because they bring clarity and a framework-publicity and I think will bring new investors into the ecosystem. It is like a foothold if you like for BTC to continue its path- not that it needs it... but fact is... they are coming, they are going to be put into place, and as such- they are not "bad" or should I say "not too bad" It is a far cry from "BTC is bannned" or regulated out of use (good luck with that one) One way or another I do not see these regs being the end of "Cryptos for humanity" either. There are too many people around the world fed up of the boot on their face. |
|
|
|
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!
yup...... |
|
|
|
What if BTC stabilises here?
I'm just getting the feeling recently that all the Bull/Bear nonsense is based on the belief that BTC is a speculative instrument (or still in the speculative phase) and that may not be true.
Take Dell for instance and personalise it for understanding. Michael Dell is already rich beyond the dreams of Croesus - he's not taking BTC because he needs the money/fiat/crypto and he doesn't need to hodl to achieve some future dream of luxury. It's an optional transactional medium for him to continue to accrue wealth - that is all.
As it gets easier to obtain, and easier to disburse the price is going to settle down as a matter of course. BTC has already become a global currency (it happened while we were not sleeping) and after all the excitement about China - and then then the come-down - we're all still holding coin with the most amazing utility.
That's what Big Trade is buying into - the utility, not the speculative opportunity, so I'm not expecting another "launch". I'll be very surprised if we see $1000 again - there's no good reason for it at the transactional level.
Where demand meets supply, and the demand outstrips supply.... then the price will rise... there is not the velocity/liquidity in place at the moment to stabalise the price where it is, and the price rise will come as the utility/usage increases, and demand outstrips supply.... which is due in ................5.........4..........3........ |
|
|
|
|
So basically I should stop taking LSD and leave my neighbours horse alone.... this also explains why I have less Bitcoins than I thought...Banks you say?
who would have thought...
|
|
|
|
if you have a fully verified coin base account that is. SO GET SPENDING. Even if you pay USD go USD to BTC to buy... it's actually cheaper that way.
How do you send USD to Coinbase/exchange/Bitpay/whatever, and what do they send to Dell -- USD, or BTC? If USD, how do they send it? This appears to be one of those basic retarded questions of yours that could easily be answered by yourself, if you were to buy and use bitcoins then you would possibly realize how to use them. Of course, the customers pay in bitcoin, and then if Dell wants to convert them to fiat after the transaction, they have that fiat conversion option. And that is the (non)answer that I get whenever I ask that question in this forum. I had to ask the same person three times (on another thread), before he understood the question (and answered it for only one special case). I thought that I called the question stupid and I answered it...... and you are implying that you are seeking some kind of deeper and more significant meaning? And what would that deeper and more significant meaning be? Yes you called the question stupid, and no you did not understand it. If "you pay USD go USD to BTC to buy", as the poster suggested, how do you send USD to Coinbase/exchange/Bitpay/whatever? I stuff golden trinkets up my magical unicorns arse and shoo it on its way... usually works just fine for me. |
|
|
|
next time I chat to Erik, we can tease each other about how we have different views.....  |
|
|
|
WTF is this EUROPACOIN...  its #3 rated at CoinmarketCap... probably a pile of shyte |
|
|
|
And I'm selling a boat for NXT (or BTC) ! I'll be posting the ad sometime today, but does anyone want a 1953 ChrisCraft Riviera:  It's in NL, close to Amsterdam, almost perfect original condition. €30,000 or the NXT/BTC equivalent. So, any whales want to go boating? Beautiful boat.... I do not think I will be in the market for such a boat, not for a good few years... but that is one classy craft |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
