It uses difficulty from the time when block was found. So it should be +/- correct.

None of this IP is mine :-). Please try to connect to 176.31.157.133. Right now the node is on connection limit, but time to time some peers close connection. Or give me any of your static IP and I'll add it to my trusted IPs list.

I'm spending much more time in my job than I expected, so Qt must wait few days, sorry .

Maybe you explained it already, but why exactly it's hard to detect blocks from my pool?

Pool is using namecoin's blockexplorer to cross-check if blocks are matured and accepted by the rest of the network. Unfortunately blockexplorer gets broken, there are not new blocks since yesterday. I reported it right now, after they fix it, pool will recalculate all namecoin blocks again and everything will be fine.

Any idea? It's fresh git clone.

At this time there's not an android app for electrum backends, but friend of mine is working on it.

BadBear, I think so, too. Somebody crashed the market because was affraid of market crash.

Yes, of course. Bitcoin is pure capitalism. Money vote.

I like how many market specialists are on this forum. And when price goes in different direction than they expected, they are speaking about "manipulator". Just because they cannot understand that market will do whatever it want, not what they think it should.

I decided to try GLBSE and learn how that stuff works. Congratulation for your mining operation, I'm now proud owner of 34 shares :-).

Yes, they're probably using leaked emails from mtgox. Nice example of ponzi scheme, right? I'm not sure if activities like this can make bitcoin more serious :-/.

I didn't touch anything and all emails were sent by the server, so it was somewhere on the way. Strange...

Now more seriously. As far as you don't know counterparty, you don't have any way how to force payback. You answered yourself pretty correctly.

However I can imagine some web of trust where lending will be possible when there's at least some connection between both parties. Unfortunately I'm not a specialist to networks like Ripple, so I don't know how exactly it should work.

I have (good) personal experience with bitcoin lending. Few months ago I borrowed 700 BTC from one good guy on this forum, because I wanted to order some goods asap and I had money on the way. It was pretty big risk for that lender, because I had a chance to run away with those coins and he even didn't know my real name (well, it was long before I had 1777 posts .

They don't work.

Of course I know that, those 800k don't worry me. However I mixed that 50k daily volume and I thought this address is keeping 50k BTC. Now I see it's only around 800 BTC, which is of course fine (I'm keeping similar balance).

I'm surprised that deepbit isn't using sendmany and also that process payouts from so big account. I expected he's using some cold storage...

I noticed it days ago, but have no idea who's that.

Yes, this is OT, but I have similar issues with Bitcoin Wallet as Vandroiy (HTC Desire S). It's strange that sometimes it works (for example I made a lot of payments during Prague conference with it), but sometimes it's almost unusable. I sent a lot of tracebacks back to Andreas, not sure if it was usefull for him.

Back to topic - yes, Bitcoin Spinner is working for me :-).

Strange, email is working, I received one payout notificating two hours ago. Can you re-check your side for potential issues?