If Facebook managed to convince a large majority of bitcoin users and miners to switch to a patented version of bitcoin software owned by the social network, the company would be able to establish its own rules. In this case, she could turn bitcoin into a corporate version of fedcoin (Fedcoin), described above.

little is known about the bitcoin creator, and even if we knew who he is, we can not reverse the system in reverse order, it goes on its own until until 21 million bitcoins are mined.

The extent to which the effectiveness of transactions, the number of exchanges, companies, entrepreneurs who are ready to accept a certain crypt for payment, the level of security and confidentiality, the number of exchange offices in which it is possible to exchange crypto-currency for traditional money and, of course, will affect the extent to which the crypto currency is needed. same, investment attractiveness.

In his profile on the P2P Foundation website, Satoshi indicated that he is 37 years old and that he lives in Japan. There is a point of view that these data do not correspond to reality: Satoshi writes in English as his native language, and Bitcoin software is not localized for Japanese and is not documented in Japanese. Since mid-2010, Satoshi Nakamoto does not participate in the Bitcoin project

Steve Wozniak, a mathematician by training, believes that bitcoin outperforms them both as a mediator and as a means of preserving value - for one important reason: his mathematically defined stock of 21 million coins makes it impossible to lower the existing stock in the price, which makes it safer .

specifically, the right time you will not find. so if you want to buy promising crypto currency, do not wait and buy.

I believe that no. because one of the side effects of the blockchain is the transition of society to a new level of consciousness. After all, mankind did not know the precedents, when the empowered authority would have to answer directly to the voters, and the process of making claims becomes more simple and transparent than ever.

Optimists believe that Bitcoin's rate in a couple of years (perhaps tens of years) can generally reach up to $ 1 million per 1 BTC, but that's only in the long term. Personally, I think that this is quite realistic if the governments of the countries can agree among themselves and make it legal.

rather, it is not. bitcoin was created not to end the government, in order to circumvent it as a system in the implementation of transactions.

To begin with, despite its popularity (the share of bitcoin is now about 70% in the global crypto currency market), its legal status is not the same in different countries. The other side of the coin is a high entry threshold. There is one more important aspect concerning the safety of independent investing on the exchange. Bitcoin is positioned as a very reliable investment - the user is well protected by the very concept of crypto currency. However, with the growth of its popularity, the number of hacker attacks is also growing.

Governments can regulate asset prices, such as currency, by buying and selling shares in international markets. you can reduce the excessive interest in the asset class, tying it to rules that increase the cost of doing business. This is a classic regulation, such as compliance with SEC regulations.

It only seems so to you. In fact, the technology will remain, but the crypto currency will die. And perhaps in 100 or more years, we will again forget about crypto-currencies and will pay with natural metals and jewelry.

That's it that technology is popular. Only thanks to her bitcoin holds the first place.

Do you understand that the market is growing? Bitcoin itself becomes obsolete. He can not offer participants the same perspectives that five years ago.

Many currencies are much better than bitcoin and I do not understand why they are still not at the top of the list of crypto-currencies.

Is it dangerous. You understand, the market is very unstable. Do you imagine that someone in one moment will abduct all means and stocks of the state? I think it will be scary for everyone.

I think it's bad that people refuse to work permanently for cryptocurrency. If the actions of states are directed against it, then many will remain with nothing.

I think that in this case, you should not only talk about bitcoin. About the whole market cryptocurrency. It can disappear because of the actions of various and factors, which means that many will again find themselves without work.

Russia and the US always have different opinions. For all. But we are not politicians and we do not judge them. I think that my country's position is the most faithful.

A lot of laws are broken every minute. But if the media is the main thing throughout the country, then they need to be accurate in their words and expressions.