|
So is this the new owner of Crycurex on the support account or the old one that thought it would be easy?
|
|
|
|
That does not explain though; why Cryptsy (which many of the forum must surely use) are still stagnant at a much higher level.
Wut ?  Well by your argument, everyone is screaming "SELL! SELL!" on CEX on the basis that Peta is offering "rock-bottom" prices. Well if that was true then you expect to see a similar selling of GHS on Cryptsy as well, on the basis that there are probably as many people who have interest in MN1 shares. But they are still kicking around the . 009 mark. 0.009 > 0.0026 BTCHope the math help  Yes and there is no mass selling at 0.009 from people rushing to buy at 0.0026. Hope the economics of supply and demand are not causing you much difficulty. |
|
|
|
|
if you are buying GHS then why not go to the website and buy at the current price... far easier....
|
|
|
|
Wtf are you guys thinking buying CEX contracts? I've got over 1 TH on www.lunamine.com for 0.0025 BTC per GHs.. and they pay out whenever you want to. CEX is 0.0061.. Three times more!! This will never break even. Even the "lowered" maintenance is 2x larger! ripoff Yeah I have referral link but I am not even using it here.. I'm just being sorry for the guys tricked into this legit scam.. Yes but there are significant differences between the two services (unless I stand to be corrected) because Luna is a lifetime contract and from what I understand of the website there is no trading if the value of that GHS contract goes up. CEX is a trading platform for GHS rather than an investment platform. You also have to consider that the minimum spend on Luna is 100GHS (at the moment; if you remember Cryptsy had a fixed 1GHS and a fixed 10GHS contract offering which soon changed) whereas CEX (and Cryptsy and Crycurex et al) offer fractional GHS which appeals to the beginner miner - indeed I only started off with a few CoinyeCoin and 0.1BTC bought from Bittylicious not so long ago. All I was pointing out was that CEX appeared to have a sizeable (10%+) drop in the asking price for GHS whereas others in a similar market appeared to be stable. This thread is, of course, about CEX and not any new start-up that you are promoting. |
|
|
|
That does not explain though; why Cryptsy (which many of the forum must surely use) are still stagnant at a much higher level.
Wut ? Well by your argument, everyone is screaming "SELL! SELL!" on CEX on the basis that Peta is offering "rock-bottom" prices. Well if that was true then you expect to see a similar selling of GHS on Cryptsy as well, on the basis that there are probably as many people who have interest in MN1 shares. But they are still kicking around the .009 mark. |
|
|
|
|
That does not explain though; why Cryptsy (which many of the forum must surely use) are still stagnant at a much higher level.
|
|
|
|
|
Strangely I would expect such an announcement to cause a small surge in GHS price; but it does appear to be falling like a stale lemon?
|
|
|
|
|
Well the website is certainly still alive, so it might have been on auto-renew......
|
|
|
|
|
I was kind of ignoring that because I think if I wanted to fuck across 3 (or 4 depending on ages) generations of family I would have some quite bizarre fetish going on.
|
|
|
|
Crycurex is in the process of being sold. You might want to comment on the thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=639062.0 although it is a self-moderated thread so Martin will just delete your comments and accuse you of being some paid hater from another exchange..... I got mucked around just like you and many other Crycurex users; but the owner just does not understand why everyone got paid to hate him. |
|
|
|
|
Is there some issue ongoing at the moment on CEX?
GHash is reporting that there has been 9 blocks solved over the last 6 hours but my GHS has done no work for them? On top of that the price dropped around the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
More importantly - under your countries law, have you got the consent of each of your registered users to transfer their information outside of your country?
(EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC) (Act No. 428/2002 Coll. the Data Protection Act, as amended)
PS I know you don't particularly want to trade with me; but I might be interested in making an offer.....
(oh wait - I am not allowed to post in this thread, you keep removing my posts (including one with a bid))
|
|
|
|
Looking at his first 4 posts; I would suggest that mr.Who777 might be associated with the site: hello, read about mixing services, and now decided to mix my first coins ( i have a some kind of black market) i used 2 mixers, first one was http://bitmixer.info/ and niw i know that it is a scam, God bless mixed only 0.2 btc another one was http://bitmix4you.com/ much better than previos, i received my coins in 2-3 hours after mixing Read a lot of bad and good about this mixer http://bitmix4you.com/thought a lot before mixing, but in the end decided, evrything works! first time mixed there min (0.1 btc) than mixed 1.244 i`m satisfied with there work and can`t understand angry reaction on spam, it is a some kind of PR so, advise to everyone, it is better than losing coins on mixbit (in onion) being the 2 (of 4) not in our thread here..... Smells crycurex (my codeword for scam) to me. |
|
|
|
1) He bought ASICs with IPO money??? Really?
yes really, why cant you be happy that i am re investing that money into the coin, i was well within my right to spend it on a new pc or a holiday to hawaii, since utc was an entrepeneurial endevour. out of all the people involved with starting the coin, i am the only person still involved and i am the only person who is spending his gain on the coin.Power is 29 cent here, and why would i want 10% in mh/s that i would have gotten in GPU`s that i now have in asics???
Oh yea? Did you tell people in the beginning before they invested that you are entitled to spend the IPO all on yourself? Hmmmmm. Spend the proceeds of a pre-sale on miners to bring in BTC to assist in the hyper-inflation of the market. Now there's an idea. |
|
|
|
|
Ooooops.
I would not question him. He will accuse you of having a mental illness and being a paid hater from CryptoRush.
(No... seriously - that is what every PM to me has said recently)
edit: it appears he has actually taken my advice on making the auction transparent.... and tidied up the thread.
|
|
|
|
I make no apologies for bumping this thread, because the owner of Crycurex seems to still think I am a "paid hater" on behalf of CryptoRush  as I see you have serious mental problems, but allow me to ask one question you primitive. Looks like you do your best to damage name of my exchange as much as possible ... Why you dont focus your life energy to find stolen coins from www.cryptorush.in where approximately 500 000 - 900 000 Usd were stolen ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624588.new#newMorning Martin I thought you said you would never PM me anymore? I see you can only defend yourself with childish insults like saying I have a serious mental problem. People with serious mental problems get locked away in mental hospitals.... My eyes are a bit sore of hours of coding (have you ever tried removing a websites dependance on Erlang.... it is a pain in the ass) so I will entertain your question. I would love to focus my energy on CryptoRush, but you see my account was dormant with them long before anyone lost any money, but you just had so little idea how to run a business or a cryptocurrency exchange while I was an active customer and you listened to absolutely nothing but your own meandering experience and believing you were right, and your lies, and your empty promises; that you were more damaging than CryptoRush when you were "trading". You hid behind the BitCoinTalk forum. Lombage even directed me to it as it was home to your "Terms & Conditions" in full; as I said when I called you a scammer, YOU are the reason I registered an account at BitCoinTalk. If you had not simply called me a hater when I pointed out flaws in the basics of your exchange we might not be at this point; but your almost narcissistic approach to thinking you are right despite not knowing how to run an (allegedly) unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange is now so legendary I have used it in a seminar on customer service that I gave at a charity conference..... on how not to do it. Many Regards many of plain talking ... important words in your reply were: "I would love to focus my energy on CryptoRush" all other words were just trash like 99 % of your other words and like 99 % of your posts .. So please focus your life energy on biggiest scam for last months - Cryptorush.in, if you return at least 10 % of coins to thier true owners, I will say you are helpful for community. Apparently to be a help to the community I need to refund the coins of an exchange that I was a customer of.... Hang on. I will check, is 0.13BTC enough to cover that? Because that is my entire balance anywhere! |
|
|
|
As a relatively layman to the world of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency I can not see a successful 51% attack being of any benefit to the person undertaking it. I am sorry if I miss something simple and I will happily stand corrected; but to undertake the attack you have to have in excess of 51% of the total hashing power and that is substantial in itself; I realise that GHash has been the most prominent group of servers to possibly achieve this. Would they really do it though? They might have considered whether becoming the biggest of the big then they may become a regulator almost by default and without knowing anyone associated with GHash then maybe they don't want to. but the only reasons that I could see a company with the amount of money invested in hardware to have 51% of the hashing power are: - They were compromised.
- They had found some massive flaw that would very quickly render all of their hardware worthless.
Now. There is something that might not have been considered and I regret that I am not learned enough in Bitcoin to know how and where to look. If GHash went offline would the huge drop in hashing cause anyone else to have enough of a stake to do something? Reading between the lines I understand that it is massively unlikely that it would ever happen but there is always the minute chance. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think in the strictest sense of the financial term, that they are actually doing an IPO.
From what I understand of their offering it is more likely to become aligned to crowdfunding, which the FCA DO have some regulation over and had rules introduced back in April.
Regretfully I will do the research for that as I have far more pressing matters to attend to.... good luck if you have to read any of their circular white papers!
(Oh and while Crycurex-Support is still accusing me of spoiling his reputation; look... seee... I am being unbiased here on BTC and not moaning about him at all)
|
|
|
|
|
An interesting thread.
I think purely on the attitude of the CEO I won't be using Instant-BitCoins for my next purchase, but I am interested as to which piece of regulation raskul thinks the website is in breach of:
* Coins are not a tangible asset therefore not covered by the Sale of Goods Act 1979
* Coins are not a digital download as you are not actually downloading anything and therefore not covered by the Consumer Contracts Regulations
* The (old) Distance Selling Regulations (being replaced by the CCRs above from today) do not apply to goods or services where the price is dependent on market fluctuations for value (think stock markets)
The Financial Conduct Authority have long distanced themselves from being a regulator of digital currencies and went as far as de-registering a company who had managed to become registered under the radar.
The HMRC responded to a question about VAT on BitCoin transactions stating that bitcoin currency was to be treated as a single-purpose, face-value voucher.
UK Law does not effectively have any consumer regulation that manages to cover bitcoin, in my opinion
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
