I think so, yesterday. Blocks are flying left and right on there so we'll see some time soon  I know pool mining is still very fresh but would be nice to get access to some better stats. Seriously, these pools are just all the same. There needs to be a update to improve stats. There was a block 9 minutes ago and I didn't get paid. Don't know what's going on either myself. It took some time on moneropool.org. 30 - 60 mins maybe? Guess wait and see. I'll mine 24 hours and see what's up. Really was the same for me the last two days. Mining, nothing happening, block found, not getting paid, worrying, spreading fud. All of a sudden payout comes around, feeling stupid. |
|
|
|
There was a block 9 minutes ago and I didn't get paid. Don't know what's going on either myself. It took some time on moneropool.org. 30 - 60 mins maybe? |
|
|
|
I think so, yesterday. Blocks are flying left and right on there so we'll see some time soon I know pool mining is still very fresh but would be nice to get access to some better stats. |
|
|
|
maybe the next step should be to add it on coinmarketcap - or do you think it is too early? it's too early but exposure is always good. trollbox is going nuts for monero. |
|
|
|
|
How far can you back up the anonymity claim?
Is it done the same way darkcoin does it? So basically a darkcoin clone?
|
|
|
|
Mining Monero is like waiting for a bus. None for ages, then along come three! Go extremepool.org yeah, it's really something different than scrypt pool mining. i went the route and bought some, now to figure out how to withdraw and stuff.. edit: does anyone have experience with cryptonote.exchange.to? why does it say my withdrawl is pending approval? Withdraws are manual - at least one time per 24 hours and probably 2-3 times per 24 hours. hey, thanks. i contacted support and they said the same. minutes later it got executed. all i need now is the transaction id to see if it actually arrived in my wallet. i'm mining at the same time and "refresh" showed 2 seperate ids. i guess one from the pool and one from the exchange. |
|
|
|
Regarding the first question, are you sure you are using the updated simpleminer.exe? Also, is your single core hyperthreaded? If so, you could run two instances of simpleminer.
I'm pretty sure I am on the latest binaries, but I have not tried running a second instance of the miner. My CPU usage is already 99% with the single instance. Am I really going to get more hashing with another instance? Thanks for your input. If your already at 99% then no, you wont get more. I need 2 threads per core to get to 100%. |
|
|
|
Mining Monero is like waiting for a bus. None for ages, then along come three! Go extremepool.org yeah, it's really something different than scrypt pool mining. i went the route and bought some, now to figure out how to withdraw and stuff.. edit: does anyone have experience with cryptonote.exchange.to? why does it say my withdrawl is pending approval? |
|
|
|
looks like moneropool.org payed out. ~1.3 mro for participating in the 2 blocks found. have to hook up the killawatt and see if i can somehow justify this as "profitable"  |
|
|
|
OK, so I was curious about how to make best use of my CPUs.
... an i7, a Core2 Duo & the i5 in my lappy.
I ran them for a couple of days using Myr-Gr (suprnova) & was getting around 1.8 Myr/hr.
37 hours ago I switched them to Cubit (cpu-pool) & I now appear to be somewhere around 1.5 Myr/hr.
Yes, it's hard to get truly accurate numbers on such a short run, esp as cpu-pool takes a long time to solve blocks & most of them seem to run 200% +.
But I suppose my point really is, why aren't my 3 CPUs on Cubit not getting around the same 'reward' as my 3 GPUs on Myr-Gr? (25-33 Myr/hr)
I'd say they were 'technologically comparable' (i7 = HD7990, i5 = HD5870, Duo = GTX 540) so why so low on Cubit? I thought the whole point of the multi-algo was to equalise the playing field?
Or am I missing something?
Actually, I have the same question. I thought the hi-end CPU on CPU-algo will produce nearly the same MYR quantity as hi-end GPU on GPU-algo. What's the problem? There are no CPU algos, all are GPU and ASIC Then that should be made very clear on the OP & your 'advertising' SHOULD NOT be implying 'a coin for everyone' as it does - just be honest & say it's still a coin for whales with asic-farms. VERY disappointed  That is not completely correct. Qubit is GPU mineable, however it's the best we've got for CPU right now. If the incentive is big enough every algorithm gets GPU'd and then ASIC'd. But you can't make a claim like " A coin for everyone except CPU miners because while it's ok it's not the best solution yet but we're working on it." |
|
|
|
Still no payout from moneropool.org for the last blocks..?
Not for me too. I've switched to extremepool.org and see if they pay or not. I had an auto payout from *.org yesterday shortly after the block was found. Admin seemed honest so not trying to spread fud but i switched for the rime being and it seems extremepool also shows better hashrate stats and is faster in delivering jobs. But could always be just lag.. |
|
|
|
|
Still no payout from moneropool.org for the last blocks..?
|
|
|
|
Ok, so besides mining I think I'm gonna spend some of my scrypt earnings on monero.
But wouldn't it be wise to hold out a bit buying it? I mean surely the influx of new coins will be bigger once there is a gui wallet and gpu miner and "proper" pools? Or am I wrong?
If by 'new coins' you mean the number of MRO hitting the markets - the rate of production is the same no matter how many miners there are. Hmm, yeah, I've come to the same conclusion. I'll buy some from time to time just to make sure |
|
|
|
|
Ok, so besides mining I think I'm gonna spend some of my scrypt earnings on monero.
But wouldn't it be wise to hold out a bit buying it? I mean surely the influx of new coins will be bigger once there is a gui wallet and gpu miner and "proper" pools? Or am I wrong?
|
|
|
|
I'd like to make a public service announcement. Before I do, though, I'd like to say, all pool owners involved have promised to fix their issues, and I am not being paid, nor am I affiliated with the pool I'm going to recommend.
PSA: Both moneropool.com and moneropool.org are insecure. I'm not going to release details until I've given them a reasonable period of time to correct the issues, however, I will say that moneropool.org seems to be a LOT worse than moneropool.com, and none of the three pools I know of use a seperate server for the actual mining (which is very important when that server holds other people's money.) The admin of moneropool.org acknowledged the extreme issue with his pool, and promised to fix it (as of right now, it's unfixed), but he seemed to blow off the idea of either putting httpd in a VM, or on another server entirely. The admin of moneropool.com acknowledged the slightly severe issue, as well as agreeing the httpd should be moved or served out of a VM.
I'm going to recommend (and switch to immediately) extremepool.org. While their httpd is still on the same server as the mining daemon, they have no severe security issues - in fact, their security is excellent, as they seem to have taken several steps to secure their server, far beyond the default configs - and I spoke to the admin, who appears quite knowledgable and experienced in securing a server.
EDIT: Two pool admins have promised me MRO donations, moneropool.com and extremepool.org. However, I wrote this before I knew the admin of extremepool.org was giving me anything, so I believe the statement in my second sentence remains true.
I'm now mining at extremepool.org too. I noticed also that I've not been paid for my shares at moneropool.org despite one or two blocks being found hours ago. Yeah, haven't been paid out yet either for any blocks after the one yesterday. Might give Extremepool a try. |
|
|
|
|
What's the actual coin count due to the forks? Is it less than 16mill?
|
|
|
|
New source and 6 threads already up to 70h. Really excited for 16 threads. Looking good |
|
|
|
|
TMB has ~5gh.
Plus there's a huuuuge load coming from china.
|
|
|
|
|
Trying the updated files now.
WOuld it be a good idea to call 2 threads per core?
|
|
|
|
100 GH to 39GH? Asic test? multipool?
Either that or all the multipools with x11 are doing it. I hope its not an asic  ASIC which pool is that? Dedicated i know for sure its me on spot 2  how many cards? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
