volumen is one of the most important criterion poloniex, is another's definitely development and view of the future. 2 years, there is no position group, if any. so please Discuss efficiently, because soon we will trade vrt on yobit: D many miners go to zcash, from the standpoint of mining vrt looks good, but price ... and a view of the future looks badly oh badly  Zcash does look interesting. I'm waiting for it to settle before I do anything with it. The price started around 1.5 btc and now it's around .2 btc . The creator of vertcoin made that . zcash goes to the correct supply only, so the price quickly drops. Miners went where the money. Vertcoin any added value for 2 years, a year and will be typing to delist poloniex You think vertcoin is going to delisted from polo ? If we were gonna get delisted, it would have been done months ago when all the other shitcoins got delisted. Maybe in the future, who knows but i sure hope not polo next delist purge can come any time now ... i think this month or dec ... they use to delist coins every 3-6 months I doubt they would delist vtc. There are times every couple months where the volume is pretty high. |
|
|
|
enough to write the recommended method was local wallet, so now I'll know  so recommended method was myetherwallet, since I could not 1 second ico send a ether  ?? Does not anyone could foresee? It was necessary to write lest synchronize local eth wallet !!! him to send the eth are you devs have recommended myetherwallet and you have received a chance to be a golem project only if it was your first ethereum ico. ive read in other icos people had the same problem. not with myetherwallet in general, but things like gas price too low and money wouldnt arrive quickly enough. i guess we should have known that using a 3rd party server isnt a good idea for lightning fast ico with big potential. if you dont know, now you know.. always have a node ready money is still flowing in... ^^ |
|
|
|
so recommended method was myetherwallet, since I could not 1 second ico send a ether ?? Does not anyone could foresee? It was necessary to write lest synchronize local eth wallet !!! him to send the eth are you devs have recommended myetherwallet and you have received a chance to be a golem project |
|
|
|
many miners go to zcash, from the standpoint of mining vrt looks good, but price ... and a view of the future looks badly oh badly Zcash does look interesting. I'm waiting for it to settle before I do anything with it. The price started around 1.5 btc and now it's around .2 btc . The creator of vertcoin made that . zcash goes to the correct supply only, so the price quickly drops. Miners went where the money. Vertcoin any added value for 2 years, a year and will be typing to delist poloniex |
|
|
|
hmmm 2016-11-11 11:13:25] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.09 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:13:25] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.30 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:13:26] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.76 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:13:26] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.99 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:14:26] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.11 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:14:26] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.76 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:14:26] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.25 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:14:27] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.97 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:15:04] stratum_recv_line failed
[2016-11-11 11:15:04] Stratum connection interrupted
[2016-11-11 11:15:05] CPU #2: 240 H, 6.26 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:15:05] CPU #3: 228 H, 5.98 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:15:05] CPU #0: 240 H, 6.10 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:15:06] CPU #1: 228 H, 5.77 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:16:09] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.78 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:16:09] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.97 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:16:10] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.08 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:16:10] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.24 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:17:09] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.78 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:17:09] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.99 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:17:11] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.11 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:17:12] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.25 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:18:09] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.76 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:18:10] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.92 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:18:12] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.07 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:18:13] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.28 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:19:10] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.76 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:19:10] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.99 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:19:13] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.10 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:19:14] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.27 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:20:10] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.76 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:20:10] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.97 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:20:15] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.07 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:20:15] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.27 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:21:11] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.98 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:21:11] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.75 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:21:16] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.09 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:21:17] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.24 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:22:11] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.95 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:22:11] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.73 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:22:16] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.11 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:22:17] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.33 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:23:11] CPU #3: 360 H, 5.99 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:23:12] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.76 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:23:18] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.07 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:23:19] CPU #2: 384 H, 6.23 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:24:11] CPU #3: 360 H, 6.05 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:24:11] CPU #1: 348 H, 5.86 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:24:18] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.15 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:24:33] CPU #2: 384 H, 5.21 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:25:13] CPU #3: 372 H, 5.98 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:25:14] CPU #1: 360 H, 5.77 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:25:16] stratum_recv_line failed
[2016-11-11 11:25:16] Stratum connection interrupted
[2016-11-11 11:25:17] CPU #2: 276 H, 6.25 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:25:17] CPU #3: 24 H, 5.99 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:25:17] CPU #0: 360 H, 6.11 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:25:18] CPU #1: 24 H, 6.14 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:26:20] CPU #3: 360 H, 6.01 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:26:21] CPU #0: 372 H, 6.10 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:26:23] CPU #1: 372 H, 5.83 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:26:24] CPU #2: 384 H, 5.99 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:27:23] CPU #2: 360 H, 6.07 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:27:25] CPU #3: 372 H, 5.72 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:27:30] CPU #1: 360 H, 5.43 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:27:44] CPU #0: 372 H, 4.48 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:28:25] CPU #3: 348 H, 5.77 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:28:26] CPU #2: 372 H, 5.96 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:28:31] CPU #1: 336 H, 5.48 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:28:35] CPU #0: 276 H, 5.48 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:29:26] CPU #2: 360 H, 5.98 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:29:26] CPU #3: 348 H, 5.72 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:29:33] CPU #1: 336 H, 5.43 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:29:34] CPU #0: 336 H, 5.68 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:30:25] CPU #2: 360 H, 6.08 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:30:27] CPU #3: 348 H, 5.72 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:30:35] CPU #1: 336 H, 5.37 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:30:41] CPU #0: 348 H, 5.21 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:31:28] CPU #3: 348 H, 5.67 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:31:29] CPU #2: 372 H, 5.86 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:31:36] CPU #1: 324 H, 5.33 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:31:56] CPU #0: 324 H, 4.29 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:32:30] CPU #2: 360 H, 5.90 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:32:31] CPU #3: 348 H, 5.54 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:32:40] CPU #1: 324 H, 5.11 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:32:54] CPU #0: 264 H, 4.59 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:33:30] CPU #2: 360 H, 5.95 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:33:31] CPU #3: 336 H, 5.66 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:33:39] CPU #1: 312 H, 5.25 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:33:59] CPU #0: 276 H, 4.20 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:34:30] CPU #2: 360 H, 5.98 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:34:32] CPU #3: 348 H, 5.68 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:34:44] CPU #1: 324 H, 5.03 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:34:51] CPU #0: 264 H, 5.05 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:35:30] CPU #2: 360 H, 6.09 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:35:32] CPU #3: 348 H, 5.78 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:35:38] stratum_recv_line failed
[2016-11-11 11:35:38] Stratum connection interrupted
[2016-11-11 11:35:39] CPU #1: 276 H, 4.99 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:35:39] CPU #2: 60 H, 6.14 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:35:40] CPU #0: 204 H, 4.24 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:35:40] CPU #3: 48 H, 6.04 H/s
[2016-11-11 11:35:46] eu.poolinat0r.com:4443 scrypt block 22418 |
|
|
|
many miners go to zcash, from the standpoint of mining vrt looks good, but price ... and a view of the future looks badly oh badly |
|
|
|
|
if someone is working on the development of vrm? A month ago, they said of the new wallet, promotional campaign. It did not look good !!
and please do not refer me to the forum vericoin because there nothing I can not see
|
|
|
|
|
ask effectsToCause, I am sad. We have new miners, the supply is high and nobody is buying. Dev has not published anything for a month, it's a bad joke; /
|
|
|
|
|
When they settle payment bounty in .btc?
|
|
|
|
fairness in the distribution of the bounty, and the transparency of the work to ico was promising. I do not know what is happening now, I still think that iconomi has a plan for the future  |
|
|
|
One address has over 50% off the last 100 blocks  Yet this address pool, probably pollinator. Mine this coin pay % miners |
|
|
|
what? discussion? half a year you discuss is how much they will work? 10 years?  |
|
|
|
we have again botnets, and starts dumping |
|
|
|
what are the directions of development vrm? You did ico, and what now? I in all of this I do not see any sense, but it just me? |
|
|
|
|
Checking in 3rd week 11/8/2016
|
|
|
|
something is wrong with the pollinator, my hashrate fell in one day in half .. from time to time workers: [2016-11-08 01:12:29] Total: 365.41 H/m [2016-11-08 01:13:32] Total: 365.49 H/m [2016-11-08 01:14:08] stratum_recv_line failed [2016-11-08 01:14:08] Stratum connection interrupted -- |
|
|
|
|
im on board with substantial sum of asn:P
|
|
|
|
pollinator is a good choice, especially for the location of Europe. Currently, the pool captures a large majority vrm blocks testbug once again - well done! |
|
|
|
|
where after poloniex delist is now master gap exchange?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
