looks like dev was in contact with rex since they added it , meaning he provided the info on the questions they had.(i would think cause it's on bittrex now)
wow holders are much stronger than i thought they'dd be, that's right refuse to go bellow 400 lol
Its either full moon or price goes to zero. Nothing in between. i assume you mean up or down? duh lol It's extreme up or extreme down. Not just up and down. i vote for extreme up  (do we vote on this) Cast your vote on exchange by buying all the coins  i got plenty i mined it from day 1 on all 3 pools (huge 10mh per each ) |
|
|
|
looks like dev was in contact with rex since they added it , meaning he provided the info on the questions they had.(i would think cause it's on bittrex now)
wow holders are much stronger than i thought they'dd be, that's right refuse to go bellow 400 lol
Its either full moon or price goes to zero. Nothing in between. i assume you mean up or down? duh lol It's extreme up or extreme down. Not just up and down. i vote for extreme up (do we vote on this) |
|
|
|
why does this coin already have 400k marketcap?
you all realize that is severely overpriced for a new coin??
but it has a wallet lol |
|
|
|
looks like dev was in contact with rex since they added it , meaning he provided the info on the questions they had.(i would think cause it's on bittrex now)
wow holders are much stronger than i thought they'dd be, that's right refuse to go bellow 400 lol
12 mio coins are not soooo much. Should go up much more  when it launched price was 800 even reached 1600 for a second (i think i remember it right) |
|
|
|
looks like dev was in contact with rex since they added it , meaning he provided the info on the questions they had.(i would think cause it's on bittrex now)
wow holders are much stronger than i thought they'dd be, that's right refuse to go bellow 400 lol
Its either full moon or price goes to zero. Nothing in between. i assume you mean up or down? duh lol |
|
|
|
|
looks like dev was in contact with rex since they added it , meaning he provided the info on the questions they had.(i would think cause it's on bittrex now)
wow holders are much stronger than i thought they'dd be, that's right refuse to go bellow 400 lol
|
|
|
|
This is why there are so many scams. Nobody gives a crap. Fuck it! Throw it on Bittrex so I can dump my coins to the next sucker at a higher price.
remember this? "Tomorrow; website, plan/roadmap writing, bounty outline, web wallet." if he shows up with a website today we will go right back up, funny how one comment can change prices of coins nowadays, it's a dangerous game to play the new ones. Trust me, I would like nothing more than for the dev to be legit. I'm just realistic. i agree with you everything is in the air now, and i only risk what i can afford to lose which is why i'm still holding. i never said you did anything wrong. I know you didn't. I feel like I'm getting chastised for trying to warn the community about the misinformation I received directly from the dev. I will wait like everyone else. thank you for your effort, but those who will listen have and those who dont - wont. theres no point for you to force it any further. we all deserve our fate. beautifully said |
|
|
|
I don't think your FUD crusade is gonna work, everyone here knows you're trolling so... how is he trolling ? following statement from him "U are paying 12K for coin launched in thread of 13 pages by newbie account and traded on fifth-rate exchange that even yet get reviewed." is correct. |
|
|
|
This is why there are so many scams. Nobody gives a crap. Fuck it! Throw it on Bittrex so I can dump my coins to the next sucker at a higher price.
remember this? "Tomorrow; website, plan/roadmap writing, bounty outline, web wallet." if he shows up with a website today we will go right back up, funny how one comment can change prices of coins nowadays, it's a dangerous game to play the new ones. Trust me, I would like nothing more than for the dev to be legit. I'm just realistic. i agree with you everything is in the air now, and i only risk what i can afford to lose which is why i'm still holding. i never said you did anything wrong. |
|
|
|
This is why there are so many scams. Nobody gives a crap. Fuck it! Throw it on Bittrex so I can dump my coins to the next sucker at a higher price.
remember this? "Tomorrow; website, plan/roadmap writing, bounty outline, web wallet." if he shows up with a website today we will go right back up, funny how one comment can change prices of coins nowadays, it's a dangerous game to play the new ones. |
|
|
|
|
another one where dev has 10 days worth of mining, look at the big picture lol
|
|
|
|
No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation,
Here's what Brian Kelly says about regulation: "The New York State Department of Financial Services took the first step toward developing these rules this week, with the announcement of a BitLicense. Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky has taken the lead in regulating digital currency businesses with the goal of protecting consumers while fostering innovation. This was the right move at the right time." Now Erik Vorhees' take on the same legislation, a well-respected member of the bitcoin community: "The concern is essentially that any user of any Bitcoin service would have to be entered into all sorts of databases with their name and personal information, like where they live, what they look like, what nationality they are — probably scans of their passport or driver’s license. And so this is all just a bunch of personal information that other people have no business knowing. And if the government wants to have private information about people, they need to make a case that that person is at least a suspect of a crime, I would think. They shouldn’t be able to just require everyone’s information just because they write it on paper. So that was my main concern — there are other concerns, but that was kind of the thrust of my piece." http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies.
Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be. That's exactly what it means, because in this case it doesn't have to be inevitable. He is just brainwashing people into accepting a new form of slavery by the financial system so Wall Street can continue its dominant position as Earth's Overlords. Some more from Brian Kelly's original article: "The open-source nature of digital currencies provides a built-in self-regulatory mechanism, but that mechanism does not protect against human greed." And Wall Street DOES?  ??!!! WHAT A FUCKING JOKE. i thought you said you will leave and spread awareness, you can't convert people that have their minds set, look up definition of the word insanity(i just can't be nice anymore) |
|
|
|
every time i check the thread here i'm looking for that BK post "good news guys" |
|
|
|
and watch it now dump into double digits, nice job Panda Really, this is your serious response? I probably have 10x more RVC then you do. I hold about 5% of all the coins. it's a response i could care less how many coins you got , i got enough, but good job on the investigation , i only said it cause it's usually true, put a tiny litlle bit of doubt in people's minds and they will dump,and your response to my comment which was nothing but an observation of current markets and the way they work was i have 10x coins as much as you, good for you i wish you nothing but the best with your investement I thought you were being sarcastic about the "good job panda" because you thought I ruined the market or something. [/quote] not at all, sorry if i came of like that, i wish nothing but best to everyone involved and hope we get somewhere, but i'm glad that people such as yourself are doing research. |
|
|
|
and watch it now dump into double digits, nice job Panda Really, this is your serious response? I probably have 10x more RVC then you do. I hold about 5% of all the coins. [/quote] it's a response i could care less how many coins you got , i got enough, but good job on the investigation , i only said it cause it's usually true, put a tiny litlle bit of doubt in people's minds and they will dump,and your response to my comment which was nothing but an observation of current markets and the way they work was i have 10x coins as much as you, good for you i wish you nothing but the best with your investement |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I apologise for any inconvenience caused. The missing blocks were indeed pos.
Since many people were complaining about the nethashrate and missing blocks i believed something shady was going on. I didn't realized pos blocks could be the "problem" atm.
We will contact c-cex and ask them to open the market again.
you are dev's right hand? You can find me in the OP, i am part of this project just like Provenceday. I don't see you in the OP. If you are close to the project then tell the dev to get in here and fix this. It's not hard. I see, OP update. Its already fixed and i am sure he will be here soon. I already apologise for him, no problems anymore. Ok everyone. I've been doing some digging and I need input from the Revcoin community. I don't want to jump to conclusions so I need all opinions. I PMd rvccoin yesterday to ask about his intentions for the coin and he said it was a real project and that Provenceday is involved and so did walhalla as you can see from the above post. Here's where it gets interesting. I PMd Provenceday: Quote from: JakeThePanda on Today at 03:00:32 PM Quote from: provenceday on Today at 02:51:49 PM Quote from: JakeThePanda on Today at 02:44:23 PM Quote from: provenceday on Today at 02:36:44 PM Quote from: JakeThePanda on Today at 01:35:49 PM Hey, I was told that you are actually part of the Revcoin project. Is that true? no, i am not. Do you know the Revcoin dev? do not know them. In the thread they say you are part of the project. Have you seen it? do you have the link? thanks I sent provenceday the link and he hasn't responded to me and is now offline. Rvccoin hasn't responded either. The community can take this next part for what it's worth, but it seemed very strange to me. Provenceday then went offline and some minutes later Rvccoin went online, although he didn't post. Rvccoin went offline and some minutes later Provenceday came back online. It seemed very strange to me. wallahala hasn't been online since July 26th. Let me know what you guys think? Is this jumping the gun on accusations? and watch it now dump into double digits, nice job Panda |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
Done today;
-released Mac wallet
-pr guy hired
-skype meeting with devs
-coinmarketcap application
-ipo fund transfer request Maidak
-website content writing
-plan/roadmap writing
Tomorrow; website, plan/roadmap writing, bounty outline, web wallet.
Hi dev, I already compiled the Mac Wallet. You don't like mine?  Yours is not official one  Yep, but the same you want to be acknowledged? okay, good job bud keep up the good work This is sarcasm I guess  Very funny, a simple "thank you" does not hurt. I made it when I saw the community claim it. sorry if it sounded sarcastic i'm actually genuine and i thank you for your contribution. |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
Done today;
-released Mac wallet
-pr guy hired
-skype meeting with devs
-coinmarketcap application
-ipo fund transfer request Maidak
-website content writing
-plan/roadmap writing
Tomorrow; website, plan/roadmap writing, bounty outline, web wallet.
Hi dev, I already compiled the Mac Wallet. You don't like mine? Yours is not official one Yep, but the same you want to be acknowledged? okay, good job bud keep up the good work |
|
|
|
And for everyone trying to conflate my argument with wanting to "shut down crypto," you're missing the point entirely, and on purpose, and there's nothing I can do to get you to see the point.
How exactly am I missing the point? You clearly said he is trying destroy BTC, or whatever word you used. You sound kind of like a radical newb, which is fine, but my point is very clearly stated that your hyping something that is never going to happen, wether it's the true motive or not. So obviously your attempt is to troll the thread, regardless of your reasononing. Shutting down of the bitcoin and 51% attacks are like Bigfoot, everyone has heard about it, but no one has actually seen one....... It's old and tired, and radical and newbish You keep conflating my opinions with stuff I never said. I could give two shits about a 51% attack. I never said bitcoin would get "shut down." I simply think its a contradictory and uneducated position to take demanding regulation in cryptocurrency when financial regulation has failed in every single facet of life for the average citizen. It has done nothing but cost money and keep people shackled to a lower economic class. And now you're supporting the man who is single-handedly trying to introduce this into the crypto to further the riches of the 1%. Great job. Please stop and take it to an appropriate thread. you are talking to same 5 people , if you want to make a difference reach more people and spread awareness. good luck. PS: you are now arguing with people , but let me tell you some people that have their mind made up you can't convince them with arguments, i think you should preach to ones who are open minded and undecided instead you trying to convince already converted by arguing and it's a waste of energy , find the open minded ones to spread awareness. one flyer per person is enough don't try to show the whole stack on 1 person English is not my first language buti hope you understand what i'm trying to say |
|
|
|
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.
PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)
Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there. not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin. I checked out Hyper after his tweets and it's not something I'd invest in yet, it does look potential though. I doubt he sold after the plug and I don't think it's illegal as it's not a stock. If David wants to start moving markets for personal gain he'll discredit himself entirely. It actually looks like sync guys dropped the ball there, article didn't even mention them but they stormed in. i still think his rushing in with his opinion(the guy is so full of himself where he thinks he can't be wrong) pieces and it will bite him in the ass (but i could be wrong) i do not think he's been long enough into crypto and he's not aware how influential a little comment let alone an article can be in this space . but hey that is just my opinion. anyway where is our POS i want to start staking |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
