|
whatdidshedo
|
 |
July 29, 2014, 06:02:19 PM |
|
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.
PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)
Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there. not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin. |
|
|
|
|
whatdidshedo
|
|
July 29, 2014, 06:52:17 PM |
|
anyway i shouldn't be talking about other coins here, my order filled on cryptsy well one of them, next one is much lower from where it's at now but you never know
|
|
|
|
|
Doging
|
|
July 29, 2014, 06:59:11 PM |
|
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.
PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)
Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there. not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin. I checked out Hyper after his tweets and it's not something I'd invest in yet, it does look potential though. I doubt he sold after the plug and I don't think it's illegal as it's not a stock. If David wants to start moving markets for personal gain he'll discredit himself entirely. It actually looks like sync guys dropped the ball there, article didn't even mention them but they stormed in. |
|
|
|
|
whatdidshedo
|
|
July 29, 2014, 07:10:08 PM |
|
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.
PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)
Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there. not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin. I checked out Hyper after his tweets and it's not something I'd invest in yet, it does look potential though. I doubt he sold after the plug and I don't think it's illegal as it's not a stock. If David wants to start moving markets for personal gain he'll discredit himself entirely. It actually looks like sync guys dropped the ball there, article didn't even mention them but they stormed in. i still think his rushing in with his opinion(the guy is so full of himself where he thinks he can't be wrong) pieces and it will bite him in the ass (but i could be wrong) i do not think he's been long enough into crypto and he's not aware how influential a little comment let alone an article can be in this space . but hey that is just my opinion. anyway where is our POS i want to start staking  |
|
|
|
|
Doging
|
|
July 29, 2014, 07:42:47 PM |
|
what's this about Dirac sucking Naut i'm hearing ? why are we even tied to Dirac. it's that thing from other day , where someone sucked Naut by pumping Dirac i assume but who trades naut for dirac? are some funds from brian tied to that par so it can be abused? i think we should cut ties and be a coin not tied to any other.
PS: David going mental pumping some trashing other coins(i don't think he's even aware what he's doing, he should stick to politics)
Dirac back at 1.4 and NAUT should be in a much stronger position if it happens again. I noticed David was getting mixed up with sync guys, not sure what the story is there. not only that but hew was praising hyper, but when you look at the book he started tweeting after price went 5x,(example not sure exactly how much) but if he bought day before it was so much cheaper and if he did that then tweeted isn't that called againsat the law in real trading?pumping your own stock publicly?i'm asking cause i'm not sure but i think he's not aware of what he's doing and how volatile these markets are and every comment can destroy a coin. I checked out Hyper after his tweets and it's not something I'd invest in yet, it does look potential though. I doubt he sold after the plug and I don't think it's illegal as it's not a stock. If David wants to start moving markets for personal gain he'll discredit himself entirely. It actually looks like sync guys dropped the ball there, article didn't even mention them but they stormed in. i still think his rushing in with his opinion(the guy is so full of himself where he thinks he can't be wrong) pieces and it will bite him in the ass (but i could be wrong) i do not think he's been long enough into crypto and he's not aware how influential a little comment let alone an article can be in this space . but hey that is just my opinion. anyway where is our POS i want to start staking I agree he has to tread very carefully but he's done OK so far. I doubt POS will be long but I'm not worried at this price, looks like accumulation across exchanges now. |
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 8570
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
July 29, 2014, 09:55:39 PM |
|
And for everyone trying to conflate my argument with wanting to "shut down crypto," you're missing the point entirely, and on purpose, and there's nothing I can do to get you to see the point.
How exactly am I missing the point? You clearly said he is trying destroy BTC, or whatever word you used. You sound kind of like a radical newb, which is fine, but my point is very clearly stated that your hyping something that is never going to happen, wether it's the true motive or not. So obviously your attempt is to troll the thread, regardless of your reasononing. Shutting down of the bitcoin and 51% attacks are like Bigfoot, everyone has heard about it, but no one has actually seen one....... It's old and tired, and radical and newbish You keep conflating my opinions with stuff I never said. I could give two shits about a 51% attack. I never said bitcoin would get "shut down." I simply think its a contradictory and uneducated position to take demanding regulation in cryptocurrency when financial regulation has failed in every single facet of life for the average citizen. It has done nothing but cost money and keep people shackled to a lower economic class. And now you're supporting the man who is single-handedly trying to introduce this into the crypto to further the riches of the 1%. Great job. |
|
|
|
|
whatdidshedo
|
|
July 29, 2014, 10:13:51 PM
Last edit: July 29, 2014, 10:54:13 PM by whatdidshedo |
|
And for everyone trying to conflate my argument with wanting to "shut down crypto," you're missing the point entirely, and on purpose, and there's nothing I can do to get you to see the point.
How exactly am I missing the point? You clearly said he is trying destroy BTC, or whatever word you used. You sound kind of like a radical newb, which is fine, but my point is very clearly stated that your hyping something that is never going to happen, wether it's the true motive or not. So obviously your attempt is to troll the thread, regardless of your reasononing. Shutting down of the bitcoin and 51% attacks are like Bigfoot, everyone has heard about it, but no one has actually seen one....... It's old and tired, and radical and newbish You keep conflating my opinions with stuff I never said. I could give two shits about a 51% attack. I never said bitcoin would get "shut down." I simply think its a contradictory and uneducated position to take demanding regulation in cryptocurrency when financial regulation has failed in every single facet of life for the average citizen. It has done nothing but cost money and keep people shackled to a lower economic class. And now you're supporting the man who is single-handedly trying to introduce this into the crypto to further the riches of the 1%. Great job. Please stop and take it to an appropriate thread. you are talking to same 5 people , if you want to make a difference reach more people and spread awareness. good luck. PS: you are now arguing with people , but let me tell you some people that have their mind made up you can't convince them with arguments, i think you should preach to ones who are open minded and undecided instead you trying to convince already converted by arguing and it's a waste of energy , find the open minded ones to spread awareness. one flyer per person is enough don't try to show the whole stack on 1 person English is not my first language buti hope you understand what i'm trying to say |
|
|
|
|
HKBvM
|
|
July 29, 2014, 10:46:17 PM |
|
And for everyone trying to conflate my argument with wanting to "shut down crypto," you're missing the point entirely, and on purpose, and there's nothing I can do to get you to see the point.
How exactly am I missing the point? You clearly said he is trying destroy BTC, or whatever word you used. You sound kind of like a radical newb, which is fine, but my point is very clearly stated that your hyping something that is never going to happen, wether it's the true motive or not. So obviously your attempt is to troll the thread, regardless of your reasononing. Shutting down of the bitcoin and 51% attacks are like Bigfoot, everyone has heard about it, but no one has actually seen one....... It's old and tired, and radical and newbish You keep conflating my opinions with stuff I never said. I could give two shits about a 51% attack. I never said bitcoin would get "shut down." I simply think its a contradictory and uneducated position to take demanding regulation in cryptocurrency when financial regulation has failed in every single facet of life for the average citizen. It has done nothing but cost money and keep people shackled to a lower economic class. And now you're supporting the man who is single-handedly trying to introduce this into the crypto to further the riches of the 1%. Great job. Listen. You are saying the very same things again and again. It is annoying. You said you will open your own thread, please do it. Post the link here. Launch your anti-Naut campaign. Move this discussion elsewhere, go to a politics forum, whatever. Just stop posting the same nonsense again. Please. Footnote: Calling other positions uneducated is not a good basis for a discussion. After spending precious lifetime on reading you posts it is just laughable. Please dont answer, as I will ignore you from now on. |
|
|
|
|
|
BTCrawl
|
|
July 29, 2014, 11:06:13 PM |
|
And for everyone trying to conflate my argument with wanting to "shut down crypto," you're missing the point entirely, and on purpose, and there's nothing I can do to get you to see the point.
How exactly am I missing the point? You clearly said he is trying destroy BTC, or whatever word you used. You sound kind of like a radical newb, which is fine, but my point is very clearly stated that your hyping something that is never going to happen, wether it's the true motive or not. So obviously your attempt is to troll the thread, regardless of your reasononing. Shutting down of the bitcoin and 51% attacks are like Bigfoot, everyone has heard about it, but no one has actually seen one....... It's old and tired, and radical and newbish You keep conflating my opinions with stuff I never said. I could give two shits about a 51% attack. I never said bitcoin would get "shut down." I simply think its a contradictory and uneducated position to take demanding regulation in cryptocurrency when financial regulation has failed in every single facet of life for the average citizen. It has done nothing but cost money and keep people shackled to a lower economic class. And now you're supporting the man who is single-handedly trying to introduce this into the crypto to further the riches of the 1%. Great job. Please stop and take it to an appropriate thread. you are talking to same 5 people , if you want to make a difference reach more people and spread awareness. good luck. PS: you are now arguing with people , but let me tell you some people that have their mind made up you can't convince them with arguments, i think you should preach to ones who are open minded and undecided instead you trying to convince already converted by arguing and it's a waste of energy , find the open minded ones to spread awareness. one flyer per person is enough don't try to show the whole stack on 1 person English is not my first language buti hope you understand what i'm trying to say I think it's best to just ignore her to be honest. It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over. You know that old saying "Never get into an argument with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level." and all that. I think that applies here Our time is best spent elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 8570
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
July 29, 2014, 11:27:57 PM |
|
last post on the page
|
|
|
|
|
Doging
|
|
July 30, 2014, 01:20:57 AM |
|
It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.
Good description, you just can't debate with her. |
|
|
|
|
FlyingMongoose
|
|
July 30, 2014, 01:35:11 AM |
|
So close to 200
Don't forget to vote http://www.btc38.com/trade/vote_for_trade.htmlhttps://bter.com/votinghttps://hitbtc.com/votehttps://www.swaphole.com/#!votinghttp://www.betbycoin.com/coinvotes/To Do: Release Proof of Stake Wallet - Being Worked on by Blocktech Mobile Wallet App - (Doesn't NEED to stake, but would be nice). Multipool Official block explorer - The NautInsight one is nice, but it's not marked as official (it wouldn't hurt to have that block explorer moved to the nautiluscoin domain) Video(s) - Make Nautiluscoin promo videos! Website update - Front page update Come up with more plans to get naut into the hands of more people and more in the public eye - Nautiluscoin Community Manager - - Note that much of my posts are my own observations and opinions and not necessarily representative of Nautiluscoin itself. |
qoinpro.com/951c974b34f66cc68e805832df0c9d8c
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 8570
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
July 30, 2014, 01:39:34 AM |
|
It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.
Good description, you just can't debate with her. You're right, neither of you can debate me because you write me off as a troll before trying to counter my arguments using facts and logic. |
|
|
|
|
FlyingMongoose
|
|
July 30, 2014, 06:51:40 AM |
|
It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.
Good description, you just can't debate with her. You're right, neither of you can debate me because you write me off as a troll before trying to counter my arguments using facts and logic. No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation, HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies. Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be. |
qoinpro.com/951c974b34f66cc68e805832df0c9d8c
|
|
|
|
Doging
|
|
July 30, 2014, 08:05:12 AM |
|
It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.
Good description, you just can't debate with her. You're right, neither of you can debate me because you write me off as a troll before trying to counter my arguments using facts and logic. No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation, HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies. Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be. This is either a shakedown or she's not all there. Do you know if multipool development will be paid for by the nsf or do we have to arrange a bounty? |
|
|
|
|
kehtolo
|
|
July 30, 2014, 08:28:30 AM |
|
It looks to me like it's gone all quiet on the western front. Does anyone know what is going on?
I don't normally come here and demand answers to anything.. as i try to always keep up with this thread.. BUT
I have no idea what is going on anymore.
Here is where I am up to -
Digibyte devs not developing PoS - now being handled by another dev.. who was named in the thread and even posted here i believe.
(I'm not trawling back to find the name)
Is this where we are at?
Meanwhile, interest and volume as well as price is dwindling downwards.
Roadmap anyone?
|
The next 24 hours are critical!
|
|
|
|
BTCrawl
|
|
July 30, 2014, 09:16:02 AM |
|
It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.
Good description, you just can't debate with her. You're right, neither of you can debate me because you write me off as a troll before trying to counter my arguments using facts and logic. No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation, HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies. Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be. Wow, is she still answering my posts despite me ignoring her? Guess there's a reason she has the word "nut" in her username Anyway, I think we've only had a couple of trolls\crazy people in this thread. That's pretty damn good statistics for this forum after all  |
|
|
|
|
|
BTCrawl
|
|
July 30, 2014, 09:22:36 AM |
|
It looks to me like it's gone all quiet on the western front. Does anyone know what is going on?
I don't normally come here and demand answers to anything.. as i try to always keep up with this thread.. BUT
I have no idea what is going on anymore.
Here is where I am up to -
Digibyte devs not developing PoS - now being handled by another dev.. who was named in the thread and even posted here i believe.
(I'm not trawling back to find the name)
Is this where we are at?
Meanwhile, interest and volume as well as price is dwindling downwards.
Roadmap anyone?
Yeah, most people are just sitting around and waiting for the latest update right now I guess. BK hired a dev who couldn't deliver the proof of stake code on time, and BK finally had enough and hired Blocktech to do it instead. This was a few days ago and we haven't gotten a timeline since, because BK said that he doesn't want to end up in the same situation again with missed deadlines and all. another good thing is that they'll probably be implementing a dynamic PoS, that's more technologically advanced than what was previously worked upon. |
|
|
|
|
|
open82buy
|
|
July 30, 2014, 09:56:42 AM |
|
Well while waiting, I have been stocking up on some more coins.  there's good times ahead for this coin. |
|
|
|
|
|
FlyingMongoose
|
|
July 30, 2014, 04:24:34 PM |
|
It's like having a discussion with someone who's deeply religious and just keeps screaming "Infidel!" over and over.
Good description, you just can't debate with her. You're right, neither of you can debate me because you write me off as a troll before trying to counter my arguments using facts and logic. No, you completely ignore numerous arguments that prove the opposite of your points; you often claim BK is specifically FOR the regulation of crypto, when in fact he has repeatedly stated that he is NOT for the regulation, HOWEVER, he understands it is an inevitability and feels it be necessary that people in crypto (such as you, and me), be the ones to write that regulation, and NOT the governing bodies. Accepting something as an inevitability is NOT the same thing as supporting it, it never has been, and never will be. This is either a shakedown or she's not all there. Do you know if multipool development will be paid for by the nsf or do we have to arrange a bounty? I have not been told though from past experiences from bk he may be paying someone to make that happen as well. I can't answer for certain though |
qoinpro.com/951c974b34f66cc68e805832df0c9d8c
|
|
|
|
