Was i breaking another term and condition of the site by offering you a bet
Not at all, I just don't gamble. |
|
|
|
oh so was someone here who could be trusted given my login password then they would not see lots of posts warning in my message inbox that full thanks to you
and if they looked at the date/time of the warning message and the time my comment was posted and then looked at how long it took to get deleted then they would agree with you that you are not following me around.
Tell me are you a betting man because if you are then agree to give in your position as moderator here and I will agree to keep away if they agree with your version of the story or have you been caught in a lie this time ?
Hang around, I will look to see if the time stamps are available
I am not a betting man so I will not take you up on that offer. However, I would be interesting to see what someone thinks about that. |
|
|
|
The majority of the posts of yours I removed were reported by other users for being off topic or spam. It's not like I'm actively following every single post you make and deleting each one. You may notice that many of your posts which do not take threads in completely different directions have not been removed even though they certainly could have been as they are within my jurisdiction. Furthermore, you are not the only person whose posts have been removed by me. I remove many posts from many different users each day. This is called moderation, not censorship.
Pack of lies and you know it or would you like to say why this was removed from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3371680.msg35378165#msg35378165This is a good point and I am developing an open source 515 byte Cyphertext (Switches left to right)
using byte shift instead of BigINT and MOD's mainly because it needs to be very fast with 1-5mb blocks but clearly
just doubling up to avoid noun detection does not make it bullet proof so I threw in a little byte swapping too.
Sure it can still be cracked but for movie file shares and HTML + Image encryption I think it offers enough
encryption plus the key exchange is done using secp256k so being practical I think I have the right mix.
One size fits all for encryption does not work in my book What does this post have to do with the topic of "Key agreement protocol Diffie-Hellman using Bitcoin's secp256k1" and whether secp256k1 is safe for ECDH? The discussion in that thread is about secp256k1 and its properties, yet your post talks about something that you are developing and how that works. What you are developing has nothing to do with secp256k1 and is irrelevant to that topic. The only mention of secp256k1 is that you are going to use it for key exchange, but that is not helpful to the topic at all. The focus of this post is not about the properties of secp256k1 and its security but rather about your thing which just happens to use secp256k1. It is a tangent to the topic and it thus off topic, so I removed it. Furthermore, that post was reported to me by another user, see the below screenshot:  One rule for some and another rule for everyone else with you in charge mate like MooDog being abusive and you don't do naff all about it
but when someone hits back, well your like mother hen protecting your chicks.
In what way is DooMad being abusive? If you use the report to moderator link, I'll see the report and do something about it. As I said earlier, I am not following you around, I am primarily responding to reports. But that's just what you are doing, bias deleting of posts and pro-bitcoin posters here who get blown away by the facts I present
don't get this treatment so clearly you have a vested interest and you should step down if you cannot control yourself.
In what way have any pro-bitcoin posters been "blown away by the facts" that you present? I have left up a lot of your posts, especially the stuff about lightning network. Tell me, where do you see these people being "blown away"? AFAICT, they are more blown away by your stupidity than any "facts" that you present. Censorship mate, book burning, cap fits so wear it and me and you should have had this out a long time ago so maybe you thought
I would roll over, your wrong.
And clearly you think that I would roll over. You're wrong. I call him a nazi for his censorship but if you want I will trust with my login so then you can see all my messages
in the inbox that he keeps deleting and yes some were fair play, others for pointing him out but in lots of case
he is out of order and I will not stand for it.
If you want, post every single message that I have deleted that you have a problem with me deleting and I will give you an explanation for why that was deleted or an apology if something was deleted without cause. If you're going to do that, please also provide a link to the thread that the post was deleted from. |
|
|
|
This is bullshit he is talking and he has been following me around all day and one post that i was watching was deleted in second so lets try looking at this post the dick deleted as an example.
I have not been following you around. I have my watchlist (which contains threads that you post in) open on another monitor with it set to autorefresh every minute, so I will see if anyone (including you) posts in one of those threads. So of course I saw your post soon after you posted it, I was online at the time looking at my watchlist. |
|
|
|
so I would like to know if I have the world record yet.
Nah, there's people who have had more posts deleted than you. ('member #2025424', 10)
('member #1011631', 10)
('member #2025451', 10)
('member #1999068', 10)
('member #676128', 10)
('member #712379', 10)
('member #1328547', 10)
('member #16673', 10)
('member #1941384', 10)
('member #1839198', 10)
('member #2040638', 11)
('member #1321028', 11)
('member #2009863', 11)
('member #1964752', 11)
('member #1351060', 11)
('member #1410946', 11)
('member #2008655', 12)
('member #106010', 12)
('member #400366', 12)
('member #720294', 12)
('member #1868482', 12)
('member #112590', 12)
('member #1457466', 12)
('member #1360245', 12)
('member #1862740', 12)
('member #1116936', 13)
('member #1731117', 13)
('member #1989970', 13)
('member #1790929', 13)
('member #1836361', 14)
('member #2022359', 14)
('member #1424569', 14)
('member #252173', 15)
('member #914134', 15)
('member #1972978', 15)
('member #1357663', 17)
('member #1001233', 17)
('member #1989981', 17)
('member #1423316', 18) <---This is you
('member #1106068', 18)
('member #970182', 18)
('member #1804855', 19)
('member #1554619', 20)
('member #1728726', 21)
('member #18201', 21)
('member #1707870', 22)
('member #1344614', 22)
('member #1593008', 23)
('member #1989640', 23)
('member #1670837', 26)
('member #1444132', 27)
('member #1232636', 27)
('member #1832429', 28)
('member #1639334', 32)
('member #1791752', 32)
('member #1140197', 32)
('member #1702038', 33)
('member #1848619', 37)
('member #1738568', 39)
('member #2010332', 43)
('member #1873035', 44)
('member #845046', 44)
('member #1059454', 57)
('member #1153166', 66)
('member #1923831', 68)
('member #1707247', 98)
('member #1905021', 184)
That list is just a list of those people who are listed in the modlog more than 10 times. IIRC the modlog retains 30 days of actions. Scraped using a script I just wrote. |
|
|
|
The majority of the posts of yours I removed were reported by other users for being off topic or spam. It's not like I'm actively following every single post you make and deleting each one. You may notice that many of your posts which do not take threads in completely different directions have not been removed even though they certainly could have been as they are within my jurisdiction. Furthermore, you are not the only person whose posts have been removed by me. I remove many posts from many different users each day. This is called moderation, not censorship. My job is not to censor you nor is it to "maintain some narrative" (if it were, then a lot of posts from users like franky1 would have been removed). My job is to keep threads on topic and to remove useless posts that add nothing to the discussion. Also moderators cannot ban anyone. Only admins and global mods can do that, and they only ban if they agree with a moderators suggestion that someone should be banned.
What makes you think I'm a fascist or a nazi? Do you realize that there are more to those terms than just censorship?
Side note: complaining about my moderation in every post you make is off topic for all of the places you are posting and thus your posts will likely be removed if you do that.
Regarding your newest spam about needing to index the site to see what posts are deleted, there's a public modlog although it does not contains the contents of the posts that were removed, just what action was taken. |
|
|
|
|
Your address for Bitcoin Core is a segwit address. However there is currently no standard way for exported private keys to indicate that the address to create is a segwit address. When you import that into any wallet, it will assume that the private key is for the non-segwit address, and thus you get the non-segwit address in Electrum.
AFAIK there is currently no way to import private keys for segwit addresses from Bitcoin Core to Electrum.
|
|
|
|
Thanks, another question, can the coinbase output be P2SH address? And can it be segwit?
Yes. The outputs for a coinbase transaction are just like outputs for any other transaction. |
|
|
|
Can coinbase transaction contains multiple destinations, or does it have to be one output? For example, for the current reward 12.5, if set the coinbase tx to send 10 to one address and 2.5 to another, is it a valid coinbase tx and will it get confirmed by the network?
Yes, you can have a coinbase transaction with multiple outputs. The sum of the outputs just needs to be less than the block reward (block subsidy plus transaction fees). |
|
|
|
quick question. if i want to build from source in Ubuntu, which one of these do i download:
Source code (tar.gz)
armory_0.96.4_src.tar
Source code (zip)
Downlaod armory_0.96.4_src.tar. The other ones are automatically generated by Github and do not have all of the necessary components. |
|
|
|
|
A script is a sequence of bytes that gives instructions to the script interpreter. It is not human readable data and attempting to interpret the raw bytes as text as you have done will result in garbage (which is what you are seeing). Typically people examine scripts encoded in hexadecimal or they decode the script into text that represent the opcodes and data provided in the script. The data is usually in hex.
What are you trying to do with the script?
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan. Duplicate |
|
|
|
can i addnode= from local LAN that's running a full node to my spv wallet to sync from alot faster then say using the internet? Reason i run 2 copies is i hate copying that 150 gb of data over my network ~ 30 mins to backup the entire blockchain
No, you cannot sync from an SPV wallet, that's not how Bitcoin works. How long does it normally take for the PPA repository to catch up with the latest version?
Sometimes it can take a few weeks. |
|
|
|
|
It is not possible to send BTC to BCH and vice versa. They are two completely separate coins with their own networks and blockchains. BTC and BCH are completely incompatible.
|
|
|
|
hello
i mine now with 6 gtx 1060 3gb card bitcoin core on simpel miner but i find not a good setting
can some one hulp me thx
You cannot mine Bitcoin with GPUs. You won't have enough hash power to mine anything. |
|
|
|
SO Bitcoincore there is nothing innovative
Not at all. Bitcoin Core is simply not implementing the Lightning Network because that is a completely separate thing which other people are already experts in and doing. There's no point for Bitcoin Core to do anything with layers on top of Bitcoin, it has to handle the base layer. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core is not a Lightning Network?
No. Bitcoin Core is a node and wallet software for Bitcoin. It is unrelated to the Lightning Network. Bitcoin Core does not have the functionality for the Lightning Network. |
|
|
|
In electrum wallet the default is to use 1 receiving address. Although multiple addresses are generated when I initially create a wallet, they are never used (not even for change) unless I specifically transfer funds to them. I don't know why.
I have never seen this behavior before when I use Electrum. It always gives a new address when I click on "Receive". Is electrum a bad implementation?
No. |
|
|
|
The Lightning Network can theoretically allow for infinite number of transactions per second. however, the main issue are transaction fees which should be almost zero. I am not sure LN will solve that.
The fees for transactions made over the Lightning Network will be near 0. |
|
|
|
Why isn't this implemented in Bitcoin Core wallet
It is, and many wallets do use a new keypair for every single transaction. New keys and their addresses are generated every time you get an address to receive Bitcoin. New keys and addresses are generate for every time a change output is needed. In fact, the only wallets that don't are poorly written wallets that people should not use. Every major wallet software available uses new addresses for change and for receiving. or enforced as a verification rule?
It can't without being a hard fork because keys have been reused in the past already. Furthermore it reduces the usability of addresses because you can't just post a donation address and receive at it multiple times. It also reduces the usability of paper wallets. This cannot be a consensus rule without disrupting a lot of things. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
