at this time we know that the Blockchain is being discussed in large countries. and some time ago the Chinese president was welcome on Blockchain. But what about Bitcoin? there is still a lot of controversy going on. Even the US (SEC) is still rejecting the given bitcoin proposal. while we know. Bitcoin is the first carrier of Blockchain technology for general use. is it because of the basic bitcoin that has an anonymous background? so it is difficult to be accepted by the state. could bitcoin be separated someday? I mean Blockchain will be positively welcomed in the world. while Bitcoin will remain controversial.
share your opinions.
in my opinion some countries hate bitcoin because they feel it's not profitable even very detrimental to the country, when its citizens invest bitcoin, bank revenue might decrease, especially bitcoin is not taxed, so that the government does not benefit anything, while blockchain technology can be utilized by the government to benefit, because the government can control the blockhain technology they make, but they don't have control over bitcoin. For some countries they can't accept it easily as they have no control over it, they want to mandate and imposed tax first before they will say to people that it is legal, but as of the moment, they can't accept it because they think that Bitcoin will be a hindrance in stock market as people choose to invest in Bitcoin than in the stock market. Decentralization and taxation law. It is the main concern of most countries that find it hard to accept bitcoin. It will bypass the fund circulation inside the government and it might affect the allocation of economic resources. More consideration required for them before they finally are able to accept bitcoin. More things to look for before it happens. yes guys, as long as it doesn't benefit the state and government. it will continue to be controversial. basically, the duty of the state is to prosper the people. but when bitcoin will prosper people. country is blocking it. various reasons are used for not accepting bitcoin. as an example of the community in this forum. is it better in the economy and finance before we know bitcoin? I personally don't. my economic and financial situation improved when I learned about bitcoin and this forum. |
|
|
|
There is no hard and fast rule to pronounce an ICO as good or bad. It's the experience of the users that tells them if an ICO can be a good ICO or a bad ICO! However, in money matters, it is very important to know the details of the project owner. If we categorize few important factors for a good or bad ICO, owner and team identification will definitely come within the first 3 parameters!
In you case, I would rather suggest you not to launch an ICO itself. Because if you don't identify yourself, your project will be scrapped after the launch. And if you do, you may go to jail! If you think that your ideas are great, go to angel investors and pitch your idea! That would help you to start your business!
Very good, I agree with this. Elite investors will not ignore the best ideas in the crypto or ICO world. meet them, explain your idea. and make them trust you. so your ICO project will not be considered bad. because elite investors have great access to government. and that will make the government respond to your ideas well. |
|
|
|
|
that's possible. life without technology today can be done, financial systems without Bitcoin technology. even without the internet can be done. I think that's more peaceful. I personally live in the countryside, in fact the financial system in my village is still traditional with fiat money. and they don't understand bitcoin. all went very peacefully, safely and comfortably.
|
|
|
|
|
really like that guys .. ?? did you see what about credit / debit cards, or ATM, internet banking. before that only applies fiat money. and now, most of it is digital. so when bitcoin is accepted in all countries. the use of bitcoin can be learned. even easier than ATMs, and Debit / credit cards. because it only uses smartphones and the internet.
|
|
|
|
It's not that easy to accept digital world especially in some poor countries that don't have much access in the internet or that their citizens don't even know how to access computers and still have zero knowledge over the internet. So, it won't be that much easy to accept and adopt. In time it will happen little by little.
I am interested in your opinion about a poor country that cannot accept the digital world. because it is limited by the internet. I think differently if a poor country has internet access, maybe Bitcoin will be free to use. because with Bitcoin, countries can compete with large countries that don't accept bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Until now, Bitcoin is hardly accepted by countries for what it is because it is [1] beyond their comprehension, [2] a threat to their existing fiat system, [3] is neither issued nor directly monitored or supervised by the government, [4] is not owned by a certain person or company which the government could easily communicate, convince, or even threaten when the necessity arises, [5] is somehow anonymous, [6] and so forth. Having mentioned all these reasons, it is really difficult for Bitcoin to be accepted as legal tender in any country.
Yes these points are the main reason why some of the countries does not accept bitcoin and discourage their citizens from using it as we have seen so many instances wherein bitcoin has been used to extort money for unlawful activities which has portrayed bitcoin and it's anonymity in poor light, it's not easy to convince governments that's there were crimes and similar unethical activities even before the existence of bitcoin as they think bitcoin has made it easier for criminals to carry out activities. this is what I think. most of the principles of bitcoin are contrary to government. Until now there has been no best solution for bitcoin to be used officially in the financial system or transactions in a country. so in my opinion bitcoin will continue to run alone, with or without government support. but I also can't predict if one day bitcoin will be officially accepted for transactions in all countries. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is only controversial for the global bankster elite who are currently holding the bag of 200+ trillion USD of unsecured debt.
Meanwhile the rest of the world will engage in honest p2p permissionless commerce using BTC.
not only like that guys, you are right Bitcoin is just a controversy with elite banks, but they are collaborating with the government. following government regulations, elite banks have a large and substantial contribution to the government. then what about bitcoin? decentralized system, I think it will reduce existing contributions. because it cuts the middle man out as a contribution to the government. so the government makes it difficult to use bitcoin. |
|
|
|
SEC is not rejecting bitcoin proposal, they are rejecting ETFs which has nothing to do with bitcoin. and they are not the decision makers when it comes to bitcoin regulations.
aside from that the whole point of bitcoin has always been that it doesn't need any country to accept it. it is decentralized and works fine with or without countries acceptance. it is only up to people to choose to use it or not.
maybe bitcoin doesn't need a country to accept it. because the system is decentralized, so all full rights are in bitcoin users. as well as the election using bitcoin or not. but what if 80% of people in a country use bitcoin could the country be silent? I don't think so. countries will still do regulation, while bitcoin is decentralized. including also about regulation. The state wants to protect its people through many rules and regulations of law, while Bitcoin gives freedom to its users. |
|
|
|
|
at this time we know that the Blockchain is being discussed in large countries. and some time ago the Chinese president was welcome on Blockchain. But what about Bitcoin? there is still a lot of controversy going on. Even the US (SEC) is still rejecting the given bitcoin proposal. while we know. Bitcoin is the first carrier of Blockchain technology for general use. is it because of the basic bitcoin that has an anonymous background? so it is difficult to be accepted by the state. could bitcoin be separated someday? I mean Blockchain will be positively welcomed in the world. while Bitcoin will remain controversial.
share your opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
I personally am a bad trader. I don't even have tips like yours. the only tip that I use is. trade without being emotional. but good, you have shared good tips. for a vacation, I did not specify the time. whenever I want to take a break from crypto trading. then that's when I rest and take a vacation ... because crypto is freedom .. at any time we can trade. for analysis, I personally only determine through the graph. and maybe some news too.
|
|
|
|
|
I am very welcome about this. That's a good idea, because it should have adopted the blockchain technology. but what they mean is just to move fiat currency to this blockchain technology. so it's easier to use for transactions and carry. I don't think they will make it even, they still make a currency difference.
|
|
|
|
|
keep holding half of bitcoin, sell some bitcoin for real investments, such as land, houses, apartments, etc. and take a few more bitcoins to start a new business. so overall you have everything. bitcoin, personal business, home, land, you already have. then enjoy the results. bitcoin trading to keep on living.
|
|
|
|
|
how can one avoid the promotion of crypto projects? especially the promoter. I think a little difficult.
1. Most promoters are bounty hunters. which is their goal to participate in marketing.
2. the promoted project has a large allocation (although currently it is fake)
3. have a good start, for example a large project partner (even if it's just writing)
4. lack of understanding of the promoted project. (basically get a high reward, regardless of the project)
that is the reason scam projects are widespread in crypto, even controlling more than 70% in the ICO section.
|
|
|
|
|
trade, I still recommend trading for you. although learning crypto trading is no easier than a promoter / marketing. but it's good that you learn the crypto trade. the reason is, your time, your money, and the project you are promoting.
- You just waste your time on promotion
- I think, current promoters are not good, a lot of participation is not paid from it.
- I think the current project is bad, there is no ICO project to rely on.
|
|
|
|
|
indeed nothing new. Most of the same altcoin, nothing different. everything is just selling ideas without reality. sell empty dreams that other people want. too much shitcoin to make the current situation like a landfill. them, the ICO dev is looking for personal gain. and I think the only thing that remains valuable is Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
not sure guys. Personally, I think it's more profitable when tokens are already listed in the market. i personally got a loss on IEO not ICO. all drop when listing on the market. but I can recover my losses from the already listed IEO Token. because I have seen the lowest price to buy and waiting for the highest price to sell. and if not stable. we can stop to trade and wait by monitoring to reenter. For IEO purchases, you cannot predict that. because it can happen, their good news can be made without facts to invite investors.
|
|
|
|
|
I usually see a bunch of old altcoins pumping, that is my indicator. but at this time, I have not seen that. I think the altcoin session hasn't started yet. maybe waiting for bitcoin to reach $ 10K - $ 12K. so like in the graph that was written that. altcoin decline will still occur. before a hard pump is carried out.
|
|
|
|
|
I just vacation with family, visiting quiet places, like waterfalls, mountains, water rides. or entertaining children play. I personally need a long time, about 5-7 days to make my mind relax. after that return to trade. besides discussing in this forum is also one of my inspirations in understanding my mistakes in trading that I have done. and in essence I did a picnic and sharing thoughts with family and friends.
|
|
|
|
By writing threat, I didn't mean issues like tether's issue. I mean, they are not coins, they are just usd and eur.
If you realize that point, then the question is moot. Bitcoin derives a lot of its popularity from the fact that its value is subject to the free market, meaning that its price moves according to supply and demand. Stable coins don't do that, and there is never going to be significant interest in them other than using them as a substitute for cash on exchanges. So no, there isn't a stable coin in existence or one to be yet created that will present a threat to bitcoin, or to any altcoins. What if we use bitcoin without these backup stable coins? We may need to learn that we can do without these stable coins, we don't need usd or eur or other traditional money. We should start using directly bitcoin rather than its usd value. For example, an apple may cost some satoshi not cents. Apple's cost depends the traditional way, demand and supply and its price can change in return for satoshis. We should remove usd eur and others, stable or not. it is not easy to do that, because there are many differences between USD / EUR (fiat currency) and Bitcoin. all goods in the country have been managed by the state. including currency. the government must know all financial transactions. where the money comes in, and where it will come out. and what it is used for. while bitcoin, the government can't control that. basic bitcoin is privacy, anonymous, without a middle man. and free. so both are needed to keep transactions safe. |
|
|
|
|
don't panic, they make prices fall just to make other bitcoin holders panic, while whales have been waiting below. so, to get this moment well, is to remain calm. and add bitcoin before they pump hard. keep watching the market and don't be influenced by the bearish market. it will only make you lose another big moment.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
