Overclocking too much. Try dropping down core clocks slowly until it's stable.

I agree with the separate ports having different difficulties.

Implement the change and I will post results.

I'll post tests on a 1080Ti and 1070 Rig shortly. Thanks.

EDIT:

1080 Ti 46 Mh
1070 27 Mh

With the x64

vs 51 and 28.5 on CWIGM on x64


x32 SPMOD6 is same speed as CWIGM, all the same settings
1850 Core 850 MV across all cards 25.5 Intensity

How do you guys deal with the 240V requirement? I see they have 120V variants but they're priced around regular ATX PSU's.

Is converting to use 240V the only way or can some sort of PDU or adapter be used to run it on a regular house circuit?

Hmm.. might be hard to justify the price on this mod with the shallow orderbook and high initial cost. I'll wait it out to see how the 1080's and 1080ti's perform with the mod as that's the majority of my farm.

26 on 1070
35 on 1080
47 on 1080ti

On SPmod1 at 25 Intensity

Running max clocks on cards between 1770-1850 core around 831mv to 850mv

Receiving errors on 2x 1080s and 2x 1070s

error clSetkKernal Arg after running

Below is the bat

sgminer.exe -k skunkhash  --gpu-platform 1 -o stratum+tcp://pool.onepool.online:6000 -u BTmqtfhwvZqGofQy9vrqt7tnDMTfwzdVGW -p x -I 8
pause

Any ideas?

Only equihash and I think I've heard neoscrypt? (don't have in on my list) require any memory overclock.

Also if there was a criteria for profit switching such as must be 5% more profitable that the current coin being mined over a specific time frame it could minimize the unnecessary switches.

I believe this is the reason why people hate on Zpool claiming its stealing. It isn't from my months of testing it's just situations of sub optimal switches and market value fluctuations when the longer confirmations coins are exchanged which cause those random days of regular or less profit.

Nvidia Inspector also allows memory underclocking to -1000 which allows for head room on the core overclocks when set to power limits.

I haven't been able to get that done on MSI AB or I'd be using the new 2.xx versions of NEMOSMINER.


Now when mining just one algo though using the new curve feature with fixed voltage is most optimal.

Hey, so I had lots of DGB on Mintpal and never happened to get the withdrawal even though it was requested. Any hopes of retrieving it?

The address is DCRivRt5fCwCpnudqt6q9P1EBTTbnRD5FQ


EDIT: Sorry that was another address, this one still shows the coins being there and I have proof from my desktop wallet that I sent mined coins to that address back in 2014.
I've followed the threads of Mintpal and it seems that most were able to retrieve their digibytes. I understand other coins were held back though.

Is there any way this can be impleneted to use Zpool with NEMOS multi algo switching?

If not when is the 3.0 Test planning on having NVDA algo added? I see its mentioned as well as mentioning support for coins like DGB, ETC but in profit switching it doesn't seem there are any entries yet.

Thanks for the great work.

Anyone able to get custom OC and TDP to work with Nvidia Inspector with the new Nemos2.0?

I currently have it working on the old 1.7.6 bat from previous posts across the forum.

Almost all algos other than equihash do better with Mem UV as much as possible.

Currently running lyra2v2, skein, c11, x17 and blake2s exclusively.

Testing to see if cutting down on the multiple switching will help profitability. Seems that certain algos are tougher on clocks as well. These seem to allow me to overclock even more for about 5% improvements on hash so I'm interested in seeing if that compensates for the missed opportunities with the other algos.

Anyone else experimented with this before? I'm using a 7x1070 rig and a 5x 1080 rig.

Also rather than using + values as each manufacturer has different base rates I've been using 1740 base core on 80TDP for 1070's at 127W and 1820 base core on 85 TDP for 1080s at 165W

Issue seems to be fixed now.

I like the pool and some days when everythings working it's definitely worthwhile. However I've noticed quite a few times a week this happens where I might have to split my rigs so that I get some consistent payouts vs risking it all on zpool.

If you need any help with testing or examples of when issues are happening let me know. Ideally I'd want to continue using the pool.

I rescanned a wallet backup I had from 2014 and it synced correctly with my balance. However the moment I tried to send digibytes it said that a "fatal error has occured" which then closed the client.

Any ideas on the cause?

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

How would you start multiple instances in a multswitch batch like Nemosminer?

Running a 1080 Rig and found similar results to the 1080ti that it doesn't perform 30% better on all algos due to the GDDR5x memory.

Running on Blake2s, LBRY and Skein exclusively at 80% TDP for 150W Power Draw reported on software at roughly 1900 core /4200 mem clocks (different models so offsets are different).

Anyone else have results or experience with GTX 1080s? (not the 1080TI)

I'm currently testing +105 core and -502 mem (max on MSI) on multiple GTX 1070s. What algorithms are memory intensive like ETH and ZEC? When running on the multi-algo pools like zpool or miningpoolhub is there any advantage to keeping memclocks up as opposed to underclocked as much as possible to allow higher core on reduced TDP of 77?

Also with 1080Ti's coming at a premium are GTX 1080 a worth alternative if they can be purchased at 30% more than a GTX 1070 or do they suffer in certain algorithms?

Fuck... I was going to mine some more tonight