▂▃▅▆▇⫷[🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰]⫸⫷[!Paying 10 FLUX PA's!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸▇▆▅▃▂

[Jaerin]

So is the checkbox that shows you the earnings by each individual altcoins coming back?  It was nice to have that kind of data.

Not yet, I haven't had time to look into it.  Been working on a new fee system and currently testing it on scrypt/lyra2v2 & sha256.

I'll soon be implementing this type of fee system across most algo's. The more hash the pool has, the lower the fee will be!

Current thresholds are:

        scrypt under 5Gh=2.25%, 5Gh-10Gh=2% & 10Gh+=1.75%

        sha256 under 500Gh=2.25%, 500Gh-1Ph=2%, 1Ph-5Ph=1.75,5Ph+=1.5%

        lyra2v2 under 5Gh=2.25%, 5Gh-10Gh=2%, 10Gh-25Gh=1.75, 25Gh+=1.5%

Cheers

So is this intended to keep people from algo hopping too much?  I'd guess the hash rate may fluctuate a lot depending on the profitability.  I'm sure there are some that stick to one or two hashes, but for someone using multialgo this might cause a lot of variance in fees.  Granted the fees are fairly low overall, but likely would have to be figured into the profitability somehow.

yeah for some reason having decred in there will null your diff setting. It's been attempted to be fixed a couple times now but seems it still screws it up.

Can you confirm what number we should use for equihash since it comes usually in KH/s?

[crackfoo]

So is the checkbox that shows you the earnings by each individual altcoins coming back?  It was nice to have that kind of data.

Not yet, I haven't had time to look into it.  Been working on a new fee system (FlexFee™) and currently testing it on scrypt/lyra2v2 & sha256.

I'll soon be implementing this type of fee system across most algo's. The more hash the pool has, the lower the fee will be!

Current thresholds are:

        scrypt under 5Gh=2.25%, 5Gh-10Gh=2% & 10Gh+=1.75%

        sha256 under 500Gh=2.25%, 500Gh-1Ph=2%, 1Ph-5Ph=1.75 & 5Ph+=1.5%

        lyra2v2 under 5Gh=2.25%, 5Gh-10Gh=2%, 10Gh-25Gh=1.75 & 25Gh+=1.5%

Cheers

Added x11 as well.

       x11 under 20Gh=2.25%, 20Gh-50Gh=2%, 50Gh-100Gh=1.75 & 100Gh+=1.5%

[Storx]

i am not sure what is up with the immature shares on blake2s, i have immature shares in the couple hundreds now that has been building up since yesterday.. is it backed up?>

[crackfoo]

i am not sure what is up with the immature shares on blake2s, i have immature shares in the couple hundreds now that has been building up since yesterday.. is it backed up?>

Netko takes about 48 hours to confirm blocks. Shares can't get backed up on just one algo. If something backs up it shows on all algos

[Storx]

i am not sure what is up with the immature shares on blake2s, i have immature shares in the couple hundreds now that has been building up since yesterday.. is it backed up?>

Netko takes about 48 hours to confirm blocks. Shares can't get backed up on just one algo. If something backs up it shows on all algos

Ok thanks, just so use to seeing them exchanged like within 30 minutes.. thought maybe my account was jacked up or something and the blake2s was just adding to the issues, because in 3 payouts a payout has not been triggered on my account and im at 1/4 btc unpaid.. last time this happened it took 2 days before it finally payed me

[cashen]

Still seeing some odd things around payout time.

[cashen]

What exchange is used for Netko?

[SharkOne]

I'm currently having a look at the API and there's something I don't understand.

"bitcore":{ 
      "name":"bitcore",
      "port":3556,
      "coins":1,
      "fees":2,
      "hashrate":529168602,
      "workers":14,
      "estimate_current":"0.00015663",
      "estimate_last24h":"0.00015508",
      "actual_last24h":"0.17900",
      "hashrate_last24h":294483128.4,
      "rental_current":"0.23995455"
   },

It seems that "actual_last24h" is the same value as displayed on the website, however the "estimate_current" and "estimate_last24" seem to be by a factor of 1000? Is it a different unit?

Which value is used to compute the autoswitching?

Thanks!

[a4si]

i am not sure what is up with the immature shares on blake2s, i have immature shares in the couple hundreds now that has been building up since yesterday.. is it backed up?>

Netko takes about 48 hours to confirm blocks. Shares can't get backed up on just one algo. If something backs up it shows on all algos

Does this mean also that at least 48 hours pases before Netko can be sent to exchange in to BTC? If so does it still make sense to mine it given the fact that in long period of 48 hours it's vale may crash and thus be more safer for us to stay and mine only Verge, Taj and other coins which have quick turaround?

I'm just asking to understan how this works, not criticizing;)

[miliard]

I'm currently having a look at the API and there's something I don't understand.

"bitcore":{ 
      "name":"bitcore",
      "port":3556,
      "coins":1,
      "fees":2,
      "hashrate":529168602,
      "workers":14,
      "estimate_current":"0.00015663",
      "estimate_last24h":"0.00015508",
      "actual_last24h":"0.17900",
      "hashrate_last24h":294483128.4,
      "rental_current":"0.23995455"
   },

It seems that "actual_last24h" is the same value as displayed on the website, however the "estimate_current" and "estimate_last24" seem to be by a factor of 1000? Is it a different unit?

Which value is used to compute the autoswitching?

Thanks!

First 2 are in BTC and actual_last24h is in mBTC

[cryptoinvestor_x]

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

[Jaerin]

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

I've been only running on this pool for a couple of days and notice that my earnings are fairly significantly lower than I expected them to be.  I've had a few outages and non-optimal things running, but still only getting .0127BTC from 7-GTX1080's and 1 GTX1080Ti it seems pretty low to me.  I expected closer to .02 at least.

With mining some of these super low volume coins on tiny exchanges I'm not sure how the payout actually works.  The estimates coming out of Multipoolminer seem like they are way off compared to what I'm actually seeing realized on the pool.  Nicehash miner is paying out pretty much the same with just my 5-1080 mining rig. 

I'm not ready to throw the towel in yet considering I'm still tweaking, but something definitely feels off from where I expect it to be.  Might just go back to mining up DGB for a while, but was hoping to get some pure BTC instead of having to dump on the DGB market.

[scryed]

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

I'm also seeing this.

[cryptoinvestor_x]

Issue seems to be fixed now.

I like the pool and some days when everythings working it's definitely worthwhile. However I've noticed quite a few times a week this happens where I might have to split my rigs so that I get some consistent payouts vs risking it all on zpool.

If you need any help with testing or examples of when issues are happening let me know. Ideally I'd want to continue using the pool.

[crackfoo]

restarting the server hosting the stratum servers. It was due for a reboot from previous patching.

[Storx]

Seems Blake2s is having issues again with reported hashrates.

Miner displays correct speeds and share submitted but site shows 10% and is effectively reducing percentage of block rewards mined.

Anyone else running into the issue?

I've been only running on this pool for a couple of days and notice that my earnings are fairly significantly lower than I expected them to be.  I've had a few outages and non-optimal things running, but still only getting .0127BTC from 7-GTX1080's and 1 GTX1080Ti it seems pretty low to me.  I expected closer to .02 at least.

With mining some of these super low volume coins on tiny exchanges I'm not sure how the payout actually works.  The estimates coming out of Multipoolminer seem like they are way off compared to what I'm actually seeing realized on the pool.  Nicehash miner is paying out pretty much the same with just my 5-1080 mining rig.  

I'm not ready to throw the towel in yet considering I'm still tweaking, but something definitely feels off from where I expect it to be.  Might just go back to mining up DGB for a while, but was hoping to get some pure BTC instead of having to dump on the DGB market.

I feel ya, the other day i had 8 GTX1080ti's mining zpool and the total earnings to my wallet only increased $12ish for the entire day of mining on zpool.... most days it brings in nice numbers in earnings.. but it seems like 1 or 2 days a week my earnings drop like to 1/4 or 1/2 of the earnings with shares still being accepted on all rigs.. hope its fixed soon

Someone previously mentioned it could be the rigs themselves messing up.. so to correct this "possible" issue i have implemented daily restarts every 24hrs via windows task managing and set the batch file to run on startup so it resumes mining..

[Jaerin]

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc.  I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Found a post that equihash should be measured in kSol/sec.  So you would want to put 1.2 for equihash

[ilitirit]

Hmmm... now I regret not screen capping the graph of the hashrates.  I've heard people say that it's an issue with the graph code, but I can see a direct correspondence between what it shows and my earnings.  Every 1 hour or so I've had to restart my miners because the site shows that my hash rate halves as reported on the site and with it of course my earnings even though my local rate stays constant.  This is fixed after a restart, but then after a while it just drops again.  I stopped mining on Zpool for a few days because of this, but I started again tonight just to test it.  Hopefully this issue has been resolved.

[cashen]

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc.  I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Found a post that equihash should be measured in kSol/sec.  So you would want to put 1.2 for equihash

Speaking of Equihash, is the actual correct on the main page? I've seen seen a coin even half of what the actual says it is.

[Jaerin]

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc.  I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Found a post that equihash should be measured in kSol/sec.  So you would want to put 1.2 for equihash

Speaking of Equihash, is the actual correct on the main page? I've seen seen a coin even half of what the actual says it is.

It looks right to me at least right now.

SS of my 3 machines mining:


SS of my frontpage on zpool:


Obviously there is a bit of luck involved, but it actually seems to be showing slightly higher in some cases.  It does take a bit to ramp up on the main page because I believe it is a rolling average.  I notice it takes a minute or two to get up to what appears full speed on the main page, but I suspect that is just an artifact of the averaging.  We'll see how it goes.  I'm not sure that Zpool is really worth it to me when I can be mining something like 2200DGB/day and it will go back up in a matter of time.  I'll give it some more time and see how it goes.