 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
Is it a good time to invest in Doge?
What do you think?
It's probably a very bad time to buy. The enormous volume (4000 btc plus in 24 hrs on Cryptsy) suggests a deliberate strategy. High volume and stable low price suggests laundering. A fast and effective way of anonymising BTC by currency hopping. But to work it needs price regulation to avoid the risk of huge swings. So buy up a significant portion of the currency, and let the price settle back to a nice steady progression. Fluctuations can then be controlled with selective buying and dumping. Eat your heart out Dark Cloak Crypt etc. You win the prize for dumbest theory about the weekend bubble. So what's yours? In all the time I've been watching cryptsy I've never seen a single coin do more than a tenth of this volume. 4653 BTC in one day is staggering. |
|
|
|
I'm looking for a PR company. We will fix this  With respect, you can't fix anything unless the developers fix the wallet. Supersend might work, but it's cranky at best. Half the time there's no nodes available, and unless you know that the wallet Must be fully unlocked to make it work, then it seems to be a non-starter. It's not even being ridiculed on other threads, which means that as yet it's barely been noticed. |
|
|
|
Is it a good time to invest in Doge?
What do you think?
It's probably a very bad time to buy. The enormous volume (4000 btc plus in 24 hrs on Cryptsy) suggests a deliberate strategy. High volume and stable low price suggests laundering. A fast and effective way of anonymising BTC by currency hopping. But to work it needs price regulation to avoid the risk of huge swings. So buy up a significant portion of the currency, and let the price settle back to a nice steady progression. Fluctuations can then be controlled with selective buying and dumping. Eat your heart out Dark Cloak Crypt etc. |
|
|
|
|
I'm starting to think that Mamm and Super are dry runs for another project... an ICO, perhaps. Developer interest has dried up, but they've proven that they can deliver a functioning wallet with claims to unique technology. I'm yet to be convinced that Supersend works as advertised on the packet... but fancy labels and flowcharts are all that's required to generate a couple of hundred BTC in advance sales. After the Sys debacle it takes a smooth launch to buy time to get the funds out of escrow, Nice little earner.
|
|
|
|
|
Very droll. The top bid on Bittrex is 0.00... 911
|
|
|
|
why the pump? coz of merge mining?
could some1 please explain?
Laundrette tokens. It's gone through the wash and rinse and completing the fast spin cycle. Expect a pause before the next load. |
|
|
|
I am surprised with devs stance. This is like a suicide for dev and a coin...
Refers to ---> Syscoin - Business on the Blockchain - LAUNCHED! ??żżWhat do you mean? Is there similarity? Pre-dumped IPO Nxt-alike Scamcoin launched with dysfunctional wallet and broken blockchain. Developers had no intention of delivering a product, but Moolah withheld the escrow and forced them to tidy it up. Nothing returned to investors. Now dying slowly on Mintpile. This one could still fly if the developers fix the issues with the wallet, and make Supersend easier to use. It only works if the wallet is left fully unlocked with the 'staking only' box unchecked. And it's not yet clear if the wallet has to be left unlocked to act as a Supersend Node. Mine's online for staking, but there's no way I'm leaving it fully unlocked to act as a node. |
|
|
|
To see where this kind of conduct leads, need only check out the fate of Fluttercoin, another piece of unique and innovative tech (proof of transaction) that is sitting on the crypto scrap pile primarily because the dev had the same kind of attitude.
That is the main value of a moderated thread. The appearance of squabbling is very damaging to confidence. I wouldn't trust any coin that hides behind a moderated thread. Free and frank discussion is essential to the development of community trust. Check the Darkcoin thread, the largest Alt thread on BTC Forum. I support moderated thread because there are losers that show up just to spew unsubstantiated FUD. It's like graffiti, you wipe that shit off and keep your store open for business. Super has been pretty good about not over-moderating. Spend some time reading the thread and you will see people speaking their mind and Superteam just taking it on the chin when it's warranted. Spend some time reading the thread and you'll see that I've been active here for quite some time. My opinion stands. FUD is easily dismissed, but pertinent questions and reasonable criticism are easily dismissed as FUD. Xcoin became moderated and inspired an Xcoin Scam Thread. If the coin is honest it has nothing to fear from hecklers. But if it starts to censor criticism, then it obviously has a lot to hide. But however you feel about the subject, I know which way my own instincts will jump if censorship is applied. I won't hang around complaining, I'll just sign off. |
|
|
|
To see where this kind of conduct leads, need only check out the fate of Fluttercoin, another piece of unique and innovative tech (proof of transaction) that is sitting on the crypto scrap pile primarily because the dev had the same kind of attitude.
That is the main value of a moderated thread. The appearance of squabbling is very damaging to confidence. I wouldn't trust any coin that hides behind a moderated thread. Free and frank discussion is essential to the development of community trust. Check the Darkcoin thread, the largest Alt thread on BTC Forum. Then obviously you are a noob and you don't know what you are talking about. No posts were erased till now, it's a just in case. If you had just a little of documentation before writing this, DRK devs admitted that they should have adopted moderated thread, they were in FUD for weeks after MasterNodes, with market and development paused because of that. *same thing with URO, CLOAK, etc.* I suppose a moderated thread might spare us the kind of ignorant kneejerk abusive response that you seem to espouse... but no amount of browbeating is going to deter me from airing my opinions, without feeling the need to resort to personal attacks. Your style of delivery is merely something that we must endure in order to ensure a free exchange of ideas. Moderated thread = FUD removal It has nothing to do with my personality or yours. I've no use for a forum that's devoted to uncritical sycophantic praise. Doubts and issues need to be confronted and addressed, not swept under the carpet. If the developers choose to moderate this thread, I shall feel free to assume that they have something to hide, and moderate my investments accordingly. |
|
|
|
To see where this kind of conduct leads, need only check out the fate of Fluttercoin, another piece of unique and innovative tech (proof of transaction) that is sitting on the crypto scrap pile primarily because the dev had the same kind of attitude.
That is the main value of a moderated thread. The appearance of squabbling is very damaging to confidence. I wouldn't trust any coin that hides behind a moderated thread. Free and frank discussion is essential to the development of community trust. Check the Darkcoin thread, the largest Alt thread on BTC Forum. Then obviously you are a noob and you don't know what you are talking about. No posts were erased till now, it's a just in case. If you had just a little of documentation before writing this, DRK devs admitted that they should have adopted moderated thread, they were in FUD for weeks after MasterNodes, with market and development paused because of that. *same thing with URO, CLOAK, etc.* I suppose a moderated thread might spare us the kind of ignorant kneejerk abusive response that you seem to espouse... but no amount of browbeating is going to deter me from airing my opinions, without feeling the need to resort to personal attacks. Your style of delivery is merely something that we must endure in order to ensure a free exchange of ideas. |
|
|
|
|
Wallet issues.
I've finally succeeded in using Supersend, after multiple failures, for the following reasons:
Supersend will not work if the wallet is locked. Even when you are asked to enter the password, this is not enough to activate the feature successfully.
Supersend will not work uf the wallet is Unlocked for Staking Only. Even when you are asked to enter the password, this is not enough to activate the feature successfully.
Supersend will only work successfully if the wallet is Fully Unlocked. If it is Unlocked for Staking Only it must be locked and then unlocked with the staking only box unchecked.
None of this is detailed in the instructions. I discovered it by trial and error. But it does raise some serious security issues, if the wallet needs to be left online and unlocked.
Does the wallet need to be left unlocked to act as a Supersend Node? This would leave it vulnerable to attack whenever it is helping to support the network. I am not prepared to leave an unlocked wallet online, even with firewall protection.
|
|
|
|
To see where this kind of conduct leads, need only check out the fate of Fluttercoin, another piece of unique and innovative tech (proof of transaction) that is sitting on the crypto scrap pile primarily because the dev had the same kind of attitude.
That is the main value of a moderated thread. The appearance of squabbling is very damaging to confidence. I wouldn't trust any coin that hides behind a moderated thread. Free and frank discussion is essential to the development of community trust. Check the Darkcoin thread, the largest Alt thread on BTC Forum. |
|
|
|
Divided communities kill coins. United communities repair confidence.
It is human nature to put self interest over community interest, and that is why so few projects reach their potential.
Super is on the correct fork, by definition.
Ironically it's tanking on Bittrex while the price on Cryptsy (where the wallet problems have landed) is much higher. I was luck to have most of my coin in my wallet. Perhaps I should dump on Bittrex while there's still a market. |
|
|
|
for vegasguy :
Do not despair, there must surely be a solution. I also thought I lost my Supercoin and recover after many hours of nervousness.
1. look no previous version of this wallet is running when starting windows
this happened to me.
2 erase all but wallet.dat
3 Clean windows registry with Cclean program.
4 Reinstall wallet 3.1.1
Cclean won't do for intransigent QT problems. You need an uninstaller like Revo that will remove every last trace of the wallet. (but First take a copy of your Wallet.Dat and store it on a removable drive). |
|
|
|
Ya in my world, in my businesses , when I make mistakes "I PAY FOR IT"! Customers dont even have to ask, I just do. They NEVER get to the point of anger and frustration, NOT EVER.
haha, sorry!  You are not a customer Vegas. This is not shopping on fifth avenue. You invest in something, in parts, much more risky than a startup. You are an Investor! Take the risks or get out (what you are actually doing and thats just fine and up to you) To answer your post with all seriousness. If your coins from staking are not accepted, you did not loose them, you will receive them just later. If your coins where sent to an exchange like cryptsy, wait till the exchange is on the right fork. Best of luck mate! Too right. We should've stayed on the right fork and lef Bittrex to take the fall. Remind me never again to support a move like that. |
|
|
|
I've mentioned Forging issues previously and received no reply. Forging works successfully, but each day the number of transactions doubles and the amount of stake halves for each transaction. The total amount of reward remains steady, but the fragmentation will surely lead to more blockchain issues if it continues indefinitely.
Yes, this also leads to the wallet being slower, and will make sending large amounts complicated as you'll exceed transaction size limits when gathering small inputs. Ideally the staking should merge back outputs to keep things under control. This can be fixed with a simple update to the qt. For you savvy users you can patch your own qt/daemon Simply change line 20 of wallet.cpp to whatever you wish int64_t nStakeCombineThreshold = 1000 * COIN; As it is now. I will combine any inputs created by POS transactions less that 1000 coins into larger ones. Example 1: You have a 1000 coin input. When it stakes you will get a 1001 coin input back or whatever the reward you get it If you have a 10000 coin input when it stake it will be broken into 2 inputs of 5001 each. Or whatever the reward is Working on getting the cryptsy wallet synced and back online. Ill keep you updated Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try it out on a separate wallet before applying it to my full stake. Ideally I'd like to restrict fragmentation to no less than an eighth of my long-term total. I have a Mammothcoin wallet that's now churning out hundreds of transactions per day. The fragmentation shows no sign of slowing so if I don't shut it down (and remove it from the Supersend chain) it'll soon be in the tens of thousands. Supercoin consolidated after the Fork, but since then it's been doubling the number of transactions daily. |
|
|
|
UPDATE: got my 20k back from Mintpal. STILL out over 20k from "Generated but not accepted". Ive had tried everything many times over, that has been posted about in the last few threads. Ive been polite calm and professional and have posted many times BEGGING the supercoin team to address my issue. They have never addressed my issues. Users have suggested the regular fixes, download the latest version, delete all in roaming except wallet.dat, go to old backup (done that dated 8/1/14), salvage wallet(done that), (repair wallet done that), import and export keys into new wallet (done that). I heard a phrase once about 20 years ago and it stuck in my head, and it goes like this "BE NICE, UNTIL YOU CANNOT BE NICE ANY LONGER". I have bugun to dump the super I got from Mintpal at stupid prices. Got it down to under 1500 sat , Im gonna pound at it some more today and see if I can get it near 1000 sat. Some nice bargains on Super guys at Bittrex, enjoy. Ive even been buying my own back and selling it lower..LOL. DO YOU HEAR ME NOW SUPERTEAM~!?!??!!?
You will hurt not only supercoin team. You also will hurt other supercoin holders, who just like you. That wasn't the message I heard when Bittrex users were begging for support. Funny how things turn out when the shoe's on the other foot. No solidarity or community spirit now. Just fuck you jack I'M OK. |
|
|
|
Supercoin - world 1st true peer-to-peer decentralized trustless anonymous wallet using multisig technologies!
It means before Supercoin there were no trust-less real anonymous system in any altcoin.
The coin still has some serious issues that won't simply go away because you've chosen to ignore them. Cryptsy wallets are still Offline and coins can't be withdrawn. I haven't tried depositing to Cryptsy, but I've no intentions of doing so until the issues are resolved. Instead, I've dumped my remaining coin on Cryptsy. I've had several attempts at transferring coins to a second wallet using Supersend without any success. With a minimum of Three nodes available the sending icon turns brown for a while and then nothing. The coins remain in my sending wallet. I've mentioned Forging issues previously and received no reply. Forging works successfully, but each day the number of transactions doubles and the amount of stake halves for each transaction. The total amount of reward remains steady, but the fragmentation will surely lead to more blockchain issues if it continues indefinitely. I agree with others who've said that the Supersend feature needs independent verification to assure users that it is indeed Trustless and Anonymous. In the meanwhile it's essential that All Exchanges are functioning correctly if you want Investors to trust this coin. |
|
|
|
I owe you a pint of Heavy and a deep fried Mars bar!  ) LoL. Done ! - as long as I don't have to consume them both at the same time You sort of do have to consume them at the same time. One of the few times when two wrongs do make a right. just curious....what is this ritual? Never heard of it. Is heavy a pint of guiness? Sorry, really intrigued Almost assuredly Guinness, although the Mars bar thing could be code for something else.  Guinness is an Irish Stout. 'Heavy' is a generic term for a variety of Scotch Ale. |
|
|
|
Superteam, I apprecaite your dedication and hardwork. I have a question, you say "We go back before the fork time". What exactly does this mean?? What exact date and time is it reset to? If I sent money to an exchange AFTER the fork, what will happen to my funds? Please be detailed for all of us. What about the POS money I made AFTER the fork? I have tens of thousands of supercoins (I hope), that I made hundreds of coins in interest (I think). Do I lose all that stake money??
I Also notice on OP: Under no circumstances will SuperCoin be responsible for any loss or damage, including loss of coins, loss of data, damage of software and hardware, personal injury or death, resulting from anyone's use of Supercoin software or the service, whether online or offline.
This software and the service are provided "As-Is" and Supercoin makes no warranties of any kind relating to the services and expressly disclaims any and implied warranties, including without limitation the implied warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. Supercoin cannot guarantee and does not promise any specific results from use of Supercoin and/or the service.
Make no mistake, your still liable for losses, the community will make sure of that.
Vegas
Wherever you find your funds, be sure to test the wallet with a small transfer to avoid the risk of a heavy loss. One coin or less. Pay the fee and watch it's progress through confirmations. Give it 50 or more. |
|
|
|
|
