Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 12:07:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
21  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [CLOSED]Minion Chip Assembly GB on: December 06, 2014, 09:59:41 PM
Technobit has refunded my problem order for TP Links. Many thanks.
22  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [CLOSED]Minion Chip Assembly GB on: December 06, 2014, 09:55:42 PM
@sorehammer:

Did you ever cover your electricity costs, do you live in a student dorm or something (free electricity) if not then why did you keep mining?

edit: I was not implying that you were complicit in the PR stunt, you just got lucky, and now unlucky.
23  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 06, 2014, 09:42:58 PM
Sorry if I hurt your fragile feelings Decksperiment... Kiss

edit: Actually... no I'm not... Fuck You and your esoteric crack fueled bullshit!
24  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 06, 2014, 09:34:37 PM
Again, I will restate, please distill any salient points, let's take them one at a time, no need to rush. Bring forth your argument to the table, let an orderly debate commence, it is you who called for it.

Not interested in that. More interested in this:

I prefer that you ask good questions and read it ALL so that you can judge in wisdom of knowledge.

Debates should use the Socratic Method.

If it is truth, it does not matter the source; why do you try to get me to re-hash the truth for you? For the truth, you go to the source, not to me.

On the AECES site, you can see the salient points (explicitly identified) for the Eisenbeiss case. The headings can suffice as points for the Pye article.

I will not distill anything for you, because it is all right there; enjoy.

I put it to you that you are unable to fully comprehend and distill the article.

I did read the article, his main argument (it was very boring to pick through Pyes' garbage padding) is that there are unexplainable gaps in the development of farming/domestication, a few posts back I explained in my own words how those gaps could be naturally filled without having to resort to spirituality or other such nonsense.

Read that post and argue against it...
25  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 06, 2014, 04:38:57 PM
I have instances of both - exist and not exist but fairly yes he does , i am not in mood to write the whole proof, but yeah he is !!

Fair enough, thread finished, superstar says he exists, he has the proof! (can't be bothered writing it though).

Note the "he"... so we can all be pretty certain god has cock and balls, just like many of us, he must be a chronic fapper unless there's a mrs god also. Yes that'll be it mr and mrs god, I hear they plan on resurfacing their driveway in spring, a thouroughly nice couple.
26  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 06, 2014, 03:34:47 AM
I am happy to debate with you BlackJaguar, but you only need to post links if I ask you for them, I would prefer it if you could distill the salient points of any texts into easy reading posts, it will speed things up that way.

I am happy to post the truth here (in full) and let truth-seekers investigate for themselves.

Students have to ask good questions, teachers only need to show the path.

You may debate with me but I prefer that you ask good questions and read it ALL so that you can judge in wisdom of knowledge.

Again, I will restate, please distill any salient points, let's take them one at a time, no need to rush. Bring forth your argument to the table, let an orderly debate commence, it is you who called for it.

If I require a link I will ask.

EDIT: let's not either of us consider ourselves students or teachers, let's have a debate... mmmkay.
27  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 06, 2014, 03:32:15 AM
Opinions and ignorance are all that we all have I'm afraid, that may hurt your ego but it's the full truth.

There are many points in that article; you would do well to address all of them if you want a well-substantiated opinion. Of course, you are free to speculate, but don't try to pass that off as "the full truth". Speak for yourself. Opinions and ignorance is all that YOU have...

I will address an article penned by your good self.

If you want a link war then I'm not the droid you are looking for.  If you want a dick waving competition then at least have the good manners to wave your own dick around instead of some other mans.

But really... all that you think is "true" is a subjective opinion based on your perceptions, that's 101 philosophy.

For example, just let's say that tomorrow everyone had a small popup appear in their vision that read:

"you are in a simulation"

You would probably start to change your opinion of what you consider "real" pretty quickly.

I'm not saying this will happen, just as you can't say (with absolute 100% certainty) that it won't.

So we all have opinions and we are all ignorant of some things, I will be ignorant of subjects you may be well versed in and vise verse.

I await your debate.
28  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 05, 2014, 09:22:29 PM


A true statement.. kindly remind yourself of the four who have continued from the beginning, (you included) to slander the truth bearer.. because tonights final post will make a laughin stock of y'all.. not the rest of the readers, but those to whom I mean.

But I'm the truth bearer!

29  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 05, 2014, 09:08:40 PM
I am happy to debate with you BlackJaguar, but you only need to post links if I ask you for them, I would prefer it if you could distill the salient points of any texts into easy reading posts, it will speed things up that way.
30  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 05, 2014, 09:03:13 PM
There is almost zero open debate in this thread, only opinions and ignorance.

All are encouraged to debate the things that I have posted in this thread, because so far they have NOT been openly discussed. Here are some of the things I posted:

aeces.info/Top40/top40-main.shtml
first case....... chessplaying ghosts
Yes. Correspondence with the dead proven by Prof. Eisenbeiss.

Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?

Quote
Like domesticated plants and animals, humans stand well outside the classic Darwinian paradigm. Darwin himself made the observation that humans were surprisingly like domesticated animals.

What about the scientific anomalies that Darwinists, Creationists and Intelligent Design proponents alike are unable to explain?

Evidence for Creation by Outside Intervention

OK,

Opinions and ignorance are all that we all have I'm afraid, that may hurt your ego but it's the full truth.

Here's my opinion:

Domestication is a subset of evolution it is NOT mutually exclusive to it.

The point buried deep within one of the the texts you linked to is:

Quote
THE EMERGENCE OF DOMESTICATED ANIMALS

...we face the problem of trying to imagine those first herdsmen with enough vision to imagine a "final model", to start the breeding process during their own lifetimes and to have it carried out over centuries until the final model was achieved...

No vision was needed, the final model itself evolved:

The animals were already breeding fine in nature. The herdsmen then had to hunt them down, expending energy and time to do so.

As soon as human brain thought "if I could stop these animals running away it would be easier." ... it began ...

This thought may have first been acted upon by using nets or portable fences made of sticks bound together.

A farm is just a permanent large net around an animal.

Thoughts and ideas are just information, this is memetic information and it propogates and evolves over generations in a very similar fashion to genetic information.

Perhaps the first "farm" was a geographically quite contained area where animals came for water. A place that could be closed in with only a modest fence or wall. The herdsmen could fence a herd or animals in that area and then just supply food into the area or if the area were big enough with a water source flowing through it then it may have even been a perfect few acres of self replenishing hunting ground, where animals could be corralled to the edges in order to catch, kill and then eat.

A domesticated animal is still operating within evolution, be it a domesticated cat or ape (human).

Even if humans gain complete understanding and control of the genome then we have not stepped outside of evolution, the only way a species can leave the evolutionary game is by going extinct.

You see it's fun to speculate on possible mechanisms to fill in the gaps, rather than saying.... DUH! GOD DID IT!
31  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 05, 2014, 07:37:03 PM
32  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: December 04, 2014, 03:03:54 PM
Mastercard head of SE Asia goes all out with every myth, stereotype and piece of FUD he could possibly fit into 4.30 of attacking bitcoin.

This is scripted propaganda and it is excellent to watch. It really shows how worried they are that they have to make such an anti bitcoin informerci that can easily be taken apart. The part about what their core business is shows just how stupid they think their customers are

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=bO4jHXjCXw8
".. ensuring greater transparency [...] in the way people live their life..."

"Why somebody need to be anonymous? I certainly don't want somebody mining technology or mining financial services away from my control."

Fuck you Mr. Matthew Driver, you are dangerous.

What can I say? I concur with you.

They aim to eliminate cash entirely, be it electronic or not, and move toward a world based on their electronic
payment system. Wow. Every time I hear something like this I wonder how they can be so full of themselves.

Of course Mastercard wants "transparency".  Not for themselves of course!  No, the details of their internal business will be kept private.  But YOUR daily business will be monitored, data-mined, and controlled by banks and payment processors.

See, it's TRANSPARENT!  Transparent is such a nice word.

At least he barely makes the effort to conceal that mastercard wants to destroy financial privacy.

I think it's "funny":

https://i.imgur.com/PdfpxEV.jpg

courtesy of @ThrowAway1d52e8d

It is perfectly true, the Venn diagram is correct.

But alas mainstream minds cannot grasp the notion of set intersection, they prefer simple discreet binary separation. Good/Bad etc.

Maybe it's the Flouride? Cheesy
33  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 04, 2014, 02:58:56 PM
i dont know if science can prove that God exists.. but for me they dont have to prove it because no one can prove the presense of Him

It can't.  This is definitive.  Its scope of exploration and explanation is inadequate by definition.

Yes, your time would be more productively spent harvesting lint from your navel.
34  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 04, 2014, 02:57:07 PM
I just wanted to let you know that I will be eating your god at lunch time today. Tongue

RAMEN Brother!

He is YOUR God too!   Wink



Ramen Vod!

Welcome to the tasty side!
35  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Cortex7 - Bitcoin Trading Robot Software - Windows, Linux, Mac, Android. on: December 03, 2014, 08:37:40 PM
I wanted to buy it with BTC but it says unable to create deposit address.

Problem sorted, I had to white list the Cortex7 server with block chain.
36  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Cortex7 - Bitcoin Trading Robot Software - Windows, Linux, Mac, Android. on: December 03, 2014, 07:54:55 PM
I wanted to buy it with BTC but it says unable to create deposit address.

Thanks for the heads up, I will check into the problem now...
37  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: December 01, 2014, 04:20:31 AM
We are our own Gods people.

Did moses, mohammed, isis, horus etc exist? Yes! Were they children of god yes!

Then I have to ask, what does every religious text describe humans as?

The children of god!............ Now if my father was chinese, what does that make me? It also makes me chinese. So if I am the child of god, and was "created in gods image" then what the heck does that make me? A God!

Just think about it.

Why in the blue fuck is it that only human beings can create fires out of thin air?

Why is it that only human beings clothe themselves, cook their food, live in mammoth sized buildings, know of all the elements that exist (even those that aren't found on earth), have different dna from every living creature on earth (look up evolution gap) etc etc etc

We take for granted the fact that we communicate, every day, with people who are thousands of miles away, using some hand held device, which is powered by waves that we can't even see with our eyes.

We take for granted the fact that there are modern day alchemists (just like jesus) who still walk the earth today. Just like how jesus turned water to wine, there are people who turn iron and carbon into steel.

We are all just as powerful as jesus, moses and the other host of prophets. It's just that those guys believed in their own power 100%.

Through the media and their vile and disgusting tirade of fear mongering, most people (not me) have been brainwashed into thinking that they are powerless.. people have been brainwashed into saying the most erroneous things such as: "we all make mistakes, we are only humans"... like wtf?

The media would have you believe that lions and elephants etc are the "kings of the jungle". Well I have been to this "jungle" on numerous occasions and can say wholehartedly that these elephants, lions, jaguars etc are scared shitless of human beings

We are gods on earth peoples
Nah. Make the earth spin backwards and I might take a glance at that claim. Big claims. Small achievements.

You are so good, CryptoJerk. But, a couple of points.

The difference between Jesus and the rest is that He was the ONLY one Who had the essence of life in Himself. The others may have had power. Many may still have power. But the only one Who had the essence of life was/is Jesus.

Jesus didn't keep the essence to Himself. Rather, like Moses and others shared the good power that they had, Jesus shares life with all of us.

Now, because we all have life, and because of what God has made us to be with that life, we all have power, even though a good portion of that power isn't evident yet - most of us can't walk on liquid water very well.

God wanted life for us from the beginning. Because life is possibly the most important gift we have received from God, Jesus was esteemed greatly by God, when He shared life with us all. Because Jesus did this, God took Him to Heaven with Himself, and made Jesus to be God, equal with Himself, for all time and eternity... and outside of time... for ever and ever, even beyond eternity and infinity.

When Moses came down from the mountain after he had face God, and received the Ten Commandments, Moses' face was radiant (Probably his whole body was radiant with a kind of radiance that was blocked by his clothing.). This same radiance was with Moses when he met with God in the Tent of Meeting. But when Moses stepped out of the presence of God, the radiance gradually faded.

When Jesus met Moses and Elijah on the Mountain of Transfiguration, all of them shared the Heavenly radiance that does not fade. They talked about the up-coming work Jesus was going to do on the cross, where He would release life to all people. After they were done talking, Jesus put off the radiance and the glory so that He could finish the work in this life. But, He has taken it back up forever.

The point? God doesn't kid around. The only way we receive life and power is through Jesus. And, like Moses of old, when we receive some of the life and power in this life, it passes. So, focus on Jesus for the life and power that will come when God brings the new Heavens and new Earth into being and fulfillment.

Smiley

If we lost our our star Sol then our power would be lost, life would die out. Some bacteria would sustain an ecosystem for a while near geothermal vents, living off the geothermal energy and chemistry, but the geothermal energy would itself decay as our whole system began to cool to near zero, only receiving miniscule heating from other systems starlight.

It's a situation even Jesus could not fix.

So really we should give thanks to Sol. And if you feel the urge to pray then by all means pray to Sol, pray that it will nourish us for another day.

Another good thing is that it's easy to prove the existence of Sol, you just gotta look at it and feel its warmth, no mystical nonsense required.

One bad thing about Sol is that it is the same and shared by every life form on the planet, this is bad for tyranny. Fictitious deity's are far more suited to dividing man. Sol will bring us together, and that is why Sol is all but ignored in the modern era where centralized control rules supreme.



Forget the nonsense the "priests" spout, see the true beauty!

Why look for abstract meaning when undeniable awe and beauty stares you right in the face? A long time ago every man woman and child "worshipped" sol, this worship was hijacked, its the reason for halos on supposed enlightened figures, sol was personified and then politicized and here we are today up shit creek!
38  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: November 30, 2014, 09:11:53 PM
To put things in perspective, fiat has been ~x3 better store of value than Bitcoin over the last year.
You may now return to your delirium.

Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.

Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.

We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.

Fiat is a faith based money, anyone with half a brain knows fiat is not tenable in the long term. It's issuance is controlled by a few families who are FAR richer than us, their wealth wasn't accrued through labor.

You should study some history rather than browsing my little pony sites.
39  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: November 30, 2014, 03:50:21 PM
...
Sound money ( gold and bitcoin included ) WILL break up to it's real price in the future.



Quite fitting, your GIF rebuttal has as much substance as fiat. Cheesy

It does look pretty though... weeee!
40  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: November 30, 2014, 03:35:35 PM
i highly recommend this text containing best of geopolitical porn to make warm feelings in the tommies for all the gold bugs out there..

http://www.gold-eagle.com/article/grandmaster-putins-golden-trap

Good read, lays it out plain and simple, it is indeed checkmate!

Sound money ( gold and bitcoin included ) WILL break up to it's real price in the future.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!