Would also love to see the evidence of scc's claims of 850GH... where did Admin of SCC say this is it in sccstats chat logs?
Ahem,
The users currently own 500GHS, a 350GHS batch just arrived last week but we don't plan in selling those KHS for the time being.
|
|
|
|
I find it funny as it has been stated a lot especially on blogs.
500 GIGAHASH, with another 350 GIGAHASH that hasn't been FUCKING TURNED ON.
Marcelo did actually state that he had bought an extra 350ghs and was running it, but not adding it to his khs share market. You can confirm this by asking any long standing member in the trollbox. So technically he IS claiming 850ghs. At least get shit it right if your going to run your mouths.
At least get your shit right if you're going to run your mouth. FTFY |
|
|
|
|
How about asking Marcello when he is going to pay the users losses back? lol
He is only interested in himself, not some random investors.
|
|
|
|
So am I to understand that scrypt.cc cut down YOUR rewards until they recover THEIR losses?
That's just how the ponzi rolls  Marcello needs a few more cases of this:  |
|
|
|
|
SITREP:
I can confirm that TX's are no longer causing occasional rejection errors.
Good work on finding the bad bit of code ParkByte, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Are all you Scryptards still happy with Marcello using YOUR funds to pay HIS losses back?
|
|
|
|
Its teh end agauin?
Oh no, I won't end while there are still people like you propping it up PS: I don't see this when I refresh the trade page.
Well the only reason I checked, was that I saw another user in the trollbox mention it, so I thought I would test it, and that was the result. But I guess we were imagining it if it doesn't act that way for you. |
|
|
|
Another bit of screwed up behaviour on their site. Refresh trade page and see:  The sell for 474 disappears after a few seconds,  Then refresh page, and guess what shows up again:  Ad infinitum, same every time you refresh. Professional site indeed. |
|
|
|
|
Oh he gets the mails all right, he just never replies to them.
|
|
|
|
This is funny , rewards are reduced 80% becuase admin must recover balances  Yes this is because admin does not want out be out of pocket, when he can just use your investments to keep his bank roll in the black. Notice how he manipulated the userbase into depositing even more BTC before he announced the reduced rewards. Which some users thought was a good sign. lol See how fair he has been with you? I am sure there will be more shouting before Scrypt.cc finally dies/users wake up. |
|
|
|
Well deposits are not working and admin has clearly stated this several times not to make deposits. If this was a Ponzi about to make a run for it, why on earth would they say NO DEPOSITS PLEASE!!
The reason he does not want any more deposits is because he is now in the "cooling the mark off" process. If he was to leave registration open for new users, then the users that have been silenced for trying to make it clear that he has scammed everyone would be able to make a new account to continue to call admin out. This would be bad for the cooling period, so he just silences/bans/deletes any naysayers and then they have no option to communicate on the site. Admin is obviously watching the chat, as I have had 3 accounts silenced there since the "trading" (I use the term loosely laughingly) was turned back on. Two of those accounts have now also been totally deleted. This does not happen on its own people, admin has done it. So, if admin is there, silencing certain accounts, ask yourselves why he has made no announcements in the trollbox, anywhere on the site or on this thread? Answers on the back of a postcard please...... |
|
|
|
Seriously guys, you need to wake up. If scrypt.cc had any legitimacy then admin would have at least posted a message explaining why things have not gone as previously announced. Instead, many users that have stated the site is a scam in the TB have been silenced or even had their account deleted, who did that I wonder? surely not admin? /sarcasm  Can you not see that this is just part of cooling the marks down?  Take a deep breath and move on. |
|
|
|
open your eyes. Admin IS in chat watching, as he is banning any awkward question askers, but he is not trying to help the other users there is he? It's all over. https://youtu.be/JSUIQgEVDM4 |
|
|
|
So, what about us??
If you have sent a ticket in, then all you can do is wait. Either you will get sorted or you won't. There is not much else you can do. |
|
|
|
My miners still produce a steady payout there, and I am watching the announcements page closely on site for the when/if of cloud mining again. GH/s trading (and having them available to mine a bit too) was always my most profitable option there.
I don't buy BTC there, but that is also a nice feature.
You really don't mind only getting 1-5 blocks a day with your miners? I assume you are not paying for power then. |
|
|
|
Actually Fuckhead all it takes to sue someone for slander is saying something that you can't prove.
Using your own logic, If I were to state that scrypt.cc were mining and I could not prove it, that would be slander? Did you actually bother looking up the definitions of Slander and Libel? Here: Libel vs. slander
Libel is the use of false, defamatory claims about someone in written or printed form. Slander likewise denotes false statements that damage a person’s reputation, but it is committed orally or in any other transient form. Both words have complex legal definitions and connotations, which we won’t explore here. Legal complications aside, all you need to remember is that libel is written and slander is spoken. Slander is also often used informally as a synonym of defamation. Both words function as both nouns and verbs. http://grammarist.com/usage/libel-slander/Given that at no point has anyone heard cryptodevil say anything, he couldn't possibly have slandered anyone. FTFY |
|
|
|
& as mentioned already, it's not 850GH/S in purely scrypt but I may as hit my head against the wall. It will get the same outcome. It's either you guys are investors in scrypt and trying to force people out or you signed to one of the higher cost groups and are pissed. There is always a motive for someone to spread rumours. What's your MOTIVE? Maybe you would like to quote where admin has stated that it is not solely SCRYPT he is using. I did see him quoting 500 ghs and buying an extra 350 ghs more recently, but nothing else, and we have to assume the 850ghs is mining scrypt only. If he is also mining SHA256 with those chips, he will be making a loss, as 850ghs of SHA is insignificant. I have more than that sitting under my desk, switched off. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
