Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:34:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: November 30, 2023, 02:18:00 PM
Improved mixing algorithm, ready to mix your coins Smiley
2  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: YoMix, a fake bitcoin mixer (potential honeypot scam) on: October 23, 2023, 03:01:33 PM
...

It seems you are unable to follow up with responses in your own thread. The "scammer address as destination" issue doesn't even belong to OP as they have absolutely different issue related to a stuck transaction due to a low fee set by your service.

The "scammer address as destination" issue you are trying to assign to Russtie Beerkan actually belongs to another user named brace the mace with the original reply here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62977921#msg62977921

The original issue raised by OP (Russtie Beerkan) belongs here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62978113#msg62978113

Are you able to recognize the difference in the usernames across the posts in your thread?
I am not trying to defend the OP since they haven't provided any evidence yet, however, it's obvious that you are being unfair with your responses and your counter-accusations make me doubt about your competence and ability to run a mixer properly.

That's a bold accusation bro, how do you know the addresses they are using belong to Kraken?

By checking them on Arkham Explorer, for example, or any other AML/Chain intelligence provider as there are plenty.
A stunning clarification, but we perfectly see the difference in nicknames, and we were not mistaken when we addressed this problem to the OP.
This is the same person, or a person’s friend with the wrong destination address problem.
Firstly, they flooded our ticket system with RBF question (they asked to RBF low-fee transaction with different address), then, in the same hour, after got rejected, they began to write on the forum. But in general it even doesn't matter.

Specifically in this topic, we see nothing but baseless accusations. The whole text is from the category: “There is nothing complicated to hack google, even the child knows this,” but of course this is complete nonsense.
So much words like scam/honeypot/fake/etc (even in thread title) makes us think this topic especially created for search engines, it's obvious Smiley.
As for low mining fees we've answered in service announcement thread. In short: we're ready to help and accelerate transaction with partners mining pool, but not RBF it. OP asked to RBF with changed destination address.
We remind that we're traditional mixer, and, if you're tracking your input address and see money gone to exchange it means other client wanted them to be there (same for receiving coins, if client sent them from kyc exchange to us), it doesn't mean we use exchange addresses  Roll Eyes. And we don't reuse addresses as we said above, it's insecure and we never did it.
When OP provides more information (if ever) we'll return back with answer personally to him, but for now good luck everyone and stay safe Cool.
3  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: YoMix, a fake bitcoin mixer (potential honeypot scam) on: October 23, 2023, 07:22:30 AM
So much fake information in one thread, awesome.
If ppl in this thread don't know why OP so angry, that's why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62987027#msg62987027
If you set scammer address as destination one in our service it's not problem of our service, we fully completed everything you expected us to do (provided LoG, received coins, mixed them, sent to the address you set).
We don't change orders and don't broadcast RBF transactions.

And yes, we have nothing to deal with kraken/etc, and we don't reuse our addresses obviously, it's easy to track for any experienced person (except OP, sadly he's experienced only in posting fake information).
Walletexplorer URL also makes no sense at all, good you found 3 of kraken (or not, idk, anyway not belongs to us) addresses, but, and what?

GL everyone, if someone still wants we can continue discussion in our service thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724
Stay safe Roll Eyes
4  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: October 23, 2023, 07:12:16 AM
Ready to mix your coins! Smiley
5  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: October 12, 2023, 10:31:40 PM
I recommend AGAINST this service with all my might.

-snip-

I can see the frustration here, Would you be kind enough to share the proof of your transaction, So that team can review and we can also see what happened here? Abusing and using such language wont solve here anything, If you want them to look into your query you must provide some proofs.
I contacted them from their form with the letter of guarantee they provide, which is already more than enough proof for them to fix the issue.

They really shouldn't be running a mixer service since they can't configure bitcoind to function properly.
With some simple mempool sniffing I could pick out all YoMix transactions due to their bad transaction fee configuration so really there's no point to anyone using this mixer.
I filled their form with instructions on how they could re-do a transactiont they initially had put wrong fees to and all they said was that their platform wasn't made for thisHuh

So my funds should stay in limbo for an indefinite amount of time just because this mixer's devs are incompetent at doing just one thing?
And no I won't be posting proof because only YoMix can fix this issue and by posting about it here I would be effectively de-anonymizing my transaction.
There are no issues from our side. If you're really experienced bitcoin user you have to know, that transaction you've asked to RBF is not bip125 replaceable anyway, and it's correct behavior. All transactions are final.
The only issue here is wrong destination address from your side, experienced bitcoin user has to pay attention on what he copy&paste.
Please, don't try to shift responsibility for your own mistake onto us.
Fun to read about 'mempool sniffing' Smiley, we have dynamic mining fees and sometimes, when mempool fees experience a spike, tx can stuck for a bit, but after contacting us we usually accelerate transaction via partners mining pools, if client asked us to do that, that's all we can do, no rbf/etc.
6  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: October 12, 2023, 02:08:04 PM
Anyone here in contact with YoMix? They could potentially save me from being scammed.
Please tell them to look into my support tickets regarding following transaction: 6044896d116b6f23ad218ceac7b2333728b148d6e64f149ddbf00f05bcad7742

thanks
What exactly is the problem here? Tried to deposit on Yomix, but your transaction is likely not going to be confirmed within 24 hours?
If that is the case, then you shouldn't worry. Contact their support (https://[banned mixer]/en/contacts) and state your issue.

Something tells me that your transaction might even get dropped from the mempool. Time wilt tell, anyway.
I inputed a scammer's bitcoin address when sending BTC through the mixer by mistake.
YoMix sent the transactions with fees that are too low and therefore the transactgion has been pending for days now.

I already contacted them through their contact form with my letter of guarantee (which is 100% proof I am the one who used the service) and asked them to do a double spend to a different address with higher fees so the scammer doesn't get my money.

They simply closed my tickets and didn't help me.  The transaction is still pending. They can do something, but I guess they're not interested... I told them they can keep part of the transaction as bounty but I guess they preffer a scammer gets paid? Crazy...
Hello there.
Sorry, but that's not a problem of our service that you entered "incorrect" address. We never change order details. Also, we never leave ticket unanswered. Usually people create multiple tickets and we answer in one of them, and we answered you that we can do nothing in this situation.
As i can see, transaction is not replaceable anyway, you can check it using mempool.space explorer.
Very sad it happened for you, be careful.

7  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: September 18, 2023, 03:31:12 PM
Super Bump to this topic


This topic was posted a while ago, which indicates the possibility of hacking central mixing services[1] because mixing services follow a specific pattern. With deep analysis, you may be able to understand this specific pattern, and then it will be easy for you to know the deposits of all users (their patterns are random) compared to the deposits of the mixing service (coins). Mixer bitcoins which usually follows a systematic approach and accordingly you can link income transactions with output by deducting fees and you will get a list of user addresses before and after mixing.

What I am trying to say here is that I noticed in [banned mixer] withdrawal fees are not chosen by the user. If there was an option to make them available to the user or make them random, it would enhance privacy.

Other than that I didn't find anything, you did a great job especially NO java script version.

[1] Breaking Mixing Services
No javascript site generates random fee every time you reload page, in full version you can manually set it using slider.
Also, we have multitransaction option which totally breaks this problem you mentioned .
8  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: July 08, 2023, 07:07:44 PM
I've been searching the internet for some time now for articles and reviews about Yomix Mixer. Yesterday, by coincidence I found two articles published on the 22nd and 23rd of June, which contained a positive evaluation of the platform and a detailed description of the services it provides to users, along with the features that distinguish it from the rest of its competitors in the crypto market.
What caught my attention is that there is a mention of a person named Alexey Hlyncev as the contact representative for the platform.
Media Contact

Organization: YoMix
Contact Person: Alexey Hlyncev
Website: https://[banned mixer]/en
Email: adv@[banned mixer]
City: Washington
Country: United States
Link to bloomberg article published in 22-06-2023.
Link to benzinga article published in 23-06-2023.
I would like to know if this person is the real representative of the Yomix platform, with confirmation from its official representatives here on the forum. And assuming that it is, can this have an impact on the degree of user security and privacy of the service, as it is the first time that I find a full name of a person working in a crypto-Mixing service, who is supposed to work in complete anonymity afaik. Feel free to correct my view point if you find me wrong.
tbh we even didn't know we have articles there  Grin
We're working with several companies for promoting our mixer and yes, they can put any contact info they want.
9  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: June 26, 2023, 03:23:13 AM
<...>
You could also make full use of the FAQ section. It always has most of the answers to your questions https://[banned mixer]/en/pages/faq



I have a question to @YoMix regarding the blog, particularly this/en/blog/post/best-bitcoin-mixers-2022-2023] article. Can't it be updated? I see chipmixer being listed as one of the best mixers, but we all know it's no more as of today
This article mostly for seo purposes, bitcointalk has a good mixer list which we recommend to use to find suitable one.
10  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: May 27, 2023, 12:23:29 PM
Hello,  tried to contact you through a ticket but did not receive an answer, in a strange way, there was a delay in 2 out of 3 transactions, I don't remember that I put it, could you remove it please? Thank you.
Hey, where you sorted out?
Yep. We answered in our anonymous ticket system.
11  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: April 30, 2023, 07:57:24 AM
How does that work, if the input is higher than YoMixe's balance coin, or does it work on a versatile algorithm? Just read my question as a common user if it is a stupid one, considering I'm not tech-savvy on that part.  Tongue

Ponzi? Grin
Does Yomix use the same rule as (in)famous Chipmixer that coins received are 'older' than coins sent?

This means that if the mixer take a commission from 1% to 3%, then you will get a commission from 1% to 1.5%, according to the commission that will be deducted in each transaction.

I think you wanted to write: 0.5% - 1.5%
Obviously not Smiley
In case deposit amount is higher than our balance you'll just need to wait other users deposits. As we have pretty good inflow and enough our own reserves i don't think it'll happen.
12  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: April 13, 2023, 11:58:58 AM
Hi boys, we made some updates:
- added ticket system with ticket auto-deletion, works both for no-js and js version of service
- no-js version now have fee selector (instead of input) with auto-generated fees
- fixed transaction status for transactions rejected from being included in blockchain
- a bit more obfuscation and protection from dust attacks
- after click on transaction hash redirect is now to .onion blockchain explorer if you used tor
- a lot of UI fixes and improvements
 Cool
13  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: April 02, 2023, 06:37:16 PM
Are you planning an implementation with the possibility of mixing other cryptocurrencies? It can always happen that you need to mix Eth or LTC. I think this would also be appreciated by customers.
Nope, we're not going to support ltc/eth in near future, we'll focus on obfuscating bitcoin transactions.
14  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: March 17, 2023, 09:38:01 AM
YoMix, how do you feel about what happened to Chipmixer with the FBI seizing their website and putting out an international arrest warrant for the owner? Personally I think it is inevitable that all mixers will have their domains seized and the owners will end up arrested or on the run while an international arrest warrant is on their names. Do you worry about being next investigated and possibly charged with money laundering and other crimes?
That's quite sad story.
15  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: March 15, 2023, 02:33:37 PM
Chipmixer was just seized, both the clearnet and TOR site. I can't find anything about it right now, like news articles or anything, so I don't have any more information. It seems like it just happened in the past few hours. Definitely something to monitor and cautiously see if there are any opportunities for taking on more users. Perhaps lower fees for the time being as an incentive?
That's sad.
Our fees are pretty low, but we'll think about lowering it a bit more for some time.
16  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: March 11, 2023, 02:30:32 PM
Is there another DNS attack on the clearnet recently? I tried to access the website but it shows DNS not found/DNS error. Tried it several times, sometimes it succeed and sometimes it doesn't. I'm pretty sure it is not my internet problem since I use DNS encryption and VPN that doesn't block the Yomix clearnet address.
Nope, we just moved clearnet domain to another provider, because previous one couldn't handle ddos, now everything works fine.
17  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: March 01, 2023, 05:16:23 PM
I've been trying to load yomix but it's not working. "Onionsite Not Found - The most likely cause is that the onionsite is offline." I'm quite new to this stuff so I'd like to ask what could cause this type of things? thx
Yes we're experiencing huge DDOS attack (even DNS got attacked). TOR mirror is working now (may be a bit slow and down sometimes), clearnet is on the way. It doesn't affect mixing in any way, so, even if site is down, all mixing orders will be completed in time and coins will be send. For now, please use only TOR mirror until further updates.
Stay tuned.

Update:
[banned mixer] is working, can be down sometimes, we're working on it, please use TOR instead.

Update2:
Both clearnet and onion work well atm.
18  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: February 20, 2023, 06:30:23 AM
@Yomix, DDOS-guard doesn't relay the entire website, right? Otherwise, that could open the site up to an MITM attack, that's why mixers don't use Cloudflare or similar protection. I'm not too familiar with DDOS-guard specifically, though, so the answer I'm hoping is that they only "vet" traffic as it first enters but then can't see or track any of the mixing that takes place on the site.

I want to put it out there that I don't want to be critical in a bad way, and I know I've given feedback a few times that is a bit constructive. I believe any honest attempt at a new mixer is good for the space, and I used Yomix once already with satisfactory results. I just worry that a lot of the feedback in here is people who are sort of just shilling the site and only saying positive things to keep up with the signature campaign. I think the Yomix founders would agree that honest feedback, delivered in a non-critical way, is what they need from all of us.
For privacy purposes we always recommend to use TOR, clearnet can't be considered as safe w/ or w/o using ddos-guard/etc. As our site under DDOS 24/7 for last month for some reason (usually, if ddos fails it stops) we've been forced to use some protection like ddos-guard from the beginning.
We're already preparing our own L7 antiddos as ddos-guard is not so good in protecting our service (up to 60% of bad requests are still reaching origin), i think we'll need about a month or less to stop using it. But even w/o ddos-guard we'll strongly recommend to use TOR.
Thanks for your feedback!
19  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: February 13, 2023, 09:39:42 AM
I just knew that site have a dark mode, I don't know the button was there before, or they were an improvement this week?,
and so far so good and cozy to my eyes.

So, I have a question about /en/partner/dashboard]Partner, how is it calculated?, is based click or mixing amount?.

and, at the end of referral link is unique too, for example: https://[banned mixer]/_/stefan-marquardt , maybe we can make extra money if permitted to wear in signature.
We share 50% of our income if mixing order created with using your referral link.
We can't pay for clicks, because we don't have any logs to prevent cheating by clicking multiple times (we can't implement limit by IP, for example).
Dark mode is available from the beginning, for last weeks we've improved only backend to increase mixing speed and prevent dust attacks.
20  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated on: February 08, 2023, 12:35:56 PM
Is it possible for the same thing to happen to Mixing balance from YoMix? Can these transactions be tracked?
The only mixing service that would not come under the radar of centralized exchanges are those that do not really muddy the trail of  the transactions making it easy for them to track the source and store up that data for future reference. The attack on privacy exists and involves all mixing or coinjoining services.

Avoiding centralized exchanges would make transacting from mixers easier and without hitches.

- Jay -

Better to go with the wallet transfer to the mixer and then after receiving the newly minted coins, again back to the wallet. Anyways it will create new wallet as well thus making it sure we are not exposing our privacy that way.

However, lets say we are using YoMixer, then it is evident that with coinjoining protocol large number of people will be doing this mixing and thus sharing lets say 0.50 btc. However, it is highly impossible to understand who got which satoshi / btc in the process thus making it more anonymous and it serves the purpose properly.

In case of centralised, the system is bit flawed and runs with higher fees too. This is just personal experience though.
I believe that powerful centralized platforms have tools to track deposit transfers. According to my experience, Binance was able to track the transfer, although I did not transfer directly from the mixer to the platform, but rather that all transfers were made from my own wallet. The means of tracking on the blockchain have evolved to the point where it is really difficult to hide completely. Yomix Mixer should take into consideration these details.
I mentioned my experience with Binance after using one of the Mixer platforms (not Yomix) and I don't know if they will be able to track the transfers from any Mixer.
Centralized exchange have the required tools to track transfer done on it either for good or bad, but with disclosed entity. Binance is the largest crypto exchange that stores coins and having one of the top trading volumes of crypto currency. Although it was hacked last year and the CEO of Binance, Changpeng Zhao reinforce his team to encrypt and decrypt data of users of the exchange. The exchange security is improving on a daily basis and reducing the scams to its minimal rate but it can not be eradicated totally.

It's ranges from very difficult to impossible to track an identity before, through, and after the mixer, but seeing if a transaction merely came from or through a mixer isn't all that difficult. That's why Binance probably detected that you used a mixer, yet I'd doubt they have the capabilities to tell where the money came from before it was sent through the mixer.  It depends also on the obfuscation tactics used by the mixer. They are not all the same! Yomix has low fees and that's great, but my gut tells me, and I hope this is wrong, but could this be an instance of "you get the level of security you pay for?" Would I be better off using a higher-fee mixer that perhaps tumbles to the excess and uses a wider range of time delays. Not as fast, more expensive, I guess all just different products to choose from.
Low fee is just for marketing purposes for now, it may increase in the near future. We have a lot of obfuscation inside about what i'll not going to tell here because of privacy purposes.
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!