Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2017, 01:12:44 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
  Home Help Search Donate Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 [346]
6901  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Do BTC payments have to be signed with the same keys used to get the BTC? on: March 08, 2010, 12:10:04 PM
Say that I buy 100 BTC from NLS. He has my identity. I then buy something with those particular BitCoins. If the seller and NLS share info, can I be identified? My understanding is that I can, because I used the same BitCoin address to both receive and send those coins.
6902  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Money Transfer Regulations on: March 02, 2010, 07:46:03 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-gold

Quote
In 2007 the proprietors of the e-gold service were indicted by the United States Department of Justice on four counts of violating money laundering regulations. In July 2008 the company and its three directors pled guilty to charges of "conspiracy to engage in money laundering" and the "operation of an unlicensed money transmitting business" in the U.S. District Court for D.C.  The company faces fines of $3.7 million.

Running an exchange seems very dangerous. I would never do it without talking to a lawyer and setting up a LLC.
6903  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC on: February 27, 2010, 07:18:31 AM
Cool; it works! Grin Thanks for your help!

I am using 2.9.0.

(No memory issues for me.)
6904  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC on: February 26, 2010, 07:37:50 PM
Using DB-4.7.25 fixed that problem.

I'm now getting this error, though:
Code:
g++ -O0 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -I"/usr/include" -I"/opt/tdep/include" -o bitcoind -L"/usr/lib" -L"/usr/local/lib" -L"/opt/tdep/lib" obj/nogui/util.o obj/nogui/script.o obj/nogui/db.o obj/nogui/net.o obj/nogui/irc.o obj/nogui/main.o obj/nogui/rpc.o obj/nogui/init.o obj/sha.o -l wx_baseu-2.9 -Wl,-Bstatic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l db_cxx -Wl,-Bdynamic -l crypto -l gthread-2.0
obj/nogui/init.o: In function `wxArrayString::Item(unsigned int) const':
init.cpp:(.text._ZNK13wxArrayString4ItemEj[wxArrayString::Item(unsigned int) const]+0x7): undefined reference to `wxTheAssertHandler'
init.cpp:(.text._ZNK13wxArrayString4ItemEj[wxArrayString::Item(unsigned int) const]+0x42): undefined reference to `wxOnAssert(char const*, int, char const*, char const*, wchar_t const*)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [bitcoind] Error 1
6905  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC on: February 26, 2010, 04:58:54 PM
I'm using Berkeley DB 4.5.20.
6906  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC on: February 26, 2010, 09:18:32 AM
I'm getting errors when trying to compile with just wxBase.

Code:
g++ -c -O0 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -I"/opt/tdep/include" -I"/usr/include" -DwxUSE_GUI=0 -o obj/nogui/util.o util.cpp
In file included from util.cpp:5:
headers.h:22:24: error: wx/clipbrd.h: No such file or directory
In file included from headers.h:100,
                 from util.cpp:5:
db.h: In member function 'bool CDB::Exists(const K&)':
db.h:140: error: 'class Db' has no member named 'exists'
make: *** [obj/nogui/util.o] Error 1

Clipbrd.h isn't installed with wxBase. Moving wxWidgets-2.9.0/include/wx/clipbrd.h to my include directory just eliminates those two "no such file" lines.
6907  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC on: February 24, 2010, 06:51:40 AM
I'm using Linux From Scratch, so installing a dependency-ridden package like GTK would be a bit of a pain. Why should I add a dozen additional packages and hundreds of megabytes to my system when BitCoin doesn't even use them?
6908  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC on: February 24, 2010, 03:07:37 AM
On Linux it needs libgtk2.0-0 installed

Will this requirement be removed sometime? I'd rather not have to deal with GTK.
6909  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Post your static IP on: February 21, 2010, 09:48:26 AM
I'm at theymos.ath.cx. I should be online 24/7.

You need to look up my IP address before you give it to Bitcoin. My IP address only changes infrequently, so this should be OK.
6910  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof-of-work difficulty increasing on: February 16, 2010, 06:01:51 AM
I generated 5 blocks today on my Pentium processor. Two of them were within 3 minutes of each other.

I have noticed some slowdown since the adjustment, but I still generate a lot of coins. My computer is off while I'm sleeping, and BitCoin bootstraps quickly when I turn it back on. Do you guys-who-are-having-trouble have the BitCoin port open?
6911  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Incorrect Firefox Warning for Bitcoin website on: February 16, 2010, 05:17:17 AM
The CA's root certificate needs to be included in the browser to make the warning go away. CACert isn't included in any popular browser, and Startcom was only recently added to Windows. With Startcom, anyone who doesn't install the optional root certificates update in Windows update will still get an error in Chrome, Safari, and Internet Explorer. Firefox has had it built-in for a while.

HTTPS isn't the default (or really necessary) for bitcoin.org, so it doesn't much matter. If you want to manually switch to HTTPS, then you can deal with the self-signed certificate.
6912  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Incorrect Firefox Warning for Bitcoin website on: February 15, 2010, 08:43:04 AM
The TLS certificate is self-signed, so the warning is "correct". The encryption is just as strong as any other HTTPS connection, but without a CA's signature the site's identity can't be guaranteed -- a man-in-the-middle attack could be used. Unfortunately, getting a signature costs money.

Verifying the certificate's fingerprint here before adding an exception will prevent any MITM attack. This is only necessary when you add an exception; subsequent MITM attempts will trigger a warning by your browser.
6913  Bitcoin / Technical Support / Re: Double Click Win32 Exe Installer = NCIS Error. on: February 15, 2010, 03:30:12 AM
It doesn't even detect bitcoin.exe normally, just when it's in the installer. I sent the file to ESET, but I don't know if they actually check into these things.
6914  Bitcoin / Technical Support / Re: Double Click Win32 Exe Installer = NCIS Error. on: February 15, 2010, 12:43:10 AM
Turn off NOD32, download, and save to a different location than before.Then run the installer (the one you just downloaded). It's not a virus. You can turn NOD32 back on after the installation is complete.
6915  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What's with this odd generation? on: February 14, 2010, 09:46:58 PM
What property guarantees the continuing profitability? If the cost of electricity triples in 20 years, the number and size of transactions wouldn't change (as far as I know), but running a node would become more expensive and possibly unprofitable.

What stops someone from creating a client that will send repeated transactions just below the fee maximum when it has to in order to avoid fees? Or from many different identities to the same one (if this is possible)? I can see there being a great demand for such a client if BitCoin becomes very popular.
6916  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What's with this odd generation? on: February 14, 2010, 08:48:57 AM
Is the fee enough to always ensure the profitability of running a node, even when BitCoin generation stops being profitable?
6917  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What's with this odd generation? on: February 12, 2010, 08:31:52 AM
There's a small transaction fee for very large transactions.  (usually over 10,000 bc)  The node that generates the block that contains the transaction gets the fee.

The fee is based on the KB size of the transaction and intended to compensate the network for the resources used to process it.

If the same money gets sent again, it won't incur the fee again because it'll be small.  The first time they're bundling hundreds of 50 bc coins together.  After that it's just one line to send the combined unit.

Does the sending client send more BitCoins to account for the fee (so the recipient gets what he's expecting)? Why couldn't someone just send 1000 small transactions to bypass fees?
6918  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / What's with this odd generation? on: February 10, 2010, 06:31:40 PM
I thought BitCoin only generated in 50 coin increments, but I got 50.44 here.

Pages: « 1 ... 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 [346]
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!