Due to the unfortunate timing of the bittrex wallet offline and I know there are those that procrastinate until the last days, I think it will be best to delay the JUMBLR snapshot until block 472000
So, the JUMBLR snapshot is changed from 464000 to 472000. A hotfix version is updated to deal with the bittrex wallet issue, but it will probably be a day or two before it comes back online.
Block 472000 will be early next week, probably Tuesday.
No JUMBLR for greedy Bittrex. They take an absurdly high 0.25% in commission in every trade for both buyer and seller. Because all trades are handled automatically by computers it should be a much lower percentage or a fixed absolute value with no percentage for every trade. With a volume in 24h of 12000 BTC for Bitcoin cash they take 12000*0.0025*2=60 BTC or 60*4200=252000 dollars. |
|
|
|
|
In 10 days it is 9 months since this thread started. Can we see:
A timeplan with realistic estimations.
Pictures from a game prototype or an early version.
Statistics and pictures of the complementary cards.
You will earn more money from this project delivering a working game than from new card sales.
|
|
|
|
Over the next few days/weeks , i will be selling ALL my btc for bcc
Hopefully catch some noob dumps @ this price or cheaper, then i will begin buying more bcc from then on ,
I WILL NOT SUPPORT SEGWIT COIN
Pumping by cheerleading. Go go ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLTk1hqS92o |
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to do the BTCD to KMD swap manually instead of using the automatics of the ICO site? Most of the BTCD have already been swapped and there aren't much BTCD left on Poloniex.
|
|
|
|
i know you/we didnt reach the 8 btc goal but will you do these services anyway as you/we were close to target and it really could be an awesome feature
We promised to do first 3 Roadmap goals as we rised funds for them. But of course we dont limit our plans to it. We going to implement all unreached Roadmap goals too, of course it may be much slower without funding but I think, still possible. We also want to start making profit and implement monetisation, and will begin with our ICO tracker on next days. It will be option to move ICO higher on list and place some banners for Hubcoin payment. And the part of those profits will be invested for additional Hubcoin development and promotion too. Nice with business plans involving Hubcoin. You could have used bitcoin but it has high transaction cost. When Hubcoin gets added to Coin market cap https://coinmarketcap.com/ it will surely increase since there are less than 100 000 Hubcoins sold for 7500 Satoshi giving a very low relative market cap of less than 10 BTC (not including the premine). I know that the unsold coins will be destroyed. Is the premine 10% out of the original 3 000 000 for a total premine of 300 000? If so, then the premine, of which 9% is distributed to various coin developers and 1% to the dev, is 3 times larger than the amount of coins sold in the ICO. How much of the premine is spendable during the first year? How much is the total of coins that can be bought and sold right now since this has to be included in the information to Coin market cap. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1944476 |
|
|
|
Unsold coins will be void and burned. Less than 100 000 HUB have been sold. |
|
|
|
Approximately how much KMD does a notary node mine each month?
1500 Currently that's 1500*0.00037000*2558=$1419.69 in a month. With a low rent you can live on that full time. When KMD rises and multiplies that sum will also rise and multiply. After the BTC event coming up BTC could rise to up to $4000/BTC this year. It was originally stated that they should get about $500 each month "get the ~$500 per month". When notary node operators dump KMD and profit in BTC and then in $$$ the KMD rate decreases. https://support.supernet.org/support/solutions/articles/29000010574-notary-node-electionsselling pressure from notary mined KMD is about 10% the selling pressure from the 5% APR. which is about 14,000 KMD per day, or if 100% of the 5% APR is being sold at current prices less than 10% of daily volumes. It does not seem that notary selling will have any measurable effect on market price as they have an ongoing cost basis for the server and time needed vs. 5% APR that requires literally no ongoing costs at all. And it is an order of magnitude less than what at most is 10% daily volumes. So dumping from 5% APR is more of an issue than notary node operators profit dumping. With 16 notary nodes in 4 regions we get 64 notary nodes. The cost now is 64*1419.69=$90860.16 each month. In a year that is over a million dollars, $ 1 090 321. How will this be handled when KMD/$ multiplies? |
|
|
|
Approximately how much KMD does a notary node mine each month?
1500 Currently that's 1500*0.00037000*2558=$1419.69 in a month. With a low rent you can live on that full time. When KMD rises and multiplies that sum will also rise and multiply. After the BTC event coming up BTC could rise to up to $4000/BTC this year. It was originally stated that they should get about $500 each month "get the ~$500 per month". When notary node operators dump KMD and profit in BTC and then in $$$ the KMD rate decreases. https://support.supernet.org/support/solutions/articles/29000010574-notary-node-elections |
|
|
|
|
Approximately how much KMD does a notary node mine each month?
|
|
|
|
|
I invested 0.50 BTC. Great team. Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
The pre-ICO is now going to run until friday 28th of july with no hardcap of $300k. What are the new dates for the ICO? Quote from slack: " Nicholas Judge: - We will accelerate the release of the tokens relative to the ICO. So, this delay will only push the release of the tokens back 4-5 days from the originally promised date. (pushing the ICO back a bit less than 4 weeks, but the token release date up three weeks, relative to the ICO end date). - We will remove the hard cap of $300k. If donations accelerate too much, we will close it down, as we don't want to let a market-significant share of tokens be awared with a 50% premium. We want to have the time and resources to have a truly world-class ICO. - We're going to keep working just as hard at it. - We will begin major development projects and more hiring now, not at the end of the pre-ICO. We've got some surprises in store when it comes to the MVP and its release date, relative to the ICO :slightly_smiling_face: :slightly_smiling_face: :slightly_smiling_face: - Let's have an open discussion about this in our community: If anyone has any points they'd like to discuss please let us know. " https://rootstoken.slack.com/archives/C64FZQ68H/p1500351303175663 |
|
|
|
What is an instaminer, some sort of exploit? When the mining difficulty goes down a person or multipool can throw an overload of hashpower on the mining network to try to mine many blocks in a short amount of time. The result is a high difficulty for anyone trying to continue mining after that. |
|
|
|
Since Unify is getting stuck on blocks once again - I am starting to think about hard forking Unify.
That would kill the value of old coins Hardfork has nothing to do with switching chains, it will continue on the same chain but with new rules. Therefore the nodes running with old wallet software, and blocks mined by them after the fork are not valid on the new chain. Here is a picture for the reference, for you to have a better understanding:  Edit: by switching chains i mean starting a completely new chain from the scratch, and therefore old coins disappearing which does not happen with hardfork, since the old blocks will still remain. Why not create a new coin with similar algo & stats but new code & then exchange Unify to new one with 1:1 ratio.... When the difficulty is low someone often mines on a pool with a too large rented hash power where they get the whole block reward for themselves. When the blocks have come too fast relative the target timespan of 10 minutes leading to the difficulty getting too high most hashpower leave the network. We need a better difficulty adjustment algorithm. For example: "DigiShield Activated in February of 2014[7] this hard fork allowed for the DigiByte blockchain to protect against multi-pools that mine large numbers of DigiByte at a low difficulty. It achieves this by recalculating block difficulty between each block, allowing for a faster correction when a multi-pool begins or ceases contributing to DigiByte, rather than recalculating once every fortnight as is the case with Bitcoin. Since then DigiShield has been added into a number of other cryptocurrency blockchains such as Dogecoin, Startcoin, Nautiluscoin, and Zcash, with the help of the DigiByte team. [8]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiByteNautilus coin is a scrypt coin with digishield difficulty retargeting. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591114.0https://github.com/nautiluscoin/nautiluscoin |
|
|
|
It's getting hard cause of your philantrophy hash man ! The difficulty was 2094 directly after the difficulty 33519 and I had 20GH/s on which functioned at the difficulty level of 2094 if you look at earlier blocks. But 10GH/s would have been better which I know now. There came block 1881 only 25 seconds after block 1880 and with a percentage of 0.87 which added to an increased difficulty later depending on the difficulty algorithm. After the block 1882 the difficulty jumped up to 17703. The blocks 1882 and 1883 were mined on another pool. https://unify.acc-pool.pw/index.php?page=statistics&action=blockshttps://unify.acc-pool.pw/index.php?page=statistics&action=round&height=1880I have had 10GH/s on the pool with difficulty 17703 for two blocks and now there is only one block left with difficulty 17703. I advise to step up the hashrate gradually from the next block on so we don't proceed to another high difficulty. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
