|
Bu 2 yıllık bir proje . Altına endeksli bir kripto projesiydi hatta altınları türkiyeden alacaklardı .
|
|
|
|
|
Mirallas arkadaşı global de konu yönettiği için takdir ediyorum ama buradada arkadaşımlarıda bilgilendirse hiç fena olmayacak .
|
|
|
|
|
Paranın çokluğuna bağlı bir durum . Eğer tüm hayatın boyunca rahat bir şekilde harçayacak bir para ise mutlulluk getirir. Hiç bir yerde çalışmana gerek yok , Hiç kimse ezemeyecek sizi . Dünyayı dolaşma şansın var .
|
|
|
|
|
Bu hacim ile hiç bir şey olmaz janus tan . Milleti kandıracaklar .
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin can both end poverty, and make some of the population even poorer.  Crypto currency is primarily a currency |
|
|
|
maybe it is just me , but it is not possible for me to make phonecalls with that program and i tryed a lot
Try to dial without + |
|
|
|
|
I've seen many projects that don't have any code at all, but only a whitepaper. And no one had even suspicions. But here people provided the code. Personally I am interested, despite some negative
|
|
|
|
Why I can't make a phone call from laptop? dialing like this: + country code + area code + 8 digits of phone number
try dial without + |
|
|
|
Can people will be able to use any type of cell phone?
What is the minimum requirement in terms of ROM/RAM memory and capacity of the cell phone to be able to operate as a proxy?
Also, I was not able to make a phone call yesterday from a laptop, is there a special way of dialing from the USA to other countries?
Our software is very well optimized and will work on almost any smartphone, it is not demanding on resources. You can call to any country. Format for dialing E.164 (international format) <Country_Code> <City_Code> <SubscriberNumber> When I make a phone call I get a message: "not found". Perhaps I need to reset my laptop and open the program again? Why don't you type a real example how to dial? Maybe there is something to configure at settings? maybe the instruction from the official site will help you  |
|
|
|
Could someone explain how this relates to Bitcoin? The overall Bitcoin economy and such doesn't register at all in this kind of discussion, does it?
The more governments screw up their monetary systems, the brighter Bitcoin's prospects become.  This would be the logical thing to think, but for this to become a fact we need educated people to know what Bitcoin is, otherwise if they want to save their money somewhere they will go for the classics (USD and metals). BTC is currently one of the worst financial vehicles to place one's savings into. It is wildly speculative and far too volatile to risk hard earned capital for diminishing returns. Traditional savings routes in IRAs, CDs, mutual funds, heck even a savings account (as low as the interest rates are) are far more safe currently. I liken BTC to that of a penny stock today. Put some cash into it. It may crash into the moon or hit the basement. What I find exciting is that BTC is educating the younger people of today (far more technologically advanced) on economics and how monetary policy works in a real-time way. |
|
|
|
|
We can sit around and talk about this for eternity regarding how it affects nations or individuals: plain and simple - worry about yourself and those important to you.
Live within your means, adapt to the changing systems of the world and plan for the worst (hoping for the best).
|
|
|
|
Don't worry, nobody will notice you are gone.
Just you and your soapbox my friend. Remember, it gets lonely at "the top," but you don't need me telling you that... |
|
|
|
|
Man, I used to get excited about participating in a discussion on this board...
All it has become is a useless sounding board for quoting Armstrong all day. People can read his blog, no need to put it here too. I'll just butt out of this one from here on out. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
In a situation where there are multiple sovereign defaults, no one has the balance sheet to provide another, bigger, bailout. Except the IMF. Concerning the bolded text above, wouldn't it be possible that no consensus would be needed; everyone is so interconnected (read:screwed) that an SDR might just be the 'fairest' option?
In theory, I think SDRs could be used successfully; however, the problem is with the economic size of the nations involved and pre-existing debts. For instance, The US is part of the IMF's SDR program. The US wants China on board. China wants no part because of the debt it holds of the US'. If all nations (hypothetically) were to transition into SDRs, existing debt obligations would be buried. Countries in heavy debt want this, countries with no global debt don't. Conversely, countries with "lots of money" (countries in debt like the US) are expected to buy SDRs in a larger portion to help smaller countries get loans from the IMF or a more favorable exchange rate for their currency. Countries with no money (who want cheap credit) are expected to go to the IMF for loans. De facto they are under the control of the IMF and wealthy nation participants (not really different from today). The current SDR system in place through the IMF is having the same problems the US is having now regarding being the world's reserve. Nobody wants to give up the power associated with having reserve status. All the solutions are the same (currently). If it's not a nation, it's a bank. If it's not a bank, it's an entity. If not an entity, it's a government. Nations in heavy debt are screwed (i.e. the US), but the US can self sustain with it's political power and military might in the world. Europe is partially screwed, but has a socialist net that will keep default states afloat because it's in the interest of all intertwined. The fairest solution of all (IMO) would be to let nations form agreements for their global trades. No need for a reserve to set the standard. There is no standard, only what nations negotiate. I do understand this may bring "unwelcome" bargaining in the dark areas of the markets for arms and such, but this happens anyway. The world isn't fair, it's survival of the fittest. |
|
|
|
The 80:20 rule applies to nearly all cultures and humanity in general. The top 20% of men have 80% of the sex. In highly populated areas of increased affluence, a 95:5 rule is a better measure. A high SMV (sexual market value) is what gets men laid (a piece of it being made up by bank account balance). I concur on feminism. It is running vapid in the US right now and will destroy a generation of young men and women. Entitlements are at an all time high, freedom of choice has never included so many things by default and as a result, we have a generation of young people who have zero skills, no money to support themselves and all the time in the world to explore "themselves." |
|
|
|
I've understood the subject.
So that new reserve currency would be pretty much like gold. But no currency is pegged to gold any longer, and you may say that all national currencies are currently floating against gold, or that gold floats against each national currency, but few countries will accept that this new reserve currency shall be the standard against which all the others should be measured. Setting a reserve currency requires a consensus to begin with, but that doesn't exist at this time. Questions to ask is what authority could say this is the new world reserve currency, and why should countries accept it as such.
This topic should not be in "Economics", but in "Politics".
I agree. No world authorities are going to agree to such a thing; it's in nobody's interest to do so. The IMF has been trying to push SDRs for years now with the biggest problem being that countries have to deal with the IMF and become a member. The stipulations are way to grand for it to work. The next reserve currency (if there is another one) would do best to be backed by something infinite, easily obtainable and liquid. Finite commodities like gold or oil end up one-sided and serve the good of those who hold the most. |
|
|
|
|
I think the title should say one-nation controlled one-world reserve currency. The idea of a reserve currency is not rooted in ease of global commerce. It is rooted in control of political and economic world power.
|
|
|
|
The music stops when the lenders don't want to lend more (in case of the 200 trillion number which includes future liabilities, you also have to include: When people stop trusting that pensions and welfare will be paid).
Lots of people do not know that they have lent out assets to the government through their pension funds. They believe in the lies and the scams from the state. Lots of people will have to learn really quick when the reset comes. I wonder how it will play out.
I believe this could be one of the mechanisms for diverting a dying debt system. Many companies in the US no longer offer pensions. Most have done away with this system in preference of 401Ks or other limited investment vehicles. Even then, the 401Ks offered have a fraction of the returns they used to and allow no control over funds chosen by the individual employee. I see the potential in the future for the USG to tax workers on all benefits given (including healthcare costs). Retirement/healthcare and the likes will all become the personal responsibility of the individual. The effect of this will be massive especially with the youth no longer saving for their future. The USG can then used this increased tax pool to finance its existing obligations and transitory long enough for the die off of generations on the older (broken) system utilized today. Future generations will have no idea what Social Security or Medicare was. |
|
|
|
You read that right: $210 trillion. A trillion here, a trillion there: pretty soon, were talking big money. Professor Lawrence Kotlikoff of Boston University testified before the Senate Budget Committee. As usual, his testimony is shocking The U.S. has a $210 trillion fiscal gap and may well be in worse fiscal shape than any developed country, including Greece, Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff told members of the Senate Budget Committee in written and oral testimony on Feb. 25. The first point I want to get across is that our nation is broke, Kotlikoff testified. Our nations broke, and its not broke in 75 years or 50 years or 25 years or 10 years. Its broke today. http://teapartyeconomist.com/2015/03/12/washingtons-210-trillion-deficitI remember the official USA Federal Deficit being in the range of $14 Billion, $15 B, $18,000,000,000, but the numbers above are hard to comprehend. I hope the collapse can somehow be avoided for a long time. IMO, it's just numbers on page somewhere. The US was broke and in deficit 20 years after it started thanks to Hamilton. The US should really stop financing wars. It's what made this mess anyway. Since we all know that won't happen, the best it can hope for is to continue control of the petrodollar dominating a large chunk of the World's commerce through their currency. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
