|
Der Hinweis zum Tabakanbau leuchtet ein.
Denn etwas müssen sie machen.
Sonst steigen ihnen (der neuen Koalition) die Konservativen aufs Dach.
Mir war bisher aber auch nicht bekannt, dass die Leute in NL alle illegal handeln.
Ich war überzeugt die Gewächshäuser sind legal. So kann man sich täuschen.
|
|
|
|
|
muß ich mezzomix und thandie leider recht geben
es wird nicht immer besser, es wird immer schlechter
und gerade jetzt bei & mit Corona treten die bösartigen Seiten einiger Mitmenschen besonders hervor
|
|
|
|
Need help! Find a developer NodeJS for change logic for faucet, pm please!!!
Reward: 200 LSK wait you!
I think a better captcha might keep the bots from milking it dry so fast no, i want another variant))) it will very interesting an kill all bots 100% I agree. But all these captcha's are total crap. If I need 30 attempts until it works - to crazy. |
|
|
|
im endeffekt also auch "schwer" erarbeitete zinsen...  Na also bitte  So schlimm ist es ja nun auch nicht. |
|
|
|
kraken need to add more coins!
Hey I have a question precisely on this topic: Does Kraken have a way to suggest a new cryptocurrency like the New Coin Request at Poloniex? I would be really interested but could not find anything about it on Kraken. Basically they operate like this (sorry Dargo, but it' totally true): 1. You make a recommendation with solid arguments. 2. They say no. 3. You ask why. 4. They give you a seriously weak counter argument. Examples: "We a focusing on other things right now", "We don't feel it's necessary right now", etc... 5. Some time goes by... 6. Then one of two things happen: a: nothing b: they add the feature you requested bragging about how they came up with it on their own. Examples (that I personally suggested a long time ago (2014) and was promptly dismissed): - flipping the BTC/LTC pair to LTC/BTC (like every other exchange had, and now Kraken also) - maker/taker fee structure Recently Dash. People were requesting it like crazy, but Kraken said no. Then out of the blue they add it saying on their blog: "You know what, we just decided to add Dash. We think it's a cool thing. The developers are really happy about it. Here's what they have to say....". Maybe... But my question was: is there a form or a link or other way to suggest new cryptos? Or is it easy to contact via e-mail? |
|
|
|
kraken need to add more coins!
Hey I have a question precisely on this topic: Does Kraken have a way to suggest a new cryptocurrency like the New Coin Request at Poloniex? I would be really interested but could not find anything about it on Kraken. |
|
|
|
 A brief summary of my ongoing Twitter campaign:So far I have created Tweets for 76 Community Delegates including links to their proposals.- Isabella, gregorst, punkrock, Jan, redsn0w, BitBanksy, Gr33nDrag0n, MrV, Carolina, veriform, luiz, Gordo, someonesomeone, Max, TheRedHawk, 4miners, GoldenEye, SpaceTrucker, Samuray, Dafricash, Communitypool, vrlc92, corsaro, bioly, tharude, Vi1son, anamix, shift_team, LitcoinCollector, joeri, rooney, chamberlain, ntelo, djselery, cc001, densmirnov, Cryptostorms, metal494_new, Phinx, dakk, slasheks, ViperTKD, olejegcord, sgdias, GreXX, stoner19, stellardynamic, odsejen, Lamar, lap, MalReynolds, Hua, LiskfairShare, Luukas, Grumlin, ThePool, shinekami, Vega, atreides, Phoenix1969, Devasive, GrajsonDelegate, xujian, iii.element.iii, cad789, fixcrypt, techbytes, bitseed, wannabe_rotebaron, tembo, kushed.delegate, TraderBill, hmachado, fulig, lightcurve, liskit
And some special Tweets to great initiatives.- Battle Chain Project, Lisk France association, Lisk and StartupWeekend, MyHappyLuck games, Lisk New Orleans: Blockchain Meetup
These are just a few selected, much more are to be found on my Twitter
I have additionally created a Twitter Moment. There you can find all tweets, arranged from new to old. Twitter Moments - Lisk Community Delegates: https://twitter.com/i/moments/809360501713080320Twitter PolyCrypto: https://twitter.com/PolycryptoThis campaign continues.
Gladly I would capture as many delegates as possible. For this it would be helpful if you have a good proposal to inform the user about your projects and contributions to Lisk.Lisk Forum - Lisk Community Delegates: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1238#p9779Great work @Poly These are all very contributing and committed delegates. |
|
|
|
I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...
Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...
Does it make sense? If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this. atreides cc001 corsaro dakk goldeneye gr33ndrag0n hmachado liskit MrV ntelo Phoenix1969 polycrypto redsn0w sgdias theredhawk vrlc92 wannabe_rotebaron ...and some more. Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk. And of course you can also vote for pools. Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve. Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates. This is not the point, rather a decentralized network. And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project. If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support. If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups. Cooperation don't means i vote you, you vote me or "if you vote me, you have to vote also..." you can understand what i mean..... this is the kind of groups that i don't like...... Cheers Oh man sorry... You don't understand the reality and the facts. Most GDT members and some later ARK members are doing great things for Lisk's since February last year. And this group not only found for a vote swap. These members have also come together to exchange experiences, code, tips and tricks, suggestions and ideas. These people have done more for Lisk than all the pools and all the elite members together. But okay, vote whoever you want. |
|
|
|
I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...
Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...
Does it make sense? If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this. atreides cc001 corsaro dakk goldeneye gr33ndrag0n hmachado liskit MrV ntelo Phoenix1969 polycrypto redsn0w sgdias theredhawk vrlc92 wannabe_rotebaron ...and some more. Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk. And of course you can also vote for pools. Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve. Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates. This is not the point, rather a decentralized network. And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project. If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support. If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups. On another note, update your signature, ARK v1.2.0 is out...  -tb- Yes you are right. My Sig looks good I think. But the current versions in there are not the best idea if the devs work too fast |
|
|
|
I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...
Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...
Does it make sense? If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this. atreides cc001 corsaro dakk goldeneye gr33ndrag0n hmachado liskit MrV ntelo Phoenix1969 polycrypto redsn0w sgdias theredhawk vrlc92 wannabe_rotebaron ...and some more. Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk. And of course you can also vote for pools. Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve. Some of them are on my voted list... but i unvote if they do/enter corporations.... simple, for me decentralization means no groups and agreements between delegates. This is not the point, rather a decentralized network. And cooperation is the best thing can happen to a project. If everyone just makes his own thing then there is no community and then there is no support. If you have interest in the success of Lisk then you should vote for good delegates depending on groups. |
|
|
|
I agree too, unvoted all the delegates that are part of a circle/corporation or something like that, aggregation of delegates is the contrary of the DpoS concept...
Vote only for delegates that are not part of a group ! And some pools too to have some lisk back.... but also on pools avoid to give votes to group of pools that belong all to the same person...
Does it make sense? If you want to vote then you should choose candidates who have contributed well to the Lisk ecosystem and to the community and which still do this. atreides cc001 corsaro dakk goldeneye gr33ndrag0n hmachado liskit MrV ntelo Phoenix1969 polycrypto redsn0w sgdias theredhawk vrlc92 wannabe_rotebaron ...and some more. Read the proposals https://forum.lisk.io/viewforum.php?f=48It does not matter in which group the people are. Main thing they do something for Lisk. And of course you can also vote for pools. Team members and officials should not have a delegate. They can pay themselves out of the fund or via lightcurve. |
|
|
|
I'm thinking about setting up 11 delegates that distribute ~95% to voters, the rest is for operating costs. Currently, 25 Lisk a month is more than enough to run a VPS.
And the result we've seen a few days ago. Many of the new and unknown elite delegates were not in forging, a lot of Red Nodes in Explorer. They have no backup nodes and no failover functions for their nodes. Such delegates with only one cheap VPS are a danger to the stability of Lisk network. |
|
|
|
Hier spielt wohl Keiner mehr mit? Na schön, dann führe ich halt Selbstgespräche.... Mir gefällt dieser Coin von Tag zu Tag mehr. Nicht nur der momentane Kursverlauf, sondern auch das unglaublich einfache Handling des Ark-Clients. Ich habe gerade erst herausgefunden, dass man von diesem aus ganz einfach einen Delegate wählen kann und dass die Delegates zum Teil ihre Einkünfte mit denen, die sie gewählt haben, teilen. So wächst mein Bestand an Ark jeden Tag ein klein wenig. Das ist wie früher mal Zinsen auf seinem Bankkonto! Jetz habe ich kaum noch Zweifel, dass die Cryptos die Schlacht um das "Geld" schließlich gewinnen werden! Wenn sich das mal herumgesaprochen hat....  Stimmt, der ARK Client ist deutlich besser als Lisk Nano. Eigentlich und ehrlich gesagt finde ich Lisk Nano nicht toll und für mich auch überflüssig. Hier sollte man endlich mal etwas sinnvolles wie eben den ARK Client auf die Beine stellen oder das Teil einstampfen. |
|
|
|
sehe gerade:
Temporarily Disabled
Die Wallet auf Poloniex.
Wer weiss was? Ist es wegen einem Update? Oder wollen die in aller Ruhe LISK pumpen?
Also wenn du mich fragst, sind die Poloniex Leute ziemliche Larmärsche. Ein Update ist derzeit nicht raus. Es sei denn, Polo hat das letzte Update verschlafen und holt es jetzt nach. Naja, keine Ahnung. Für kleinere Sachen nutze ich eh lieber Bittrex. Die brauchen nur etwas über 70 Bestätigungen, Polo dümpelt immer noch bei 303 rum. Und deren Support ist ja wohl lächerlich. |
|
|
|
Vote for new Lisk pool LISKLAB100% profit sharing for next few weeks[ current rank: #144https://twitter.com/LiskLab[/center] *node going online as soon as we receive enough votes so if we vote now we allready earning lisk? or only when it enter top 101? Logically a pool needs votes to get into the top 101. And when the pool is active in forging you get your shares. |
|
|
|
Done. Great pr campaign. Let's see where Lisk is at the end of the month. |
|
|
|
------------------- Important warning for anyone supporting this pool ["robinhood"]: -------------------
Liberspirita is running an open campaign showing unprecedented shameful behavior that shouldn't go unnoticed by the Lisk community.
He was a former GDT member and used the good will of the group to get his pool to a forging spot, while at the same time is running another delegate in his name for pure profit.
As soon as he got the forging spots he left GDT claiming he didnt want to be involved on the Politics of DPOS.
Only yesterday we (the whole Lisk community) noticed that Liberspirita was asking people to unvote some of the most important pillars in the Lisk world.
Shielding himself behind some agenda against the ARK project, he started pointing fingers at people that are not even related to ARK.
What was his goal with this? Probably he wants to get some more forging spots, 2 is not enough for him.
For someone whose only contribution to Lisk was to make a pool, something that takes 30m to set up, he sure feels entitled to boss people around on who to vote.
Fortunately, he is not very smart and did all this in such an open way that it cause outrage from everyone. The mass unvoting of his 2 delegates (liberspirita and robin hood) shows just that.
I think we should all accept the fact that Lisk supporters have different opinions about a number of things, it's the way a community works.
Lisk needs a strong community and can benefit from all groups, even if they don't think alike.
The Goal is the same: LisK to succeed.
Liberspirita though, is a disgrace to the community and everyone supporting him should think twice.
Beeing on Lisk since before MainNet was launched, this was the first time i felt something had to be said about this.
DPOS is a competitive system but i hope shamefull behavior like this is banned from Lisk.
quoted +1 I just notice this:
More then 90% of liberspirita pool voters are getting a HUGE pennalty , making this pool the one with lower payouts.
Then a few selected voters get all those extra Lisks that are stolen.You dont need to take my word for it, its stated on his site: http://robinhood.liberspirita.net/statsTrue words. +1 Guys please delete your votes for robinhood and liberspirita. He wants to destroy the Lisk community. For someone whose only contribution to Lisk was to make a pool, something that takes 30m to set up, he sure feels entitled to boss people around on who to vote. |
|
|
|
so your point is? not voting for elite group? and dump ark to the ground?
No. You can vote what you want. I'm just saying, Luiz as a so-called Ambassador plays a wrong game. He spreads untruths about other members with a fake account (Mandy ). And he established an elite group with some members and many sockpuppets. Is that what an Ambassador should do for Lisk? No. What he is doing for Lisk in China currently? I see nothing. I don't see any movement. That's all... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
