Kiba, rethinking about what you said... something starts boiling in my head... maybe I can do both.

Give me some time to think about it, how to implement it.

<edit>
Would need some kind of moderation though, else people might send "offensive stuff" or other crap through the advertising system.
It would cost them btc, but still. That might harm the advertising system.
</edit>

I'm more thinking on a Project Wonderful type of implementation, with bidding on sites, etc. Also, later, I want to include stats of how effective the advertisement is/was for advertisers. And publishers might want to have some control about what type of ads are displayed on their site.

I don't see how you could do this without accounts. Other ways of implementing might do without accounts, but then it will look a lot different, with less possibilities.

noagendamarket and others, any comment on this?

I guess this thread is more to get Bitcoin exposure/advertisement and not that it needs to be project wonderful, right?
This might be helpful (advertising with bitcoins and even helps the bitcoin economy):

http://www.biddingpond.com/item.php?id=148

Sure, was already planning to do that. I've never used project wonderful, so some things might be a little different (and not have all the stats, etc. in the beginning).

Here is the first update:
- Designed the databases to store the publishers (people who have websites where they want to have ads shown on) and the websites (publishers can have multiple websites).
- Moved some existing code of an earlier (temp. abandoned)  project around and modified that registration page.

<edit>
Update for things I just did:
- New database where Publishers can link keywords to their website(s) (no web connection atm.).
- Restructured some ugly code, looks much better now.
- Account screen for publishers allows now update of email address, bitcoin address and password.
</edit>

Looks all normal here (also FF).

6. Rule 34

Well I'm going to give this a try. Just to see how far I get with this (more bounty might increase my motivation ).

Why no 0.3.16?

Moores law doesn't say anything about "computer power", only the amount of transistors on a chip.

I also came here via the Slashdot post. Living in Europe, options for safe online payment are very limited, even more if you are, just like me, very sceptical about paypal and similar services (they are not banks and don't have to comply with regulations that governments put upon them). Although I have a credit card (they are not so easy to get here in Europe as compared to the usa), I'd rather not use it, because it puts me in debt of someone.

Bitcoin doesn't have these side effects and I understand how they work, this generates some trust for me and I hope bitcoin will be accepted by many people in the future.

Hoi Witchspace, welkom!

Waar kom je vandaan?

Thank you for the information.

I've been searching through the code, but haven't able to find anything yet that might cause the problem.
The part where genproclimit comes into play (until where it is the same as not setting it) is relatively small
and doesn't seem to do strange things. Also, as this code is also the same as the prebuild binaries it seems that
the problem is somewhere else.

Did you already try to get a gdb trace? (there seems also to be a -debug option, might be useful)

Ok, could you give me some info on the system and your C++/LD-flags?

Pushed bitcoin-0.3.15 ebuild to github.

Do you have SSP enabled?


<edit>
Try the binaries first, if they also give problems, hand the problem to the devs. They might be quicker in pinpointing the problem.
If the problem is not present in the binaries, we might have to add a build flag somewhere (although there is not much difference,
compared with the distributed build scripts).
</edit>

Ok, I'll see if I can find out what is going wrong (please note that I'm not a C++ coder myself).

The distributed binary works, right?

Ahh... nothing beats good old non-constructive feedback.

I don't think it LOOKS bad, but seems rather unusable (why need to register?, can't you just let people post messages that you review before showing them on the website?).

You might want to record the idea in:

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1268.0

My untrained eyes say, up until 0.23-0.24 and then down again. Trend is still negative. If it breaks through this barrier it might go up again, but looking at the current market depth, there are more sellers then buyers, so I guess it will not be happening.

You could even put in a option to have monthly paying people not having the banner displayed.
The current banner is not that annoying, but when "hit the monkey"-type of banners show up.