803
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NLG] Guldencoin.com/pay-here Meet our awesome community
|
on: November 08, 2014, 08:24:43 AM
|
Seems like a waste of money... Isn't that just a "number of followers" that will be increased (without caring or interested people behind it)? They select serious interested people as they say and take the time to do that by hand. It can be done for youtube and likes on facebook as well. "Nederlandse Target Twitter volgers Opgelet, voor de Premium Twitter volgers moeten wij toegang hebben tot uw account. Enkel op deze manier kunnen wij garanderen dat u enkel Nederlandse Twitter volgers ontvangt die geοnteresseerd zijn in uw branche. Natuurlijk wordt het privacy beleid gevolgd. Verwachte levertermijn is afhankelijk van uw bestelling. Deze kan oplopen van 2 tot 6 maanden naargelang de grootte van uw bestelling. De reden hiervoor is dat we Nederlandse Target Twitter volgers op een zo natuurlijk mogelijke manier willen toevoegen aan uw account. Dienen uw premium target Twitter volgers binnen een bepaalde termijn geleverd worden, neem dan even contact met ons op. We bespreken dan wat haalbaar is." Ok, but giving them access to your account... isn't that a violation of the T&S of Twitter (or any online service that uses accounts)? Could that get your account suspended? <edit> I don't know anything about these things, just seems as an awkward way of working to me. </edit>
|
|
|
807
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NLG] Guldencoin.com/pay-here Meet our awesome community
|
on: November 03, 2014, 02:45:31 PM
|
They caused hashing problems with bitcoin in the past (>51% hash rate), compared to them clevermining is peanuts... do we really want that?
It wasn't problems with Bitcoin and Ghash/Cex.io was it? It was the fact that they have so much hash added to the network that they could launch an attack but swore they never would. Clevermining is a multipool that only mines when it's most profitable, Cex.io isn't a multipool that works this way I believe? Sure, they are not the same. But, it all comes down to trust (how much do you trust the words of a/any pool owner that they wouldn't do a 51% attack). >51% is something no pool should be able to get at one point, that would be the best. We are currently unable to cope with clevermining's hashing capabilities... my worries are that things would get worse if Cex.io will start mining NLG. But, I could be wrong.
|
|
|
810
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NLG] Guldencoin.com/pay-here Meet our awesome community
|
on: October 23, 2014, 08:24:32 AM
|
Others getting SSL errors when connecting to the guldencoin forum?
Several sites are giving SSL problems. Most important, I can't access Bittrex because of SSL troubles. Man, what a clusterf*ck... at least I'm not the only one with issues. This might be related to the POODLE SSL bug that was recently published. Updating your browser should fix the problem and let you connect securely again. Yeah, could be related to that. Anyway, it started working out of itself again.
|
|
|
814
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NLG] Guldencoin.com/pay-here Meet our awesome community
|
on: October 22, 2014, 07:03:25 PM
|
I just pointed my rig to Criptoe instead of using it on Hardcoreminers.com so I can test direct mining.
What benefit does one have when using Criptoe instead of Hardcoreminers?
If you're fine with HCM, you can stay there. I've heard people saying that they are worried about the payout of HCM (finances of the pool appear to be not so good), but I have no hard proof to back that up. Criptoe and Guldenpool are my personal favourites (I like mining where I can give just a NLG address to the miner and have everything receiving at that address).
|
|
|
815
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NLG] Guldencoin.com/pay-here Meet our awesome community
|
on: October 22, 2014, 06:58:25 PM
|
Today i rented (first time ever) a rig of 75Mh and pointed it to Criptoe. So far I see everything runs smooth and I wonder how this will run futher. One question... how can I see how much coins I mine/or have mined so far? I am quite new to this so I know this is real newbie question.
With Criptoe this is a bit difficult. You can see how much NLG comes in to your address that you use when mining (if you use that address for criptoe only). On http://criptoe.com/tbs you can see the pending found blocks, which is the amount of blocks currently found, but which have not matured yet. With your hash rate (compared to the pool hash rate) this can give a bit of indication on how much NLG you can expect. If I like, I will point more later on to support the network. Because selling means a loss at this moment, I won't sell, just keep and buy some stuff from our merchants later on ;-)
I try to see how much I mined for the BTC that I used for renting and put a sell order (rate = BTC used/NLG yielded) on bittrex. I expect the price to go up at some point, which at that time I will get my BTC back.
|
|
|
817
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [NLG] Guldencoin.com/pay-here Meet our awesome community
|
on: October 21, 2014, 10:34:20 AM
|
Sorry, but I am getting the feeling Guldencoin's planning and decision making is influenced a lot by the (foreign) Mining pools.
Is that really what the Guldencoin team wants?
Exactly the same issue I have with this as well. I started renting hashing power again (~2GH/s now) to combat this. It worked before my "forced" leave, it will work again (check price ramp up from 28 sept to 5 Oct). If more people would do it this, the whole switched mining issue would be non-existent. My last batch of mined NLGs via this way would sell for 630 sat to break even... that is not so much (especially when clevermining isn't dumping so much anymore).
|
|
|
818
|
Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Questions regarding Electrum on a server
|
on: October 04, 2014, 06:51:55 AM
|
I don't know python very well but you could hire one of the electrum developers to make this for you.
Yeah, I know, but I managed yesterday to get the functionality that I needed working (except for the new addresses, but on second thought that isn't really needed for my project).
|
|
|
819
|
Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Questions regarding Electrum on a server
|
on: October 03, 2014, 08:55:43 AM
|
You can do this via the command line. Type `electrum help` to see the available commands and `electrum help <command_name>` for command specific help.
As for balance checks in recent electrum versions it spawns a daemon that listens for multiple requests. The daemon automatically dies if no new requests are forthcoming. So you can do periodic bulk checks via a cron job.
Thank you for your reply. I prefer to avoid calling the shell (the shellshock bug shows nicely why I don't like it), else I would not be asking the question. Past few days I've been going through the code and started writing the python code to interface with Electrum in a programmable way. The problem that I'm running now in to is that the Electrum code is poorly documented and to my opinion made more complex than it should be (Wallet and WalletStore classes to mention one example).
|
|
|
|